journal article·2023-04-12Open access

Techno-Economic Potential of Plasma-Based CO2 Splitting in Power-to-Liquid Plants

Samuel Jaro Kaufmann, Paul Rößner, Stephan Renninger, Maike Lambarth, Moritz Raab, Jan Stein, Valentin Seithümmer, Kai Peter Birke

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 8

Abstract

Mitigating climate change requires the development of technologies that combine energy and transport sectors. One of them is the production of sustainable fuels from electricity and carbon dioxide (CO2) via power-to-liquid (PtL) plants. As one option for splitting CO2, plasma-based processes promise a high potential due to their flexibility, scalability, and theoretically high efficiencies. This work includes a modeling and techno-economic analysis. A crucial element is the process of the joint project PlasmaFuel, in which two plasma technologies are included in a PtL plant to produce synthetically sulfur-free marine diesel. The results are divided into three scenarios, which differ in the use of different boundary conditions and thus represent different degrees of technology development. The evaluation results in process efficiencies from 16.5% for scenario 2018/20 to 27.5% for scenario 2050, and net production costs between EUR 8.5/L and EUR 3.5/L. Furthermore, the techno-economic potential is mapped in order to open up development steps in the direction of costs below EUR 2.0/L. The present work allows statements regarding system integration and the industrial use of the plasma-based process.; moreover, conclusions can be drawn towards the most important levers in terms of process optimization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Electrical Energy Storage Systems, Institute for Photovoltaics, University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 47, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany

Funding

Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz (BMWK)

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Olivier, J.G.J., and Peters, J.A.H.W. (2023, February 08). Trends in Global CO2 and Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 2020 Report. Available online: http://www.pbl.nl/en.
2. International Energy Agency (2023, February 08). International Energy Agency (IEA) World Energy Outlook 2022. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2022.
3. (2023, February 08). Eurostat Renewable Energy Statistics. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Renewable_energy_statistics#Share_of_renewable_energy_more_than_doubled_between_2004_and_2021.
4. BMWi and AGEE-Stat (2023, February 08). Zeitreihen zur Entwicklung der erneuerbaren Energien in Deutschland (Stand: Februar 2014). Available online: https://www.erneuerbare-energien.de/EE/Navigation/DE/Service/Erneuerbare_Energien_in_Zahlen/Zeitreihen/zeitreihen.html.
5. Jahr, D., Zwischenziele, D., Energien-gesetzes, E., Eu-gesetzgebung, D., and Ziele, D. (2023). Erneuerbare Energien 2022 Zubauzahlen und beschlossene Beschleunigungsmaßnahmen im Überblick (National + Europäisch).
6. Smolinka, T., Wiebke, N., Sterchele, P., Lehner, F., and Jansen, M. (2018). Studie IndWEDe Industrialisierung der Wasserelektrolyse in Deutschland: Chancen und Herausforderungen für Nachhaltigen Wasserstoff für Verkehr, Strom und Wärme, NOW GmbH.
7. Maia Research (2023, February 08). Global Syngas Market Research Report 2022. Available online: https://www.marketresearch.com/QYResearch-Group-v3531/Global-Piperonal-Research-31676097/.
8. Finanzen.net (2023, February 08). Erdgaspreisentwicklung. Available online: https://www.finanzen.net/rohstoffe/erdgas-preis-natural-gas/chart/euro.
9. Techno-economic analysis of power and hydrogen co-production by an IGCC plant with CO2 capture based on membrane technology10.1016/B978-0-444-63577-8.50074-7 ↗
10. Soler, A., and Schmidt, P. (2021, January 27–28). E-Fuels: A techno-economic assessment of European domestic production and imports towards 2050. Proceedings of the 14th Concawe Symposium, Virtual.
11. Giuliano, A., Catizzone, E., and Freda, C. (2021). Process Simulation and Environmental Aspects of Dimethyl Ether Production from Digestate-Derived Syngas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18020807 ↗
12. A standardized methodology for the techno-economic evaluation of alternative fuels—A case study10.1016/j.fuel.2016.12.003 ↗
13. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz (2019). Bareiß: Forschungsinitiative „Energiewende im Verkehr “-150 Förderprojekte gehen an den Start, Press release.
14. Verband der Chemischen Industrie (2021). Ermittlung der Treibhausgas-Emissionen in Transport und Logistik der Chemisch- Pharmazeutischen Industrie, Verband der Chemischen Industrie.
15. The 2020 plasma catalysis roadmap10.1088/1361-6463/ab9048 ↗
16. Plasma Technology for CO2 Conversion: A Personal Perspective on Prospects and Gaps10.3389/fenrg.2020.00111 ↗
17. CO2 reduction reactions: General discussion10.1039/C5FD90080H ↗
18. Plasma technology—A novel solution for CO2 conversion?10.1039/C6CS00066E ↗
19. Catalysis Enabled by Plasma Activation of Strong Chemical Bonds: A Review10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00263 ↗
20. A review of plasma-assisted catalytic conversion of gaseous carbon dioxide and methane into value-added platform chemicals and fuels10.1039/C8RA03146K ↗
21. Combining non-thermal plasma with heterogeneous catalysis in waste gas treatment: A review10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.09.035 ↗
22. Industrial applications of atmospheric non-thermal plasma in environmental remediation10.1088/0741-3335/49/5A/S01 ↗
23. Beyond fossil fuel–driven nitrogen transformations10.1126/science.aar6611 ↗
24. Reforming of tar from biomass gasification in a hybrid catalysis-plasma system: A review10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.03.039 ↗
25. Renewable Hydrogen Production by Alcohols Reforming Using Plasma and Plasma-Catalytic Technologies: Challenges and Opportunities10.1021/cr5003744 ↗
26. Tu, X., Whitehead, J.C., and Nozaki, T. (2019). Plasma Catalysis, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-05189-1 ↗
27. Renninger, S., Rößner, P., Stein, J., Lambarth, M., and Birke, K.P. (2021). Towards High Efficiency CO2 Utilization by Glow Discharge Plasma. Processes, 9.10.3390/pr9112063 ↗
28. Dual-vortex plasmatron: A novel plasma source for CO2 conversion10.1016/j.jcou.2020.03.002 ↗
29. Reduction Characteristics of Carbon Dioxide Using a Plasmatron10.1007/s11090-013-9499-8 ↗
30. Carbon dioxide conversion in an atmospheric pressure microwave plasma reactor: Improving efficiencies by enhancing afterglow quenching10.1016/j.jcou.2019.12.011 ↗
31. Plasma-driven dissociation of CO2 for fuel synthesis10.1002/ppap.201600126 ↗
32. The Quest for Value-Added Products from Carbon Dioxide and Water in a Dielectric Barrier Discharge: A Chemical Kinetics Study10.1002/cssc.201601234 ↗
33. A packed-bed DBD micro plasma reactor for CO2 dissociation: Does size matter?10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.210 ↗
34. The early-stage design of plasma for the conversion of CO2 to chemicals: A prospective techno-economic assessment10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102156 ↗
35. Efficiency of CO2 Dissociation in a Radio-Frequency Discharge10.1007/s11090-010-9273-0 ↗
36. Plasma-chemical CO2 decomposition in a non-self-sustained discharge with a controlled electronic component of plasma10.1016/j.saa.2004.01.034 ↗
37. Development of a Swirl-Induced Rotating Glow Discharge Reactor for CO2 Conversion: Fluid Dynamics and Discharge Dynamics Studies10.1002/ente.202000535 ↗
38. Routes to increase the conversion and the energy efficiency in the splitting of CO2 by a dielectric barrier discharge10.1088/1361-6463/aa562c ↗
39. On the kinetics and equilibria of plasma-based dry reforming of methane10.1016/j.cej.2020.126630 ↗
40. High efficiency CO2-splitting in atmospheric pressure glow discharge10.1016/j.jcou.2020.101322 ↗
41. An optimized reactor for CO2 splitting in DC atmospheric pressure discharge10.1016/j.jcou.2022.101919 ↗
42. Renninger, S., and Lambarth, B.J. (2023). BMBF Projectreport PlasmaFuel, Report available upon request.
43. Einsatz von perowskitischen Hohlfasermembranen in einem Mikrowellenplasma10.1002/cite.201900048 ↗
44. Zeolites for CO2–CO–O2 Separation to Obtain CO2-Neutral Fuels10.1021/acsami.8b04507 ↗
45. IEA (2019). The Future of Hydrogen, OECD. No. June.
46. Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis: Catalysts and Chemistry
47. Peters, M.S., Timmerhaus, K.D., and West, R.E. (2003). Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, McGraw-Hill.
48. Mayyas, A.T., Ruth, M.F., Pivovar, B.S., Bender, G., and Wipke, K.B. (2019). Manufacturing Cost Analysis for Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers, Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-72740.10.2172/1557965 ↗
49. Hannula, I. (2023, February 08). Liquid Transportation Fuels via Large-Scale Fluidised-Bed Gasification of Lignocellulosic Biomass. Available online: http://www.vtt.fi/publications/index.jsp.
50. Techno-economic Analysis of MEA CO2 Capture from a Cement Kiln—Impact of Steam Supply Scenario10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1761 ↗
51. Bundesnetzagentur (2023, February 08). Bundesnetzagentur SMARD Strommarktdaten. Available online: https://www.smard.de/home.
52. Christensen, A. (2023, February 08). Assessment of Hydrogen Production Costs from Electrolysis: United States and Europe. International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT). Available online: https://theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/final_icct2020_assessment_of_hydrogen_production_costsv2.pdf.