journal article·2022-10-18Open access

The Influence of Flight Direction and Camera Orientation on the Quality Products of UAV-Based SfM-Photogrammetry

Shaker Ahmed, Adel El-Shazly, Fanar Abed, Wael Ahmed

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 20

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) can provide valuable spatial information products for many projects across a wide range of applications. One of the major challenges in this discipline is the quality of positioning accuracy of the resulting mapping products in professional photogrammetric projects. This is especially true when using low-cost UAV systems equipped with GNSS receivers for navigation. In this study, the influence of UAV flight direction and camera orientation on positioning accuracy in an urban area on the west bank of the Euphrates river in Iraq was investigated. Positioning accuracy was tested in this study with different flight directions and camera orientation settings using a UAV autopilot app (Pix4Dcapture software (Ver. 4.11.0)). The different combinations of these two main parameters (camera orientation and flight direction) resulted in 11 different flight cases for which individual planimetric and vertical accuracies were evaluated. Eleven flight sets of dense point clouds, DEMs, and ortho-imagery were created in this way to compare the achieved positional accuracies. One set was created using the direct georeferencing method (without using GCPs), while the other ten sets were created using the indirect georeferencing approach based on ground truth measurements of five artificially created GCPs. Positional accuracy was found to vary depending on the user-defined flight plan settings, despite an approximately constant flight altitude. However, it was found that the horizontal accuracy achieved was better than the vertical accuracy for all flight sets. This study revealed that combining multiple sets of images with different flight directions and camera orientations can significantly improve the overall positional accuracy to reach several centimeters.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications · Archaeological Research and Protection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt

College of Engineering, University of Anbar, Ramadi 31001, Iraq

College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Baghdad 10001, Iraq

Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Falmouth TR10 9FE, Cornwall, UK

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Assessment of UAV photogrammetric mapping accuracy in the beach environment10.2112/SI85-036.1 ↗
2. The impact of number and spatial distribution of GCPs on the positional accuracy of geospatial products derived from low-cost UASs10.1080/01431161.2018.1515508 ↗
3. UAV for 3D mapping applications: A review10.1007/s12518-013-0120-x ↗
4. Muzirafuti, A., Cascio, M., Lanza, S., and Randazzo, G. (2021, January 4–6). UAV Photogrammetry-based Mapping of the Pocket Beaches of Isola Bella Bay, Taormina (Eastern Sicily). Proceedings of the 2021 International Workshop on Metrology for the Sea; Learning to Measure Sea Health Parameters (MetroSea), Reggio Calabria, Italy.10.1109/MetroSea52177.2021.9611617 ↗
5. Analysis of point cloud generation from UAS images10.5194/isprsannals-II-1-45-2014 ↗
6. Applying ASPRS accuracy standards to surveys from small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS)10.14358/PERS.81.10.787 ↗
7. Spatial accuracy of UAV-derived orthoimagery and topography: Comparing photogrammetric models processed with direct geo-referencing and ground control points10.5623/cig2016-102 ↗
8. Assessment of positioning accuracy of UAV photogrammetry based on RTK-GPS
9. Relations between the Number of GCPs and Accuracy of UAV Photogrammetry in the Foreshore of the Sandy Beach10.2112/SI95-263.1 ↗
10. Štroner, M., Urban, R., Seidl, J., Reindl, T., and Brouček, J. (2021). Photogrammetry using UAV-mounted GNSS RTK: Georeferencing strategies without GCPs. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13071336 ↗
11. Accuracy of UAV photogrammetry compared with network RTK GPS
12. Using UAVs for map creation and updating. A case study in Rwanda10.1080/00396265.2016.1268756 ↗
13. Positional quality assessment of orthophotos obtained from sensors onboard multi-rotor UAV platforms10.3390/s141222394 ↗
14. Accuracy assessment of real-time kinematics (RTK) measurements on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) for direct geo-referencing10.1080/10095020.2019.1710437 ↗
15. (2022, October 01). “Agisoft Metashape”. Available online: https://www.agisoft.com.
16. Development and evaluation of a UAV-photogrammetry system for precise 3D environmental modeling10.3390/s151127493 ↗
17. Chaudhry, M.H., Ahmad, A., Gulzar, Q., Farid, M.S., Shahabi, H., and Al-Ansari, N. (2021). Assessment of DSM based on radiometric transformation of UAV data. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21051649 ↗
18. Forlani, G., Diotri, F., di Cella, U.M., and Roncella, R. (2019). Indirect UAV strip georeferencing by on-board GNSS data under poor satellite coverage. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11151765 ↗
19. The test field for uav accuracy assessments