Application of Hydrochar, Digestate, and Synthetic Fertilizer to a Miscanthus x giganteus Crop: Implications for Biomass and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Source abstract
Abstract
Miscanthus x giganteus (miscanthus), a perennial biomass crop, allocates more carbon belowground and typically has lower soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions than conventional feedstock crops, but best practices for nutrient management that maximize yield while minimizing soil GHG emissions are still debated. This study evaluated the effects of four different fertilization treatments (digestate from a biodigester, synthetic fertilizer (urea), hydrochar from the hydrothermal carbonization of digestate, and a control) on soil GHG emissions and biomass yield of an established miscanthus stand grown on abandoned agricultural land. Soil GHG fluxes (including CH4, CO2, and N2O) were sampled in all treatments using the static chamber methodology. Average biomass yield varied from 20.2 Mg ha−1 to 23.5 Mg ha−1, but there were no significant differences among the four treatments (p > 0.05). The hydrochar treatment reduced mean CO2 emissions by 34% compared to the control treatment, but this difference was only statistically significant in one of the two sites tested. Applying digestate to miscanthus resulted in a CH4 efflux from the soil in one of two sites, while soils treated with urea and hydrochar acted as CH4 sinks in both sites. Overall, fertilization did not significantly improve biomass yield, but hydrochar as a soil amendment has potential for reducing soil GHG fluxes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bioenergy crop production and management · Biofuel production and bioconversion · Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Environmental Studies Program, Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs, Ohio University, The Ridges, Building 22, Athens, OH 45701, USA
Biomedical and Chemical Engineering and Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, 150 W University Blvd, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA
Department of Environmental and Plant Biology, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA
Funding
Ohio University 1804 Fund · AEP Foundation
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. Management swing potential for bioenergy crops10.1111/gcbb.12042 ↗
2. Biogas-digestate as nutrient source for biomass production of Sida hermaphrodita, Zea mays L. and Medicago sativa L.10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.357 ↗
3. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biomass for Energy and Crop Production10.2478/apbi-2014-0001 ↗
4. Aso, S.N. (2020). Digestate: The Coproduct of Biofuel Production in a Circular Economy, and New Results for Cassava Peeling Residue Digestate. Renewable Energy, IntechOpen.
5. Agricultural benefits and environmental risks of soil fertilization with anaerobic digestates: A review10.1007/s13593-013-0196-z ↗
6. Hydrothermal carbonization of municipal waste streams10.1021/es2004528 ↗
7. Growth and Yield of Miscanthus × giganteus Grown in Fertilized and Biochar-Amended Soils in the Western North Carolina Mountains10.2179/14-021R1 ↗
8. Potential Soil Carbon Sequestration and CO2 Offset by Dedicated Energy Crops in the USA10.1080/07352680600961021 ↗
9. Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems10.1890/05-2018 ↗
10. Impact of second-generation biofuel agriculture on greenhouse-gas emissions in the corn-growing regions of the US10.1890/110003 ↗
11. Bioenergy crop greenhouse gas mitigation potential under a range of management practices10.1111/gcbb.12152 ↗
12. Miscanthus: European experience with a novel energy crop10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00032-5 ↗
13. Miscanthus biomass production for energy in Europe and its potential contribution to decreasing fossil fuel carbon emissions10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00749.x ↗
14. Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: The potential of Miscanthus10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01662.x ↗
15. Seasonal nitrogen dynamics of Miscanthus×giganteus and Panicum virgatum10.1111/j.1757-1707.2009.01022.x ↗
16. Are the environmental benefits of Miscanthus × giganteus suggested by early studies of this crop supported by the broader and longer-term contemporary studies?10.1111/gcbb.12150 ↗
17. Effect of nitrogen addition on Miscanthus × giganteus yield, nitrogen losses, and soil organic matter across five sites10.1111/gcbb.12217 ↗
18. Energy balances and greenhouse gas-mitigation potentials of bioenergy cropping systems (Miscanthus, rapeseed, and maize) based on farming conditions in Western Germany10.1016/j.renene.2012.12.004 ↗
19. The yield and quality response of the energy grass Miscanthus × giganteus to fertiliser applications of nitrogen, potassium and sulphur10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.06.007 ↗
20. Carbon mitigation by the energy crop, Miscanthus10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01438.x ↗
21. Growth, yield and mineral content of Miscanthus×giganteus grown as a biofuel for 14 successive harvests10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.02.009 ↗
22. Nitrogen Fertilization Does Significantly Increase Yields of Stands of Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum in Multiyear Trials in Illinois10.1007/s12155-013-9385-5 ↗
23. Nitrogen Fertilization Effects on Biomass Production and Yield Components of Miscanthus ×giganteus10.3389/fpls.2017.00544 ↗
24. Potential growth and biomass productivity of Miscanthus×giganteus as affected by plant density and N-fertilization in central Greece10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.07.004 ↗
25. Nitrogen fertilization of Miscanthus × giganteus: Effects on nitrogen uptake, growth, yield and emissions from biomass combustion10.1007/s10705-016-9793-y ↗
26. Soil-derived trace gas fluxes from different energy crops–results from a field experiment in Southwest Germany10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01135.x ↗
27. How do soil emissions of N2O, CH4 and CO2 from perennial bioenergy crops differ from arable annual crops?10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01136.x ↗
28. Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Nitrate Leaching, and Biomass Yields from Production of Miscanthus × giganteus in Illinois, USA10.1007/s12155-012-9191-5 ↗
29. Are the benefits of yield responses to nitrogen fertilizer application in the bioenergy crop Miscanthus × giganteus offset by increased soil emissions of nitrous oxide?10.1111/gcbb.12125 ↗
30. Nutrient requirements of Miscanthus x giganteus: Conclusions from a review of published studies10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.015 ↗
31. Agricultural use of biogas digestate as a replacement fertilizers
32. Greenhouse gas fluxes from soils fertilised with anaerobically digested biomass from wetlands
33. Does the use of digestate to replace mineral fertilizers have less emissions of N2O and NH3?10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.02.004 ↗
34. Degradation kinetics of biochar from pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization in temperate soils10.1007/s11104-013-1745-6 ↗
35. Influence of Organic and Mineral Fertilization on Soil Greenhouse Gas Emissions. A Review
36. Biochar and hydrochar effects on greenhouse gas (carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, and methane) fluxes from soils10.2134/jeq2011.0132 ↗
37. Win-win: Application of sawdust-derived hydrochar in low fertility soil improves rice yield and reduces greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural ecosystems10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142457 ↗
38. Microalgae-derived hydrochar application on rice paddy soil: Higher rice yield but increased gaseous nitrogen loss10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137127 ↗
39. Closing the loop: Integrative systems management of waste in food, energy, and water systems10.1007/s13412-016-0370-0 ↗
40. Miller, K., Herman, T., Philipinanto, D., and Davis, S. (2020). Anaerobic digestion of food waste, brewery waste, and agricultural residues in an off-grid continuous reactor. in review.10.3390/su13126509 ↗
41. Measurement of Greenhouse Gas Flux from Agricultural Soils Using Static Chambers
42. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv Prepr.10.18637/jss.v067.i01 ↗
43. Nutrient recovery from digestate: Systematic technology review and product classification10.1007/s12649-016-9642-x ↗
44. Minireview of potential applications of hydrochar derived from hydrothermal carbonization of biomass10.1016/j.jiec.2017.08.026 ↗
45. Pilot-scale biogas production in a temperate climate using variable food waste10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105568 ↗
46. Heaton, E.A., Boersma, N., Caveny, J.D., Voigt, T.B., and Dohleman, F.G. (2014). Miscanthus (Miscanthus x giganteus) for biofuel production. Ext. Am. Res. Learn. Netw. SUA.
47. Yield Potential and Nitrogen Requirements of Miscanthus × giganteus on Eroded Soil10.2134/agronj2016.10.0582 ↗
48. Short-term and residual availability of nitrogen after long-term application of organic fertilizers on arable land10.1002/jpln.200520510 ↗
49. Microcosm study on the decomposability of hydrochars in a Cambisol10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.036 ↗
50. Effect of hydrothermally carbonized char application on trace gas emissions from two sandy soil horizons10.2134/jeq2013.12.0513 ↗
51. Carbon sequestration potential of hydrothermal carbonization char (hydrochar) in two contrasting soils; results of a 1-year field study10.1007/s00374-014-0980-1 ↗
52. Greenhouse gas emissions from soils—A review10.1016/j.chemer.2016.04.002 ↗
53. Yiqi, L., and Zhou, X. (2010). Soil Respiration and the Environment, Elsevier.
54. Impact of hydrochar on rice paddy CH4 and N2O emissions: A comparative study with pyrochar10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.056 ↗
55. Methane flux in non-wetland soils in response to nitrogen addition: A meta-analysis10.1890/09-2185.1 ↗
56. A review of nitrogen enrichment effects on three biogenic GHGs: The CO2 sink may be largely offset by stimulated N2O and CH4 emission10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01351.x ↗
57. Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: A review10.1002/elsc.201100085 ↗
58. Soil incubation study showed biogas digestate to cause higher and more variable short-term N2O and N2 fluxes than mineral-N10.1002/jpln.201900075 ↗
59. Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from optimized and alternative cereal cropping systems on the North China Plain: A two-year field study10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.003 ↗
60. Biochar and denitrification in soils: When, how much and why does biochar reduce N2O emissions?10.1038/srep01732 ↗
61. Can biochar reduce soil greenhouse gas emissions from a Miscanthus bioenergy crop?10.1111/gcbb.12052 ↗
62. Effects of different biochars and digestate on N2O fluxes under field conditions10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.005 ↗
63. Fidel, R.B., Laird, D.A., and Parkin, T.B. (2019). Effect of Biochar on Soil Greenhouse Gas Emissions at the Laboratory and Field Scales. Soil Syst., 3.10.3390/soilsystems3010008 ↗