journal article·2024-09-19Open access

Machine Learning for Advanced Emission Monitoring and Reduction Strategies in Fossil Fuel Power Plants

Zitu Zuo, Yongjie Niu, Jiale Li, Hongpeng Fu, Mengjie Zhou

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 18

Abstract

Fossil fuel power plants are a significant contributor to global carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions. Accurate monitoring and effective reduction of these emissions are crucial for mitigating climate change. This systematic review examines the current state of research on the application of machine learning techniques in evaluating the emissions from fossil fuel power plants. This review first briefly introduces the continuous emission monitoring (CEM) systems and predictive emission monitoring (PEM) systems that are commonly used in power plants and highlights that machine learning models can significantly improve PEM systems through their capability to process and interpret large datasets intelligently to transform traditional emission monitoring systems by enhancing their precision, effectiveness, and cost-efficiency. Compared to previously published review articles, the key contribution and innovation in this present review is the discussion of machine learning models in CO2/NOx emissions according to the different algorithms used, including their advantages and disadvantages in a systematic way, which aims to help future researchers to develop more effective machine learning models. The most popular machine learning model includes reinforcement learning, a forward neural network, a long short-term memory neural network, and support vector regression. While each model method has its own advantages and disadvantages, we noted that training data quality, as well as the proper selection of model parameters, plays an important role. The challenges and research gaps, such as model transferability, a deep understanding of the physics of CO2/NOx emissions, and the availability of high-quality data for training machine learning models, are identified, and recommendations as well as potential future research directions to address these challenges are proposed and discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting · Fault Detection and Control Systems · Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Resources and Environmental Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China

College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China

Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, New York, NY 75080, USA

School of Computer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UB, UK

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. A review of trends and drivers of greenhouse gas emissions by sector from 1990 to 201810.1088/1748-9326/abee4e ↗
2. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2024, January 01). Overview of Greenhouse Gases, Available online: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases.
3. World Bank Group (1998). Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook, The World Bank Group.
4. United Nations Climate Change (2021). AR6 Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, United Nations Climate Change.
5. International Energy Agency (2020). Global Energy & CO2 Status Report 2019, International Energy Agency Publications.
6. Monteiro, F., and Sousa, A. (2024). CO2 Emissions Resulting from Large-Scale Integration of Electric Vehicles Using a Macro Perspective. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14146177 ↗
7. International Energy Agency (2022). Global Energy Review: CO2 Emissions in 2021, International Energy Agency Publications.
8. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2024). Electric Power Monthly, U.S. Energy Information Administration.
9. Kanwal, F., Ahmed, A., Jamil, F., Rafiq, S., Ayub, H.M.U., Ghauri, M., Khurram, M.S., Munir, S., Inayat, A., and Abu Bakar, M.S. (2021). Co-Combustion of Blends of Coal and Underutilised Biomass Residues for Environmental Friendly Electrical Energy Production. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13094881 ↗
10. CO2 emissions and financial development in an emerging economy: An augmented VAR approach10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.017 ↗
11. Guo, B., Zhou, B., Zhang, Z., Li, K., Wang, J., Chen, J., and Papadakis, G. (2024). A Critical Review of the Status of Current Greenhouse Technology in China and Development Prospects. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14135952 ↗
12. Conti, J., Holtberg, P., Diefenderfer, J., LaRose, A., Turnure, J.T., and Westfall, L. (2024, January 01). International Energy Outlook 2016 with Projections to 2040. USA, 2016, Available online: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1296780.10.2172/1296780 ↗
13. Abu Bakar, M.S., Ahmed, A., Jeffery, D.M., Hidayat, S., Sukri, R.S., Mahlia, T.M.I., Jamil, F., Khurrum, M.S., Ina, A., and Moogi, S. (2020). Pyrolysis of solid waste residues from Lemon Myrtle essential oils extraction for bio-oil production. Bioresour. Technol., 318.10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123913 ↗
14. Macroeconomic impact of stranded fossil fuel assets10.1038/s41558-018-0182-1 ↗
15. Lasek, J.A., and Lajnert, R. (2022). On the Issues of NOx as Greenhouse Gases: An Ongoing Discussion…. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122010429 ↗
16. Human health and environmental impacts of coal combustion and post-combustion wastes10.1016/j.jsm.2017.12.007 ↗
17. Urban pollution and solar radiation impacts10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.166 ↗
18. A novel approach for analysing environmental sustainability aspects of combine harvester through telematics data. Part I: Evaluation and analysis of field tests10.1007/s11119-023-10060-6 ↗
19. A novel approach for analysing environmental sustainability aspects of combine harvesters through telematics data. Part II: An IT tool for comparative analysis10.1007/s11119-023-10065-1 ↗
20. International Energy Agency (2021). World Energy Outlook 2021, International Energy Agency Publications.
21. Hackney, R., Sadasivuni, S.K., Rogerson, J.W., and Bulat, G. (2016). Predictive Emissions Monitoring System for Small Siemens Dry Low Emissions Combustors: Validation and Application. Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, American Society of Mechanical Engineers.10.1115/GT2016-57656 ↗
22. Jahnke, J. (2022). Continuous Emission Monitoring, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781119434009 ↗
23. Optimization of coal-fired boiler SCRs based on modified support vector machine models and genetic algorithms10.1016/j.fuel.2008.10.038 ↗
24. ABB Measurements & Analytics (2019). Predictive Emission Monitoring Systems: The New Approach for Monitoring Emissions from Industry, ABB Measurements & Analytics.
25. Ciarlo, G., and Callero, F. (2024, January 01). Predictive Emission Monitoring Systems (PEMS) Deploying Software-Based Emission Monitoring Systems for Refining Processes. Available online: https://library.e.abb.com/public/310e4b7c45a742578722e61894999b4e/AT_ANALYTICAL_029-EN_A.pdf.
26. Rockwell Automation Inc. (2009). Software CEM Predictive Emissions Monitoring System, Rockwell Automation Inc.
27. Eisenman, T., Bianchin, D.R., and Triebel, D. (2014, January 19–21). Predictive Emission Monitoring (PEM): Suitability and Application in View of. U.S. EPA and European Regulatory Frameworks. Proceedings of the 19th Symp. Ind. Appl. Gas Turbines Committee, Banff, AB, Canada.
28. Singh, P.K., Kar, A.K., Singh, Y., Kolekar, M.H., and Tanwar, S. Machine Learning: A Review of the Algorithms and Its Applications. In Proceedings of ICRIC 2019.
29. A review of machine learning10.1017/S026988899700101X ↗
30. Zhan, C., Ghaderibaneh, M., Sahu, P., and Gupta, H. (2021, January 7–11). DeepMTL: Deep Learning Based Multiple Transmitter Localization. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), Pisa, Italy.10.1109/WoWMoM51794.2021.00017 ↗
31. DeepAlloc: Deep Learning Approach to Spectrum Allocation in Shared Spectrum Systems10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3352034 ↗
32. Prediction of combustion activation energy of NaOH/KOH catalyzed straw pyrolytic carbon based on machine learning10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.089 ↗
33. Machine Learning: Algorithms, Real-World Applications and Research Directions10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x ↗
34. PRISMA (2023, May 18). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Available online: https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-flow-diagram.
35. Zhan, X., Xu, H., Zhang, Y., Huo, Y., Zhu, X., Yin, H., and Zheng, Y. (2021). DeepThermal: Combustion Optimization for Thermal Power Generating Units Using Offline Reinforcement Learning. arXiv.10.1609/aaai.v36i4.20393 ↗
36. ThermalNet: A deep reinforcement learning-based combustion optimization system for coal-fired boiler10.1016/j.engappai.2018.07.003 ↗
37. Development of artificial neural network model for a coal-fired boiler using real plant data10.1016/j.energy.2008.10.010 ↗
38. ANN–GA approach for predictive modeling and optimization of NOx emission in a tangentially fired boiler10.1007/s10098-012-0490-5 ↗
39. Estimation of the main air pollutants from different biomasses under combustion atmospheres by artificial neural networks10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141484 ↗
40. Prediction of SOx–NOx emission from a coal-fired CFB power plant with machine learning: Plant data learned by deep neural network and least square support vector machine10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122310 ↗
41. Botros, K.K., Selinger, C., and Siarkowski, L. (2009). Verification of a Neural Network Based Predictive Emission Monitoring Module for an RB211-24C Gas Turbine. Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, American Society of Mechanical Engineers.10.1115/GT2009-59419 ↗
42. Botros, K.K., and Cheung, M. (October, January 27). Neural Network Based Predictive Emission Monitoring Module for a GE LM2500 Gas Turbine. Proceedings of the International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, AB, Canada.
43. Development of novel dynamic machine learning-based optimization of a coal-fired power plant10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107848 ↗
44. A Support Vector Based CO2 Gas Emission Prediction System for Generation Power Plant10.1166/asl.2017.8875 ↗
45. A novel least squares support vector machine ensemble model for NOx emission prediction of a coal-fired boiler10.1016/j.energy.2013.02.062 ↗
46. Prediction of NOX emission for coal-fired boilers based on deep belief network10.1016/j.conengprac.2018.08.003 ↗
47. Combining Support Vector Regression and Ant Colony Optimization to Reduce NOx Emissions in Coal-Fired Utility Boilers10.1021/ef700451v ↗
48. Modeling and Optimization of NOX Emission in a Coal-fired Power Plant using Advanced Machine Learning Methods10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.1129 ↗
49. Modelling of a Post-combustion CO2 Capture Process Using Bootstrap Aggregated Extreme Learning Machines10.1016/B978-0-444-63428-3.50339-8 ↗
50. Rahmanda, A.A., Soeprijanto, A., Muhammad, A., Syaiin, M., Adhitya, R.Y., Herijono, B., Endrasmono, J., Singgih, A., Zuliari, E.A., and Haryudo, S.I. (2017, January 17–19). Control and monitoring system optimalization of combustion in furnace boiler prototype at industrial steam power plant with comparison of Neural Network (NN) and Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) method. Proceedings of the 2017 International Symposium on Electronics and Smart Devices (ISESD), Yogyakarta, Indonesia.10.1109/ISESD.2017.8253317 ↗
51. Modeling and reduction of NOX emissions for a 700 MW coal-fired boiler with the advanced machine learning method10.1016/j.energy.2015.11.020 ↗
52. Integrating multi-objective optimization with computational fluid dynamics to optimize boiler combustion process of a coal fired power plant10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.02.069 ↗
53. Prediction of the NOx emissions from thermal power plant using long-short term memory neural network10.1016/j.energy.2019.116597 ↗
54. Sustainable NOx emission reduction at a coal-fired power station through the use of online neural network modeling and particle swarm optimization10.1016/j.conengprac.2019.104167 ↗
55. Cuccu, G., Danafar, S., Cudré-Mauroux, P., Gassner, M., Bernero, S., and Kryszczuk, K. (2017, January 11–14). A data-driven approach to predict NOx-emissions of gas turbines. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/BigData.2017.8258056 ↗
56. Forecasting of carbon dioxide emissions from power plants in Kuwait using United States Environmental Protection Agency, Intergovernmental panel on climate change, and machine learning methods10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.023 ↗
57. Modeling and optimization of the NOX generation characteristics of the coal-fired boiler based on interpretable machine learning algorithm10.1080/15435075.2021.1947827 ↗
58. Comparative study of computational intelligence approaches for NOx reduction of coal-fired boiler10.1016/j.energy.2013.04.007 ↗
59. A robust fuzzy tree method with outlier detection for combustion models and optimization10.1016/j.chemolab.2016.09.003 ↗
60. Panigrahi, B.K., Suganthan, P.N., Das, S., and Satapathy, S.C. (2011). SVR with Chaotic Genetic Algorithm in Taiwanese 3G Phone Demand Forecasting. Swarm, Evolutionary, and Memetic Computing: Proceedings of the Second International Conference, SEMCCO 2011, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India, 19–21 December 2011, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-27172-4 ↗
61. Guo, M., Li, D., Du, C., Jia, Z., Qin, X., Chen, L., Sheng, L., and Li, H. (2012). Prediction of the Busy Traffic in Holidays Based on GA-SVR. Advances in Computer Science and Information Engineering, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-30223-7_91 ↗
62. Parallel randomized sampling for support vector machine (SVM) and support vector regression (SVR)10.1007/s10115-007-0082-6 ↗
63. Modeling and Optimization of NOx Emission from a 660 MW Coal-Fired Boiler Based on the Deep Learning Algorithm10.1252/jcej.21we004 ↗
64. NOx reduction using amine reclaimer wastes (ARW) generated in post combustion CO2 capture10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.05.015 ↗
65. Yang, F., Du, M., and Hu, X. (2019). Evaluating Explanation without Ground Truth in Interpretable Machine Learning. arXiv.
66. A review: Fundamentals of computational fluid dynamics (CFD)10.1063/1.5066893 ↗
67. Transfer learning using computational intelligence: A survey10.1016/j.knosys.2015.01.010 ↗
68. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805 ↗
69. Explainable AI (XAI): Core Ideas, Techniques, and Solutions10.1145/3561048 ↗