journal article·2022-08-24Open access

Switching Learning Methods during the Pandemic: A Quasi-Experimental Study on a Master Course

Vita Santa Barletta, Fabio Cassano, Agostino Marengo, Alessandro Pagano, Jenny Pange, Antonio Piccinno

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 17

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic marked an important breakthrough in human progress: from working habits to social life, the world population’s behaviours changed according to the new lifestyle requirements. In this changing environment, university courses and learning methods evolved along with other “remote” working activities. For this quasi-experimental study, we discuss the effectiveness of the changes made by the LUMSA University in Rome, comparing two different groups of students who attended a master’s course with blended and fully remote methodologies. Here, we focused our attention on the paradigm shift, comparing the data gathered during the blended course in the 2019/2020 academic year with data gathered during the same course, but conducted fully online, in the academic year 2020/2021. Considering the sample size and type, the group comparison was made using a non-parametric test (U-test). The statistical analysis results suggest that there was no substantial difference between the students’ performance, confirming that the course changes made to adapt to the pandemic situation were successful and that learning effectiveness was preserved.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Online Learning and Analytics · Educational Innovations and Technology · E-Learning and Knowledge Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Computer Science, University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy

Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici, Lettere, Beni Culturali, Scienze della Formazione, Università di Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy

Department of Economics and Finance, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy

Laboratory of NT and Distance Learning, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 451 10 Ioannina, Greece

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Rakic, S., Pavlovic, M., Softic, S., Lalic, B., and Marjanovic, U. (2019, January 21–22). An Evaluation of Student Performance at e-Learning Platform. Proceedings of the 2019 17th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA), Starý Smokovec, Slovakia.10.1109/ICETA48886.2019.9040066 ↗
2. Chivu, R.G., Orzan, G., and Popa, I.C. (2019, January 11–12). Education software and modern learning environment: Elearning. Proceedings of the 15th International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education, Bucharest, Romania.10.12753/2066-026X-19-163 ↗
3. Instruments to explore blended learning: Modifying a method to analyse online communication for the analysis of face-to-face communication10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.024 ↗
4. College students’ experience of emergency remote teaching due to COVID-1910.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105578 ↗
5. Foster strengths and circumvent weaknesses: Advantages and disadvantages of online versus face-to-face subgroup discourse10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.005 ↗
6. An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.012 ↗
7. Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701 ↗
8. Receptivity and Feedback to the Online Endodontics Congress Concept as a Learning Option-An International Survey
9. Learning Analytics for Learning Design: A Systematic Literature Review of Analytics-Driven Design to Enhance Learning10.1109/TLT.2018.2868673 ↗
10. An overview of learning analytics10.1080/13562517.2013.827653 ↗
11. Amjad, T., Shaheen, Z., and Daud, A. (2022). Advanced Learning Analytics: Aspect Based Course Feedback Analysis of MOOC Forums to Facilitate Instructors. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst.
12. The use of learning analytics and the potential risk of harm for K-12 students participating in digital learning environments10.1007/s11423-020-09854-6 ↗
13. Students’ experience of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A province-wide survey study10.1111/bjet.13102 ↗
14. Guralnick, D., Auer, M.E., and Poce, A. (2022). Online Student-to-Student Interaction: Is It Feasible?. Innovations in Learning and Technology for the Workplace and Higher Education, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-90677-1 ↗
15. Barletta, V.S., Cassano, F., Pagano, A., and Piccinno, A. (2022, January 7). A collaborative AI dataset creation for speech therapies. Proceedings of the CoPDA2022—Sixth International Workshop on Cultures of Participation in the Digital Age: AI for Humans or Humans for AI, Frascati, Italy.
16. Learning Analytics: Drivers, Developments and Challenges10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051816 ↗
17. Marengo, A., and Pagano, A. (2021, January 29–30). Training Time Optimization through Adaptive Learning Strategy. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing, and Technologies (3ICT), Zallaq, Bahrain.
18. Learning analytics: Challenges and limitations10.1080/13562517.2017.1332026 ↗
19. Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education
20. Editorial: Learning design, teacher inquiry into student learning and learning analytics: A call for action10.1111/bjet.12273 ↗
21. Informing Pedagogical Action: Aligning Learning Analytics With Learning Design10.1177/0002764213479367 ↗
22. Marengo, A., Pagano, A., and Ladisa, L. (2016, January 27–28). Mobile gaming experience and co-design for kids: Learn German with Mr. Hut. Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on e-Learning (2016) ECEL, Prague, Czech Republic.
23. Learning Analytics: A Survey10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V18P155 ↗
24. Scripting and monitoring meet each other: Aligning learning analytics and learning design to support teachers in orchestrating CSCL situations10.1111/bjet.12198 ↗
25. AMOEBA: Designing for collaboration in computer science classrooms through live learning analytics10.1007/s11412-015-9217-z ↗
26. Supporting teachers in data-informed educational design10.1111/bjet.12262 ↗
27. Yousef, A.M.F., and Khatiry, A.R. (2021). Cognitive versus behavioral learning analytics dashboards for supporting learner’s awareness, reflection, and learning process. Interact. Learn. Environ., 1–17.10.1080/10494820.2021.2009881 ↗
28. Huang, R.X. (2021, January 15–16). Building a Pedagogical Framework for the Education of Sustainable Development using a Values-based Education Approach. Proceedings of the 2021 Third International Sustainability and Resilience Conference: Climate Change, Sakheer, Bahrain.10.1109/IEEECONF53624.2021.9667982 ↗
29. Omer, U., Farooq, M.S., and Abid, A. (2020). Cognitive Learning Analytics Using Assessment Data and Concept Map: A Framework-Based Approach for Sustainability of programmeming Courses. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12176990 ↗