Parametric Analyses of the Response of Masonry Walls with Reinforced Plaster
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a parametric study on the response of unreinforced and retrofitted masonry specimens. The adopted strengthening technique is the steel-reinforced plaster, which is very commonly used but it is not supported by a proper theoretical and experimental characterization in the scientific literature. The aim was to investigate the main parameters that affect the structural performances of the walls. Several numerical models were implemented using the finite element method to analyze the influence of the bricks’ arrangements, the mechanical properties of the mortar joints, the number of connectors, and the mechanical properties and thickness of the plaster coating. A concrete damage plasticity model was adopted to describe the bricks, the mortar joints, and the plaster behaviors. For the unreinforced specimens, the outcomes confirmed that the mortar strength had a significant influence on the performance of the wall, together with the presence of potential weaknesses in the bricks, while the bond effect was negligible. For reinforced walls, the connectors do not have a significant influence on retrofitted wall capacity but may prevent instability if a proper number is considered. Furthermore, the strength of the plaster coating does not affect the collapse load significantly, while increasing the fracture energy, which can be produced, for instance, by using fiber-reinforced concrete, increases the capacity of retrofitted walls, with more limited damage. Finally, an increase in the plaster thickness may be beneficial in terms of collapse load, even though greater thickness may increase the seismic masses significantly.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Building materials and conservation · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
Construction Technologies Institute, Italian National Research Council (ITC-CNR), 20098 San Giuliano Milanese, Italy
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Performance based studies of in-plane loaded unreinforced masonry walls
2. Damage models for the Seismic Response of Brick Masonry Shear Wall. Part I: The Mortar Joint Model and Its Application10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199704)26:4<423::AID-EQE650>3.0.CO;2-# ↗
3. Hendry, A.W., Sinha, B.P., and Davies, S.R. (2017). Design of Masonry Structures, CRC Press.10.4324/9780203362402 ↗
4. Experimental evaluation of shear and compression strength of masonry wall before and after reinforcement: Deep repointing10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.11.021 ↗
5. Evaluation of Compressive Strength of Masonry Walls by Limit Analysis10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:10(2179) ↗
6. Elgawady, M.A., and Lestuzzi, P. (2004, January 4–7). A review of conventional seismic retrofitting techniques for URM. Proceedings of the 13th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherland.
7. A critical review of retrofitting methods for unreinforced masonry structures10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.004 ↗
8. Modelling approaches of the in-plane shear behaviour of unreinforced and FRP strengthened masonry panels10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.012 ↗
9. Static cyclic in-plane shear response of damaged masonry walls retrofitted with NSM FRP strips—An experimental evaluation10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.10.026 ↗
10. Preservation of Historical Monumental Structures using Fibre Reinforced Polymer (FRP)—Case Studies10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.043 ↗
11. Shear strengthening of masonry wallettes resorting to structural repointing and FRCM composites10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.044 ↗
12. Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of URM walls: In-plane cyclic loading10.1617/s11527-006-9207-8 ↗
13. Pseudo-static cyclic loading comparison of reinforced masonry walls strengthened with FRCM or NSM FRP10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.043 ↗
14. (2022, May 09). Ministero Delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti. Decreto Ministeriale 17 Gennaio 2018 C.S.LL.PP. Aggiornamento Delle «Norme tecniche per le Costruzioni» 2018. Available online: https://www.certifico.com/categorie/332-costruzioni/5669-decreto-17-gennaio-2018.
15. Earthquake Planning and Protection Organization of Greece EPPO (2022, May 09). CODE OF INTERVENTIONS (ΚAΝ.ΕPΕ.). Available online: http://ecpfe.oasp.gr/sites/default/files/files/full.pdf.
16. Identification of shear parameters of masonry panels through the in-situ diagonal compression test10.1080/15583050802138634 ↗
17. The use of the diagonal compression test to identify the shear mechanical parameters of masonry10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.11.001 ↗
18. Testing masonry blockwork panels for orthotropic shear strength10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.116 ↗
19. Experimental and numerical insights on the diagonal compression test for the shear characterisation of masonry10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122964 ↗
20. Testing and modeling the diagonal tension strength of rubble stone masonry panels10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.019 ↗
21. Fathalla, E., and Salem, H. (2018). Parametric study on seismic rehabilitation of masonry buildings using FRP based upon 3D non-linear dynamic analysis. Buildings, 8.10.3390/buildings8090124 ↗
22. Sediek, O.A., El-Tawil, S., and McCormick, J.P. (2020, January 13–18). Impact of Earthquake-Induced Debris on the Seismic Resilience of Road Networks. Proceedings of the 17th World Conference of Earthquake Engineering, Sendai, Japan.
23. A micro-mechanical model for the homogenisation of masonry10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00230-5 ↗
24. Nonlinear analysis of masonry panels strengthened with textile reinforced mortar10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.021 ↗
25. Seismic assessment of masonry arch bridges10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.012 ↗
26. Nonlinear micromechanical model for tuff stone masonry: Experimental validation and performance limit states10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.078 ↗
27. Identification of mesoscale model parameters for brick-masonry10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.04.003 ↗
28. Damage and plasticity at the interfaces in composite materials and structures10.1016/j.cma.2009.08.024 ↗
29. Micro-mechanical finite element modeling of diagonal compression test for historical stone masonry structure10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.02.014 ↗
30. (2016). Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading). Standard No. ASTM C293/C293M-16.
31. (2008). Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars (Using Portions of Prisms Broken in Flexure). Standard No. ASTM C349-08.
32. Diagonal compressive strength of masonry samples—experimental and numerical approach10.1617/s11527-012-9933-z ↗
33. De Damage and performance evaluation of masonry churches in the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.021 ↗
34. An insight in the late Baroque architecture: An integrated approach for a unique Bibiena church10.1016/j.culher.2016.07.006 ↗
35. (2022, May 09). Dassault Systèmes ABAQUS/CAE Documentation 2017. Available online: https://pdf.directindustry.com/pdf/simulia/abaqus-cae-2017/6159-949010.html.
36. (2002). Standard Test Method for Diagonal Tension (Shear) in Masonry Assemblages. Standard No. ASTM International ASTM E 519:02.
37. A plastic-damage model for concrete10.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-4 ↗
38. Damage assessment of three medieval churches after the 2012 Emilia earthquake10.1007/s10518-016-0073-7 ↗
39. Calibration of a concrete damage plasticity model used to simulate the material components of unreinforced masonry reinforced concrete infill frames10.1617/s11527-021-01845-0 ↗
40. Szczecina, M., and Winnicki, A. (2015, January 25–29). Calibration of the CDP model parameters in Abaqus. Proceedings of the 2015 World Congress on Advances in Structural Engineering and Mechanics (ASEM15), Incheon, Korea.
41. Stress-Strain Characteristics of Clay Brick Masonry under Uniaxial Compression Hemant10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:9(728) ↗
42. Cattaneo, S., and Vafa, N. (2021). Tensile capacity of adhesive anchors in damaged masonry. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112110135 ↗
43. Experimental In-Plane Behavior of Tuff Masonry Strengthened with Cementitious Matrix–Grid Composites10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:3(223) ↗
44. Shear-compression tests on stone masonry walls strengthened with basalt textile reinforced mortar (TRM)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125804 ↗
45. In-plane strengthening of clay brick unreinforced masonry wallettes using ECC shotcrete10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.01.043 ↗
46. Engineered cementitious composites for effective strengthening of unreinforced masonry walls10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.04.017 ↗
47. Fracture energy-based optimisation of steel fibre reinforced concretes10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.04.018 ↗
48. Fracture of Plain and Fiber-Reinforced High Strength Mortar Slabs with EA and ESPI Monitoring10.1023/A:1008948125654 ↗