Deep Learning Applications in Geosciences: Insights into Ichnological Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Ichnological analysis, particularly assessing bioturbation index, provides critical parameters for characterizing many oil and gas reservoirs. It provides information on reservoir quality, paleodepositional conditions, redox conditions, and more. However, accurately characterizing ichnological characteristics requires long hours of training and practice, and many marine or marginal marine reservoirs require these specialized expertise. This adds more load to geoscientists and may cause distraction, errors, and bias, particularly when continuously logging long sedimentary successions. In order to alleviate this issue, we propose an automated technique to determine the bioturbation index in cores and outcrops by harnessing the capabilities of deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) as image classifiers. In order to find a fast and robust solution, we utilize ideas from deep learning. We compiled and labeled a large data set (1303 images) composed of images spanning the full range (BI 0–6) of bioturbation indices. We divided these images into groups based on their bioturbation indices in order to prepare training data for the DCNN. Finally, we analyzed the trained DCNN model on images and obtained high classification accuracies. This is a pioneering work in the field of ichnological analysis, as the current practice is to perform classification tasks manually by experts in the field.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Geosciences, College of Petroleum Engineering & Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
Institute of Applied Mathematics, Middle East Technical University, Ankara 06800, Turkey
ARISE, Department of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks10.1145/3065386 ↗
2. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., and Dean, J. (2013, January 5–10). Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and Their Compositionality. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, NV, USA.
3. Goodfellow, I.J., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y. (2014, January 8–13). Generative Adversarial Nets. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada.
4. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (2014). Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. arXiv.
5. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A., Kaiser, L., and Polosukhin, I. (2017, January 4–9). Attention Is All You Need. Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA.
6. Machine learning application to automatically classify heavy minerals in river sand by using sem/eds data10.1016/j.mineng.2019.105899 ↗
7. Value of geologically derived features in machine learning facies classification10.1007/s11004-019-09838-0 ↗
8. Volcano video data characterized and classified using computer vision and machine learning algorithms10.1016/j.gsf.2020.01.016 ↗
9. Convolutional neural networks as aid in core lithofacies classification10.1190/INT-2018-0245.1 ↗
10. Bromley, R.G. (1996). Trace Fossils: Biology, Taphonomy and Applications, Chapman and Hall. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-1-4899-2875-7 ↗
11. MacEachern, J.A., Bann, K.L., Gingras, M.K., and Pemberton, S.G. (2007). A Conceptual Framework for the Application of Trace Fossils. Applied ichnology, SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology).10.2110/pec.07.52 ↗
12. MacEachern, J.A., Bann, K.L., Gingras, M.K., and Pemberton, S.G. (2007). The Ichnofacies Paradigm: High-Resolution Paleoenvironmental Interpretation of the Rock Record. Applied ichnology, SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology).10.2110/pec.07.52.0027 ↗
13. Knaust, D., and Bromley, R.G. (2012). Marine Invertebrate Neoichnology. Developments in Sedimentology, Elsevier.
14. Knaust, D., and Bromley, R.G. (2012). Estuaries. Developments in Sedimentology, Elsevier.
15. Knaust, D., and Bromley, R.G. (2012). The Ichnofacies Paradigm. Developments in Sedimentology, Elsevier.
16. A quantitative assessment of the neoichnology and biology of a delta front and prodelta, and implications for delta ichnology10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.05.013 ↗
17. The phycosiphon ichnofacies and the rosselia ichnofacies: Two new ichnofacies for marine deltaic environments10.2110/jsr.2020.41 ↗
18. Description and analysis of bioturbation and ichnofabric10.1144/gsjgs.150.1.0141 ↗
19. Unburrowed mudstones may record only slightly lowered oxygen conditions in warm, shallow basins10.1130/G37648.1 ↗
20. Sedimentological and ichnological characterization of the middle to upper devonian horn river group, british columbia, canada: Insights into mudstone depositional conditions and processes below storm wave base10.2110/jsr.2017.76 ↗
21. Classification and unsupervised clustering of ligo data with deep transfer learning10.1103/PhysRevD.97.101501 ↗
22. Highly-accurate machine fault diagnosis using deep transfer learning10.1109/TII.2018.2864759 ↗
23. Automatic velocity analysis using convolutional neural network and transfer learning10.1190/geo2018-0870.1 ↗
24. Autonomous martian rock image classification based on transfer deep learning methods10.1007/s12145-019-00433-9 ↗
25. Fighting Together against the Pandemic: Learning Multiple Models on Tomography Images for COVID-19 Diagnosis10.3390/ai2020016 ↗