Positioning Systems for Unmanned Underwater Vehicles: A Comprehensive Review
Source abstract
Abstract
Positioning systems are integral to Unmanned Underwater Vehicle (UUV) operation, enabling precise navigation and control in complex underwater environments. This paper comprehensively reviews the key technologies employed for UUV positioning, including acoustic systems, inertial navigation, Doppler velocity logs, and GPS when near the surface. These systems are essential for seabed mapping, marine infrastructure inspection, and search and rescue operations. The review highlights recent technological advancements and examines the integration of these systems to enhance accuracy and operational efficiency. It also addresses ongoing challenges, such as communication constraints, environmental variability, and discrepancies between theoretical models and field applications. Future trends in positioning system development are discussed, with a focus on improving reliability and performance in diverse underwater conditions to support the expanding capabilities of UUVs across scientific, commercial, and rescue missions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems · Water Quality Monitoring Technologies · Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, University of West Attica, 12244 Athens, Greece
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Palitharathna, K.W.S., Suraweera, H.A., Godaliyadda, R.I., Herath, V.R., and Thompson, J.S. (2020, January 5–30). Multi-AUV Placement for Coverage Maximization in Underwater Optical Wireless Sensor Networks. Proceedings of the Global Oceans 2020: Singapore–U.S. Gulf Coast, Biloxi, MS, USA.10.1109/IEEECONF38699.2020.9389126 ↗
2. An Effective Data-Collection Scheme with AUV Path Planning in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks10.1155/2022/8154573 ↗
3. Advances in unmanned underwater vehicles technologies: Modeling, control and guidance perspectives
4. Sun, K., Cui, W., and Chen, C. (2021). Review of underwater sensing technologies and applications. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21237849 ↗
5. Qin, J., Li, M., Li, D., Zhong, J., and Yang, K. (2022). A Survey on Visual Navigation and Positioning for Autonomous UUVs. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14153794 ↗
6. Venkatesan, S. (2016, January 6–9). AUV for Search & Rescue at Sea—An Innovative Approach. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV), Tokyo, Japan.10.1109/AUV.2016.7778711 ↗
7. Wibisono, A., Piran, M.J., Song, H.-K., and Lee, B.M. (2023). A survey on unmanned underwater vehicles: Challenges, enabling technologies, and future research directions. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23177321 ↗
8. Allard, Y., Shahbazian, E., and Isenor, A. (2014). Unmanned Underwater Vehicle (UUV) Information Study, Defence Research and Development Canada.
9. Wang, Z., Qu, X., Li, L., and Wang, L. (2023, January 19). Development Overview and Application Prospects of Advanced UUVs. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Communication, Singapore.10.1007/978-981-97-2200-6_4 ↗
10. Watson, S., Duecker, D.A., and Groves, K. (2020). Localisation of Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) in Complex and Confined Environments: A Review. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20216203 ↗
11. A review of different designs and control models of remotely operated underwater vehicle10.1177/0020294020952483 ↗
12. Underwater gliders for ocean research10.4031/002533204787522703 ↗
13. Navigation technologies for autonomous underwater vehicles10.1109/TSMCC.2008.919147 ↗
14. Eren, F., Pe’eri, S., Thein, M.-W., Rzhanov, Y., Celikkol, B., and Swift, M.R. (2017). Position, Orientation and Velocity Detection of Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) Using an Optical Detector Array. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17081741 ↗
15. Yang, H., Xu, Z., and Jia, B. (2022). An Underwater Positioning System for UUVs Based on LiDAR Camera and Inertial Measurement Unit. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22145418 ↗
16. Javaid, M.Y., Ovinis, M., Nagarajan, T., and Hashim, F.B. (2014, January 3–5). Underwater Gliders: A Review. Proceedings of the MATEC Web of Conferences, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.1051/matecconf/20141302020 ↗
17. Bellingham, J.G., and Willcox, J.S. (1996, January 2–6). Optimizing AUV Oceanographic Surveys. Proceedings of the Symposium on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology, Monterey, CA, USA.
18. The present state of autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) applications and technologies10.4031/002533208786861272 ↗
19. Lyu, M., Zhao, Y., Huang, C., and Huang, H. (2023). Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Search and Rescue: A Survey. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15133266 ↗
20. Zagatti, R., Juliano, D.R., Doak, R., Souza, G.M., de Paula Nardy, L., Lepikson, H., Gaudig, C., and Kirchner, F. (May, January 30). FlatFish Resident AUV: Leading the Autonomy Era for Subsea Oil and Gas Operations. Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, USA.
21. Yeo, R. (October, January 29). Surveying the Underside of an Arctic Ice ridge Using a Man-Portable GAVIA AUV Deployed Through the Ice. Proceedings of the OCEANS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
22. Christensen, J.H., Jacobi, M., Rotne, M.C., Nielsen, M.S., Abildgaard, M., Eriksen, C., and Mogensen, L.V. (October, January 30). SeaShark: Towards a Modular Multi-Purpose Man-Portable AUV. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles Symposium (AUV), St. Johns, NL, Canada.10.1109/AUV50043.2020.9267896 ↗
23. Low-cost, man-portable autonomous underwater vehicles for rapid environmental assessment10.4031/002533208787157714 ↗
24. Gracias, N., Ridao, P., Garcia, R., Escartín, J., L'Hour, M., Cibecchini, F., Campos, R., Carreras, M., Ribas, D., and Palomeras, N. (2013, January 10–14). Mapping the Moon: Using a Lightweight AUV to Survey the Site of the 17th Century Ship ‘La Lune’. Proceedings of the 2013 MTS/IEEE OCEANS, Bergen, Norway.10.1109/OCEANS-Bergen.2013.6608142 ↗
25. McFarlane, J.R. (1997, January 8–10). The AUV Revolution; Tomorrow Is Today. Proceedings of the SUT Underwater Technology International: Remote Intervention, Aberdeen, Scotland.
26. Modelling, design and robust control of a remotely operated underwater vehicle10.5772/56810 ↗
27. Goldstein, A., and Bentley, S. (2010, January 20–23). Use of Highly Portable Micro-Sized Remotely Operated Vehicles for Environmental Monitoring and Mapping. Proceedings of the OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/OCEANS.2010.5664495 ↗
28. Recent developments of remotely operated vehicle in the oil and gas industry
29. Qasem, F., Susilo, T., Said, S., Alarbash, Z., Hasan, M., Jabakhanji, B., and Beyrouthy, T. (2019, January 24–26). Preliminary Engineering Implementation on Multisensory Underwater Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) for Oil Spills Surveillance. Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Bioengineering for Smart Technologies (BioSMART), Paris, France.10.1109/BIOSMART.2019.8734217 ↗
30. Robotic tools for deep water archaeology: Surveying an ancient shipwreck with an autonomous underwater vehicle10.1002/rob.20350 ↗
31. Oceanographic research using remotley operated underwater robotic vehicles: Exploration of hydrothermal vent sites on the mid-Atlantic ridge at 37 (degrees) north 32 (degrees) west
32. Joochim, C., Phadungthin, R., and Srikitsuwan, S. (2015, January 18–20). Design and Development of a Remotely operated Underwater Vehicle. Proceedings of the 2015 16th International Conference on Research and Education in Mechatronics (REM), Bochum, Germany.10.1109/REM.2015.7380385 ↗
33. Christ, R.D., and Wernli Sr, R.L. (2011). The ROV Manual: A User Guide for Observation Class Remotely Operated Vehicles, Elsevier.
34. Output feedback motion control system for observation class ROVs based on a high-gain state observer: Theoretical and experimental results10.1016/j.conengprac.2014.12.005 ↗
35. A review of the uses of work-class ROVs for the benefits of science: Lessons learned from the SERPENT project10.3723/175605405784426637 ↗
36. Robertson, G.S. (, January 12–14). The Application of Work Class ROV’s. Proceedings of the SUT Subtech, Aberdeen, UK.
37. Mohamad, M.M.B. (2012). Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) Prototype. [Bachelor’s Thesis, Universiti Teknologi Petronas].
38. Wu, Q. (1997, January 6–9). The Development of SEAPUP (a Light Work Class ROV). Proceedings of the Oceans’ 97. MTS/IEEE Conference Proceedings, Halifax, NS, Canada.
39. Martins, A., Almeida, J., Almeida, C., Matias, B., Kapusniak, S., and Silva, E. (2018, January 28–31). EVA a Hybrid ROV/AUV for Underwater Mining Operations Support. Proceedings of the 2018 OCEANS-MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Oceans (OTO), Kobe, Japan.10.1109/OCEANSKOBE.2018.8558880 ↗
40. A Review of Underwater Localization Techniques, Algorithms, and Challenges10.1155/2020/6403161 ↗
41. Real-Time Positioning and Tracking for Vision-Based Unmanned Underwater Vehicles10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVI-3-W1-2022-163-2022 ↗
42. Review on unmanned underwater robotics, structure designs, materials, sensors, actuators, and navigation control
43. Dhanak, M.R., and Xiros, N.I. (2016). Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Navigation. Springer Handbook of Ocean Engineering, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-16649-0 ↗
44. Broadband acoustic communication aided underwater inertial navigation system10.1109/LRA.2022.3154004 ↗
45. A new contour-based combined matching algorithm for underwater terrain-aided strapdown inertial navigation system10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111870 ↗
46. Britting, K.R. (2010). Inertial Navigation Systems Analysis, Artech House Publishers.
47. Larsen, M.B. (2000, January 11–14). Synthetic Long Baseline Navigation of Underwater Vehicles. Proceedings of the OCEANS 2000 MTS/IEEE Conference and Exhibition. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No. 00CH37158), Providence, RI, USA.
48. Hypothesis grids: Improving long baseline navigation for autonomous underwater vehicles10.1109/JOE.2006.872220 ↗
49. Miller, A., Miller, B., and Miller, G. (2021). Navigation of Underwater Drones and Integration of Acoustic Sensing with Onboard Inertial Navigation System. Drones, 5.10.3390/drones5030083 ↗
50. Field Testing of Moving Short-baseline Navigation for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles using Synchronized Acoustic Messaging10.1002/rob.21460 ↗
51. Dajun, S., Jia, G., Jucheng, Z., and Yunfeng, H. (2017, January 22–25). Design of High Accuracy Ultra Short Baseline Underwater Acoustic Position System. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing (ICSPCC), Xiamen, China.10.1109/ICSPCC.2017.8242400 ↗
52. BeamsNet: A data-driven approach enhancing Doppler velocity log measurements for autonomous underwater vehicle navigation10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105216 ↗
53. Snyder, J. (2010, January 20–23). Doppler Velocity Log (DVL) Navigation for Observation-Class ROVs. Proceedings of the OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/OCEANS.2010.5664561 ↗
54. Klein, I., and Diamant, R. (2020). Dead reckoning for trajectory estimation of underwater drifters under water currents. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.3390/jmse8030205 ↗
55. Saksvik, I.B., Alcocer, A., and Hassani, V. (2021, January 20–23). A Deep Learning Approach to Dead-Reckoning Navigation for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles with Limited Sensor Payloads. Proceedings of the OCEANS 2021: San Diego–Porto, San Diego, CA, USA.10.23919/OCEANS44145.2021.9706096 ↗
56. Topini, E., Topini, A., Franchi, M., Bucci, A., Secciani, N., Ridolfi, A., and Allotta, B. (2020, January 5–30). LSTM-Based Dead Reckoning Navigation for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. Proceedings of the Global Oceans 2020: Singapore–U.S. Gulf Coast, Biloxi, MS, USA.10.1109/IEEECONF38699.2020.9389379 ↗
57. Underwater Acoustic Modems10.1109/JSEN.2015.2434890 ↗
58. Designing an Adaptive Acoustic Modem for Underwater Sensor Networks10.1109/LES.2011.2180013 ↗
59. Design of a Low-Cost Underwater Acoustic Modem10.1109/LES.2010.2050191 ↗
60. Optical Communication and Positioning Convergence for Flexible Underwater Wireless Sensor Network10.1109/JLT.2023.3264023 ↗
61. Magnetic Navigation and Tracking of Underwater Vehicles10.3182/20130918-4-JP-3022.00059 ↗
62. Kaji, C.V., Hoover, R.C., and Ragi, S. (2019, January 20–22). Underwater Navigation using Geomagnetic Field Variations. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (EIT), Brookings, SD, USA.10.1109/EIT.2019.8834192 ↗
63. Fernandez, V.I., Hou, S.M., Hover, F.S., Lang, J.H., and Triantafyllou, M.S. (2007). Lateral-Line Inspired Mems-Array Pressure Sensing for Passive Underwater Navigation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
64. Bayesian surface and underwater navigation10.1109/TSP.2006.881176 ↗
65. Hunter, A.J. (2006). Underwater Acoustic Modelling for Synthetic Aperture Sonar. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Canterbury].
66. Challenges in seafloor imaging and mapping with synthetic aperture sonar10.1109/TGRS.2011.2155071 ↗
67. Erol, M., Vieira, L.F.M., Caruso, A., Paparella, F., Gerla, M., and Oktug, S. (2008, January 25–31). Multi Stage Underwater Sensor Localization Using Mobile Beacons. Proceedings of the 2008 Second International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications (Sensorcomm 2008), Cap Esterel, France.10.1109/SENSORCOMM.2008.32 ↗
68. Time-Difference-of-Arrival-Based Localization Methods of Underwater Mobile Nodes Using Multiple Surface Beacons10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3060565 ↗
69. Drap, P. (2012). Underwater Photogrammetry for Archaeology. Special Application Photogrammetry, InTech.10.5772/33999 ↗
70. Photogrammetric modeling of underwater environments10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.05.004 ↗
71. Hidalgo, F., and Bräunl, T. (2015, January 17–19). Review of Underwater SLAM Techniques. Proceedings of the 2015 6th International Conference on Automation, Robotics and Applications (ICARA), Queenstown, New Zealand.10.1109/ICARA.2015.7081165 ↗
72. Survey of underwater robot positioning navigation10.1016/j.apor.2019.06.002 ↗
73. Wang, G., Ding, H., Xia, H., and Wang, C. (2019, January 8–11). An Underwater Robot Positioning Method Based on EM-ELF Signals. Proceedings of the Intelligent Robotics and Applications, Shenyang, China.10.1007/978-3-030-27538-9_55 ↗
74. Investigation of a 3-D Undersea Positioning System Using Electromagnetic Waves10.1109/TAP.2020.3048584 ↗
75. Overview of underwater transmission characteristics of oceanic LiDAR10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3100395 ↗
76. Alcocer, A., Oliveira, P., and Pascoal, A. (2006, January 12–15). Underwater Acoustic Positioning Systems Based on Buoys with GPS. Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, Carvoeiro, Portugal.10.1016/j.conengprac.2006.04.001 ↗
77. Li, Y., Ruan, R., Zhou, Z., Sun, A., and Luo, X. (2023). Positioning of Unmanned Underwater Vehicle Based on Autonomous Tracking Buoy. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23094398 ↗
78. Liu, M., Zhu, J., Pan, X., Wang, G., Liu, J., Peng, Z., and Cui, J.-H. (2023). A Distributed Intelligent Buoy System for Tracking Underwater Vehicles. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 11.10.3390/jmse11091661 ↗
79. Nie, Q., Gao, W., Zhao, L., and Zu, W. (2007, January 23–25). High Accuracy INS based on Fiber Optical Gyroscope for AUV Application. Proceedings of the 2007 2nd IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, Harbin, China.10.1109/ICIEA.2007.4318887 ↗
80. Towed-array beamforming during ship's manoeuvring10.1049/ip-rsn:19960492 ↗
81. Navigation of Unmanned Surface Vehicles Using Underwater Geophysical Sensing10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3038816 ↗
82. Wei, Z., Pei, Y., Zhu, X., Liu, K., Zhang, X., Zong, L., and Li, X. (2024). A high-precision positioning method for deep-towed multichannel seismic arrays. Front. Mar. Sci., 11.10.3389/fmars.2024.1351327 ↗
83. Skarsoulis, E.K., Piperakis, G., Kalogerakis, M., Orfanakis, E., Papadakis, P., Dosso, S.E., and Frantzis, A. (2018). Underwater acoustic pulsed source localization with a pair of hydrophones. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10060883 ↗
84. A theory of the imaging mechanism of underwater bottom topography by real and synthetic aperture radar10.1029/JC089iC06p10529 ↗
85. Choi, H.-m., Yang, H.-s., and Seong, W.-j. (2021). Compressive underwater sonar imaging with synthetic aperture processing. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13101924 ↗
86. Pleskachevsky, A., and Lehner, S. (2011, January 14–16). Estimation of Underwater Topography Using Satellite High Resolution Synthetic Aperture Radar Data. Proceedings of the 4th TerraSAR-X Meeting, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany.
87. Salumäe, T., Raag, R., Rebane, J., Ernits, A., Toming, G., Ratas, M., and Kruusmaa, M. (2014, January 14–19). Design Principle of a Biomimetic Underwater Robot U-CAT. Proceedings of the 2014 Oceans—St. John’s, St. John’s, NL, Canada.10.1109/OCEANS.2014.7003126 ↗
88. An Airborne Sonar System for Underwater Remote Sensing and Imaging10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3031808 ↗
89. Palomer, A., Ridao, P., Youakim, D., Ribas, D., Forest, J., and Petillot, Y. (2018). 3D Laser Scanner for Underwater Manipulation. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18041086 ↗
90. Underwater Laser Scanner: Ray-Based Model and Calibration10.1109/TMECH.2019.2929652 ↗
91. Development and demonstration of a gravity gradiometer onboard an autonomous underwater vehicle for detecting massive subseafloor deposits10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.008 ↗
92. Monterroso Muñoz, A., Moron-Fernández, M.-J., Cascado-Caballero, D., Diaz-del-Rio, F., and Real, P. (2023). Autonomous Underwater Vehicles: Identifying Critical Issues and Future Perspectives in Image Acquisition. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23104986 ↗
93. Vision-Based Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Navigation in Poor Visibility Conditions Using a Model-Free Robust Control
94. Biswas, D. (2018). Design and Fabrication of an Unmanned Underwater Vehicle (UUV). [Bachelor’s Thesis, Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology].
95. Underwater wireless communications: Current achievements and research challenges
96. Adaptive H-infinite Kalman filter based on multiple fading factors and its application in unmanned underwater vehicle10.1016/j.isatra.2020.08.030 ↗
97. Bae, I., and Hong, J. (2023). Survey on the developments of unmanned marine vehicles: Intelligence and cooperation. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23104643 ↗
98. A review of terrain aided navigation for underwater vehicles10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114779 ↗
99. A Review of Guidance Laws Applicable to Unmanned Underwater Vehicles10.1017/S0373463302002138 ↗
100. Mahdi, A.E., Azouz, A., Abdalla, A.E., and Abosekeen, A. (2022). A Machine Learning Approach for an Improved Inertial Navigation System Solution. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22041687 ↗