Survivability of a Pipeline with a Surface Crack Taking into Account Biaxial Constraint of Deformations Along Its Front
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A method for assessing the survivability of a pipeline with a longitudinal surface semi-elliptical normal separation crack, located away from a transverse weld, taking into account biaxial strain restraint along its front, is proposed. At present there are no publications that predict the growth of such a crack while accounting for the Txx and Tzz stresses, which are the non‑singular terms in the Williams expansion for stresses at the crack front in three‑dimensional bodies. For simulation of fatigue crack growth a modified Paris law was used, in which the range of the conventional stress intensity factor (SIF) is replaced by the range of an effective SIF. In the expression for the effective SIF, in addition to the conventional SIF, the Txx and Tzz stresses are included. The proposed two‑parameter approach allows one to account for deformation constraint in the crack plane: in the direction normal to the front, by introducing Txx stresses into the expression for the effective SIF, and in the longitudinal direction, by introducing Tzz stresses. The expression for the effective SIF was previously obtained by the authors by refining the maximum tangential stress failure criterion. It is assumed that the tangential stresses in the pre‑failure zone are equal to the local strength of the material. The size of the pre‑failure zone and the local material strength are determined taking Txx and Tzz stresses into account. Numerical simulation was performed in the finite‑element environment ANSYS Workbench. To build the finite‑element model in the vicinity of the crack front, degenerated 15‑node wedge singular elements derived from SOLID186 were used; these have a built‑in capability to compute the SIF and Txxstresses. A special APDL macro was developed to compute the Tzz stresses and the effective SIF along the crack front. It is shown that the traditional single‑parameter approach based on the Paris law does not allow one to account for biaxial deformation constraint when assessing pipeline survivability, since, unlike the effective SIF, the conventional SIF for a longitudinal semi‑elliptical crack depends only on the circumferential stresses. It was established that for surface cracks of the same initial depth, increasing the half‑length reduces the pipeline life. Moreover, the life predicted using the standard single‑parameter Paris law is approximately 30% lower than that obtained from the two‑parameter analysis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Paris, P. and Erdogan, F., A critical analysis of crack propagation laws, J. Basic Eng., 1963, vol. 85, pp. 528–533.10.1115/1.3656900 ↗
2. Walker, K., The effect of stress ratio during crack propagation and fatigue for 2024-T3 and 7075-T6 aluminum, in Effects of Environment and Complex Load History on Fatigue Life, Proceedings of the 1968 Symposium, Vol. 462 of ASTM Special Technical Publications, PA, USA: ASTM, 1970, pp. 1–14.10.1520/STP32032S ↗
3. Forman, R.G., Kearney, V.E., and Engle, R.M., Numerical analysis of crack propagation in cyclic-loaded structures, J. Basic Eng., 1967, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 459–463.10.1115/1.3609637 ↗
4. Kujawski, D., A new (ΔK + K max)0.5 driving force parameter for crack growth in aluminum alloys, Int. J. Fatigue, 2001, vol. 23, pp. 733–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-1123(01)00023-810.1016/s0142-1123(01)00023-8 ↗
5. Fonte, M.A., Stanzl-Tschegg, S.E., Holper, B., et al., The microstructure and environment influence on fatigue crack growth in 7049 aluminum alloy at different load ratios, Int. J. Fatigue, 2001, vol. 23, pp. S311–S317. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-1123(01)00179-710.1016/s0142-1123(01)00179-7 ↗
6. Sadananda, K. and Vasudevan, A.K., Fatigue crack growth mechanisms in steels, Int. J. Fatigue, 2003, vol. 25, pp. 899–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-1123(03)00128-210.1016/s0142-1123(03)00128-2 ↗
7. Dinda, S. and Kujawski, D., Correlation and prediction of fatigue crack growth for different R-ratios using Kmax and ΔK+ parameters, Eng. Fracture Mech., 2004, vol. 71, pp. 1779–1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2003.06.00110.1016/j.engfracmech.2003.06.001 ↗
8. Sadananda, K. and Vasudevan, A.K., Multiple mechanisms controlling fatigue crack growth, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2003, vol. 26, pp. 835–845. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00684.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00684.x ↗
9. Savkin, A.N., Badikov, K.A., and Sedov, A.A., Modeling and calculation of fatigue crack growth time in structural steels, Zavod. Lab. Diagn. Mater., 2021, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 43–51. https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2021-87-5-43-5110.26896/1028-6861-2021-87-5-43-51 ↗
10. Nejad, R.M., Tohidi, M., Darbandi, A.J., et al., Experimental and numerical investigation of fatigue crack growth behavior and optimizing fatigue life of riveted joints in Al-alloy 2024 plates, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 2020, vol. 108, p. 102669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10266910.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102669 ↗
11. Sajith, S., Shukla, S.S., Murthy K.S.R.K., and Robi, P.S., Mixed mode fatigue crack growth studies in AISI 316 stainless steel, Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids, 2020, vol. 80, p. 103898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.10389810.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.103898 ↗
12. Tumanov, N.V., Vorobyova, N.A., Kalashnikova, A.I., et al., Computational and fractographic studies of stable growth of low-cycle fatigue cracks in an aircraft engine turbine disk under complex loading cycles, Zavod. Lab. Diagn. Mater., 2021, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 52–60. https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2021-87-4-52-6010.26896/1028-6861-2021-87-4-52-60 ↗
13. Fedorov, A.A., Razumovsky, I.A., and Matvienko, Yu.G., Local indentation as a way to reduce fatigue crack growth rate, Zavod. Lab. Diagn. Mater., 2022, vol. 88, no. 11, pp. 46–54. https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2022-88-11-46-5410.26896/1028-6861-2022-88-11-46-54 ↗
14. Brahami, F., Bouchouicha, B., Zemri, M., et al., Fatigue crack growth rate, microstructure and mechanical properties of diverse range of aluminum alloy: A comparison, Mech. Mech. Eng., 2018, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 329–339. https://doi.org/10.2478/mme-2018-002810.2478/mme-2018-0028 ↗
15. Veselukha, V.M., Shishkin, A.E., and Bogdanovich, A.V., Assessment of the survivability of pipes of the linear section of an oil pipeline with a longitudinal semi-elliptical crack taking into account long-term operation, Mekh. Mash. Mekhanizm. Mater., 2014, no. 3, pp. 53–58.
16. Pokrovsky, A.M. and Dubovitsky, E.I., Analysis of the survivability of a main oil pipeline in the butt weld zone, Inzh. Zh. Nauka Innov., 2021, vol. 112, no. 4. https://doi.org/10.18698/2308-6033-2021-4-206910.18698/2308-6033-2021-4-2069 ↗
17. Matvienko, Yu.G., Dvukhparametricheskaya mekhanika razrusheniya (Two-Parametric Fracture Mechanics), Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2020.
18. Williams, M.L., On the stress distribution at the base of a stationary crack, J. Appl. Mech., 1957, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.401145410.1115/1.4011454 ↗
19. Roychowdhury, S. and Dodds, R.H., Jr., Effect of T‑stress on fatigue crack closure in 3-D small-scale yielding, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2004, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 2581–2606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.11.00410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.11.004 ↗
20. Hamam, R., Pommier, S., and Bumbieler, F., Mode I fatigue crack growth under biaxial loading, Int. J. Fatigue, 2005, vol. 27, pp. 1342–1346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.02010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.020 ↗
21. Chernyatin, A.S., Matvienko, Yu.G., and Razumovsky, I.A., Fatigue surface crack propagation and intersecting cracks in connection with welding residual stresses, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2018, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 2140–2152. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.1280810.1111/ffe.12808 ↗
22. Varshitsky, V.M., Valiev, M.I., and Kozyrev, O.A., Methodology for determining the interval of repeated tests of an oil pipeline section with crack-like defects, Nauka Tekhnol. Truboprov. Transp. Nefti Nefteprod., 2013, no. 3, pp. 42–46.
23. Pokrovskii, A.M., Matvienko, Yu.G., and Egranov, M.P., Prediction of the durability of a plate with a through crack taking into account biaxial constraints of deformations along the front of a normal rupture crack, Inorg. Mater., 2024, vol. 60, no. 15, pp. 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1134/s002016852470024910.1134/s0020168524700249 ↗
24. Pokrovsky, A.M. and Matvienko, Yu.G., Fracture criterion with biaxial constraints of deformations along the front of a normal rupture crack, J. Mach. Manuf. Reliab., 2023, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 320–328. https://doi.org/10.3103/s105261882304010610.3103/s1052618823040106 ↗
25. Pokrovsky, A.M. and Egranov, M.P., Two-parameter fracture criterion for a normal rupture crack, Inzh. Zh. Nauka Obrazov., 2022, vol. 127, no. 7. https://doi.org/10.18698/2308-6033-2022-7-219110.18698/2308-6033-2022-7-2191 ↗
26. Nakamura, T. and Parks, D.M., Determination of elastic T-stress along three-dimensional crack front an interaction integral, Int. J. Solids Struct., 1992, vol. 29, pp. 1597–1611. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(92)90011-h10.1016/0020-7683(92)90011-h ↗