journal article·2021-12-12Open access

Wall Structure Geometry Verification Using TLS Data and BIM Model

Gabriela Bariczová, Ján Erdélyi, Richard Honti, Lukáš Tomek

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 24

Abstract

Building information modeling (BIM) represents significant progress in the field of digitalization and informatization of the construction process. The virtual model (BIM model) is the source of graphic data among other information, which are applicable for geometry verification of the building’s structures. For this purpose, data and information about the building should be collected. Comparison of the BIM model (design) with as-built 3D models enables the evaluation of the quality of the as-built structures. The most effective methods for spatial data collection are terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and close-range photogrammetry. Using both methods, measurement can result in a point cloud. The paper describes an approach for verifying the geometry of wall structures. The graphic data of designed structures are represented by the existing BIM model. The approach presented uses the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) file format from which the designed geometry is derived. The as-built models of the structures are created from point clouds. Point cloud segmentation uses a combination of regression, filtering based on local normal vectors, and curve segmentation. Consequently, the designed and the as-built models (segmented from the point cloud) are compared.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications · BIM and Construction Integration

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Surveying, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Radlinského 11, 810 05 Bratislava, Slovakia

Department of Mathematics and Descriptive Geometry, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Radlinského 11, 810 05 Bratislava, Slovakia

Funding

Slovak Research and Development Agency

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Misalignment—Can 3D BIM Overrule Professional Setting-Out According to Plane and Height?
2. How to measure the benefits of BIM—A case study approach10.1016/j.autcon.2012.02.008 ↗
3. Eastman, C. (2009). BIM Handbook, John Wiley & Sons.
4. Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.002 ↗
5. Smith, D.K., and Tardif, M. (2009). Building Information Modeling: A Strategic Implementation Guide for Architects, Engineers, Constructors, and Real Estate Asset Managers, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470432846 ↗
6. A Review of Building Information Modelling for Construction in Developing Countries10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.649 ↗
7. Building Information Modelling adoption in the European Union: An overview10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100777 ↗
8. Building Information Modeling (BIM): Trends, Benefits, Risks, and Challenges for the AEC Industry10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000127 ↗
9. Mayer, P., Funtík, T., Gašparík, J., and Makýš, P. (2021). Analysis of the Current State of Automation of Hazard Detection Processes in BIM in Slovakia. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11178130 ↗
10. Improved area-based deformation analysis of a radio telescope’s main reflector based on terrestrial laser scanning10.1515/jag-2014-0018 ↗
11. Automatic façade modelling using point cloud data for energy-efficient retrofitting10.1007/s12518-014-0129-9 ↗
12. Reality-based 3D documentation of natural and cultural heritage sites—Techniques, problems, and examples10.1007/s12518-010-0025-x ↗
13. Scan planning for existing buildings without BIM based on user-defined data quality requirements and genetic algorithm10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103841 ↗
14. A framework for in-situ geometric data acquisition using laser scanning for BIM modelling10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101073 ↗
15. Adamopoulos, E., and Rinaudo, F. (2021). Close-Range Sensing and Data Fusion for Built Heritage Inspection and Monitoring—A Review. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13193936 ↗
16. Kovanič, Ľ., Blistan, P., Urban, R., Štroner, M., Pukanská, K., Bartoš, K., and Palková, J. (2020). Analytical Determination of Geometric Parameters of the Rotary Kiln by Novel Approach of TLS Point Cloud Segmentation. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10217652 ↗
17. Comparison of 2.5D volume calculation methods and software solutions using point clouds scanned before and after mining
18. Laser scanning for BIM and results visualization using VR10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-W2-49-2019 ↗
19. A spatio-temporal deformation model for laser scanning point clouds10.1007/s00190-020-01352-0 ↗
20. Kopáčik, A., Erdélyi, J., Kyrinovič, P., Lipták, I., and Lukáč, Š. (2016). Engineering Surveys for Industry, STU in Bratislava.
21. From Point Cloud to BIM: An Integrated Workflow for Documentation, Research and Modelling of Architectural Heritage10.1080/00396265.2016.1259719 ↗
22. Scan-to-BIM vs. 3D Ideal Modela HBIM: Parametric Tools to Study Domes Geometry10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W9-219-2019 ↗
23. Pepe, M., Costantino, D., and Restuccia Garofalo, A. (2020). An Efficient Pipeline to Obtain 3D Model for HBIM and Structural Analysis Purposes from 3D Point Clouds. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10041235 ↗
24. Fully automated registration of 3D data to a 3D CAD model for project progress monitoring10.1016/j.autcon.2013.01.005 ↗
25. Chen, J., and Cho, Y.K. (2018, January 4–7). Point-to-Point Comparison Method for Automated Scan-vs-BIM Deviation Detection. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Tampere, Finland.
26. Automating surface flatness control using terrestrial laser scanning and building information models10.1016/j.autcon.2014.03.028 ↗
27. Automated progress tracking using 4D schedule and 3D sensing technologies10.1016/j.autcon.2011.10.003 ↗
28. The value of integrating Scan-to-BIM and Scan-vs-BIM techniques for construction monitoring using laser scanning and BIM: The case of cylindrical MEP com-ponents10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.014 ↗
29. Assessment of Quality of As-Is Building Information Models Generated from Point Clouds Using Deviation Analysis
30. Borrmann, A., and Stilla, U. (2015, January 15–18). Automated Progress Monitoring Based on Photogrammetric Point Clouds and Precedence Relationship Graphs. Proceedings of the 32nd ISARC, Oulu, Finland.
31. Comparison of photogrammetric point clouds with BIM building elements for construction progress monitoring10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-3-341-2014 ↗
32. IFC (2021, November 02). Industry Foundation Classes. Building SMART., Available online: https://standards.buildingsmart.org/IFC/RELEASE/IFC4/FINAL/HTML/.
33. Recognizing structure in laser scanner point clouds
34. Vosselman, M.G., and Maas, H.G. (2010). Visualization and Structuring of Point Clouds. Airborne and Terrestrial Laser Scanning, Whittles Publishing. Available online: https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/visualisation-and-structuring-of-point-clouds.
35. Nguyen, A., and Le, B. (2013, January 12–15). 3D Point Cloud Segmentation: A survey. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics (RAM), Manila, Philippines.10.1109/RAM.2013.6758588 ↗
36. A review of point clouds segmentation and classification algorithms10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W3-339-2017 ↗
37. Voxel-based segmentation of 3D point clouds from construction sites using a probabilistic connectivity model10.1016/j.patrec.2017.12.016 ↗
38. Plane segmentation from point clouds10.1556/606.2018.13.2.16 ↗
39. An automated segmentation of NATURA 2000 habitats from Sentinel-2 optical data