Semantic Segmentation of 12-Lead ECG Using 1D Residual U-Net with Squeeze-Excitation Blocks
Source abstract
Abstract
Analyzing biomedical data is a complex task that requires specialized knowledge. The development of knowledge and technology in the field of deep machine learning creates an opportunity to try and transfer human knowledge to the computer. In turn, this fact influences the development of systems for the automatic evaluation of the patient’s health based on data acquired from sensors. Electrocardiography (ECG) is a technique that enables visualizing the electrical activity of the heart in a noninvasive way, using electrodes placed on the surface of the skin. This signal carries a lot of information about the condition of heart muscle. The aim of this work is to create a system for semantic segmentation of the ECG signal. For this purpose, we used a database from Lobachevsky University available on Physionet, containing 200, 10-second, and 12-lead ECG signals with annotations, and applied one-dimensional U-Net with the addition of squeeze-excitation blocks. The created model achieved a set of parameters indicating high performance (for the test set: accuracy—0.95, AUC—0.99, specificity—0.95, sensitivity—0.99) in extracting characteristic parts of ECG signal such as P and T-waves and QRS complex, regardless of the lead.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ECG Monitoring and Analysis · Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring · EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biosensors and Processing of Biomedical Signals, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Roosevelta 40, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning, The MIT Press. Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning.
2. 1D convolutional neural networks and applications: A survey10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107398 ↗
3. Deep learning for healthcare applications based on physiological signals: A review10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.04.005 ↗
4. Hong, S., Zhou, Y., Shang, J., Xiao, C., and Sun, J. (2020). Opportunities and Challenges of Deep Learning Methods for Electrocardiogram Data: A Systematic Review. arXiv.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103801 ↗
5. Novotna, P., Vicar, T., Hejc, J., Ronzhina, M., and Kolarova, J. (2020, January 13–16). Deep-Learning Premature Contraction Localization in 12-lead ECG From Whole Signal Annotations. Proceedings of the Computing in Cardiology, Rimini, Italy.10.22489/CinC.2020.193 ↗
6. FM-ECG: A fine-grained multi-label framework for ECG image classification10.1016/j.ins.2020.10.014 ↗
7. Automatic Detection of QRS Complexes Using Dual Channels Based on U-Net and Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory10.1109/JBHI.2020.3018563 ↗
8. Transfer learning for ECG classification10.1038/s41598-021-84374-8 ↗
9. ECG Based Identification by Deep Learning10.1007/978-3-319-69923-3_54 ↗
10. Comparative study of algorithms for ECG segmentation10.1016/j.bspc.2017.01.013 ↗
11. Automatic Detection of Wave Boundaries in Multilead ECG Signals: Validation with the CSE Database10.1006/cbmr.1994.1006 ↗
12. A Wavelet-Based ECG Delineator: Evaluation on Standard Databases10.1109/TBME.2003.821031 ↗
13. Singh, Y.N., and Gupta, P. (October, January 29). ECG to Individual Identification. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Second International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems, Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/BTAS.2008.4699343 ↗
14. A wavelet-based ECG delineation algorithm for 32-bit integer online processing10.1186/1475-925X-10-23 ↗
15. Sun, Y., Chan, K.L., and Krishnan, S.M. (2005). Characteristic wave detection in ECG signal using morphological transform. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord., 5.10.1186/1471-2261-5-28 ↗
16. Application of the phasor transform for automatic delineation of single-lead ECG fiducial points10.1088/0967-3334/31/11/005 ↗
17. New approach for T-wave end detection on electrocardiogram: Performance in noisy conditions10.1186/1475-925X-10-77 ↗
18. A Wavelet-Based ECG Delineation with Improved P Wave Offset Detection Accuracy
19. Hughes, N.P., Tarassenko, L., and Roberts, S.J. (2003, January 8–13). Markov Models for Automated ECG Interval Analysis. Proceedings of the NIPS 2003, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
20. Laguna, P., Mark, R., Goldberg, A., and Moody, G. (1997, January 7–10). A database for evaluation of algorithms for measurement of QT and other waveform intervals in the ECG. Proceedings of the Computers in Cardiology 1997, Lund, Sweden.
21. Kalyakulina, A., Yusipov, I., Moskalenko, V., Nikolskiy, A., Kosonogov, K., Zolotykh, N., and Ivanchenko, M. (2021, July 10). Lobachevsky University Electrocardiography Database. Type: Dataset. Available online: https://physionet.org/content/ludb/1.0.0/.
22. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T. (2015). U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
23. Deep Residual SENet for Foliage Recognition10.1007/978-3-662-61510-2_9 ↗
24. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2015). Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
25. Ioffe, S., and Szegedy, C. (2015). Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift. arXiv.
26. Hu, J., Shen, L., Albanie, S., Sun, G., and Wu, E. (2019). Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00745 ↗
27. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2017). Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. arXiv.
28. The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. 110.1111/j.1469-8137.1912.tb05611.x ↗
29. Classification assessment methods10.1016/j.aci.2018.08.003 ↗
30. (2022, March 14). Keras—Sensitivity at Specificity|TensorFlow Core v2.8.0. Available online: https://www.tensorflow.org/api_docs/python/tf/keras/metrics/SensitivityAtSpecificity.
31. (2021, June 25). The Top 10 Causes of Death. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death.
32. ECGAug: A novel method of generating augmented annotated electrocardiogram QRST complexes and rhythm strips10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104408 ↗
33. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, L., and Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention Is All You Need. arXiv.
34. Choromanski, K., Likhosherstov, V., Dohan, D., Song, X., Gane, A., Sarlos, T., Hawkins, P., Davis, J., Mohiuddin, A., and Kaiser, L. (2020). Rethinking Attention with Performers. arXiv.
35. Wang, S., Li, B.Z., Khabsa, M., Fang, H., and Ma, H. (2020). Linformer: Self-Attention with Linear Complexity. arXiv.
36. Li, D., Hu, J., Wang, C., Li, X., She, Q., Zhu, L., Zhang, T., and Chen, Q. (2021). Involution: Inverting the Inherence of Convolution for Visual Recognition. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01214 ↗