Deep Learning CNN-GRU Method for GNSS Deformation Monitoring Prediction
Source abstract
Abstract
Hydraulic structures are the key national infrastructures, whose safety and stability are crucial for socio-economic development. Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) technology, as a high-precision deformation monitoring method, is of great significance for the safety and stability of hydraulic structures. However, the GNSS time series exhibits characteristics such as high nonlinearity, spatiotemporal correlation, and noise interference, making it difficult to model for prediction. The Neural Networks (CNN) model has strong feature extraction capabilities and translation invariance. However, it remains sensitive to changes in the scale and position of the target and requires large amounts of data. The Gated Recurrent Units (GRU) model could improve the training effectiveness by introducing gate mechanisms, but its ability to model long-term dependencies is limited. This study proposes a combined model, using CNN to extract spatial features and GRU to capture temporal information, to achieve an accurate prediction. The experiment shows that the proposed CNN-GRU model has a better performance, with an improvement of approximately 45%, demonstrating higher accuracy and reliability in predictions for GNSS deformation monitoring. This provides a new feasible solution for the safety monitoring and early warning of hydraulic structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · GNSS positioning and interference
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Jiangsu Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210017, China
Hunan Engineering Research Center of 3D Real Scene Construction and Application Technology, Changsha 410114, China
The First Surveying and Mapping Institute of Hunan Province, Changsha 410114, China
Funding
Jiangsu Provincial Department of Water Resources · Jiangsu Hydraulic Research Institute · Department of Natural Resources of the Hunan Province
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Recent advances in tree hydraulics highlight the ecological significance of the hydraulic safety margin10.1111/nph.12798 ↗
2. Controls of the hydraulic safety–efficiency trade-off10.1093/treephys/tpaa013 ↗
3. Safety and efficiency conflicts in hydraulic architecture: Scaling from tissues to trees10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01765.x ↗
4. Sustainable hydraulic engineering through building with nature10.1016/j.jher.2014.06.004 ↗
5. Problems of and ways to optimize engineering surveys and investigations for modern hydraulic construction10.1007/BF02765759 ↗
6. Numerical investigation of hydraulic tomography for mapping karst conduits and its connectivity10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105967 ↗
7. What does hydraulic tomography tell us about fractured geological media? A field study and synthetic experiments10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.013 ↗
8. Dam Spatial Temperature Deformations Model Development Based on GNSS Data10.1061/JPCFEV.CFENG-4312 ↗
9. Zhang, P., Pang, Z., Lu, J., Jiang, W., and Sun, M. (2023). Real-Time Water Level Monitoring Based on GNSS Dual-Antenna Attitude Measurement. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15123119 ↗
10. Discovering confined zones and land deformation characteristics across an aquifer system in Iran using GNSS and InSAR techniques10.1007/s10040-023-02704-8 ↗
11. A tropospheric delay model to integrate ERA5 and GNSS reference network for mountainous areas: Application to precise point positioning10.1007/s10291-023-01425-5 ↗
12. Real-time high-precision landslide displacement monitoring based on a GNSS CORS network10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113056 ↗
13. Assessment of GNSS zenith tropospheric delay responses to atmospheric variables derived from ERA5 data over Nigeria10.1186/s43020-023-00104-7 ↗
14. Characterization and mitigation of urban GNSS multipath effects on smartphones10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113766 ↗
15. Multipath mitigation in GNSS precise point positioning using multipath hierarchy for changing environments10.1007/s10291-023-01531-4 ↗
16. Xu, P., Zhang, G., Zhong, Y., Yang, B., and Hsu, L.-T. (2024). A Framework for Graphical GNSS Multipath and NLOS Mitigation. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 1–11.10.1109/TITS.2024.3374819 ↗
17. Zhang, Q., Zhang, L., Sun, A., Meng, X., Zhao, D., and Hancock, C. (2024). GNSS Carrier-Phase Multipath Modeling and Correction: A Review and Prospect of Data Processing Methods. Remote Sens., 16.10.3390/rs16010189 ↗
18. A real-time prediction interval correction method with an unscented Kalman filter for settlement monitoring of a power station dam10.1038/s41598-023-31182-x ↗
19. Yin, Z., Yang, J., Ma, Y., Wang, S., Chai, D., and Cui, H. (2023). A Robust Adaptive Extended Kalman Filter Based on an Improved Measurement Noise Covariance Matrix for the Monitoring and Isolation of Abnormal Disturbances in GNSS/INS Vehicle Navigation. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15174125 ↗
20. Roux, A., Changey, S., Lauffenburger, J.-P., and Weber, J. (2023, January 24–27). Mortar Trajectory Estimation by a Deep Error-State Kalman Filter in a GNSS-Denied Environment. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS), Monterey, CA, USA.10.1109/PLANS53410.2023.10140013 ↗
21. Liu, J., Achurra, A., Zhang, C., Bury, A., and Wang, X. (2024). A long short term memory network-based, global navigation satellite system/inertial navigation system for unmanned surface vessels. J. Mar. Eng. Technol., 1–13.10.1080/20464177.2024.2334029 ↗
22. Leveraging GNSS tropospheric products for machine learning-based land subsidence prediction10.1007/s12145-023-01143-z ↗
23. Becker, J.M., and Roggenbuck, O. (2023). Prediction of Significant Wave Heights with Engineered Features from GNSS Reflectometry. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15030822 ↗
24. A Combined model to predict GNSS precipitable water vapor based on deep learning10.1109/JSTARS.2023.3278381 ↗
25. Linear regression models with autoregressive integrated moving average errors for measurements from real time kinematics-global navigation satellite system during dynamic test
26. Shen, L., and Lv, W. (2023). Mine Surface Settlement Prediction Based on Optimized VMD and Multi-Model Combination. Processes, 11.10.3390/pr11123309 ↗
27. Li, Z., Lu, T., Yu, K., and Wang, J. (2023). Interpolation of GNSS Position Time Series Using GBDT, XGBoost, and RF Machine Learning Algorithms and Models Error Analysis. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15184374 ↗
28. A new deep self-attention neural network for GNSS coordinate time series prediction10.1007/s10291-023-01544-z ↗
29. Chen, H., Lu, T., Huang, J., He, X., Yu, K., Sun, X., Ma, X., and Huang, Z. (2023). An Improved VMD-LSTM Model for Time-Varying GNSS Time Series Prediction with Temporally Correlated Noise. Remote Sens., 15.10.20944/preprints202306.1705.v1 ↗
30. Petrovski, I.G. (2023). International Workshop on Advances in Civil Aviation Systems Development, Springer.
31. Jamali, S.E., and Masud, M.M. (2023, January 14–15). Orbit Propagation and Determination using Genetic Algorithms. Proceedings of the 2023 15th International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT), Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.10.1109/IIT59782.2023.10366417 ↗
32. Topside ionospheric TEC modeling using multiple LEO satellites based on genetic algorithm-optimized machine learning models10.1007/s10291-023-01565-8 ↗
33. Echo state network implementation for chaotic time series prediction10.1016/j.micpro.2023.104950 ↗
34. González-Zapata, A.M., Tlelo-Cuautle, E., and Cruz-Vega, I. (2022). On the optimization of machine learning techniques for chaotic time series prediction. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11213612 ↗
35. Tang, J., Liu, C., Yang, D., and Ding, M. (2024). Prediction of ionospheric TEC using a GRU mechanism method. Adv. Space Res.10.1016/j.asr.2024.03.050 ↗
36. PositionNet: CNN-based GNSS positioning in urban areas with residual maps10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110882 ↗
37. Mehr, I.A.E., and Dovis, F. (2023). A deep neural network approach for detection and classification of GNSS interference and jammer. TechRxiv.
38. Dynamic forecast model for landslide displacement with step-like deformation by applying GRU with EMD and error correction10.1007/s10064-023-03247-8 ↗
39. ConvGRU-MHM: A CNN GRU-enhanced MHM for mitigating GNSS multipath10.1088/1361-6501/ad1978 ↗
40. Hybrid VMD-CNN-GRU-based model for short-term forecasting of wind power considering spatio-temporal features10.1016/j.engappai.2023.105982 ↗
41. A novel deep learning model integrating CNN and GRU to predict particulate matter concentrations10.1016/j.psep.2023.03.052 ↗
42. Hua, G., Wang, S., Xiao, M., and Hu, S. (2023). Research on the uplift pressure prediction of concrete dams based on the CNN-GRU model. Water, 15.10.3390/w15020319 ↗