journal article·2023-03-18Open access

Exploring and Understanding Law Enforcement’s Relationship with Technology: A Qualitative Interview Study of Police Officers in North Carolina

Ronald P. Dempsey, James R. Brunet, Veljko Dubljević

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 6

Abstract

Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) technologies into law enforcement has become a concern of contemporary politics and public discourse. In this paper, we qualitatively examine the perspectives of AI technologies based on 20 semi-structured interviews of law enforcement professionals in North Carolina. We investigate how integrating AI technologies, such as predictive policing and autonomous vehicle (AV) technology, impacts the relationships between communities and police jurisdictions. The evidence suggests that police officers maintain that AI plays a limited role in policing but believe the technologies will continue to expand, improving public safety and increasing policing capability. Conversely, police officers believe that AI will not necessarily increase trust between police and the community, citing ethical concerns and the potential to infringe on civil rights. It is thus argued that the trends toward integrating AI technologies into law enforcement are not without risk. Policymaking guided by public consensus and collaborative discussion with law enforcement professionals must aim to promote accountability through the application of responsible design of AI in policing with an end state of providing societal benefits and mitigating harm to the populace. Society has a moral obligation to mitigate the detrimental consequences of fully integrating AI technologies into law enforcement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Policing Practices and Perceptions · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8103, USA

Department of Public Administration, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8102, USA

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. A Review of Predictive Policing from the Perspective of Fairness10.1007/s10506-021-09286-4 ↗
2. Artificial Intelligence, Predictive Policing, and Risk Assessment for Law Enforcement10.1146/annurev-criminol-051520-012342 ↗
3. AI in the headlines: The Portrayal of the Ethical Issues of Artificial Intelligence in the Media10.1007/s00146-020-00965-5 ↗
4. AI, Trustworthiness, and the Digital Dirty Harry Problem
5. Machine Learning and the Police: Asking the Right Questions10.1093/police/paz035 ↗
6. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y ↗
7. Morin, R., Parker, K., Stepler, R., and Mercer, A. (2022, June 01). Behind the Badge: Amid Protests and Calls for Reform, How View Their Jobs, Key Issues and Recent Fatal Encounters between Blacks and Police. Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/01/11/behind-the-badge/.
8. Enhancing Police Legitimacy10.1177/0002716203262627 ↗
9. An Analysis of State Statutes Regarding the Role of Law Enforcement10.1177/0887403418806562 ↗
10. Predictive Policing: Review of Benefits and Drawbacks10.1080/01900692.2019.1575664 ↗
11. Predictable policing: New technology, old bias, and future resistance in big data surveillance10.1177/1354856520933838 ↗
12. Matulionyte, R., and Hanif, A. (2021). A call for more explainable AI in law enforcement. SSRN Electron. J., 1–6.10.2139/ssrn.3974243 ↗
13. Achieving Equity with Predictive Policing Algorithms: A Social Safety Net Perspective10.1007/s11948-021-00312-x ↗
14. Ethics for the New Surveillance10.1080/019722498128809 ↗
15. DeCew, J.W. (1997). In Pursuit of Privacy: Law, Ethics, and the Rise of Technology, Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501721243 ↗
16. Visibility is a Trap: The Ethics of Police Body-worn Cameras and Control
17. Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (2022, June 01). President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing, Final Report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing, Available online: https://cops.usdoj.gov/RIC/Publications/cops-p341-pub.pdf.
18. Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis10.1177/0735275112457914 ↗
19. Lights, Cameras, Action: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Police Perceptions of Citizens Who Video Record Officers in the Line of Duty in the United States
20. Accessing Hidden and Hard-to-Reach Populations: Snowball Research Strategies
21. Coin, A., Mulder, M., and Dubljević, V. (2020). Ethical Aspects of BCI Technology: What is the State of the Art?. Philosophies, 5.10.3390/philosophies5040031 ↗
22. Gardner, A.M., and Scott, K.M. (2022, December 01). Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies, 2018—Statistical Tables, Available online: https://bjs.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh236/files/media/document/csllea18st.pdf.
23. Weichselbaum, S., and Schwartzapfel, B. (2022, November 01). When veterans become cops, some bring war home, USA Today, Available online: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/03/30/when-veterans-become-cops-some-bring-war-home/99349228/.
24. Anderson, M., Barthel, M., Perrin, A., and Vogels, E.A. (2022, November 01). #BlackLivesMatter Surges on Twitter after George Floyd’s Death. Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/06/10/blacklivesmatter-surges-on-twitter-after-george-floyds-death/.
25. The Factors that Motivate Law Enforcement’s Use of Force: A Systematic Review10.1002/ajcp.12460 ↗
26. What the data say about police brutality and racial bias—and which reforms might work10.1038/d41586-020-01846-z ↗
27. People are Averse to Machines Making Moral Decisions10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.003 ↗
28. Can Mind Perception Explain Virtuous Character Judgments of Artificial Intelligence?
29. Decision-Making in Artificial Intelligence: Is It Always Correct?10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e1 ↗
30. Rigano, C. (2019). Using Artificial Intelligence to Address Criminal Justice Needs. Natl. Inst. Justice (NIJ) J., 1–10. Available online: https://www.nij.gov/journals/280/Pages/using-artificialintelligence-to-address-criminal-justice-needs.aspx.
31. AI Assistants and the Paradox of Internal Automaticity10.1007/s12152-019-09423-6 ↗
32. Dubljević, V. (2019). Neuroethics, Justice, and Autonomy: Public Reason in the Cognitive Enhancement Debate, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-13643-7 ↗
33. Public Acceptance and Perception of Autonomous Vehicles: A Comprehensive Review10.1007/s43681-021-00041-8 ↗
34. Toward Implementing the ADC Model of Moral Judgment in Autonomous Vehicles10.1007/s11948-020-00242-0 ↗
35. Dubljević, V., Sattler, S., and Racine, E. (2018). Deciphering Moral Intuition: How Agents, Deeds, and Consequences Influence Moral Judgment. PLoS ONE, 13.10.1371/journal.pone.0206750 ↗
36. Bokhari, S.A.A., and Myeong, S. (2022). Use of Artificial Intelligence in Smart Cities for Smart Decision-Making: A Social Innovation Perspective. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14020620 ↗
37. Knafo, S., and Venero, C. (2015). Cognitive Enhancement, Academic Press.
38. Policing Faces: The Present and Future of Intelligent Facial Surveillance10.1080/13600834.2021.1994220 ↗