journal article·2022-08-01Open access

Rate of Penetration Prediction Method for Ultra-Deep Wells Based on LSTM–FNN

Hongtao Liu, Yan Jin, Xianzhi Song, Zhijun Pei

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 15

Abstract

The drilling process is complex, especially for ultra-deep wells, which face the problems of high temperature, high pressure and poor drilling resistance in their formation. In order to establish an ROP (the Rate of Penetration) prediction model for ultra-deep wells, the characteristics of ultra-deep well drilling operations, such as formation temperature and formation pressure, are fully considered in the process of parameter optimization. Combined with the drilling mechanism and mutual information correlation coefficient, the final input parameters are determined. The powerful nonlinear fitting ability of the artificial intelligence method is very suitable for predicting the ROP. Considering the time sequence of multi-source data, this paper combines the powerful timing information-based mining ability of the LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network) with the nonlinear fitting ability of FNN (Fully Connected Neural Network), and establishes an intelligent prediction model of the ROP based on a LSTM–FNN. The results show that the average relative error and R2 of the LSTM–FNN model on the data of well 1 and well 2 are better than the FNN and LSTM models. In addition, the accuracy of the LSTM–FNN model on the data of adjacent wells is reduced by only 5%, which further verifies the good mobility of the model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Oil and Gas Production Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, Beijing 102249, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · China National Petroleum Corporation · China University of petroleum, Beijing

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Predicting rate of penetration during drilling of deep geothermal well in Korea using artificial neural networks and real-time data collection10.1016/j.jngse.2019.05.004 ↗
2. Zhou, F., Fan, H., Liu, Y., Ye, Y., Diao, H., Wang, Z., Rached, R., Tu, Y., and Davio, E. (2022, January 21–23). Application of Xgboost Algorithm in Rate of Penetration Prediction with Accuracy. Proceedings of the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.10.2523/IPTC-22100-MS ↗
3. Zhang, H., Lu, B., Liao, L., Bao, H., Wang, Z., Hou, X., Mulunjkar, A., and Jin, X. (2021, January 25–27). Combining Machine Learning and Classic Drilling Theories to Improve Rate of Penetration Prediction. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.10.2118/202202-MS ↗
4. Prediction of rock penetration rate using a novel antlion optimized ANN and statistical modelling10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2021.104287 ↗
5. Elmgerbi, A.M., Ettinger, C.P., Tekum, P.M., Thonhauser, G., and Nascimento, A. (2021, January 25–27). Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Real Time Rate of Penetration Optimization. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.10.2118/202184-MS ↗
6. Comparison of accuracy and computational performance between the machine learning algorithms for rate of penetration in directional drilling well
7. Hegde, C., Wallace, S., and Gray, K. (2015, January 15–16). Using Trees, Bagging, and Random Forests to Predict Rate of Penetration During Drilling. Proceedings of the SPE Middle East Intelligent Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.10.2118/176792-MS ↗
8. Is Support Vector Regression method suitable for predicting rate of penetration?10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107542 ↗
9. Abdulmalek, A.S., Salaheldin, E., Abdulazeez, A., Mohammed, M., Abdulwahab, Z.A., and Mohamed, I.M. (2018, January 23–26). Prediction of Rate of Penetration of Deep and Tight Formation Using Support Vector Machine. Proceedings of the SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.10.2118/192316-MS ↗
10. Amadi, K., Iyalla, I., and Prabhu, R. (2021, January 1–3). Modeling and Predicting Performance of Autonomous Rotary Drilling System Using Machine Learning Techniques. Proceedings of the SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Lagos, Nigeria.10.2118/208450-MS ↗
11. Mahmoud, A.A., Elkatatny, S., Al-AbdulJabbar, A., Moussa, T., Gamal, H., and Shehri, D.A. (July, January 28). Artificial Neural Networks Model for Prediction of the Rate of Penetration While Horizontally Drilling Carbonate Formations. Proceedings of the 54th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Golden, CO, USA.
12. Al-AbdulJabbar, A., Elkatatny, S., Mahmoud, M., and Abdulraheem, A. (2018, January 23–26). Predicting Rate of Penetration Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques. Proceedings of the SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.10.2118/192343-MS ↗
13. Aliyev, R., and Paul, D. (2019, January 23–26). A Novel Application of Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Rate of Penetration. Proceedings of the SPE Western Regional Meeting, San Jose, CA, USA.10.2118/195268-MS ↗
14. Negara, A., and Saad, B. (2020, January 13–15). Combining Insight from Physics-Based Models into Data-Driven Model for Predicting Drilling Rate of Penetration. Proceedings of the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.10.2523/IPTC-20090-MS ↗
15. Real-time predictive capabilities of analytical and machine learning rate of penetration (ROP) models10.1016/j.petrol.2018.08.083 ↗
16. Diaz, M.B., Kim, K.Y., and Shin, H.S. (2017, January 10–12). On-Line Prediction Model for Rate of Penetration (ROP) With Cumulating Field Data in Real Time. Proceedings of the 4th ISRM Young Scholars Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Jeju, Korea.
17. Hong, Y., Yoo, J., Wang, S., and Yoon, S. (2020, January 2–6). Augmented Machine Learning Approach of Rate of Penetration Prediction for North Sea Oilfield. Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference Asia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.4043/30184-MS ↗
18. Data-driven recurrent neural network model to predict the rate of penetration10.1016/j.upstre.2021.100047 ↗
19. Li, Y., and Samuel, R. (2019, January 5–7). Prediction of Penetration Rate Ahead of the Bit through Real-Time Updated Machine Learning Models. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC International Drilling Conference and Exhibition, The Hague, The Netherlands.10.2118/194105-MS ↗
20. Alkinani, H.H., Al-Hameedi, A.T., Dunn-Norman, S., Flori, R.E., Al-Alwani, M.A., and Mutar, R.A. (2019, January 23–26). Dynamic Neural Network Model to Predict the Rate of Penetration Prior to Drilling. Proceedings of the 53rd U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, New York, NY, USA.
21. Hybrid ensemble soft computing approach for predicting penetration rate of tunnel boring machine in a rock environment10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.06.015 ↗
22. Li, C., and Cheng, C. (2020, January 9–12). Prediction and Optimization of Rate of Penetration using a Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Method based on an Improved Genetic Algorithm and Artificial Neural Network. Proceedings of the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.10.2118/203229-MS ↗
23. Elkatatny, S. (2018, January 23–26). Rate of Penetration Prediction Using Self-Adaptive Differential Evolution-Artificial Neural Network. Proceedings of the SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.10.2118/192186-MS ↗
24. Amadi, K.W., Iyalla, I., Liu, Y., Alsaba, M., and Kuten, D. (2021, January 25–27). Evaluation of Derived Controllable Variables for Predicting Rop Using Artificial Intelligence in Autonomous Downhole Rotary Drilling System. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.10.2118/202191-MS ↗
25. Adetifa, O., Iyalla, I., and Amadi, K. (2021, January 1–3). Comparative Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Models for Drilling Rate of Penetration Prediction. Proceedings of the SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Lagos, Nigeria.10.2118/208451-MS ↗
26. Zhu, S., Song, X., Zhu, Z., Yao, X., and Liu, M. (2022). Intelligent Prediction of Stuck Pipe Using Combined Data-Driven and Knowledge-Driven Model. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12105282 ↗
27. Long Short-Term Memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
28. Learning to Forget: Continual Prediction with LSTM10.1162/089976600300015015 ↗