journal article·2018-03-08Open access

Hesitant Probabilistic Multiplicative Preference Relations in Group Decision Making

Zia Bashir, Tabasam Rashid, Jarosław Wątróbski, Wojciech Sałabun, Abbas Malik

Applied Sciences· Volume 8· Issue 3

Abstract

The preference of one alternative over another is a useful way to express the opinion of the decision-maker. In the process of group decision-making, preference relations are used in preference modeling of the alternatives under given criteria. The probability is an important tool to deal with uncertainty and, in many scenarios of decision-making problems, the probabilities of different events affect the decision-making process directly. In order to deal with this issue, the hesitant probabilistic multiplicative preference relation (HPMPR) is defined in this paper. Furthermore, consistency of the HPMPR and consensus among decision makers are studied here. In this respect, many algorithms are developed to achieve consistency of HPMPRs, reasonable consensus between decision-makers and a final algorithm is proposed comprehending all other algorithms, presenting a complete decision support model for group decision-making. Lastly, we present a case study with complete illustration of the proposed model and discuss the effects of probabilities on decision-making validating the importance of the introduction of probability in hesitant multiplicative preference relations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Cognitive Science and Mapping · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mathematics, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan

Department of Mathematics, University of Management and Technology, Lahore 54770, Pakistan

Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Szczecin, 71-101 Szczecin, Poland

Department of Artificial Intelligence Method and Applied Mathematics in the Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, West Pomeranian University of Technology, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland

Department of Computer Science, School of Engineering, Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New Zealand

References (52)

Show source-provided references
2. Decision-making in a fuzzy environment10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141 ↗
3. Decision Making with Uncertainty Using Hesitant Fuzzy Sets10.1007/s40815-017-0313-2 ↗
4. Faizi, S., Rashid, W.S.T., Wątróbski, J., and Zafar, S. (2017). Group Decision-Making for Hesitant Fuzzy Sets Based on Characteristic Objects Method. Symmetry, 9.10.3390/sym9080136 ↗
5. Lu, N., and Liang, L. (2017). Correlation Coefficients of Extended Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications to Decision Making. Symmetry, 9.10.3390/sym9040047 ↗
6. Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome10.1007/s10462-016-9511-9 ↗
7. Hesitant fuzzy sets
8. Ideal solutions for hesitant fuzzy soft sets10.3233/IFS-151740 ↗
9. Hesitant 2-tuple linguistic information in multiple attributes group decision-making10.3233/IFS-151737 ↗
10. Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision-making10.1016/j.knosys.2012.09.009 ↗
11. Generalized hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in decision support system10.1016/j.knosys.2012.08.019 ↗
12. Convex hesitant fuzzy sets10.3233/IFS-152057 ↗
13. Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision-making10.1016/j.ijar.2010.09.002 ↗
14. Dual hesitant fuzzy sets10.1155/2012/879629 ↗
15. Xu, Z., and Zhou, W. (2016). Consensus building with a group of decision makers under the probabilistic fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak.10.1007/s10700-016-9257-5 ↗
16. Zhai, Y., Xu, Z., and Liao, H. (2016). Probabilistic linguistic vector-term set and its application in group decision-making with multi-granular linguistic information. Appl. Soft Comput.10.1016/j.asoc.2016.08.044 ↗
17. Zhang, S., Xu, Z., and He, Y. (2017). Operations and Integrations of Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Information in Decision Making. Inf. Fusion.10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.001 ↗
18. Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision-making10.1016/j.ins.2016.06.021 ↗
19. Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytical Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill.10.21236/ADA214804 ↗
20. Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process10.1016/0377-2217(87)90275-X ↗
21. Managing hesitant information in GDM problems under fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations10.1142/S0218488513500402 ↗
22. A consistency and consensus based decision support model for group decision-making with multiplicative preference relations10.1016/j.dss.2011.11.022 ↗
23. Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation10.1016/0165-0114(78)90001-5 ↗
24. Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations10.1016/S0165-0114(00)00004-X ↗
25. A consensus model for group decision-making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.889952 ↗
26. Group decision-making procedure based on incomplete reciprocal relations10.1007/s00500-007-0223-6 ↗
27. On consistency measures of linguistic preference relations10.1016/j.ejor.2007.06.013 ↗
28. A sequential selection process in group decision making with linguistic assessment10.1016/0020-0255(95)00025-K ↗
29. Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00024-X ↗
30. Preference relations based on intuitionistic multiplicative information10.1109/TFUZZ.2012.2202907 ↗
31. Priority weight intervals derived from intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations10.1109/TFUZZ.2012.2226893 ↗
32. On compatibility of interval fuzzy preference matrices10.1023/B:FODM.0000036864.33950.1b ↗
33. Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision-making10.1016/j.ins.2006.12.019 ↗
34. Generalized fuzzy consistency matrix and its priority method
35. A decision support model for group decision-making with hesitant fuzzy preference relations10.1016/j.knosys.2015.05.023 ↗
36. Regression methods for hesitant fuzzy preference relations10.3846/20294913.2014.881430 ↗
37. Deriving a ranking from hesitant fuzzy preference relations under Group Decision Making10.1109/TCYB.2013.2283021 ↗
38. A decision support model for group decision making with hesitant multiplicative preference relations10.1016/j.ins.2014.05.057 ↗
39. Deriving the priority weights from hesitant multiplicative preference relations in group decision-making10.1016/j.asoc.2014.08.062 ↗
40. Zhou, W., and Xu, Z.S. (2017). Probability calculation and element optimization of probabilistic hesitant fuzzy preference relations based on expected consistency. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst.10.1109/TFUZZ.2017.2723349 ↗
41. A model of consensus in group decision-making under linguistic assessments10.1016/0165-0114(95)00107-7 ↗
42. Direct approach processes in group decision-making using linguistic OWA operators10.1016/0165-0114(95)00162-X ↗
43. Group decision-making with a fuzzy linguistic majority10.1016/0165-0114(86)90014-X ↗
44. Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision-making10.1016/0165-0114(84)90032-0 ↗
45. Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency10.1109/TSMCB.2006.875872 ↗
46. Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00725-7 ↗
47. Algorithms for improving consistency or consensus of reciprocal [0, 1]-valued preference relations10.1016/j.fss.2012.09.016 ↗
48. Consensus models for AHP group decision-making under row geometric mean prioritization method10.1016/j.dss.2010.03.003 ↗
49. A consensus model for multiperson decision-making with different preference structures10.1109/TSMCA.2002.802821 ↗
50. Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets10.1016/j.ins.2011.01.028 ↗
51. Bossuyt, P. (1990). A Comparison of Probabilistic Unfolding Theories for Paired Comparisons Data, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-84172-9 ↗
52. On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgment matrix in AHP10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00082-X ↗