Hydraulic Performance of Howell–Bunger and Butterfly Valves Used for Bottom Outlet in Large Dams under Flood Hazards
Source abstract
Abstract
Floods control equipment in large dams is one of the most important requirements in hydraulic structures. Howell–Bunger valves and butterfly valves are two of these types of flow controls that are commonly used in bottom outlet dams. The optimal longitudinal distance (L) between the two Howell–Bunger and butterfly valves is such that the turbulence of the outlet flow from the butterfly valve should be dissipated before entering the outlet valve. Subsequently, the flow passing through the butterfly valves must have a fully developed flow state before reaching the Howell–Bunger valve. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the optimal longitudinal distance between the Howell–Bunger and butterfly valves. For this purpose, different longitudinal distances were investigated using the Flow-3D numerical model. The ideal longitudinal distance obtained from the numerical model in the physical model was considered and tested. Based on the numerical study, the parameters of flow patterns, velocity profiles and vectors, turbulence kinetic energy, and formation of flow vorticity were investigated as criteria to determine the appropriate longitudinal distance. In addition, the most appropriate distance between the butterfly valve and the Howell–Bunger valve was determined, and the physical model was evaluated based on the optimal distance extracted from the numerical simulation. A comparison of the results from the numerical and the laboratory models showed that the minimum distance required in Howell–Bunger valves and butterfly valves should be equal to four times the diameter of the pipe (L=4D) so as not to adversely affect the performance of the bottom outlet system.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydraulic flow and structures · Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes · Dam Engineering and Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece
Department of Hydraulic, Hydro-Environmental Engineering, Water Research Institute, Ministry of Energy, Tehran 16589-54381, Iran
Laboratory of Hydraulic Models, LHM-Research Center, Department of Civil Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran 19967-15433, Iran
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Innovative Energy-Dissipating Hood10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2006)132:8(759) ↗
2. Development and Prototyping of Jet Systems for Advanced Turbomachinery with Mesh Rotor10.28991/esj-2021-01311 ↗
3. Large Eddy Simulation of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow for a Nested Type Fixed-Cone Valve10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.170-173.2458 ↗
4. Lewin, J. (2001). Hydraulic Gates and Valves: In Free Surface Flow and Submerged Outlets, Thomas Telford.
5. Yamini, O.A., Movahedi, A., Mousavi, S.H., Kavianpour, M.R., and Kyriakopoulos, G.L. (2022). Hydraulic Performance of Seawater Intake System Using CFD Modeling. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.3390/jmse10070988 ↗
6. Three-Dimensional Simulations and Economical Solutions for Cavitation in Hollow-Jet Dispersive Valves
7. The Effect of Heat Exchanger Design on Heat transfer Rate and Temperature Distribution10.28991/ESJ-2022-06-01-010 ↗
8. Hydrodynamic performance and cavitation analysis in bottom outlets of dam using CFD modelling10.1155/2021/5529792 ↗
9. Experimental and numerical analysis of cavitation in hydraulic proportional directional valves10.1016/j.enconman.2014.07.031 ↗
10. Nzombo, D. (2017). A numerical Investigation of Cavitation in Valves and Techno-Economic Analysis of Pinewood Solvent Liquefaction. [Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa State University].
11. Influence of inlet pressure on cavitation characteristics in regulating valve
12. Computational fluid-dynamics-based analysis of a ball valve performance in the presence of cavitation10.1134/S1810232814010044 ↗
13. Li, J.-Y., Gao, Z.-X., Wu, H., and Jin, Z.-J. (2020). Numerical Investigation of Methodologies for Cavitation Suppression Inside Globe Valves. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10165541 ↗
14. Wu, J., Utturkar, Y., Senocak, I., Shyy, W., and Arakere, N. (2003, January 23–26). Impact of turbulence and compressibility modeling on three-dimensional cavitating flow computations. Proceedings of the 33rd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Orlando, FL, USA.10.2514/6.2003-4264 ↗
15. Study on cavitation damage characteristics around a hollow-jet valve10.1299/jsmeb.42.649 ↗
16. Development of Oil Hydraulic Components Using a Flow Visualization Technique10.20965/ijat.2012.p0410 ↗
17. Analysis of boundary element of flow field in poppet valve
18. Experimental study on flow force and pressure distribution on the poppet of a converged flow poppet valve
19. Investigation of Flow Structure Inside Spool Valve with Fem and Piv Methods10.1080/14399776.2004.10781183 ↗
20. Experimental and numerical investigation of fluid flow of truncated conical poppet valve
21. Interactions between poppet vibration and cavitation in relief valve10.1177/0954406214544304 ↗
22. Experimental and numerical investigation of cavitation phenomenon in flapper–nozzle pilot stage of an electrohydraulic servo-valve10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.10.016 ↗
23. Cavitation Characteristics of Shutoff Valves in Numerical Modeling of Transients in Pipelines with Column Separation10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000971 ↗
24. Flow-induced vibration and noise in control valve10.1177/0954406215570386 ↗
25. Dynamic simulation of a pressure regulating and shut-off valve10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.06.011 ↗
26. Pressure Transients Caused by Tilting-Disk Check-Valve Closure10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000958 ↗
27. CFD analysis with fluid–structure interaction of opening high-pressure safety valves10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.05.010 ↗
28. Dynamic behavior of direct spring loaded pressure relief valves in gas service: Model development, measurements and instability mechanisms10.1016/j.jlp.2014.06.005 ↗
29. Dynamic behaviour of direct spring loaded pressure relief valves in gas service: II reduced order modelling10.1016/j.jlp.2015.04.011 ↗
30. Analysis of a directional hydraulic valve by a Direct Numerical Simulation using an immersed-boundary method10.1016/j.enconman.2012.07.012 ↗
31. Flow Science, Inc (2018). Flow-3D User Manual v11. 2, Flow Science, Inc.
32. Numerical simulation of flow over ogee crested spillways under high hydraulic head ratio
33. Experiments and CFD modeling of high-velocity two-phase flows in a large chute aerator facility
34. Experimental Modeling and Evaluation Sediment Scouring in Riverbeds around Downstream in Flip Buckets
35. Ghaleh, R.S., Yamini, O.A., Mousavi, S.H., and Kavianpour, M.R. (2021). Numerical Modeling of Failure Mechanisms in Articulated Concrete Block Mattress as a Sustainable Coastal Protection Structure. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su132212794 ↗
36. Del Toro, A. (2012). Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Butterfly Valve Performance Factors. [Master’s Thesis, School of Mechanical Engineering, Utah State University].
37. A Numerical and Experimental Study of the Time Averaged and Transient Flow Downstream of a Butterfly Valve10.1115/1.4052632 ↗
38. An experimental investigation of the circumstances which determine whether the motion of water shall be direct or sinuous, and of the law of resistance in parallel channels