journal article·2020-03-30Open access

E-mail-Based Phishing Attack Taxonomy

Justinas Rastenis, Simona Ramanauskaitė, Justinas Janulevičius, Antanas Čenys, Asta Slotkienė, Kęstutis Pakrijauskas

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 7

Abstract

The amount of fraud on the Internet is increasing along with the availability and the popularity of the Internet around the world. One of the most common forms of Internet fraud is phishing. Phishing attacks seek to obtain a user’s personal or secret information. The variety of phishing attacks is very broad, and usage of novel, more sophisticated methods complicates its automated filtering. Therefore, it is important to form up-to-date and detailed phishing attack taxonomy, which could be used for both human education purposes as well as phishing attack discrete notation. In this paper, we propose an e-mail-based phishing attack taxonomy, which includes six phases of the attack. Each phase has at least one criterion for the attack categorization. Each category is described, and in some cases the categories have sub-classes to present the full variety of phishing attacks. The proposed taxonomy is compared to similar taxonomies. Our taxonomy outperforms other phishing attack taxonomies in numbers of phases, criteria and distinguished classes. Validation of the proposed taxonomy is achieved by adapting it as a phishing attack notation for an incident management system. Taxonomy usage for phishing attack notation increases the level of description of phishing attacks compared to free-form phishing attack descriptions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Spam and Phishing Detection · Advanced Malware Detection Techniques · Network Security and Intrusion Detection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Information Systems, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius LT-10223, Lithuania

Department of Information Technology, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius LT-10223, Lithuania

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. (2020, February 03). Cybersecurity Threatscape: Q3 2019. Available online: https://www.ptsecurity.com/ww-en/analytics/cybersecurity-threatscape-2019-q3/?sphrase_id=70070.
2. Salahdine, F., and Kaabouch, N. (2019). Social engineering attacks: A survey. Future Internet, 11.10.3390/fi11040089 ↗
3. Metadata? Thesauri? Taxonomies? Topic maps! Making sense of it all10.1177/0165551504045856 ↗
4. Automatic construction of lexicons, taxonomies, ontologies, and other knowledge structures10.1002/widm.1097 ↗
5. Phishing, SMiShing & Vishing: An assessment of threats against mobile devices
6. Toward a taxonomy of malware behaviors10.1093/comjnl/bxv047 ↗
7. Miloslavskaya, N., Tolstoy, A., and Zapechnikov, S. (2016, January 6–8). Taxonomy for unsecure digital information processing. Proceedings of the 2016 Third International Conference on Digital Information Processing, Data Mining, and Wireless Communications (DIPDMWC), Moscow, Russia.10.1109/DIPDMWC.2016.7529368 ↗
8. Security attacks taxonomy on bring your own devices (BYOD) model10.5121/ijmnct.2014.4501 ↗
9. Classification of Anti-phishing Solutions10.1007/s42979-019-0011-2 ↗
10. Hussain, N., Turab Mirza, H., Rasool, G., Hussain, I., and Kaleem, M. (2019). Spam Review Detection Techniques: A Systematic Literature Review. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9050987 ↗
11. Fighting against phishing attacks: State of the art and future challenges10.1007/s00521-016-2275-y ↗
12. Liu, H., and Lang, B. (2019). Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Intrusion Detection Systems: A Survey. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9204396 ↗
13. Phishing & Anti-Phishing: A Review
14. Towards a taxonomy of cyber threats against target applications
15. Mohd Foozy, F., Ahmad, R., Abdollah, M.F., Yusof, R., and Mas’ud, M.Z. (2012). Generic Taxonomy of Social Engineering Attack and Defence Mechanism for Handheld Computer Study. J. ICACT.
16. Advanced social engineering attacks
17. Ivaturi, K., and Janczewski, L. (2011). A taxonomy for social engineering attacks. International Conference on Information Resources Management, Association for Information Systems.
18. Pienta, D., Thatcher, J.B., and Johnston, A.C. (2018, January 13). Taxonomy of Phishing: Attack Types Spanning Economic, Temporal, Breadth, and Target Boundaries. Proceedings of the 13th Pre-ICIS Workshop on Information Security and Privacy, San Francisco, CA, USA.
19. Defending against phishing attacks: Taxonomy of methods, current issues and future directions10.1007/s11235-017-0334-z ↗
20. A survey of phishing e-mail filtering techniques10.1109/SURV.2013.030713.00020 ↗
21. Phishing environments, techniques, and countermeasures: A survey10.1016/j.cose.2017.04.006 ↗
22. Beals, M., DeLiema, M., and Deevy, M. (2015). Framework for a Taxonomy of Fraud, Stanford Longevity Center/FINRA Financial Investor Education Foundation/Fraud Research Center.
23. Rastenis, J., Ramanauskaitė, S., Janulevičius, J., and Čenys, A. (2019, January 25). Credulity to Phishing Attacks: A Real-World Study of Personnel with Higher Education. Proceedings of the 2019 Open Conference of Electrical, Electronic and Information Sciences (eStream), Vilnius, Lithuania.10.1109/eStream.2019.8732169 ↗