Show source-provided references
2. Munkhdalai, L., Munkhdalai, T., Namsrai, O.E., Lee, J.Y., and Ryu, K.H. (2019). An empirical comparison of machine-learning methods on bank client credit assessments. Sustainability, 11.
10.3390/su11030699 ↗3. Demajo, L.M., Vella, V., and Dingli, A. (2020). Explainable AI for Interpretable Credit Scoring. arXiv.
10.5121/csit.2020.101516 ↗5. Explainable artificial intelligence: A survey
6. Modarres, C., Ibrahim, M., Louie, M., and Paisley, J. (2018). Towards explainable deep learning for credit lending: A case study. arXiv.
7. Advanced neural network approach, its explanation with lime for credit scoring application
9. On the suitability of resampling techniques for the class imbalance problem in credit scoring
10.1057/jors.2012.120 ↗10. A novel approach to define the local region of dynamic selection techniques in imbalanced credit scoring problems
10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113351 ↗12. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.
10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗16. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Sigkdd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.
10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗17. The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain
10.1037/h0042519 ↗18. Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree
19. Dorogush, A.V., Ershov, V., and Gulin, A. (2018). CatBoost: Gradient boosting with categorical features support. arXiv.
20. Arik, S.O., and Pfister, T. (2019). Tabnet: Attentive interpretable tabular learning. arXiv.
24. Classification methods applied to credit scoring: Systematic review and overall comparison
29. Munkhdalai, L., Lee, J.Y., and Ryu, K.H. (2020). A Hybrid Credit Scoring Model Using Neural Networks and Logistic Regression. Advances in Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing, Springer.
10.1007/978-981-13-9714-1_27 ↗30. Making machine learning models interpretable
32. Study on Credit Scoring Model and Forecasting Based on Probabilistic Neural Network
33. Partial logistic artificial neural network for competing risks regularized with automatic relevance determination
10.1109/TNN.2009.2023654 ↗38. A new deep learning ensemble credit risk evaluation model with an improved synthetic minority oversampling technique
10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106852 ↗41. Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). “Why should i trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.
10.1145/2939672.2939778 ↗42. Lundberg, S., and Lee, S.I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv.
43. Torrent, N.L., Visani, G., and Bagli, E. (2020). PSD2 Explainable AI Model for Credit Scoring. arXiv.
44. Munkhdalai, L., Munkhdalai, T., and Ryu, K.H. (2020). A locally adaptive interpretable regression. arXiv.
46. (2021, January 24). FICO Explainable Machine Learning Challenge. Available online: https://community.fico.com/community/xml.
47. Dash, S., Günlük, O., and Wei, D. (2018). Boolean decision rules via column generation. arXiv.
48. Machine learning explainability in finance: An application to default risk analysis
49. Softmax regression based deep sparse autoencoder network for facial emotion recognition in human-robot interaction
10.1016/j.ins.2017.10.044 ↗50. Asuncion, A., and Newman, D. (2021, January 24). UCI Machine Learning Repository. Available online: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/index.php.
52. He, H., Bai, Y., Garcia, E.A., and Li, S. (2008, January 1–8). ADASYN: Adaptive synthetic sampling approach for imbalanced learning. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Hong Kong, China.