Extracting Sentence Embeddings from Pretrained Transformer Models
Source abstract
Abstract
Pre-trained transformer models shine in many natural language processing tasks and therefore are expected to bear the representation of the input sentence or text meaning. These sentence-level embeddings are also important in retrieval-augmented generation. But do commonly used plain averaging or prompt templates sufficiently capture and represent the underlying meaning? After providing a comprehensive review of existing sentence embedding extraction and refinement methods, we thoroughly test different combinations and our original extensions of the most promising ones on pretrained models. Namely, given 110 M parameters, BERT’s hidden representations from multiple layers, and many tokens, we try diverse ways to extract optimal sentence embeddings. We test various token aggregation and representation post-processing techniques. We also test multiple ways of using a general Wikitext dataset to complement BERT’s sentence embeddings. All methods are tested on eight Semantic Textual Similarity (STS), six short text clustering, and twelve classification tasks. We also evaluate our representation-shaping techniques on other static models, including random token representations. Proposed representation extraction methods improve the performance on STS and clustering tasks for all models considered. Very high improvements for static token-based models, especially random embeddings for STS tasks, almost reach the performance of BERT-derived representations. Our work shows that the representation-shaping techniques significantly improve sentence embeddings extracted from BERT-based and simple baseline models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Topic Modeling · Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining · Natural Language Processing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Informatics, Kaunas University of Technology, LT-51368 Kaunas, Lithuania
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Burges, C., Bottou, L., Welling, M., Ghahramani, Z., and Weinberger, K. (2013). Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates, Inc.
2. Guyon, I., Luxburg, U.V., Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Fergus, R., Vishwanathan, S., and Garnett, R. (2017). Attention is All you Need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates, Inc.
3. The early catastrophe: The 30 million word gap by age 3
4. Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., and Bengio, Y. (2015, January 7–9). Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA.
5. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., and Toutanova, K. (2019, January 2–7). BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), Minneapolis, MN, USA.
6. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., and Gelly, S. (2021, January 3–7). An Image is Worth 16 × 16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, Vienna, Austria.
7. Gulati, A., Qin, J., Chiu, C.C., Parmar, N., Zhang, Y., Yu, J., Han, W., Wang, S., Zhang, Z., and Wu, Y. (2020). Conformer: Convolution-augmented Transformer for Speech Recognition. arXiv.10.21437/Interspeech.2020-3015 ↗
8. Beygelzimer, A., Dauphin, Y., Liang, P., and Vaughan, J.W. (2021). Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modeling. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates, Inc.
9. Reimers, N., and Gurevych, I. (2019, January 3–7). Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), Hong Kong, China.10.18653/v1/D19-1410 ↗
10. Narang, S., Chung, H.W., Tay, Y., Fedus, L., Fevry, T., Matena, M., Malkan, K., Fiedel, N., Shazeer, N., and Lan, Z. (2021, January 7–11). Do Transformer Modifications Transfer Across Implementations and Applications?. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic.10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.465 ↗
11. Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advances10.1162/coli_a_00422 ↗
12. Conneau, A., Kiela, D., Schwenk, H., Barrault, L., and Bordes, A. (2017, January 7–11). Supervised Learning of Universal Sentence Representations from Natural Language Inference Data. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Copenhagen, Denmark.10.18653/v1/D17-1070 ↗
13. Su, J., Cao, J., Liu, W., and Ou, Y. (2021). Whitening Sentence Representations for Better Semantics and Faster Retrieval. arXiv.
14. Huang, J., Tang, D., Zhong, W., Lu, S., Shou, L., Gong, M., Jiang, D., and Duan, N. (2021, January 16–20). WhiteningBERT: An Easy Unsupervised Sentence Embedding Approach. Proceedings of the Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic.10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.23 ↗
15. Jiang, T., Jiao, J., Huang, S., Zhang, Z., Wang, D., Zhuang, F., Wei, F., Huang, H., Deng, D., and Zhang, Q. (2022, January 7–11). PromptBERT: Improving BERT Sentence Embeddings with Prompts. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.603 ↗
16. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., and Dean, J. (2013). Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space. arXiv.
17. Pennington, J., Socher, R., and Manning, C.D. (2014, January 25–29). GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation. Proceedings of the Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Doha, Qatar.10.3115/v1/D14-1162 ↗
18. The principle of semantic compositionality10.1007/BF00763644 ↗
19. Bos, J. (2008). Wide-Coverage Semantic Analysis with Boxer. Proceedings of the Semantics in Text Processing, STEP 2008 Conference Proceedings, College Publications.10.3115/1626481.1626503 ↗
20. Universal grammar10.1111/j.1755-2567.1970.tb00434.x ↗
21. A Survey of Computational Semantics: Representation, Inference and Knowledge in Wide-Coverage Text Understanding10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00284.x ↗
22. Vector Space Models of Word Meaning and Phrase Meaning: A Survey10.1002/lnco.362 ↗
23. Yoshikawa, M., Mineshima, K., Noji, H., and Bekki, D. (February, January 27). Combining Axiom Injection and Knowledge Base Completion for Efficient Natural Language Inference. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Honolulu, HI, USA.
24. Clark, S., and Pulman, S.G. (2007, January 26–28). Combining Symbolic and Distributional Models of Meaning. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium: Quantum Interaction, Stanford, CA, USA.
25. Bjerva, J., Bos, J., van der Goot, R., and Nissim, M. (2014, January 23–24). The Meaning Factory: Formal Semantics for Recognizing Textual Entailment and Determining Semantic Similarity. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2014), Dublin, Ireland.10.3115/v1/S14-2114 ↗
26. Tensor product variable binding and the representation of symbolic structures in connectionist systems10.1016/0004-3702(90)90007-M ↗
27. Composition in Distributional Models of Semantics10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01106.x ↗
28. Milajevs, D., Kartsaklis, D., Sadrzadeh, M., and Purver, M. (2014, January 25–29). Evaluating Neural Word Representations in Tensor-Based Compositional Settings. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Doha, Qatar.10.3115/v1/D14-1079 ↗
29. Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.1 ↗
30. Widdows, D. (2007, January 26–28). Semantic Vector Products: Some Initial Investigations. Proceedings of the Second AAAI Symposium on Quantum Interaction, Stanford, CA, USA.
31. Holographic reduced representations10.1109/72.377968 ↗
32. Baroni, M., and Zamparelli, R. (2010, January 9–10). Nouns are Vectors, Adjectives are Matrices: Representing Adjective-Noun Constructions in Semantic Space. Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Cambridge, MA, USA.
33. Guevara, E. (2010, January 16). A Regression Model of Adjective-Noun Compositionality in Distributional Semantics. Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on GEometrical Models of Natural Language Semantics, Uppsala, Sweden.
34. Grefenstette, E., Dinu, G., Zhang, Y., Sadrzadeh, M., and Baroni, M. (2013, January 19–22). Multi-Step Regression Learning for Compositional Distributional Semantics. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS 2013)–Long Papers, Potsdam, Germany.
35. Frege in Space: A Program for Composition Distributional Semantics10.33011/lilt.v9i.1321 ↗
36. Xing, C., Wang, D., Zhang, X., and Liu, C. (2014, January 9–12). Document classification with distributions of word vectors. Proceedings of the Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA), 2014 Asia-Pacific, Siem Reap, Cambodia.10.1109/APSIPA.2014.7041633 ↗
37. Yu, L., Hermann, K.M., Blunsom, P., and Pulman, S. (2014). Deep Learning for Answer Sentence Selection. arXiv.
38. Biemann, C., Handschuh, S., Freitas, A., Meziane, F., and Métais, E. (2015). In Defense of Word Embedding for Generic Text Representation. Natural Language Processing and Information Systems, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-19581-0 ↗
39. Ritter, S., Long, C., Paperno, D., Baroni, M., Botvinick, M., and Goldberg, A. (2015, January 4–5). Leveraging Preposition Ambiguity to Assess Compositional Distributional Models of Semantics. Proceedings of the Fourth Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics, Denver, CO, USA.10.18653/v1/S15-1023 ↗
40. White, L., Togneri, R., Liu, W., and Bennamoun, M. (2015, January 8–9). How Well Sentence Embeddings Capture Meaning. Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Document Computing Symposium, Association for Computing Machinery, Parramatta, NSW, Australia. ADCS ’15.10.1145/2838931.2838932 ↗
41. Shen, D., Wang, G., Wang, W., Min, M.R., Su, Q., Zhang, Y., Li, C., Henao, R., and Carin, L. (2018, January 15–20). Baseline Needs More Love: On Simple Word-Embedding-Based Models and Associated Pooling Mechanisms. Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Melbourne, Australia.10.18653/v1/P18-1041 ↗
42. Wieting, J., Bansal, M., Gimpel, K., and Livescu, K. (2015). Towards Universal Paraphrastic Sentence Embeddings. arXiv.
43. Aldarmaki, H., and Diab, M. (2018, January 20–26). Evaluation of Unsupervised Compositional Representations. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Santa Fe, NM, USA.
44. Iyyer, M., Manjunatha, V., Boyd-Graber, J., and Daumé, H. (2015, January 26–31). Deep Unordered Composition Rivals Syntactic Methods for Text Classification. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), Beijing, China.10.3115/v1/P15-1162 ↗
45. Pham, N.T., Kruszewski, G., Lazaridou, A., and Baroni, M. (2015, January 26–31). Jointly optimizing word representations for lexical and sentential tasks with the C-PHRASE model. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), Beijing, China.10.3115/v1/P15-1094 ↗
46. Wieting, J., and Gimpel, K. (2017). Revisiting Recurrent Networks for Paraphrastic Sentence Embeddings. arXiv.10.18653/v1/P17-1190 ↗
47. Kenter, T., Borisov, A., and de Rijke, M. (2016, January 7–12). Siamese CBOW: Optimizing Word Embeddings for Sentence Representations. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Berlin, Germany.10.18653/v1/P16-1089 ↗
48. Pagliardini, M., Gupta, P., and Jaggi, M. (2018, January 1–6). Unsupervised Learning of Sentence Embeddings Using Compositional n-Gram Features. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), New Orleans, LA, USA.10.18653/v1/N18-1049 ↗
49. Gupta, P., and Jaggi, M. (2021, January 1–6). Obtaining Better Static Word Embeddings Using Contextual Embedding Models. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), Online.10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.408 ↗
50. Learning to Understand Phrases by Embedding the Dictionary10.1162/tacl_a_00080 ↗
51. Joulin, A., Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., and Mikolov, T. (2017, January 3–7). Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classification. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 2, Short Papers, Valencia, Spain.10.18653/v1/E17-2068 ↗
52. Choi, H., Kim, J., Joe, S., and Gwon, Y. (2021, January 10–15). Evaluation of BERT and ALBERT Sentence Embedding Performance on Downstream NLP Tasks. Proceedings of the 2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Milan, Italy.10.1109/ICPR48806.2021.9412102 ↗
53. Bommasani, R., Davis, K., and Cardie, C. (2020, January 5–10). Interpreting Pretrained Contextualized Representations via Reductions to Static Embeddings. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Online.10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.431 ↗
54. Yin, W., and Schütze, H. (2016, January 5–10). Learning Word Meta-Embeddings. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Berlin, Germany.10.18653/v1/P16-1128 ↗
55. Coates, J., and Bollegala, D. (2018, January 1–6). Frustratingly Easy Meta-Embedding—Computing Meta-Embeddings by Averaging Source Word Embeddings. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers), New Orleans, LA, USA.10.18653/v1/N18-2031 ↗
56. Adi, Y., Kermany, E., Belinkov, Y., Lavi, O., and Goldberg, Y. (2017, January 24–26). Fine-grained analysis of sentence embeddings using auxiliary prediction tasks. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, Toulon, France.
57. A mathematical theory of communication10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x ↗
58. Riedel, B., Augenstein, I., Spithourakis, G.P., and Riedel, S. (2017). A simple but tough-to-beat baseline for the Fake News Challenge stance detection task. arXiv.
59. Singh, P., and Mukerjee, A. (2015, January 11–14). Words are not Equal: Graded Weighting Model for Building Composite Document Vectors. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Natural Language Processing, Trivandrum, India.
60. Arora, S., Liang, Y., and Ma, T. (2017, January 24–26). A simple but tough-to-beat baseline for sentence embeddings. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017, Toulon, France.
61. Ethayarajh, K. (2018, January 20). Unsupervised Random Walk Sentence Embeddings: A Strong but Simple Baseline. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP, Melbourne, Australia.10.18653/v1/W18-3012 ↗
62. Stankevičius, L., and Lukoševičius, M. (2020, January 23). Testing pre-trained transformer models for Lithuanian news clustering. Proceedings of the CEUR Workshop Proceeding: IVUS 2020, CEUR-WS, Kaunas, Lithuania.
63. Yan, Y., Li, R., Wang, S., Zhang, F., Wu, W., and Xu, W. (2021, January 1–6). ConSERT: A Contrastive Framework for Self-Supervised Sentence Representation Transfer. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), Online.10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.393 ↗
64. An, Y., Kalinowski, A., and Greenberg, J. (2021, January 15–17). Clustering and Network Analysis for the Embedding Spaces of Sentences and Sub-Sentences. Proceedings of the 2021 Second International Conference on Intelligent Data Science Technologies and Applications (IDSTA), Tartu, Estonia.10.1109/IDSTA53674.2021.9660801 ↗
65. Yang, Z., Zhu, C., and Chen, W. (2019, January 3–7). Parameter-free Sentence Embedding via Orthogonal Basis. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), Hong Kong, China.10.18653/v1/D19-1059 ↗
66. SBERT-WK: A Sentence Embedding Method by Dissecting BERT-Based Word Models10.1109/TASLP.2020.3008390 ↗
67. Schakel, A.M.J., and Wilson, B.J. (2015). Measuring Word Significance using Distributed Representations of Words. arXiv.
68. Arefyev, N., Ermolaev, P., and Panchenko, A. (2018). How much does a word weigh? Weighting word embeddings for word sense induction. arXiv.
69. The Automatic Creation of Literature Abstracts10.1147/rd.22.0159 ↗
70. Yokoi, S., Takahashi, R., Akama, R., Suzuki, J., and Inui, K. (2020, January 16–20). Word Rotator’s Distance. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Online.10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.236 ↗
71. Amiri, H., and Mohtarami, M. (2019, January 2–7). Vector of Locally Aggregated Embeddings for Text Representation. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), Minneapolis, MN, USA.10.18653/v1/N19-1143 ↗
72. Gupta, V., Karnick, H., Bansal, A., and Jhala, P. (2016, January 11–16). Product Classification in E-Commerce using Distributional Semantics. Proceedings of the COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, Osaka, Japan.
73. Bag-of-concepts: Comprehending document representation through clustering words in distributed representation10.1016/j.neucom.2017.05.046 ↗
74. Document Vector Extension for Documents Classification10.1109/TKDE.2019.2961343 ↗
75. Li, M., Bai, H., Tan, L., Xiong, K., Li, M., and Lin, J. (2020). Latte-Mix: Measuring Sentence Semantic Similarity with Latent Categorical Mixtures. arXiv.
76. Mekala, D., Gupta, V., Paranjape, B., and Karnick, H. (2017, January 9–11). SCDV: Sparse Composite Document Vectors using soft clustering over distributional representations. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Copenhagen, Denmark.10.18653/v1/D17-1069 ↗
77. Gupta, V., Saw, A., Nokhiz, P., Netrapalli, P., Rai, P., and Talukdar, P. (2020, January 7–12). P-sif: Document embeddings using partition averaging. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New York, NY, USA.10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6292 ↗
78. K-SVD: An algorithm for designing overcomplete dictionaries for sparse representation10.1109/TSP.2006.881199 ↗
79. Gupta, V., Saw, A., Nokhiz, P., Gupta, H., and Talukdar, P. (September, January 29). Improving Document Classification with Multi-Sense Embeddings. Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
80. Gupta, A., and Gupta, V. (2021, January 10). Unsupervised Contextualized Document Representation. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Simple and Efficient Natural Language Processing, Virtual.10.18653/v1/2021.sustainlp-1.17 ↗
81. Mekala, D., and Shang, J. (2020, January 5–10). Contextualized Weak Supervision for Text Classification. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Online.10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.30 ↗
82. Discrete Cosine Transform10.1109/T-C.1974.223784 ↗
83. Almarwani, N., Aldarmaki, H., and Diab, M. (2019, January 3–7). Efficient Sentence Embedding using Discrete Cosine Transform. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), Hong Kong, China.10.18653/v1/D19-1380 ↗
84. Almarwani, N., and Diab, M. (2021, January 1–6). Discrete Cosine Transform as Universal Sentence Encoder. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 2: Short Papers), Online.10.18653/v1/2021.acl-short.53 ↗
85. Kayal, S., and Tsatsaronis, G. (August, January 28). EigenSent: Spectral sentence embeddings using higher-order Dynamic Mode Decomposition. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Florence, Italy.
86. Kim, T., Yoo, K.M., and Lee, S.g. (2021, January 1–6). Self-Guided Contrastive Learning for BERT Sentence Representations. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), Online.10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.197 ↗
87. Nguyen, L.M., Phan, X.H., Hasida, K., and Tojo, S. (2020). Document Classification by Word Embeddings of BERT. Computational Linguistics, Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-6168-9 ↗
88. Ma, X., Wang, Z., Ng, P., Nallapati, R., and Xiang, B. (2019). Universal Text Representation from BERT: An Empirical Study. arXiv.
89. Kovaleva, O., Romanov, A., Rogers, A., and Rumshisky, A. (2019, January 3–7). Revealing the Dark Secrets of BERT. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), Hong Kong, China.10.18653/v1/D19-1445 ↗
90. Liu, P., Yuan, W., Fu, J., Jiang, Z., Hayashi, H., and Neubig, G. (2021). Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing. arXiv.
91. Zhong, Z., Friedman, D., and Chen, D. (2021, January 6–11). Factual Probing Is [MASK]: Learning vs. Learning to Recall. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Online.10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.398 ↗
92. Wang, H., Li, Y., Huang, Z., Dou, Y., Kong, L., and Shao, J. (2022). SNCSE: Contrastive Learning for Unsupervised Sentence Embedding with Soft Negative Samples. arXiv.10.1007/978-981-99-4752-2_35 ↗
93. Dalvi, F., Khan, A.R., Alam, F., Durrani, N., Xu, J., and Sajjad, H. (2022, January 25–29). Discovering Latent Concepts Learned in BERT. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, Online.
94. Liu, N.F., Gardner, M., Belinkov, Y., Peters, M.E., and Smith, N.A. (2019, January 2–7). Linguistic Knowledge and Transferability of Contextual Representations. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), Minneapolis, MN, USA.10.18653/v1/N19-1112 ↗
95. Tenney, I., Xia, P., Chen, B., Wang, A., Poliak, A., McCoy, R.T., Kim, N., Durme, B.V., Bowman, S., and Das, D. (2019, January 6–9). What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, New Orleans, LA, USA.
96. Muller, B., Elazar, Y., Sagot, B., and Seddah, D. (2021, January 19–23). First Align, then Predict: Understanding the Cross-Lingual Ability of Multilingual BERT. Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, Online.10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.189 ↗
97. Hämmerl, K., Libovický, J., and Fraser, A. (2022, January 22–27). Combining Static and Contextualised Multilingual Embeddings. Proceedings of the Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022, Dublin, Ireland.10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.182 ↗
98. Ethayarajh, K. (2019, January 3–7). How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddings. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), Hong Kong, China.10.18653/v1/D19-1006 ↗
99. Carlsson, F., Gyllensten, A.C., Gogoulou, E., Hellqvist, E.Y., and Sahlgren, M. (2020, January 25–29). Semantic re-tuning with contrastive tension. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
100. Chung, H.W., Fevry, T., Tsai, H., Johnson, M., and Ruder, S. (2021, January 3–7). Rethinking Embedding Coupling in Pre-trained Language Models. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, Virtual.