journal article·2022-05-16Open access

Incorporating Cyber Threat Intelligence into Complex Cyber-Physical Systems: A STIX Model for Active Buildings

Ricardo M. Czekster, Roberto Metere, Charles Morisset

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 10

Abstract

Active buildings can be briefly described as smart buildings with distributed and renewable energy resources able to energise other premises in their neighbourhood. As their energy capacity is significant, they can provide ancillary services to the traditional power grid. As such, they can be a worthy target of cyber-attacks potentially more devastating than if targeting traditional smart buildings. Furthermore, to handshake energy transfers, they need additional communications that add up to their attack surface. In such a context, security analysis would benefit from collection of cyber threat intelligence (CTI). To facilitate the analysis, we provide a base active building model in STIX in the tool cyberaCTIve that handles complex models. Active buildings are expected to implement standard network security measures, such as intrusion-detection systems. However, to timely respond to incidents, real-time detection should promptly update CTI, as it would significantly speed up the understanding of the nature of incidents and, as such, allow for a more effective response. To fill this gap, we propose an extension to the tool cyberaCTIve with a web service able to accept (incursion) feeds in real-time and apply the necessary modifications to a STIX model of interest.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Smart Grid Security and Resilience · Network Security and Intrusion Detection · Information and Cyber Security

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Informatics and Digital Engineering, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK

School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK

The Alan Turing Institute, London NW1 2DB, UK

Funding

Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund · EPSRC · Active Building Centre Research Programme

References (94)

Show source-provided references
1. Rajkumar, R., Lee, I., Sha, L., and Stankovic, J. (2010, January 3–18). Cyber-physical systems: The next computing revolution. Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference, Anaheim, CA, USA.10.1145/1837274.1837461 ↗
2. Shi, J., Wan, J., Yan, H., and Suo, H. (2011, January 9–11). A survey of cyber-physical systems. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP), Nanjing, China.10.1109/WCSP.2011.6096958 ↗
3. Khaitan, S.K., and McCalley, J.D. (2013, January 21–25). Cyber physical system approach for design of power grids: A survey. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Power Energy Society General Meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/PESMG.2013.6672537 ↗
4. Roccotelli, M., and Mangini, A.M. (2022). Advances on Smart Cities and Smart Buildings. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/books978-3-0365-4016-0 ↗
5. Cyber-physical attacks and defences in the smart grid: A survey10.1049/iet-cps.2016.0019 ↗
6. Cyber security challenges for IoT-based smart grid networks10.1016/j.ijcip.2019.01.001 ↗
7. Cyber-security on smart grid: Threats and potential solutions10.1016/j.comnet.2019.107094 ↗
8. Kolokotronis, N., and Shiaeles, S. (2021). Cyber-Security Threats, Actors, and Dynamic Mitigation, CRC Press.10.1201/9781003006145 ↗
9. Cyber–physical system security for the electric power grid10.1109/JPROC.2011.2165269 ↗
10. Dabrowski, A., Ullrich, J., and Weippl, E.R. (2017, January 4–8). Grid shock: Coordinated load-changing attacks on power grids: The non-smart power grid is vulnerable to cyber attacks as well. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1145/3134600.3134639 ↗
11. Modelling Load-Changing Attacks in Cyber-Physical Systems10.1016/j.entcs.2020.09.018 ↗
12. Soltan, S., Mittal, P., and Poor, H.V. (2018, January 15–17). BlackIoT: IoT botnet of high wattage devices can disrupt the power grid. Proceedings of the 27th {USENIX} Security Symposium ({USENIX} Security 18), Baltimore, MD, USA.
13. Alotaibi, I., Abido, M.A., Khalid, M., and Savkin, A.V. (2020). A comprehensive review of recent advances in smart grids: A sustainable future with renewable energy resources. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13236269 ↗
14. Ingram, M., and Martin, M. (2017). Guide to Cybersecurity, Resilience, and Reliability for Small and Under-Resourced Utilities, National Renewable Energy Lab.. Technical Report.10.2172/1342373 ↗
15. A novel economic structure to improve the energy label in smart residential buildings under energy efficiency programs10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121059 ↗
16. Two-stage stochastic home energy management strategy considering electric vehicle and battery energy storage system: An ANN-based scenario generation methodology
17. Robust multi-objective thermal and electrical energy hub management integrating hybrid battery-compressed air energy storage systems and plug-in-electric-vehicle-based demand response10.1016/j.est.2021.102265 ↗
18. Deep learning-based forecasting approach in smart grids with microclustering and bidirectional LSTM network10.1109/TIE.2020.3009604 ↗
19. Tounsi, W. (2019). What is Cyber Threat Intelligence and how is it evolving?. Cyber-Vigilance and Digital Trust: Cyber Security in the Era of Cloud Computing and IoT, Wiley Online Library.10.1002/9781119618393 ↗
20. Olowu, T.O., Sundararajan, A., Moghaddami, M., and Sarwat, A.I. (2018). Future challenges and mitigation methods for high photovoltaic penetration: A survey. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11071782 ↗
21. Metere, R., Neaimeh, M., Morisset, C., Maple, C., Bellekens, X., and Czekster, R.M. (2021). Securing the Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure. arXiv.
22. Frequency response services designed for energy storage10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.046 ↗
23. Strbac, G., Woolf, M., Pudjianto, D., Zhang, X., Walker, S., and Vahidinasab, V. (2020). The Role of Active Buildings in the Transition to a Net Zero Energy System, Active Building Centre Research Programme.
24. ‘Buildings as Power Stations’: An energy simulation tool for housing10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.404 ↗
25. Canaan, B., Colicchio, B., and Ould Abdeslam, D. (2020). Microgrid cyber-security: Review and challenges toward resilience. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10165649 ↗
26. Nejabatkhah, F., Li, Y.W., Liang, H., and Reza Ahrabi, R. (2021). Cyber-security of smart microgrids: A survey. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14010027 ↗
27. Towards active buildings: Rating grid-servicing buildings10.1177/0143624420974647 ↗
28. Dasgupta, R., Sakzad, A., and Rudolph, C. (2021). Cyber attacks in transactive energy market-based microgrid systems. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14041137 ↗
29. Standardizing cyber threat intelligence information with the Structured Threat Information eXpression (STIX)
30. Czekster, R.M., Metere, R., and Morisset, C. (2022). cyberaCTIve: A STIX-based Tool for Cyber Threat Intelligence in Complex Models. arXiv.
31. From data to wisdom
32. A survey on technical threat intelligence in the age of sophisticated cyber attacks10.1016/j.cose.2017.09.001 ↗
33. Brown, R., and Lee, R.M. (2019). The Evolution of Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI): 2019 SANS CTI Survey, SANS Institute. Available online: https://www.sans.org/white-papers/38790/.
34. Pokorny, Z. (2019). The Threat Intelligence Handbook: Moving toward a Security Intelligence Program, CyberEdge Group.
35. Schaberreiter, T., Kupfersberger, V., Rantos, K., Spyros, A., Papanikolaou, A., Ilioudis, C., and Quirchmayr, G. (2019, January 26–29). A quantitative evaluation of trust in the quality of cyber threat intelligence sources. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, Canterbury, UK.10.1145/3339252.3342112 ↗
36. Griffioen, H., Booij, T., and Doerr, C. (2020). Quality Evaluation of Cyber Threat Intelligence Feeds. International Conference on Applied Cryptography and Network Security, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-57878-7_14 ↗
37. Tundis, A., Ruppert, S., and Mühlhäuser, M. (2020). On the Automated Assessment of Open-Source Cyber Threat Intelligence Sources. International Conference on Computational Science, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-50417-5_34 ↗
38. Open Source Intelligence for Malicious Behavior Discovery and Interpretation
39. Ramsdale, A., Shiaeles, S., and Kolokotronis, N. (2020). A comparative analysis of cyber-threat intelligence sources, formats and languages. Electronics, 9.10.3390/electronics9050824 ↗
40. Connolly, J., Davidson, M., and Schmidt, C. (2014). The Trusted Automated eXchange of Indicator Information (TAXII), The MITRE Corporation.
41. Barnum, S., Martin, R., Worrell, B., and Kirillov, I. (2012). The Cybox Language Specification, The MITRE Corporation.
42. Leveraging CybOXTM to standardize representation and exchange of digital forensic information10.1016/j.diin.2015.01.014 ↗
43. Bankovskis, A. (2017). One Million Homes Constructed as “Buildings as Power Stations”—Report of Indicative Benefits, SPECIFIC—UK Innovation and Knowledge Centre (IKC). Available online: https://www.specific.eu.com/.
44. Clarke, J., Jones, P., Littlewood, J., and Worsley, D. (2020). Active buildings in practice. Sustainability in Energy and Buildings, Springer.10.1007/978-981-32-9868-2_47 ↗
45. Clarke, J. (2021). Designing active buildings. Emerging Research in Sustainable Energy and Buildings for a Low-Carbon Future, Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-8775-7_2 ↗
46. How to define nearly net zero energy buildings nZEB
47. Attia, S. (2018). Net Zero Energy Buildings (NZEB): Concepts, Frameworks and Roadmap for Project Analysis and Implementation, Butterworth-Heinemann.
48. What is a Nearly zero energy building? Overview, implementation and comparison of definitions10.1016/j.jobe.2018.10.019 ↗
49. Series, I. (2009). Microgrids and Active Distribution Networks, The Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET).
50. Skopik, F., Friedberg, I., and Fiedler, R. (2014). Dealing with advanced persistent threats in smart grid ICT networks. Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT), IEEE Power Energy Society.10.1109/ISGT.2014.6816388 ↗
51. Combating advanced persistent threats: From network event correlation to incident detection10.1016/j.cose.2014.09.006 ↗
52. Yankson, S., and Ghamkhari, M. (2020). Transactive Energy to Thwart Load Altering Attacks on Power Distribution Systems. Future Internet, 12.10.3390/fi12010004 ↗
53. Grid-connected photovoltaic power systems: Technical and potential problems—A review10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.015 ↗
54. Grid-connected photovoltaic power plants: A review of the recent integration requirements in modern grid codes10.1002/er.3983 ↗
55. Robust and flexible strategy for fault detection in grid-connected photovoltaic systems10.1016/j.enconman.2018.11.022 ↗
56. Recent advances in failure diagnosis techniques based on performance data analysis for grid-connected photovoltaic systems10.1016/j.renene.2018.09.101 ↗
57. An unsupervised monitoring procedure for detecting anomalies in photovoltaic systems using a one-class Support Vector Machine10.1016/j.solener.2018.12.045 ↗
58. Security and privacy in cyber-physical systems: A survey of surveys10.1109/MDAT.2017.2709310 ↗
59. Review on microgrids protection10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.5212 ↗
60. Beheshtaein, S., Cuzner, R.M., Forouzesh, M., Savaghebi, M., and Guerrero, J.M. (2019). DC microgrid protection: A comprehensive review. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron.
61. IoT-enabled smart grid via SM: An overview10.1016/j.future.2019.02.012 ↗
62. Cyber-physical energy systems security: Threat modeling, risk assessment, resources, metrics, and case studies10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3058403 ↗
63. Kavallieros, D., Germanos, G., and Kolokotronis, N. (2021). Profiles of Cyber-Attackers and Attacks. Cyber-Security Threats, Actors, and Dynamic Mitigation, CRC Press.10.1201/9781003006145-1 ↗
64. Vahidinasab, V., and Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B. (2022). Cybersecurity Roadmap for Active Buildings. Active Building Energy Systems: Operation and Control, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-79742-3 ↗
65. Hacking power grids: A current problem10.1109/MC.2017.4451203 ↗
66. W32. stuxnet dossier
67. Stuxnet: Dissecting a cyberwarfare weapon10.1109/MSP.2011.67 ↗
68. Lessons from stuxnet10.1109/MC.2011.115 ↗
69. Karnouskos, S. (2011, January 7–10). Stuxnet worm impact on industrial cyber-physical system security. Proceedings of the IECON 2011-37th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.10.1109/IECON.2011.6120048 ↗
70. Stuxnet and the limits of cyber warfare10.1080/09636412.2013.816122 ↗
71. Back in BlackEnergy: 2014 Targeted Attacks in Ukraine and Poland
72. Cherepanov, A., and Lipovsky, R. (2016, January 5–7). BlackEnergy: What we really know about the notorious cyber attacks. Proceedings of the Virus Bulletin Conference, Denver, CO, USA.
73. Cherepanov, A., and Lipovsky, R. (2017). Industroyer: Biggest threat to industrial control systems since Stuxnet. Welivesecurity ESET, 12.
74. The 2015 ukraine blackout: Implications for false data injection attacks10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2631891 ↗
75. Response, S.I. (2014). Dragonfly: Cyberespionage attacks against energy suppliers. Rapp. Tecn, 7.
76. Chen, Q., and Bridges, R.A. (2017, January 18–21). Automated behavioral analysis of malware: A case study of wannacry ransomware. Proceedings of the 2017 16th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), Cancun, Mexico.10.1109/ICMLA.2017.0-119 ↗
77. Hsiao, S.C., and Kao, D.Y. (2018, January 11–14). The static analysis of WannaCry ransomware. Proceedings of the 2018 20th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), Chuncheon, Korea.10.23919/ICACT.2018.8323680 ↗
78. Lee, R. (2017). TRISIS Malware: Analysis of Safety System Targeted Malware, Dragos Inc.
79. Geiger, M., Bauer, J., Masuch, M., and Franke, J. (2020, January 8–11). An Analysis of Black Energy 3, Crashoverride, and Trisis, Three Malware Approaches Targeting Operational Technology Systems. Proceedings of the 2020 25th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Vienna, Austria.10.1109/ETFA46521.2020.9212128 ↗
80. Hemsley, K.E., and Fisher, E. (2018). History of Industrial Control System Cyber Incidents, Idaho National Lab.(INL). Technical Report.10.2172/1505628 ↗
81. Strom, B.E., Applebaum, A., Miller, D.P., Nickels, K.C., Pennington, A.G., and Thomas, C.B. (2018). MITRE ATT&CK®: Design and Philosophy, The MITRE Corporation. MITRE Technical Report.
82. Alexander, O., Belisle, M., and Steele, J. (2020). MITRE ATT&CK for Industrial Control Systems: Design and Philosophy, The MITRE Corporation.
83. Roberts, A. (2021). Cyber Threat Intelligence: The No-Nonsense Guide for CISOs and Security Managers, Apress.10.1007/978-1-4842-7220-6 ↗
84. Intelligence-driven computer network defense informed by analysis of adversary campaigns and intrusion kill chains
85. Lockheed Martin Corporation (2015). Seven Ways to Apply the Cyber Kill Chain with a Threat Intelligence Platform, Lockheed Martin Corporation.
86. Kwon, R., Ashley, T., Castleberry, J., Mckenzie, P., and Gourisetti, S.N.G. (2020, January 19–23). Cyber Threat Dictionary Using MITRE ATT&CK Matrix and NIST Cybersecurity Framework Mapping. Proceedings of the 2020 Resilience Week (RWS), Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/RWS50334.2020.9241271 ↗
87. Metere, R., and Arnaboldi, L. (2021). Automating Cryptographic Protocol Language Generation from Structured Specifications. arXiv.10.1145/3524482.3527654 ↗
88. Common vulnerability scoring system10.1109/MSP.2006.145 ↗
89. Fielding, R.T. (2000). Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-Based Software Architectures, University of California.
90. DoS attacks flood techniques
91. Gao, P., Shao, F., Liu, X., Xiao, X., Qin, Z., Xu, F., Mittal, P., Kulkarni, S.R., and Song, D. (2021, January 19–22). Enabling efficient cyber threat hunting with cyber threat intelligence. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 37th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), Chania, Greece.10.1109/ICDE51399.2021.00024 ↗
92. A review of attack graph and attack tree visual syntax in cyber security10.1016/j.cosrev.2019.100219 ↗
93. Systematic review of features for co-simulating security incidents in Cyber-Physical Systems10.1002/spy2.150 ↗
94. Truong, T.C., Zelinka, I., Plucar, J., Čandík, M., and Šulc, V. (2020). Artificial intelligence and cybersecurity: Past, presence, and future. Artificial Intelligence and Evolutionary Computations in Engineering Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-0199-9_30 ↗