journal article·2022-11-28Open access

Lithological Mapping of Kohat Basin in Pakistan Using Multispectral Remote Sensing Data: A Comparison of Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)

Fakhar Elahi, Khan Muhammad, Shahab Ud Din, Muhammad Fawad Akbar Khan, Shahid Bashir, Muhammad Hanif

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 23

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based multispectral remote sensing has been the best supporting tool using limited resources to enhance the lithological mapping abilities with accuracy, supported by ground truthing through traditional mapping techniques. The availability of the dataset, choice of algorithm, cost, accuracy, computational time, data labeling, and terrain features are some crucial considerations that researchers continue to explore. In this research, support vector machine (SVM) and artificial neural network (ANN) were applied to the Sentinel-2 MSI dataset for classifying lithologies having subtle compositional differences in the Kohat Basin’s remote, inaccessible regions within Pakistan. First, we used principal component analysis (PCA), minimum noise fraction (MNF), and available maps for reliable data annotation for training SVM and (ANN) models for mapping ten classes (nine lithological units + water). The ANN and SVM results were compared with the previously conducted studies in the area and ground truth survey to evaluate their accuracy. SVM mapped ten classes with an overall accuracy (OA) of 95.78% and kappa coefficient of 0.95, compared to 95.73% and 0.95 by ANN classification. The SVM algorithm was more efficient concerning computational efficiency, accuracy, and ease due to available features within Google Earth Engine (GEE). Contrarily, ANN required time-consuming data transformation from GEE to Google Cloud before application in Google Colab.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping · Remote-Sensing Image Classification · Soil Geostatistics and Mapping

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Intelligent Information Processing Lab, National Centre of Artificial Intelligence, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar 25000, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Department of Mining Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology (UET), Peshawar 25000, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology (UET), Peshawar 25000, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

National Centre of Excellence in Geology, University of Peshawar, Peshawar 25000, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Funding

Higher Education Commission

References (77)

Show source-provided references
1. Gupta, R.P. (2003). Spectra of Minerals and Rocks. Remote Sensing Geology, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-05283-9 ↗
2. Potential of ESA’s Sentinel-2 for geological applications10.1016/j.rse.2014.03.022 ↗
3. Multi- and hyperspectral geologic remote sensing: A review
4. Bachri, I., Hakdaoui, M., Raji, M., Teodoro, A.C., Benbouziane, A., and Cl, A. (2019). Machine Learning Algorithms for Automatic Lithological Mapping Using Remote Sensing Data: A Case Study from Souk Arbaa Sahel, Sidi Ifni Inlier, Western Anti-Atlas, Morocco. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 8.10.3390/ijgi8060248 ↗
5. Application of remote-sensing techniques in geological and structural mapping of Atalla Shear Zone and Environs, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt10.1007/s12517-020-05324-8 ↗
6. Khan, M.F.A., Muhammad, K., Bashir, S., Ud Din, S., and Hanif, M. (2021). Mapping Allochemical Limestone Formations in Hazara, Pakistan Using Google Cloud Architecture: Application of Machine-Learning Algorithms on Multispectral Data. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 10.10.3390/ijgi10020058 ↗
7. Köhler, M., Hanelli, D., Schaefer, S., Barth, A., Knobloch, A., Hielscher, P., Cardoso-Fernandes, J., Lima, A., and Teodoro, A.C. (2021). Lithium potential mapping using artificial neural networks: A case study from central portugal. Minerals, 11.10.3390/min11101046 ↗
8. Merembayev, T., Kurmangaliyev, D., Bekbauov, B., and Amanbek, Y. (2021). A Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Lithofacies: Case Studies from Norway and Kazakhstan. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14071896 ↗
9. Mapping evaporate minerals by ASTER10.1080/01431160903586799 ↗
10. Sekandari, M., Aminpour, S.M., Masoumi, I., Pour, A.B., Muslim, A.M., Rahmani, O., Hashim, M., Zoheir, B., Pradhan, B., and Misra, A. (2020). Application of Landsat-8, Sentinel-2, ASTER and WorldView-3 Spectral Imagery for Exploration of Carbonate-Hosted Pb-Zn Deposits in the Central Iranian Terrane (CIT). Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12081239 ↗
11. Mapping a lithologically complex terrain using Sentinel-2A data: A case study of Suriyan area, southwestern Iran10.1080/01431161.2019.1706203 ↗
12. Comparison of ASTER and sentinel-2 spaceborne datasets for geological mapping: A case study from North-East Greenland
13. Use of the Sentinel-2A Multispectral Image for Litho-Structural and Alteration Mapping in Al Glo’a Map Sheet (1/50,000) (Bou Azzer-El Graara Inlier, Central Anti-Atlas, Morocco)10.2478/arsa-2019-0007 ↗
14. Tripathi, M.K. (2019, January 28–29). Lithological Mapping using Digital Image Processing Techniques on Landsat 8 OLI Remote Sensing Data in Jahajpur, Bhilwara, Rajasthan. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Communication and Computational Techniques (ICCT), Jaipur, India.10.1109/ICCT46177.2019.8969043 ↗
15. Discrimination of Iron Deposits Using Feature Oriented Principal Component Selection and Band Ratio Methods: Eastern Taurus /Turkey10.30897/ijegeo.673143 ↗
16. Distribution of hydrothermally altered rocks in the Reko Diq, Pakistan mineralized area based on spectral analysis of ASTER data10.1016/j.rse.2006.05.014 ↗
17. Lithologic mapping in the Mountain Pass, California area using Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) data10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00127-X ↗
18. Targeting key alteration minerals in epithermal deposits in Patagonia, Argentina, using ASTER imagery and principal component analysis10.1080/0143116031000152291 ↗
19. ASTER-based remote sensing investigation of gypsum in the Kohat Plateau, north Pakistan10.1007/s13146-019-00543-x ↗
20. Capability of advanced spaceborne thermal emission and reflection radiometer (ASTER) on discrimination of carbonates and associated rocks and mineral identification of eastern mountain region (Saih Hatat window) of Sultanate of Oman10.1007/s13146-011-0071-4 ↗
21. ASTER Spectral Sensitivity of carbonate rocks—Study in Sultanate of Oman10.1016/j.asr.2013.11.047 ↗
22. Applying optimum fusion method to improve lithological mapping of sedimentary rocks using sentinel-2 and ASTER satellite images10.1007/s12145-022-00836-1 ↗
23. Pal, M., Rasmussen, T., and Porwal, A. (2020). Optimized Lithological Mapping from Multispectral and Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Images Using Fused Multi-Classifiers. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12010177 ↗
24. Accurate annotation of remote sensing images via active spectral clustering with little expert knowledge10.3390/rs71115014 ↗
25. Artificial neural networks: A new method for mineral prospectivity mapping10.1046/j.1440-0952.2000.00807.x ↗
26. Geological mapping using remote sensing data: A comparison of five machine learning algorithms, their response to variations in the spatial distribution of training data and the use of explicit spatial information10.1016/j.cageo.2013.10.008 ↗
27. Application of Artificial Neural Network for Gold—Silver Deposits Potential Mapping: A Case Study of Korea10.1007/s11053-010-9112-2 ↗
28. Integration of spectral, spatial and morphometric data into lithological mapping: A comparison of different Machine Learning Algorithms in the Kurdistan Region, NE Iraq10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.05.005 ↗
29. Improving lithological mapping by SVM classification of spectral and morphological features: The discovery of a new chromite body in the Mawat ophiolite complex (Kurdistan, NE Iraq)10.3390/rs6086867 ↗
30. A review of machine learning in processing remote sensing data for mineral exploration10.1016/j.rse.2021.112750 ↗
31. Chollet, F. (2017). Deep Learning with Python, Manning Publications Co.. [1st ed.].
32. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Springer. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 ↗
33. Morales, E.F., and Zaragoza, J.H. (2011). An introduction to reinforcement learning. Decision Theory Models for Applications in Artificial Intelligence: Concepts and Solutions, IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-60960-165-2.ch004 ↗
34. Google Earth Engine for geo-big data applications: A meta-analysis and systematic review10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.04.001 ↗
35. Pelletier, C., Valero, S., Inglada, J., Champion, N., Sicre, C.M., and Dedieu, G. (2017). Effect of training class label noise on classification performances for land cover mapping with satellite image time series. Remote Sens., 9.10.3390/rs9020173 ↗
36. Hird, J.N., DeLancey, E.R., McDermid, G.J., and Kariyeva, J. (2017). Google earth engine, open-access satellite data, and machine learning in support of large-area probabilisticwetland mapping. Remote Sens., 9.10.3390/rs9121315 ↗
37. Google Earth Engine Cloud Computing Platform for Remote Sensing Big Data Applications: A Comprehensive Review10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3021052 ↗
38. Ahmad, S., Ali, F., Ahmad, I., and Hamidullah, S. (2001). Geological map of the Kohat Plateau, NW Himalaya, NWFP. Peshawar, Pakistan. Geol. Bull. Univ. Peshawar, 34.
39. Meissner, C.R., Master, J.M., Rashid, M.A., and Hussain, M. (1974). Stratigraphy of the Kohat Quadrangle, Pakistan, USGS professional paper 716-D.10.3133/pp716D ↗
40. Identification of Lithology Using Sentinel-2A Through an Ensemble of Machine Learning Algorithms10.4018/IJAGR.297524 ↗
41. Mapping of himalaya leucogranites based on ASTER and sentinel-2A datasets using a hybrid method of metric learning and random forest10.1109/JSTARS.2020.2989509 ↗
42. Application of ASTER remote sensing data to geological mapping of basement domains in arid regions: A case study from the Central Anti-Atlas, Iguerda inlier, Morocco10.1007/s12517-013-0945-y ↗
43. The contribution of Sentinel-2 satellite images for geological mapping in the south of Tafilalet basin (Eastern Anti-Atlas, Morocco)
44. Petrography and Diagenetic History of Nagri Formation Sandstone in District Bagh and Muzaffarabad, Pakistan10.26480/pjg.02.2017.21.23 ↗
45. Transpression- and compression-related, evaporite-controlled faulting and folding in the Kohat Plateau, NW Pakistan, in Himalayan tectonics: (Searle, M.P., and Treloar, P.J., eds.)10.1144/GSL.SP.1993.074.01.37 ↗
46. The transition from Tethys to the Himalaya as recorded in northwest Pakistan10.1130/0016-7606(1996)108<1295:TTFTTT>2.3.CO;2 ↗
47. Ullah, K. (2009). Lithofacies, Petrography and Geochemistry of the Neogene Molasse Sequence of Himalayan Foreland Basin, Southwestern Kohat, Pakistan. [Ph.D. Thesis, National Centre of Excellence in Geology, University of Peshawar].
48. Hussain, H., and Zhang, S. (2018). Structural evolution of the Kohat fold and thrust belt in the Shakardarra area (South eastern Kohat, Pakistan). Geosciences, 8.10.3390/geosciences8090311 ↗
49. Petrography and Provenance of Sandstone and Studies of Shale of Kuldana Formation, Kalamula and Khursheedabad Area, Kahuta, Azad Kashmir10.26480/esmy.01.2017.21.31 ↗
50. Industrial Applications of Limestone Deposits of Kohat, NWFP: A Research Towards the Sustainability of the Deposits
51. Petrography and provenance of the Early Miocene Murree Formation, Himalayan Foreland Basin, Muzaffarabad, Pakistan10.1016/j.jseaes.2018.04.018 ↗
52. Petrography of Sandstones from the Kamlial and Chinji Formations, Southwestern Kohat Plateau, NW Pakistan: Implications for Source Lithology and Paleoclimate
53. Ali, A., Nabi, A., Zhong, F., Pan, J., and Yan, J. (2018, January 25–29). Genesis of sandstone type uranium deposit in Dhok Pathan Formation, Siwaliks Group of Trans-Indus Salt Range (Surghar range), Pakistan. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Uranium Raw Material for the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Exploration, Mining, Production, Supply and Demand, Economics and Environmental Issues (URAM-2018), Vienna, Austria.
54. der Werff, H., and der Meer, F. (2016). Sentinel-2A MSI and Landsat 8 OLI Provide Data Continuity for Geological Remote Sensing. Remote Sens., 8.10.3390/rs8110883 ↗
55. Bannari, A., El-Battay, A., Bannari, R., and Rhinane, H. (2018). Sentinel-MSI VNIR and SWIR bands sensitivity analysis for soil salinity discrimination in an arid landscape. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10060855 ↗
56. Din, S.U., Muhammad, K., Khan, M.F.A., Bashir, S., Sajid, M., and Khan, A. (2021). A fusion of feature-oriented principal components of multispectral data to map granite exposures of Pakistan. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112311486 ↗
57. Suykens, J.A.K., and Vandewalle, J. (1998). The support vector method of function estimation. Nonlinear Modeling, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4615-5703-6 ↗
58. Hsu, C.W., Chang, C.C., and Lin, C.J. (2010). A practical Guide to Support Vector Classification, Department of Computer Science National Taiwan University Taipei 106.
59. Support Vector Algorithm in R10.18637/jss.v015.i09 ↗
60. Structural analysis of regulatory DNA sequences using grammar inference and Support Vector Machine10.1016/j.neucom.2009.09.018 ↗
61. Haykin, S. (2001). Neural Network: A Comprehensive Foundation, Prentice Hall. [2nd ed.].
62. Gajawada, S.K. (2022, February 20). The Math behind Artificial Neural Networks. Available online: https://towardsdatascience.com/the-heart-of-artificial-neural-networks-26627e8c03ba.
63. Supervised Machine Learning: A Review of Classification Techniques
64. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning, MIT Press.
65. Bindal, A. (2022, February 21). Normalization Techniques in Deep Neural Networks. Available online: https://medium.com/techspace-usict/normalization-techniques-in-deep-neural-networks-9121bf100d8.
66. Jain, V. (2022, February 22). Everything You Need to Know about “Activation Functions” in Deep Learning Models. Available online: https://towardsdatascience.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about-activation-functions-in-deep-learning-models-84ba9f82c253%0A.
67. An investigation for loss functions widely used in machine learning10.4310/CIS.2018.v18.n1.a2 ↗
68. Accuracy Assessment: A User’s Perspective
69. Supervised classification of types of glaciated landscapes using digital elevation data10.1016/S0169-555X(97)00063-9 ↗
70. Comparison of Landsat OLI, ASTER, and Sentinel 2A data in lithological mapping: A Case study of Rich area (Central High Atlas, Morocco)10.1016/j.asr.2020.10.037 ↗
71. A comprehensive scheme for lithological mapping using Sentinel-2A and ASTER GDEM in weathered and vegetated coastal zone, Southern China10.1515/geo-2019-0076 ↗
72. Ahmed, W., Muhammad, K., Glass, H.J., Chatterjee, S., Khan, A., and Hussain, A. (2022). Novel MLR-RF-Based Geospatial Techniques: A Comparison with OK. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 11.10.3390/ijgi11070371 ↗
73. Hushko, S., Botelho, J.M., Maksymova, I., Slusarenko, K., and Kulishov, V. (2020, January 21–22). Sustainable development of global mineral resources market in Industry 4.0 context. Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 8th International Scientific Conference on Sustainability in Energy and Environmental Science, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.10.1088/1755-1315/628/1/012025 ↗
74. A Study on Industrial IoT for the Mining Industry: Synthesized Architecture and Open Research Directions10.3390/iot1020029 ↗
75. Internet of Things technology in mineral remote sensing monitoring10.1002/cta.2890 ↗
76. A Comprehensive Review on Internet of Things (IoT) and its Implications in the Mining Industry10.3844/ajeassp.2020.499.515 ↗
77. Geospatial Blockchain: Review of decentralized geospatial data sharing systems10.5194/agile-giss-3-29-2022 ↗