journal article·2020-03-11Open access

BIM-LEAN as a Methodology to Save Execution Costs in Building Construction—An Experience under the Spanish Framework

María Dolores Andújar-Montoya, Antonio Galiano-Garrigós, Víctor Echarri-Iribarren, Carlos Rizo-Maestre

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 6

Abstract

Current market conditions characterized by technological changes, increasing regulatory requirements and low funding make current construction management models obsolete. This tendency affects not only the private housing market but also public administration projects, which have large time and budget deviations across the board. As a result, new approaches are needed to improve the efficiency of the construction process, removing extra costs and delivering projects on time. The most representative trends in the construction industry that enable such improvements are both Building Information Modelling paradigm (BIM) and Lean Construction philosophy with one of its associated tools in the field of construction management—the Last Planner System. However, a review of the literature shows the scarcity of works on the synergy of both paradigms taking into account the extensive literature on Lean and BIM individually. This is further accused if we look beyond the theoretical literature reviews. Therefore, this paper is focused on the benefits derived from the synergy of both disciplines and the impacts on project efficiency through a case study of a public construction project at the university of Alicante in order to provide empirical evidence of the benefits and improvements of using BIM at the Look Ahead meetings and of the Last Planner System. Finally, the results of the case study allow us to make a comparison with the data related to cost deviations of other public projects with different uses, built areas, and complexity which were managed with traditional methods of construction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: BIM and Construction Integration · Construction Project Management and Performance · Facilities and Workplace Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Building Sciences and Urbanism, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain

Department of Architectural Constructions, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Determining the probability of project cost overruns10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000575 ↗
2. Plebankiewicz, E. (2018). Model of predicting cost overrun in construction projects. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10124387 ↗
3. KPMG (2015). 2015 Global Construction Project Owner’s Survey, KPMG International.
4. A construction management framework for mass customisation in traditional construction10.3390/su7055182 ↗
5. Web-enabled project management: An emerging paradigm in construction10.1016/S0926-5805(03)00003-7 ↗
6. Applying lean thinking in construction and performance improvement10.1016/j.aej.2013.04.008 ↗
7. Forensic project management: The underlying causes of rework in construction projects10.1080/10286600412331295955 ↗
8. Influence of project type and procurement method on rework costs in building construction projects10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:1(18) ↗
9. A formalism for utilization of sensor systems and integrated project models for active construction quality control10.1016/j.autcon.2005.01.008 ↗
10. Measuring the impact of rework on construction cost performance10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:3(187) ↗
11. The causes and costs of defects in construction: A study of seven building projects10.1016/S0926-5805(98)00114-9 ↗
12. Andújar-Montoya, M.D. (2015). Integral Construction Management Model for Mass Customisation in Residential Building. An Approach Based on BPM, Sciences and Urbanism Department, University of Alicante Polytechnic School, University of Alicante.
13. Andújar-Montoya, M.D., Marcos-Jorquera, D., Garca-Botella, F., and Gilart-Iglesias, V. (2017). A Context-Driven Model for the Flat Roofs Construction Process through Sensing Systems, Internet-of-Things and Last Planner System. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17071691 ↗
14. Choo, H.J.I.D., and Tommelein, I.D. (2001, January 6–8). Requirements and barriers to adoption of last planner computer tools. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Singapore.
15. Abdelhamid, T.S., and Everett, J.G. (2002, January 6–8). Physical demands of construction work: A source of workflow unreliability. Proceedings of the 10th Conference of International Group for Lean Construction IGLC-10, Gramado, Brazil.
16. Calveras, A., Ganuza, J.J., and Hauk, E. (2002). Reckless bidding in public projects. An analysis of Spanish regulation. J. Public Econ., 135–153.
17. Building Information Modeling (BIM) partnering framework for public construction projects10.1016/j.autcon.2012.12.004 ↗
18. Building Information Modelling in Operations of Maintenance at the University of Alicante
19. Koskela, L. (1992). Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering. Technical Report.
20. Koskela, L. (1997). Lean Production in Construction, University of Huddersfield.
21. Koskela, L. (1999, January 26–28). Management of production in construction: A theoretical view. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Berkeley, CA, USA.
22. Koskela, L., and Howell, G. (2002, January 6–8). The theory of project management: Explanation to novel methods. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Gramado, Brazil.
23. Koskela, G., Howell, E., Pikas, B., and Dave, B. (2014, January 25–27). If CPM is so bad, why have we been using it so long?. Proceedings of the 22th International Group for Lean Construction Conference, Oslo, Norway.
24. Santos, A., and Powell, J. (1999, January 26–28). Potential of poka-yoke devices to reduce variability in construction. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Berkeley, CA, USA.
25. Dynamic planning of construction activities using hybrid simulation10.1016/j.autcon.2014.08.011 ↗
26. Ballard, G., and Howell, G. (2003, January 22–24). An update on last planner. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC-11), Blacksburg, VA, USA.
27. Ballard, H.G. (2000). The Last Planner System of Production Control. [Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Birmingham].
28. Tommelein, I.D., and Ballard, G. (1997). Look-Ahead Planning: Screening and Pulling, University of California.
29. Muñoz, S. (2016). Standardize to Meet New Market Challenges, BuildingSMART. BuildingSMART Spanish Chapter.
30. Azhar, S., Nadeem, A., Mok, J.Y.N., and Leung, B.H.Y. (2008, January 4–5). Building Information Modeling (BIM): A new paradigm for visual interactive modeling and simulation for construction projects. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Construction in Developing Countries, Karachi, Pakistan.
31. Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.003 ↗
32. Building information modeling (BIM): Now and beyond
33. Building information modelling (BIM) framework for practical implementation10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.010 ↗
34. Beyond the BIM utopia: Approaches to the development and implementation of building information modeling10.1016/j.autcon.2014.03.009 ↗
35. Benefits and lessons learned of implementing building virtual design and construction (VDC) technologies for coordination of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) systems on a large healthcare project
36. Building information modeling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry
37. Bernstein, H.M. (2012). The Business Value of BIM in North America, McGraw Hill.
38. Using Building Information Modelling to achieve Lean principles by improving efficiency of work teams
39. The project benefits of building information modelling (BIM)10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.001 ↗
40. A framework for an automated and integrated project scheduling and management system10.1016/j.autcon.2013.04.002 ↗
41. Hardin, B., and Mccool, D. (2015). BIM and Construction Management: Proven Tools, Methods, and Workflows, John Wiley & Sons.
42. Dave, B., Koskela, L., Kiviniemi, A., Owen, R.L., and Fazenda, P.T. (2013). Implementing Lean in Construction: Lean Construction and BIM, CIRIA.
43. Mollasalehi, S., Fleming, A., Talebi, S., and Underwood, J. (2016, January 19). Development of an Experimental Waste Framework based on BIM/Lean concept in construction design. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Boston, MA, USA.
44. Interaction of lean and building information modeling in construction10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000203 ↗
45. Using social network theory and simulation to compare traditional versus BIM-lean practice for design error management10.1016/j.autcon.2015.02.014 ↗
46. Clemente, J., and Cachadinha, N. (August, January 29). Bim-Lean synergies in the management on mep works in public facilities of intensive use—A case study. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Fortaleza, Brazil.
47. Facility Management using digital Obeya Room by integrating BIM-Lean approaches-an empirical study10.3846/jcem.2018.5609 ↗
48. Bim and lean construction interactions: A state-of-the-art review
49. The Effects of BIM and Lean Construction on Design Management Practices10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.659 ↗
50. Bhatla, A., and Leite, F. (2012, January 18–20). Integration Framework of BIM with the Last Planner System TM. Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, San Diego, CA, USA.
51. Koseoglu, O., Sakin, M., and Arayici, Y. (2018). Exploring the BIM and lean synergies in the Istanbul Grand Airport construction project. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., 25.10.1108/ECAM-08-2017-0186 ↗
52. Investigating the role of lean practices in enabling BIM adoption: Evidence from two Indian cases10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000982 ↗
53. Garrido, M.C., Mendes, R., Scheer, S., and Campestrini, T.F. (2015, January 21–23). Using BIM for Last Planner System: Case studies in Brazil. Proceedings of the 2015 International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering, Austin, TX, USA.10.1061/9780784479247.075 ↗
54. Toledo, M., Olivares, K., and Gonzlez, V. (2016, January 19). Exploration of a Lean-BIM planning framework: A Last Planner System and BIM-based case study. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Boston, MA, USA.
55. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research
56. A BIM-based construction quality management model and its applications10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.009 ↗
57. How to measure the benefits of BIM - A case study approach10.1016/j.autcon.2012.02.008 ↗
58. BIM in facilities management applications: A case study of a large university complex10.1108/BEPAM-02-2014-0011 ↗
59. Effective digital collaboration in the construction industry—A case study of BIM deployment in a hospital construction project10.1016/j.compind.2015.07.003 ↗