Assessment of a Location-Based Mobile Augmented-Reality Game by Adult Users with the ARCS Model
Source abstract
Abstract
In mobile augmented reality (MAR) games, learning by doing is important to supplement the theoretical knowledge with practical exercise in order to maximize the learning outcome. However, in many fields, the users are not able to apply their knowledge in practical ways, despite having achieved a good understanding of the theoretical fundamentals and this is even more important to adult learners. The aim of this research is to examine young, middle-aged and elderly adults’ opinions about the location-based MAR game Ingress, by applying John Keller’s “ARCS learning motivation model” (Attention, Relevance, Confidence and Satisfaction). The users’ responses to closed questions related to Ingress were collected from 45 adult players aged 20–60 from Greece and were subsequently analyzed by means of pre- and post-quantitative measures of the four ARCS factors. The results show that: (a) game training improves all the factors of ARCS, primarily attention and satisfaction; (b) the responses of young people (20–35) agree more with those of elderly adults (>52) than with those of the intermediate age group of 36–51. Our findings, therefore, highlight the potential and the applicability of the ARCS model in MAR games.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Augmented Reality Applications · Educational Games and Gamification · Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Education, University of Cordoba, C\San Alberto Magno, S/N, 14071 Cordoba, Spain
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. A survey of augmented reality10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355 ↗
2. Video gaming to be twice as big as music by 2011
3. Ash, J. (2015). The Interface Envelope: Gaming, Technology, Power, Bloomsbury Publishing.
4. The space of flows
5. Fernández-Enríquez, R., and Delgado-Martín, L. (2020). Augmented Reality as a Didactic Resource for Teaching Mathematics. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10072560 ↗
6. Bueno, S., Gallego, M.D., and Noyes, J. (2020). Uses and Gratifications on Augmented Reality Games: An Examination of Pokemon Go. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10051644 ↗
7. De Souza e Silva, A., and Sheller, M. (2014). Mobility and Locative Media: Mobile Communication in Hybrid Spaces, Routledge.10.4324/9781315772226 ↗
8. Yamu, C., Poplin, A., Devisch, O., and de Roo, G. (2017). New ways of conditioning space and place in the dynamic and transformative environments: Liaising between the worlds of matter and the virtual. The Virtual and the Real in Planning and Urban Design: Perspectives, Practices and Applications, Routledge.
9. Hybrid reality and location-based gaming: Redefining mobility and game spaces in urban environments10.1177/1046878108314643 ↗
10. Playful urban spaces: A historical approach to mobile games10.1177/1046878109333723 ↗
11. Location-based mobile games for spatial knowledge acquisition
12. Colley, A., Thebault-Spieker, J., Lin, A.Y., Degraen, D., Fischman, B., Häkkilä, J., Kuehl, K., Nisi, V., Nunes, N.J., and Wenig, N. (2017, January 6–11). The geography of Pokémon GO: Beneficial and problematic effects on places and movement. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, CO, USA.10.1145/3025453.3025495 ↗
13. Pokémon GO: Mobile media play, place-making, and the digital wayfarer10.1177/2050157916680015 ↗
14. Paras, B., and Bizzocchi, J. (2005, January 16–20). Game, Motivation, and Effective Learning: An Integrated Model for Educational Game Design. Proceedings of the DiGRA 2005 Conference: Changing Views Worlds in Play, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
15. Targeting motivation—adapting flow theory to instructional design10.2190/UJ04-T5YB-YFXE-0BG2 ↗
16. Small, R.V. (1997). Motivation in Instructional Design. ERIC Digest, ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology.
17. Motivational design of instruction
18. Chang, Y.S., Hu, K.J., Chiang, C.W., and Lugmayr, A. (2020). Applying Mobile Augmented Reality (AR) to teach Interior Design students in layout plans: Evaluation of learning effectiveness based on the ARCS Model of learning motivation theory. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20010105 ↗
19. Lin, H.C.K., Lin, Y.H., Wang, T.H., Su, L.K., and Huang, Y.M. (2021). Effects of Incorporating Augmented Reality into a Board Game for High School Students’ Learning Motivation and Acceptance in Health Education. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13063333 ↗
20. Enhancing Student Motivation with use of Augmented Reality for Interactive Learning in Engineering Education10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.127 ↗
21. Hamzah, W.A.F.W., Ali, N.H., Saman, M.Y.M., Yusoff, M.H., and Yacob, A. (2014, January 2–5). Enhancement of the ARCS model for gamification of learning. Proceedings of the 2014 3rd International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr), Shah Alam, Malaysia.10.1109/IUSER.2014.7002718 ↗
22. Schmidt, J.T. (2007). Preparing Students for Success in Blended Learning Environments: Future Oriented Motivation and Self-Regulation. [Ph.D. Thesis, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich].
23. Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002 ↗
24. Gómez-Galán, J., Vázquez-Cano, E., Luque de la Rosa, A., and López-Meneses, E. (2020). Socio-educational impact of Augmented Reality (AR) in sustainable learning ecologies: A semantic modeling approach. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12219116 ↗
25. Applying augmented reality in engineering education to improve academic performance & student motivation
26. Karpashevich, P., Hornecker, E., Dankwa, N.K., Hanafy, M., and Fietkau, J. (2016, January 12–15). Blurring boundaries between everyday life and pervasive gaming: An interview study of ingress. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, Rovaniemi, FL, USA.10.1145/3012709.3012716 ↗
27. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Routledge.
28. New effect size rules of thumb
29. Huang, D.W., Diefes-Dux, H., Imbrie, P.K., Daku, B., and Kallimani, J.G. (, January 20–23). Learning motivation evaluation for a computer-based instructional tutorial using ARCS model of motivational design. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, FIE 2004, Savannah, GA, USA.
30. Motivation in cyber learning environments
31. Montola, M. (2005, January 18–21). Exploring the edge of the magic circle: Defining pervasive games. Proceedings of the DAC, Shanghai, China.
32. The digital skin of cities: Urban theory and research in the age of the sensored and metered city, ubiquitous computing and big data10.1093/cjres/rsu021 ↗
33. Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y ↗
34. The Hybrid Space of Collaborative Location-Based Mobile Games and the City: A Case Study of Ingress10.17645/up.v5i4.3487 ↗
35. Fragoso, S., and Reis, B.M.S. (2016, January 15–17). Ludic Re-enchantment and the power of locative games: A case study of the game Ingress. Proceedings of the International Conference on Culture, Technology, and Communication, London, UK.10.1007/978-3-319-50109-3_9 ↗
36. Impact of privacy, trust and user activity on intentions to share Facebook photos10.1108/JICES-06-2015-0022 ↗
37. How players across gender and age experience Pokémon Go?10.1007/s10209-019-00694-7 ↗
38. The ‘privacy paradox’in the social web: The impact of privacy concerns, individual characteristics, and the perceived social relevance on different forms of self-disclosure10.1111/jcc4.12052 ↗
39. The effects of aging on the use of handheld augmented reality in a route planning task10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.003 ↗
40. Adult perception toward videogames and physical activity using Pokémon Go10.1089/g4h.2018.0100 ↗
41. Video games make people violent—Well, maybe not that game: Effects of content and person abstraction on perceptions of violent video games’ effects and support of censorship10.1080/08934210902798536 ↗
42. Are associations between “sexist” video games and decreased empathy toward women robust? A reanalysis of Gabbiadini et al. 201610.1007/s10964-017-0700-x ↗
43. Electronic gaming and psychosocial adjustment10.1542/peds.2013-4021 ↗
44. “Who over 65 is online?” Older adults’ dispositions toward information communication technology10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.018 ↗
45. Old Dogs, New Clicks: Digital Inequality in Skills and Uses among Older Adults10.22230/cjc.2017v42n2a3176 ↗
46. Understanding why scholars hold different views on the influences of video games on public health10.1111/jcom.12293 ↗
47. Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design10.1007/BF02905780 ↗