Designing a Hybrid Equipment-Failure Diagnosis Mechanism under Mixed-Type Data with Limited Failure Samples
Source abstract
Abstract
The rarity of equipment failures results in a high level of imbalance between failure data and normal operation data, which makes the effective classification and prediction of such data difficult. Furthermore, many failure data are dominated by mixed data, which makes the model unable to adapt to this type of failure problem. Second, the replacement cycle of production equipment increases the difficulty of collecting failure data. In this paper, an equipment failure diagnosis method is proposed to solve the problem of poor prediction accuracy due to limited data. In this method, the synthetic minority oversampling technique is combined with a conditional tabular generative adversarial network. The proposed method can be used to predict limited data with a mixture of numerical and categorical data. Experimental results indicate that the proposed method can improve 6.45% compared to other similar methods when equipment failure data account for less than 1% of the total data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability · Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 407224, Taiwan
Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, Taichung 411030, Taiwan
Funding
Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Automatic Classification of Uroflow Patterns via the Grading-based Approach
2. Monitoring spatial keyword queries based on resident domains of mobile objects in IoT environments10.1007/s11036-020-01642-z ↗
3. Task-Sequencing Meta Learning for Intelligent Few-Shot Fault Diagnosis with Limited Data10.1109/TII.2021.3112504 ↗
4. A study on smart healthcare monitoring using IoT based on blockchain10.1155/2021/9932091 ↗
5. Cyberattack detection model using deep learning in a network log system with data visualization10.1007/s11227-021-03715-6 ↗
6. Netflow monitoring and cyberattack detection using deep learning with ceph10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2963716 ↗
7. Few-shot steel surface defect detection10.1109/TIM.2022.3216413 ↗
8. Limited data rolling bearing fault diagnosis with few-shot learning
9. Diagnosis of interturn short-circuit faults in permanent magnet synchronous motors based on few-shot learning under a federated learning framework10.1109/TII.2021.3067915 ↗
10. Prior knowledge-augmented self-supervised feature learning for few-shot intelligent fault diagnosis of machines10.1109/TIE.2022.3140403 ↗
11. Siamese Neural Network Based Few-Shot Learning for Anomaly Detection in Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems10.1109/TII.2020.3047675 ↗
12. SMOTE: Synthetic Minority over-Sampling Technique10.1613/jair.953 ↗
13. LSTM-GAN-AE: A promising approach for fault diagnosis in machine health monitoring10.1109/TIM.2022.3219307 ↗
14. Conditional tabular GAN-based two-stage data generation scheme for short-term load forecasting
15. Dablain, D., Krawczyk, B., and Chawla, N.V. (2022). DeepSMOTE: Fusing Deep Learning and SMOTE for Imbalanced Data. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., 1–15.
16. SMOTified-GAN for Class Imbalanced Pattern Classification Problems10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3158977 ↗
17. Kim, J., and Park, H. (2021, January 17–20). OA-GAN: Overfitting Avoidance Method of GAN Oversampling Based on XAI. Proceedings of the 2021 Twelfth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN), Jeju Island, Korea.10.1109/ICUFN49451.2021.9528594 ↗
18. Mukherjee, M., and Khushi, M. (2021). SMOTE-ENC: A Novel SMOTE-Based Method to Generate Synthetic Data for Nominal and Continuous Features. Appl. Syst. Innov., 4.10.3390/asi4010018 ↗
19. Xu, L., Skoularidou, M., Cuesta-Infante, A., and Veeramachaneni, K. (2019). Modeling Tabular Data Using Conditional GAN. arXiv.
20. Pradipta, G.A., Wardoyo, R., Musdholifah, A., Sanjaya, I.N.H., and Ismail, M. (2021, January 3–4). SMOTE for Handling Imbalanced Data Problem: A Review. Proceedings of the 2021 Sixth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC), Jakarta, Indonesia.10.1109/ICIC54025.2021.9632912 ↗
21. A Hybrid Sampling Algorithm Combining M-SMOTE and ENN Based on Random Forest for Medical Imbalanced Data10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103465 ↗
22. Martin, A., Chintala, S., and Bottou, L. (2017). Wasserstein GAN. arXiv.
23. Zinan, L., Khetan, A., Fanti, G., and Oh, S. (2017). PacGAN: The Power of Two Samples in Generative Adversarial Networks. arXiv.
24. Chunsheng, A., Sun, J., Wang, Y., and Wei, Q. (2021, January 6–10). A K-Means Improved CTGAN Oversampling Method for Data Imbalance Problem. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 21st International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS), Hainan, China.
25. XAI meets mobile traffic classification: Understanding and improving multimodal deep learning architectures10.1109/TNSM.2021.3098157 ↗
26. Dorogush, A.V., Ershov, V., and Gulin, A. (2018). CatBoost: Gradient Boosting with Categorical Features Support. arXiv.
27. Akiba, T., Sano, S., Yanase, T., Ohta, T., and Koyama, M. (2019, January 4–8). Optuna: A next-Generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework. Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery Data Mining, Anchorage, AK, USA.10.1145/3292500.3330701 ↗
28. Comparison of the Predicted and Observed Secondary Structure of T4 Phage Lysozyme10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9 ↗
29. Henning, B.K., Ong, C.S., Stephan, K.E., and Buhmann, M.J. (2010, January 23–26). The Balanced Accuracy and Its Posterior Distribution. In Proceedings of the 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Istanbul, Turkey.
30. Ioannis, M., Rallis, I., Georgoulas, I., Kopsiaftis, G., Doulamis, A., and Doulamis, N. (2021). Multiclass Confusion Matrix Reduction Method and Its Application on Net Promoter Score Classification Problem. Technologies, 9.10.3390/technologies9040081 ↗
31. Selecting and Interpreting Measures of Thematic Classification Accuracy10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00083-7 ↗
32. Dua, D., and Graff, C. (2017). UCI Machine Learning Repository, University of California Irvine.
33. Matzka, S. (2020, January 21–23). Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Predictive Maintenance Applications. Proceedings of the 2020 Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Industries (AI4I), Irvine, CA, USA.10.1109/AI4I49448.2020.00023 ↗
34. Critical thinking about explainable AI (XAI) for rule-based fuzzy systems10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3079503 ↗