journal article·2022-03-29Open access

Calculation of Intracoronary Pressure-Based Indexes with JLabChart

Giuseppe Tradigo, Salvatore De Rosa, Patrizia Vizza, Gionata Fragomeni, Pietro Hiram Guzzi, Ciro Indolfi, Pierangelo Veltri

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 7

Abstract

The Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-Free Ratio (iFR) have been proposed and clinically validated to measure the pressure gradient across coronary stenoses. They provide quantitative information on stenosis severity. Both are used in coronary revascularization procedures to measure intracoronary pressure giving quantitative information to evaluate coronary diseases during angiographic procedures. We designed and implemented a tool able to acquire and measure iFR and FFR supporting the physicians studying and treating patients in interventional cardiology laboratories. We designed an extensive case study to assess the performance of the tool in (i) acquiring pressure signals from blood pressure measurement systems; (ii) calculating FFR and iFR; and (iii) filtering out extra-beats signals during realtime signal analysis phases. The tool, named JLabChart, is available online. We tested it on two sets of data for a total of 600 cycles from 201 pressure measurements performed on 65 patients, from the Interventional Cardiology Unit of Magna Graecia University. The recognition of cardiac cycles and keypoint of the pressure curve was effective in 100% of cases for proximal (aortic) pressure and in 99.2% for distal pressure. The FFR calculated by JLabChart had an excellent correlation (Rp=0.960; p<0.001) with the FFR values obtained through the commercial systems. Similar results were obtained with iFR (Rp=0.998; p<0.001). Finally, the tool measurement results were compared with a commercial tool proving JLabChart’s efficiency with real cases. It was also compared with measurements performed on synthetic vessels and stenosis designed using the Comsol commercial tool. JLabChart is able to provide reliable measurements of FFR and iFR indexes used to support decisions on interventional procedures. It represents a valuable open source support system that can be used in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics · Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics · Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Surgical and Medical Science, University eCampus, 22060 Novedrate, Italy

Department of Surgical and Medical Science, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Atlas Writing Group European Society of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2019 (Executive Summary)10.1093/ehjqcco/qcz065 ↗
2. Percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary artery disease10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312755 ↗
3. Iaizzo, P.A. (2010). Handbook of Cardiac Anatomy, Physiology, and Devices, Springer.10.1007/978-1-60327-372-5 ↗
4. Impact of Lesion Length on Functional Significance in Intermediate Coronary Lesions10.21859/ijcp-020301 ↗
5. Visual estimation of precent diameter coronary stenosis: “A battered gold standard”10.1016/0735-1097(88)90226-4 ↗
6. Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow10.1161/01.CIR.92.11.3183 ↗
7. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses10.1056/NEJM199606273342604 ↗
8. Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI Versus Medical Therapy in Stable Coronary Disease
9. Atrial myxomas arise from multipotent cardiac stem cells10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa156 ↗
10. Salatino, A., Aversa, I., Battaglia, A.M., Sacco, A., Di Vito, A., Santamaria, G., Chirillo, R., Veltri, P., Tradigo, G., and Di Cello, A. (2019). H-Ferritin Affects Cisplatin-Induced Cytotoxicity in Ovarian Cancer Cells through the Modulation of ROS. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev., 2019.10.1155/2019/3461251 ↗
11. Stouffer, G.A. (2016). Cardiovascular Hemodynamics for the Clinician, John Wiley and Sons.10.1002/9781119066491 ↗
12. Role of incremental doses of intracoronary adenosine for fractional flow reserve assessment10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00120-0 ↗
13. Does Flow During Rest and Relaxation Suffice?10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.035 ↗
14. Coronary physiology in the catheter laboratory10.1007/s00059-019-04878-y ↗
15. FFR and iFR guided percutaneous coronary intervention10.1007/s12928-016-0404-2 ↗
16. Development and Validation of a New Adenosine-Independent Index of Stenosis Severity From Coronary Wave—Intensity Analysis10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.003 ↗
17. Nijjer, S., and Davies, J. (2017). Application of iFR in Clinical Scenarios. Physiological Assessment of Coronary Stenoses and the Microcirculation, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4471-5245-3_17 ↗
18. Diagnostic Performance of the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio: Comparison With Fractional Flow Reserve
19. Pre-Angioplasty Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Pullback Predicts Hemodynamic Outcome In Humans With Coronary Artery Disease: Primary Results of the International Multicenter iFR GRADIENT Registry10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.005 ↗
20. Baseline instantaneous wave-free ratio as a pressure-only estimation of underlying coronary flow reserve results of the JUSTIFY-CFR Study (Joined Coronary Pressure and Flow Analysis to Determine Diagnostic Characteristics of Basal and Hyperemic Indices of Functional Lesion Severity-Coronary Flow Reserve)10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000926 ↗
21. Multicenter core laboratory comparison of the instantaneous wave-free ratio and resting Pd/Pa with fractional flow reserve: The RESOLVE study10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.060 ↗
22. The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) for evaluation of non-culprit lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.03.210 ↗
23. Instantaneous wave-free ratio is not inferior to fractional flow reserve for assessment of intermediate coronary artery stenoses10.1016/S0735-1097(16)30398-9 ↗
24. Petraco, R., Javier, E., and Justin, D. (2017). Validation of iFR: Clinical registries. Physiological Assessment of Coronary Stenoses and the Microcirculation, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4471-5245-3_16 ↗
25. Diagnostic performance of instantaneous wave-free ratio for the evaluation of coronary stenosis severity confirmed by fractional flow reserve: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of randomized studies10.1097/MD.0000000000004774 ↗
26. Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI10.1056/NEJMoa1700445 ↗
27. iFR-SWEDEHEART Investigators. Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI10.1056/NEJMoa1616540 ↗
28. Development and validation of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) angiographic scoring tool (FAST) to improve the angiographic grading and selection of intermediate lesions that require FFR assessment10.1097/MCA.0b013e32834e4f71 ↗
29. Improvement in coronary haemodynamics after percutaneous coronary intervention: Assessment using instantaneous wave-free ratio10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304387 ↗
30. Quantification of the Effect of Pressure Wire Drift on the Diagnostic Performance of Fractional Flow Reserve, Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio, and Whole-Cycle Pd/Pa10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002988 ↗
31. Comparison of Different Diastolic Resting Indexes to iFR: Are They All Equal?10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.066 ↗
32. Relationship between instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve in patients receiving hemodialysis10.1007/s12928-017-0479-4 ↗
33. Reliability of physiological assessment of coronary stenosis severity using intracoronary pressure techniques: A comprehensive analysis from a large cohort of consecutive intermediate coronary lesions10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00574 ↗
34. Differences between automatically detected and steady-state fractional flow reserve10.1007/s00392-015-0894-4 ↗
35. On the reliability of measurements for a stent positioning simulation system10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.12.008 ↗
36. Moser, D.K., and Riegel, B. (2007). Cardiac Nursing: A Companion to Braunwald’s Heart Disease, Elsevier Health Sciences.
37. Miller, G. (2010). Fundamentals of Biomedical Transport Processes, Morgan and Claypool Publishers.10.1007/978-3-031-01645-5 ↗
38. Caroprese, L., Veltri, P., Vocaturo, E., and Zumpano, E. (2018, January 23–25). Deep learning techniques for electronic health record analysis (2019). Proceedings of the 2018 9th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications, IISA, Zakynthos, Greece.10.1109/IISA.2018.8633647 ↗
39. Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuray of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio to Assess Coronary Stenosis Relevance: Results of ADVISE II International, Multicenter Study (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation II10.1016/j.jcin.2015.01.029 ↗
40. Clinical Relevance of Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve: Art-of-state10.4103/0366-6999.156805 ↗
41. Diagnostic Classification of the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio is Equivalent to Fractional Flow Reserve and Is Not Improved with Adenosine Administration10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.034 ↗
42. A framework for the atrial fibrillation prediction in electrophysiological studies10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.04.001 ↗
43. (2022, March 06). Comsol Multiphysics. Available online: https://www.comsol.it/.
44. Computational analysis of stenosis geometry effects on right coronary hemodynamics
45. Different Blood Flow Models in Coronary Artery Diseases: Effects on hemodynamic parameters
46. Model and Application to Support the Coronary Artery Diseases (CAD): Development and Testing10.1007/s12539-018-0311-6 ↗
47. Kukic, P., Mirabello, C., Tradigo, G., Walsh, I., Veltri, P., and Pollastri, G. (2014). Toward an accurate prediction of inter-residue distances in proteins using 2D recursive neural networks. BMC Bioinform., 5.10.1186/1471-2105-15-6 ↗