Digital Twin-Driven Stability Optimization Framework for Large Underground Caverns
Source abstract
Abstract
With rapid urbanization, the utilization of underground space has become an important part of infrastructure. However, the stability of underground spaces such as large caverns remains a key challenge in civil engineering throughout the lifecycle of a project. Traditional methods of stability assessment rely on static models and periodic monitoring and often fail to capture real-time changes in rock behavior, leading to potential safety risks and, in severe cases, even the collapse of underground infrastructure. To address this challenge, this study introduces a digital twin (DT) framework to improve stability assessments and monitor deformations in underground structures. The framework enables the continuous monitoring and adaptive optimization of rock support systems by combining real-time sensor data with virtual simulations. A five-dimensional DT framework comprises physical objects, virtual objects, service systems, DT data, and their interconnections. It incorporates six key modules, which are structure, geology, material, behavior, performance, and environment, to enhance the understanding of cavern stability. The framework is based on Industry Foundation Classes standards to ensure seamless data exchange, interoperability, and the standardized representation of geotechnical and structural data. A seven-step methodology is developed for this framework, encompassing geological assessment, virtual modeling, Building Information Modeling (BIM)-based design, construction processes, real-time monitoring, and optimization strategies. To evaluate its effectiveness, the framework is applied to a case study, demonstrating improvements in deformation monitoring and rock support efficiency. The findings highlight the potential of integrating DT with BIM to enhance safety, reliability, and long-term stability in underground construction projects.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Drilling and Well Engineering · Geological Modeling and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
Department of Architectural Engineering and Construction Management, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
Funding
Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Digital Design and Stability Simulation for Large Underground Powerhouse Caverns with Parametric Model Based on BIM-Based Framework10.1016/j.tust.2022.104375 ↗
2. Advances in Stability Analysis and Optimization Design of Large Underground Caverns under High Geostress Condition10.1016/j.deepre.2024.100113 ↗
3. Gattinoni, P., Pizzarotti, E.M., and Scesi, L. (2014). Engineering Geology for Underground Works, Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-7850-4 ↗
4. Stability Analysis and Optimization of the Support System of an Underground Powerhouse Cavern Considering Rock Mass Variability10.1007/s12665-018-7835-2 ↗
5. A Review of Test Methods for Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rocks: Theory, Apparatus and Data Processing10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.05.003 ↗
6. A Critical Review on the Developments of Rock Support Systems in High Stress Ground Conditions10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.06.002 ↗
7. Zhang, L. (2016). Engineering Properties of Rocks, Butterworth-Heinemann.
8. A Methodology for Studying the High Wall Displacement of Large Scale Underground Cavern Complexes and It’s Applications10.1016/j.tust.2007.12.009 ↗
9. Zou, L., Meng, G., Wu, J., Fu, W., Chu, W., and Xu, W. (2024). A Case Study on the Stability of a Big Underground Powerhouse Cavern Cut by an Interlayer Shear Zone in the China Baihetan Hydropower Plant. Deep Undergr. Sci. Eng., Early View.10.1002/dug2.12094 ↗
10. Context-Based Urban Terrain Reconstruction from Uav-Videos for Geoinformation Applications10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXVIII-1-C22-75-2011 ↗
11. Large Deformation Characteristics and Reinforcement Measures for a Rock Pillar in the Houziyan Underground Powerhouse10.1007/s00603-017-1329-5 ↗
12. Ma, H.-P., Daud, N.N.N., Yusof, Z.M., Yaacob, W.Z., and He, H.-J. (2023). Stability Analysis of Surrounding Rock of an Underground Cavern Group and Excavation Scheme Optimization: Based on an Optimized DDARF Method. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13042152 ↗
13. Design and Implementation of a Smart Infrastructure Digital Twin10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104171 ↗
14. Digital Twin in Transportation Infrastructure Management: A Systematic Review
15. Digital Twins for Urban Underground Space10.1016/j.tust.2024.106140 ↗
16. Digital Twin Modeling10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.06.015 ↗
17. Latif, K., Sharafat, A., Tao, D., Park, S., and Seo, J. (2024, January 16–18). Digital Twin for Excavator-Dump Optimization Based on Two-Stream CNN-LSTM and DES. Proceedings of the KSCE Convention Conference and Civil Expo, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
18. Grieves, M., and Vickers, J. (2017). Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems. Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4 ↗
19. A Digital Twin Approach Based Method in Civil Engineering for Classification of Salt Damage in Building Evaluation10.1016/j.matcom.2025.02.003 ↗
20. Digital Twin-Based Collapse Fragility Assessment of a Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridge under Strong Earthquakes10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103547 ↗
21. Digital Twin and Its Implementations in the Civil Engineering Sector10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103838 ↗
22. Bado, M.F., Tonelli, D., Poli, F., Zonta, D., and Casas, J.R. (2022). Digital Twin for Civil Engineering Systems: An Exploratory Review for Distributed Sensing Updating. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22093168 ↗
23. Mahmoodian, M., Shahrivar, F., Setunge, S., and Mazaheri, S. (2022). Development of Digital Twin for Intelligent Maintenance of Civil Infrastructure. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14148664 ↗
24. Towards Civil Engineering 4.0: Concept, Workflow and Application of Digital Twins for Existing Infrastructure10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104421 ↗
25. Unsupervised Reconstruction of Building Information Modeling Wall Objects from Point Cloud Data10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103338 ↗
26. Digital Twin-Enabled Anomaly Detection for Built Asset Monitoring in Operation and Maintenance10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103277 ↗
27. A Review of the Digital Twin Technology in the AEC-FM Industry10.1155/2022/2185170 ↗
28. Enhanced Thermal Performance of Na2HPO4·12H2O Composite Phase Change Material Supported by Sepiolite Fiber for Floor Radiant Heating System10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104747 ↗
29. A Preliminary Investigation on Enabling Digital Twin Technology for Operations and Maintenance of Urban Underground Infrastructure10.1007/s43503-024-00021-x ↗
30. Intelligent Overall Planning Model of Underground Space Based on Digital Twin10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108393 ↗
31. Lee, S., Sharafat, A., Kim, I.S., and Seo, J. (2022). Development and Assessment of an Intelligent Compaction System for Compaction Quality Monitoring, Assurance, and Management. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12146855 ↗
32. Holistic Digital-Twin-Based Framework to Improve Tunnel Lighting Environment: From Methodology to Application10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109562 ↗
33. Lee, J., Lee, Y., Park, S., and Hong, C. (2023). Implementing a Digital Twin of an Underground Utility Tunnel for Geospatial Feature Extraction Using a Multimodal Image Sensor. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13169137 ↗
34. Borrmann, A., König, M., Koch, C., and Beetz, J. (2018). Building Information Modeling: Why? What? How?. Building Information Modeling, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-92862-3 ↗
35. Waste Lime Earthwork Management Using Drone and BIM Technology for Construction Projects: The Case Study of Urban Development Project10.1007/s12205-023-1245-z ↗
36. Digital Twins and Civil Engineering Phases: Reorienting Adoption Strategies10.1115/1.4066181 ↗
37. Latif, K., Sharafat, A., Park, S., and Seo, J. (2022, January 19–21). Digital Twin-Based Hybrid Approach to Visualize the Performance of TBM. Proceedings of the KSCE, Busan, Republic of Korea.
38. Sharafat, A., Latif, K., Tanoli, W.A., and Seo, J. (2022, January 16–19). Framework for Design Optimization and Assembly Process Simulation of Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) Based on Digital Twin and Virtual Reality. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality (CONVR), Seoul, Republic of Korea.
39. Sharafat, A., Latif, K., Park, S., and Seo, J. (2022, January 19–21). Digital Twin-Driven Optimization of Blast Design for Underground Construction. Proceedings of the KSCE, Busan, Republic of Korea.
40. Digital Twin-Enabled and Knowledge-Driven Decision Support for Tunnel Electromechanical Equipment Maintenance10.1016/j.tust.2023.105318 ↗
41. Baghalzadeh Shishehgarkhaneh, M., Keivani, A., Moehler, R.C., Jelodari, N., and Roshdi Laleh, S. (2022). Internet of Things (IoT), Building Information Modeling (BIM), and Digital Twin (DT) in Construction Industry: A Review, Bibliometric, and Network Analysis. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12101503 ↗
42. Digital Twin-Driven Intelligence Disaster Prevention and Mitigation for Infrastructure: Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities10.1007/s11069-021-05190-x ↗
43. Technologies for Digital Twin Applications in Construction10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104931 ↗
44. Tunnel Performance Prediction through Degradation Inspection and Digital Twin Construction10.1016/j.tust.2023.105544 ↗
45. From Digital Model to Digital Twin in Tunnel Construction
46. Development of BIM-Based Tunnel Information Modeling Prototype for Tunnel Design10.1155/2024/8118578 ↗
47. Yamamoto, A., Yabuki, N., Aruga, T., Yamamoto, K., and Fukuda, T. (2025, January 3–4). Development of IFC River—A River Product Model for Realizing Digital Twins of the River System. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Melbourne, Australia.10.1007/978-3-031-84208-5_46 ↗
48. IFC Concepts in the Execution Phase of Conventional Tunneling Projects10.1016/j.tust.2023.105368 ↗
49. Sharafat, A., Latif, K., Khan, M.S., and Seo, J. (2020, January 21–23). Development of BIM-IFC Standard Data Model Framework for Rock Support of Drill-and-Blast Tunnelling Projects. Proceedings of the KSCE Convention Conference and Civil Expo, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
50. International Tunnelling and Underground Space Association (2011). I.T. and U.S.A Monitoring and Control in Tunnel Construction, ITA.
51. Schuppener, B. (2007, January 23–28). Eurocode 7: Geotechnical Design, Part 1: General Rules-Its Implementation in the European Member States. Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Spain, Madrid.10.1142/9789812772480_0011 ↗
52. Recommended Rock Joints Setting in 2D FEM Simulations for Engineering Design of Excavations Created in Jointed Rockmass10.1080/14488388.2024.2328454 ↗
53. Granitzer, A.-N., and Tschuchnigg, F. (2021). Practice-Oriented Validation of Embedded Beam Formulations in Geotechnical Engineering. Processes, 9.10.3390/pr9101739 ↗
54. Carter, T.G. (2015, January 10–13). On Increasing Reliance on Numerical Modelling and Synthetic Data in Rock Engineering. Proceedings of the ISRM Congress, Montreal, QC, Canada.