journal article·2019-07-16Open access

Structural Reliability Estimation with Participatory Sensing and Mobile Cyber-Physical Structural Health Monitoring Systems

Ekin Ozer, Maria Q. Feng

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 14

Abstract

With the help of community participants, smartphones can become useful wireless sensor network (WSN) components, form a self-governing structural health monitoring (SHM) system, and merge structural mechanics with participatory sensing and server computing. This paper presents a methodology and framework of such a cyber-physical system (CPS) that generates a bridge finite element model (FEM) integrated with vibration measurements from smartphone WSNs and centralized/distributed computational facilities, then assesses structural reliability based on updated FEMs. Structural vibration data obtained from smartphones are processed on a server to identify modal frequencies of an existing bridge. Without design drawings and supportive documentation but field measurements and observations, FEM of the bridge is drafted with uncertainties in the structural mass, stiffness, and boundary conditions (BCs). Then, 2700 FEMs are autonomously generated, and the baseline FEM is updated by minimizing the error between the crowdsourcing-based modal identification results and the FEM analysis. Furthermore, using 151 strong ground motion records from databases, the bridge response time history simulations are conducted to obtain displacement demand distribution. Finally, based on reference performance criteria, structural reliability of the bridge is estimated. Integrating the cyber (FEM analysis) and the physical (the bridge structure and measured vibration characteristics) worlds, this crowdsourcing-based CPS can provide a powerful tool for supporting rapid, remote, autonomous, and objective infrastructure-related decision-making. This study presents a new example of the emerging fourth industrial revolution from structural engineering and SHM perspective.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Columbia University, 500 W 120th Street, 610 Mudd, New York, NY 10027, USA

References (71)

Show source-provided references
1. ASCE (2014). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings (ASCE/SEI 41-13), American Society of Civil Engineers.
2. AASHTO (2015). LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
3. A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods10.1177/058310249803000201 ↗
4. Vibration based condition monitoring: A review10.1177/1475921704047500 ↗
5. Structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure
6. An introduction to structural health monitoring
7. A vision-based approach for the direct measurement of displacements in vibrating systems10.1088/0964-1726/12/5/016 ↗
8. A vision-based system for remote sensing of bridge displacement10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.12.003 ↗
9. A vision-based sensor for noncontact structural displacement measurement10.3390/s150716557 ↗
10. Sensor network paradigms for structural health monitoring10.1002/stc.125 ↗
11. A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring10.1177/0583102406061499 ↗
12. Distributed Computing Strategy for Structural Health Monitoring10.1002/stc.117 ↗
13. An overview of wireless structural health monitoring for civil structures
14. Wireless sensor networks for structure health monitoring: Recent advances and future research directions10.1108/02602281111140038 ↗
15. Recent trend in wireless sensor network and its applications: A survey10.1108/SR-08-2014-683 ↗
16. Integrated virtual instrumentation and wireless monitoring for infrastructure diagnostics10.1177/1475921706057980 ↗
17. Strategic issues in sensors and smart structures10.1002/stc.88 ↗
18. Smart sensing technology: Opportunities and challenges10.1002/stc.48 ↗
19. A decentralized approach to damage localization through smart wireless sensors10.12989/sss.2009.5.1.043 ↗
20. A mobile-agent-based wireless sensing network for structural monitoring applications10.1088/0957-0233/20/4/045201 ↗
21. Mobile agent computing paradigm for building a flexible structural health monitoring sensor network10.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00656.x ↗
22. A mobile sensing system for structural health monitoring: Design and validation10.1088/0964-1726/19/5/055011 ↗
23. Drive-by damage detection in bridges using the apparent profile10.1002/stc.1721 ↗
24. Identification of traffic-induced nodal excitations of truss bridges through heterogeneous data fusion10.1088/0964-1726/24/7/075032 ↗
25. Challenges in the analysis of inhomogeneous structural monitoring data10.1007/s13349-013-0051-6 ↗
26. The unscented Kalman filter and particle filter methods for nonlinear structural system identification with non-collocated heterogeneous sensing10.1002/stc.290 ↗
27. System identification of a historic swing truss bridge using a wireless sensor network employing orientation correction10.1002/stc.1672 ↗
28. The application of smartphones to measuring transient structural displacements10.1007/s13349-012-0025-0 ↗
29. Oraczewski, T., Staszewski, W.J., and Uhl, T. (2015). Nonlinear acoustics for structural health monitoring using mobile, wireless and smartphone-based transducer platform. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct.10.1177/1045389X15585902 ↗
30. Portable and convenient cable force measurement using smartphone10.1007/s13349-015-0132-9 ↗
31. Citizen Sensors for SHM: Use of Accelerometer Data from Smartphones10.3390/s150202980 ↗
32. Citizen Sensors for SHM: Towards a Crowdsourcing Platform10.3390/s150614591 ↗
33. Synthesizing spatiotemporally sparse smartphone sensor data for bridge modal identification10.1088/0964-1726/25/8/085007 ↗
34. Direction-sensitive smart monitoring of structures using heterogeneous smartphone sensor data and coordinate system transformation10.1088/1361-665X/aa6298 ↗
36. A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001 ↗
37. The past, present and future of cyber-physical systems: A focus on models10.3390/s150304837 ↗
38. The future of human-in-the-loop cyber-physical systems10.1109/MC.2013.31 ↗
39. From wireless sensor networks towards cyber physical systems10.1016/j.pmcj.2011.03.003 ↗
40. Cyber–physical systems: A perspective at the centennial10.1109/JPROC.2012.2189792 ↗
41. Vita: A crowdsensing-oriented mobile cyber-physical system10.1109/TETC.2013.2273359 ↗
42. The internet of things: A survey10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010 ↗
43. Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010 ↗
44. The Internet of things10.1038/scientificamerican1004-76 ↗
45. Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.02.016 ↗
46. Vibration-based damage detection and seismic performance assessment of bridges10.1193/080612EQS255M ↗
47. SHM-integrated bridge reliability estimation using multivariate stochastic processes10.1002/eqe.2527 ↗
48. Ozer, E. (2016). Multisensory Smartphone Applications in Vibration-Based Structural Health Monitoring. [Ph.D. Thesis, Columbia University].
49. OpenSees: A framework for earthquake engineering simulation10.1109/MCSE.2011.66 ↗
50. Biomechanically influenced mobile and participatory pedestrian data for bridge monitoring10.1177/1550147717705240 ↗
51. Suh, S.C., Tanik, U.J., Carbone, J.N., and Eroglu, A. (2014). Applied Cyber-Physical Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-7336-7 ↗
52. Liu, C.H., and Zhang, Y. (2015). Cyber Physical Systems: Architectures, Protocols and Applications, CRC Press.10.1201/b19003 ↗
53. Hu, F. (2013). Cyber-Physical Systems: Integrated Computing and Engineering Design, CRC Press.10.1201/b15552 ↗
54. Siddesh, G.M., Deka, G., Srinivasa, K.G., and Patnaik, L.M. (2016). Cyber-Physical Systems: A Computational Perspective, CRC Press.10.1201/b19206 ↗
55. Structural-system identification. I: Theory10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1995)121:2(255) ↗
56. Structural system identification. II: Experimental verification10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1995)121:2(265) ↗
57. Evaluating the reliability of phones as seismic monitoring instruments10.1193/091711EQS229M ↗
58. Simulation of stochastic processes by spectral representation10.1115/1.3119501 ↗
59. NGA project strong-motion database10.1193/1.2894831 ↗
60. Estimation of earthquake losses to buildings10.1193/1.1585976 ↗
61. Analytical seismic fragility curves for typical bridges in the central and southeastern United States10.1193/1.2756815 ↗
62. GANA, B. (2004). GANA Glazing Manual, Glass Association of North America.
63. Fragility curves for architectural glass in stick-built glazing systems10.1193/1.4000011 ↗
64. Kramer, S.L. (1996). Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall.
65. Effect of live-load deflections on steel bridge performance10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:3(259) ↗
66. Study on the fatigue of steel highway bridges in Japan10.1016/S0950-0618(97)00015-9 ↗
67. Dynamic loading and testing of bridges in Ontario10.1139/l84-101 ↗
68. Point cloud data conversion into solid models via point-based voxelization10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000097 ↗
69. From laser scanning to finite element analysis of complex buildings by using a semi-automatic procedure10.3390/s150818360 ↗
70. Laser scanning-based updating of a finite-element model for structural health monitoring10.1109/JSEN.2015.2508965 ↗
71. Review of Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) applications in the built environment: Towards automated building inspection procedures using drones10.1016/j.autcon.2018.05.002 ↗