journal article·2022-02-25Open access

Antibacterial Activity and Biofilm Inhibition of New-Generation Hybrid/Fluoride-Releasing Restorative Materials

Sevil Gurgan, Uzay Koc Vural, Cansu Atalay, Herve Tassery, Ivana Miletic, Suna Sibel Gurpinar

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 5

Abstract

The antibacterial activity, and the effect of the application of additional topical fluoride on the bacterial activity, biofilm formation, and surface roughness of new-generation hybrid/fluoride-releasing materials were investigated. Two hundred and forty specimens were prepared in split Teflon molds (8 × 2 mm) from a resin composite (as negative control: G-aenial A’Chord/GC), Equia Forte HT Fil(GC), Equia Forte HT Fil+Equia Forte Coat, Riva Self-Cure (SDI), Riva Self-Cure+Equia Forte Coat, Zirconomer (Shofu), Beautifil II (Shofu), and Riva Silver (Shofu). Penicillin G,1U was used as positive control. The antibacterial activity was evaluated by the agar diffusion test immediately after the materials set using Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Lactobacillus casei (L. casei), and repeated after application of 0.20% w/w (900 ppm) topical fluoride. The biofilm formation of S. mutans on each material was quantified by crystal violet staining. Surface roughness of the specimens was measured by a profilometer. The data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis, Dunn’s, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey’s HSD tests (p < 0.05). None of the tested restorative materials showed antibacterial activity and no inhibition zones were observed after treatment of the restoratives with additional topical fluoride. There were significant differences among the groups in terms of biofilm formation (p < 0.005). Equia Forte HT Fil with and without coating showed the lowest, while Riva self-cure without coating and Zirconomer showed the highest biofilm accumulation. None of the new-generation hybrid/fluoride-releasing materials demonstrated antibacterial activity and additional topical fluoride application did not make any change. Biofilm formation of the tested materials differed. All tested materials showed different surface roughness values (p < 0.005). Characteristics and compositions of the materials seemed to be more effective than the surface roughness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Research and COVID-19 · Dental Erosion and Treatment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, 06100 Ankara, Turkey

Ecole de Médecine Dentaire de Marseille, Université d’Aix-Marseille, 13385 Marseille, France

Departments of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara University, 06560 Ankara, Turkey

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Dental caries in the second millennium10.1002/j.0022-0337.2001.65.10.tb03469.x ↗
2. Evidence concerning the medical management of caries
3. The effect of antimicrobial additives on the properties of dental glass-ionomer cements: A review10.1080/23337931.2018.1539623 ↗
4. The complex oral microflora of high-risk individuals and groups and its role in the caries process10.1111/j.1600-0528.2005.00232.x ↗
5. In vitro fluoride release and the antibacterial effect of glass ionomers containing chlorhexidine gluconate10.2341/08-20 ↗
6. Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and recharge potential of novel and traditional fluoride-releasing restorative materials: An in vitro study10.4103/JCD.JCD_338_18 ↗
7. Mechanical and biological characterization of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement containing doxycycline hyclate10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.08.009 ↗
8. Clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system: A 6-year evaluation10.1007/s00784-016-2028-4 ↗
9. Long-term fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement, a compomer, and from experimental resin composites10.1080/000163502753509482 ↗
10. A nano-CaF2-containing orthodontic cement with antibacterial and remineralization capabilities to combat enamel white spot lesions10.1016/j.jdent.2019.07.010 ↗
11. Mechanical, antibacterial and bond strength properties of nano-titanium-enriched glass ionomer cement10.1590/1678-775720140496 ↗
12. Antibacterial activity and fluoride release of glass-ionomer cement, compomer and zirconia reinforced glass-ionomer cement
13. Effect of two different tooth bleaching techniques on microhardness of giomer
14. Effects of food-simulating liquids on surface properties of giomer restoratives10.2341/11-419-L ↗
15. Inhibitory effects on selected oral bacteria of antibacterial agents incorporated in a glass ionomer cement10.1159/000069019 ↗
16. Antibacterial activity of resin adhesives, glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer in contact with dentin caries samples
17. Ion release, antimicrobial and physio-mechanical properties of glass ionomer cement containing micro or nanosized hexametaphosphate, and their effect on enamel demineralization10.1007/s00784-018-2674-9 ↗
18. Comparative assessment of antibacterial activity of different glass ionomer cements on cariogenic bacteria10.5395/rde.2016.41.4.278 ↗
19. Antibacterial effects of conventional glass ionomer cement
20. Antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer restorative cements exposed to cavity-producing microorganisms
21. Antibacterial surface properties of various fluoride-releasing restorative materials in vitro
22. Antibacterial activity of dentin bonding systems, resin-modified glass ionomers, and polyacid-modified composite resins
23. Biofilm formation on different materials used in oral rehabilitation10.1590/0103-6440201600625 ↗
24. Antibacterial activity of selected glass ionomer cements10.5604/17322693.1086069 ↗
25. Antibacterial activity and physical properties of glass-ionomer cements containing antibiotics10.2341/08-30 ↗
26. Biofilm formation and release of fluoride from dental restorative materials in relation to their surface properties10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.005 ↗
27. Effect of vital tooth bleaching on surface roughness and streptococcal biofilm formation on direct tooth-colored restorative materials10.2341/16-366-L ↗
28. Inhibitory activity of glass-ionomer cements on cariogenic bacteria
29. Antimicrobial properties of glass-ionomer cements and other restorative materials
30. Antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cements, compomers and resin composites: Relationship between acidity and material setting phase10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01300.x ↗
31. Antibacterial properties of aged dental cements evaluated by direct-contact and agar diffusion tests10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.01.008 ↗
32. Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of fluoride-releasing dental materials using a new in vitro method
33. Antibacterial activity of restorative dental biomaterials in vitro10.1159/000057867 ↗
34. Antibacterial effects of glass ionomers
35. Enhancement of fluoride release from glass ionomer cement following a coating of silver fluoride10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00452.x ↗
36. A continuous flow system for assessing fluoride release/uptake of fluoride-containing restorative materials10.1016/j.dental.2003.10.008 ↗
37. Antibacterial effects of hybrid tooth colored restorative materials against Streptococcus mutans: An in vitro analysis10.4103/0972-0707.114358 ↗
38. Fluoride release, recharge and mechanical property stability of various fluoride-containing resin composites10.2341/10-414-L ↗
39. Does recharging dental restorative materials with fluoride influence biofilm formation?10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.019 ↗
40. Does finishing and polishing of restorative materials affect bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation? A systematic review10.2341/17-073-L ↗
41. Morphology and bacterial colonisation of tooth/ceramic restoration interface after different cement excess removal techniques10.1016/j.jdent.2012.05.005 ↗
42. Fluorescence microscopic visualization and quantification of initial bacterial colonization on enamel in situ10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.05.006 ↗
43. Effect of anti-biofilm glass-ionomer cement on Streptococcus mutans biofilms10.1038/ijos.2015.55 ↗
44. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3 ↗
45. Effects of Material Properties on Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation10.1177/0022034515587690 ↗
46. The interaction of cells and bacteria with surfaces structured at the nanometre scale10.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.001 ↗