journal article·2024-03-01Open access

Climate Change and the Textile Industry: The Carbon Footprint of Dyes

Xin Li, Lisha Zhu, Xuemei Ding, Xiongying Wu, Laili Wang

AATCC Journal of Research· Volume 11· Issue 2

Abstract

Dyes play an important role in textile production, but their contribution to air pollution and harming human health have raised concerns and remain an international problem. The key to overcoming this challenge is to assess how much greenhouse gases are being generated and the hotspots which guide decision-making process toward more sustainable options. This article established a carbon footprint calculation method for disperse dyes. First, the system boundary description and the functional unit were discussed. Second, the carbon footprint inventory analysis was determined. What’s more, the calculation method, allocation method and emission factors were proposed. It was intended to be practical and effective based on three typical disperse dyes in China. The results showed that the carbon footprints of Disperse Blue 79, Disperse Red 167, and Disperse Orange 61 corresponded to 8.28 t CO 2 eq/t, 8.07 t CO 2 eq/t, and 7.48 t CO 2 eq/t, respectively. For the three disperse dyes, the carbon emissions of dispersing agent melamine-formaldehyde resin and liquid ammonia consumption were the dominant emission sources. The steam and electricity were the two major sources of carbon emissions caused by energy usage. The homogenization and the wastewater treatment process were the two largest emission emitters. The sensitivity analysis showed that the total product carbon footprint was mostly sensitive to dispersing agent melamine-formaldehyde resin changes, followed by steam, liquid ammonia, and electricity. The results show that disperse dye production have great potential for improvement. The reduction options for the emissions of the disperse dyes production can be concluded by the optimization of the production process and technology for dispersing agent melamine-formaldehyde resin, liquid ammonia, electricity, and steam. Through the calculation, the influencing factors for the carbon footprint can be analyzed and highlighted. The method provides a comprehensive understanding of environmental impacts with dyes, driving the adoption of sustainable dyeing practices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Environmental Sustainability in Business · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Fashion Design and Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China

College of Textile Science and Engineering (International Institute of Silk), Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China

College of Fashion & Design, Donghua University, Shanghai, China

Shanghai International Institute of Design & Innovation, Shanghai, China

Key Laboratory of Clothing Design & Technology, Donghua University, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China

Shanghai Customs District P.R. China, Shanghai, China

Zhejiang Provincial Innovation Center of Advanced Textile Technology, Shaoxing, China

Funding

Hangzhou Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project · Shanghai Science and Technology Committee · Science Foundation of Zhejiang SciTech University · Soft Science Research Project of Zhejiang Provincial Innovation Center of Advanced Textile Technology

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s43247-021-00118-610.1038/s43247-021-00118-6 ↗
2. 10.1088/1755-1315/399/1/01206510.1088/1755-1315/399/1/012065 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.seta.2017.02.01710.1016/j.seta.2017.02.017 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.10405410.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104054 ↗
5. 10.3390/polym1301013410.3390/polym13010134 ↗
6. 10.1007/s43615-022-00238-x.10.1007/s43615-022-00238-x. ↗
7. 10.3390/app1114625510.3390/app11146255 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.06.00210.1016/j.dyepig.2018.06.002 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.13610.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.136 ↗
10. 10.1007/s12221-019-1208-710.1007/s12221-019-1208-7 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.24910.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.249 ↗
12. 10.3390/su1414867010.3390/su14148670 ↗
13. 10.1002/csr.219310.1002/csr.2193 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.18110.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.181 ↗
15. WBCSD and WRI. Product life cycle accounting and reporting standard, 2011. https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards/Product-Life-Cycle-Accounting-Reporting-Standard_041613.pdf
16. BSI. PAS 2050: Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services, 2011. https://www.zemo.org.uk/assets/workingdocuments/PAS%202050%20Second%20Draft%20V%203.1%20_18_02_08_%20FINAL%20-%20RP%20circulation.pdf.
17. ISO. ISO 14067: 2013 Greenhouse gases—Carbon footprint of products—Requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication, 2018. https://www.iso.org/standard/59521.html
18. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.02810.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.028 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.10672510.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106725 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12585910.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125859 ↗
21. Ehrenberger S. Carbon footprint of magnesium production and its use in transport applications, 2020. https://elib.dlr.de/140926/1/2020-10-30_IMA_LCA-Study_Report_Update.pdf
22. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13800310.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138003 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.15210.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.152 ↗
24. Zhou Y · Int Counc Clean Transp · 2020 · 1 · 31
25. 10.3390/su1116447110.3390/su11164471 ↗
26. 10.1177/1558925021102038710.1177/15589250211020387 ↗
27. 10.1504/IJGW.2021.11835510.1504/IJGW.2021.118355 ↗
28. Liu S · Fibres Text East Eur · 2022 · 151 · 1
29. 10.3993/jfbim0026210.3993/jfbim00262 ↗
30. 10.14504/ajr.8.6.610.14504/ajr.8.6.6 ↗
31. 10.15244/pjoes/13320910.15244/pjoes/133209 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.13004210.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130042 ↗
33. 10.1186/s42825-020-00035-y10.1186/s42825-020-00035-y ↗
34. 10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.05110.1016/j.procir.2020.01.051 ↗
35. 10.5604/01.3001.0014.823510.5604/01.3001.0014.8235 ↗
36. Murugesh KB · J Text Apparel Technol Manage · 2013 · 8 · 1
37. Muthu SS · 57
38. 10.1016/j.spc.2015.12.00110.1016/j.spc.2015.12.001 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.chnaes.2015.09.00210.1016/j.chnaes.2015.09.002 ↗
40. IPCC. Chapter 6: Wastewater treatment and discharge. In: IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, 2006. https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/5_Volume5/V5_6_Ch6_Wastewater.pdf.
41. 10.1039/D0EE01530J10.1039/D0EE01530J ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.09310.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.093 ↗
43. Xin D · Environ Sci Technol · 2015 · 38 · 262
44. Li X. · 2014
45. National Development and Reform Commission, People’s Republic of China: China Regional Power Grids Baseline Emission Factors for 2015, 2016. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/ydqhbh/wsqtkz/201812/W020181221519282218265.pdf
46. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10766510.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107665 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.promfg.2016.12.04610.1016/j.promfg.2016.12.046 ↗
48. Saltelli A · 2008
49. 10.2352/ISSN.2169-4672.2007.1.0.1010.2352/ISSN.2169-4672.2007.1.0.10 ↗