Use of Machine Learning to Improve Additive Manufacturing Processes
Source abstract
Abstract
Rapidly developing artificial intelligence (AI) can help machines and devices to perceive, analyze, and even make inferences in a similar way to human reasoning. The aim of this article is to present applications of AI methods, including machine learning (ML), in the design and supervision of processes used in the field of additive manufacturing techniques. This approach will allow specific tasks to be solved as if they were performed by a human expert in the field. The application of AI in the development of additive manufacturing technologies makes it possible to be assisted by the knowledge of experienced operators in the design and supervision of processes acquired automatically. This reduces the risk of human error and simplifies and automates the production of products and parts. AI in 3D technology creates a wide range of possibilities for generating 3D objects and enables a machine equipped with a vision system, used in ML processes, to analyze data similar to human thought processes. Incremental printing using such a printer allows the production of objects of ever-increasing quality from several materials simultaneously. The process itself is also precise and fast. An accuracy of 97.56% means that the model is precise and makes very few errors. The 3D printing system with artificial intelligence allows the device to adapt to, for example, different material properties, as the printer examines the 3D-printed surface and automatically adjusts the printing. AI/ML-based solutions similar to ours, once learning sets are modified or extended, are easily adaptable to other technologies, materials, or multi-material 3D printing. They also allow the creation of dedicated, ML solutions that adapt to the specifics of a production line, including as self-learning solutions as production progresses.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Computer Science, Kazimierz Wielki University, Chodkiewicza 30, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland
Faculty of Mechatronics, Kazimierz Wielki University, Chodkiewicza 30, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland
Funding
Polish Minister of Science under the ‘Regional Initiative of Excellence’ · Kazimierz Wielki University
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. Păvăloaia, V.-D., and Necula, S.-C. (2023). Artificial Intelligence as a Disruptive Technology—A Systematic Literature Review. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12051102 ↗
2. Sgantzos, K., and Grigg, I. (2019). Artificial Intelligence Implementations on the Blockchain. Use Cases and Future Applications. Future Internet, 11.10.3390/fi11080170 ↗
3. Kao, C.-Y., and Chueh, H.-E. (2022). A Vendor-Managed Inventory Mechanism Based on SCADA of Internet of Things Framework. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11060881 ↗
4. Batu, T., Lemu, H.G., and Shimels, H. (2023). Application of Artificial Intelligence for Surface Roughness Prediction of Additively Manufactured Components. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16186266 ↗
5. Feier, A., Buta, I., Florica, C., and Blaga, L. (2023). Optimization of Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) Process for the Production of Mechanical Components Using a CNC Machine. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16010017 ↗
6. Rojek, I., Mikołajewski, D., Dostatni, E., and Macko, M. (2020). AI-Optimized Technological Aspects of the Material Used in 3D Printing Processes for Selected Medical Applications. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13235437 ↗
7. A comparison of traditional manufacturing vs. additive manufacturing, the best method for the job10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.003 ↗
8. Design of an architecture of a production planning and control system (PPC) for additive manufacturing (AM)
9. An overview on the use of operations research in additive manufacturing10.1007/s10479-022-05040-4 ↗
10. Additive manufacturing technologies: State of the art and trends10.1080/00207543.2015.1115909 ↗
11. Roberts, D.A., Yaida, S., and Hanin, B. (2022). The Principles of Deep Learning Theory, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009023405 ↗
12. Machine learning integrated design for additive manufacturing10.1007/s10845-020-01715-6 ↗
13. Methods for interpreting and understanding deep neural networks10.1016/j.dsp.2017.10.011 ↗
14. Experimental investigation and development of a deep learning framework to predict process-induced surface roughness in additively manufactured aluminum alloys10.1007/s40194-022-01445-8 ↗
15. A deep neural network for classification of melt-pool images in metal additive manufacturing10.1007/s10845-018-1451-6 ↗
16. Melt pool segmentation for additive manufacturing: A generative adversarial network approach10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107183 ↗
17. Deep-learned generators of porosity distributions produced during metal Additive Manufacturing
18. Machine learning based prediction of melt pool morphology in a laser-based powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process
19. Ng, W.L., Hoh, G.L., Goh, G.D., Ten, J.S.J., and Yeong, W.Y. (2024). Progress and Opportunities for Machine Learning in Materials and Processes of Additive Manufacturing. Adv. Mater., 2310006.10.1002/adma.202310006 ↗
20. On the Use of Neuroevolutive Methods as Support Tools for Diagnosing Appendicitisand Tuberculosis
21. Gebhardt, A. (2012). Understanding Additive Manufacturing, Hanser.10.3139/9783446431621.fm ↗
22. Rathee, S., Srivastava, M., Maheshwari, S., Kundra, T.K., and Siddiquee, A.N. (2018). Friction Based Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Principles for Building in Solid State, Benefits, Limitations, and Applications, CRC Press.10.1201/9781351190879 ↗
23. A review of various materials for additive manufacturing: Recenttrendsand processing issues10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.10.015 ↗
24. So, M.S., Seo, G.J., Kim, D.B., and Shin, J.H. (2022). Prediction of Metal Additively Manufactured Surface Roughness Using Deep Neural Network. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22207955 ↗
25. Prediction of surface roughness in extrusion-based additive manufacturing with machine learning10.1016/j.rcim.2019.01.004 ↗
26. Chugunov, S., Smirnov, A., Kholodkova, A., Tikhonov, A., Dubinin, O., and Shishkovsky, I. (2022). Evaluation of stereolithography-based additive manufacturing technology for BaTiO3 ceramic sat 465 nm. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12010412 ↗
27. Improving the surface roughness in stereolithography by controlling surface angle, hatch spaces, andpost curing time10.1002/eng2.12193 ↗
28. De Pasquale, G. (2021). Additive manufacturing of micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS). Micromachines, 12.10.3390/mi12111374 ↗
29. Surface roughness of polyamide 12 parts manufactured using selective laser sintering10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106094 ↗
30. Dey, A., and Yodo, N. (2019). A systematic survey of FDM process parameter optimization and their influence on part characteristics. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 3.10.3390/jmmp3030064 ↗
31. Surface roughness measurement of parts manufactured by FDM process using light sectioning vision system10.1007/s40032-016-0341-y ↗
32. Hybrid Artificial Intelligence System in Constraint Based Scheduling of Integrated Manufacturing ERP Systems
33. Directed Energy Deposition (DED) Process: State of the Art10.1007/s40684-020-00302-7 ↗
34. Surface roughness prediction in micro-plasma transferred arc metal additive manufacturing process using K-nearest neighbors algorithm10.1007/s00170-021-08639-2 ↗
35. Effects of additive manufacturing processes on part defects and properties: A classification review10.1007/s12008-022-00839-8 ↗
36. Li, H., Liang, X., Li, Y., and Lin, F. (2022). Performance of High-Layer-Thickness Ti6Al4V Fabricated by Electron Beam Powder Bed Fusion under Different Accelerating Voltage Values. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15051878 ↗
37. Intelligent additive manufacturing architecture for enhancing uniformity of surface roughness and mechanical properties of laser powder bed fusion components10.1109/TASE.2022.3204847 ↗
38. Rojek, I., Mikołajewski, D., Macko, M., Szczepański, Z., and Dostatni, E. (2021). Optimization of Extrusion-Based 3D Printing ProcessUsing Neural Networks for Sustainable Development. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14112737 ↗
39. Cho, K.T., Nunez, L., Shelton, J., and Sciammarella, F. (2023). Investigation of Effect of Processing Parameters for Direct Energy Deposition Additive Manufacturing Technologies. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 7.10.3390/jmmp7030105 ↗
40. Influence of process parameters on geometric and elasto-visco-plastic material properties in vatphotopolymerization
41. 3D Printing Technology for Thermal Application: A Brief Review10.37934/arfmts.83.2.8497 ↗
42. A review of binder jet process parameters; powder, binder, printing and sintering condition10.1016/j.mprp.2019.05.001 ↗
43. A review on poly jet 3D printing of polymers and multi-material structures10.1177/09544062221079506 ↗
44. Gülcan, O., Günaydın, K., and Tamer, A. (2021). The state of the art of material jetting—A critical review. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13162829 ↗
45. Post-processing of additively manufactured metallic alloys—A review10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2022.103908 ↗
46. Surface finishing on IN625 additively manufactured surfaces by combined ultrasonic cavitation and abrasion
47. Additive Manufacturing Post-Processing Treatments, a Review with Emphasison Mechanical Characteristics10.3390/ma16134610 ↗
48. Syrlybayev, D., Seisekulova, A., Talamona, D., and Perveen, A. (2022). The Post-Processing of Additive Manufactured Polymeric and Metallic Parts. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 6.10.3390/jmmp6050116 ↗
49. Surface roughness considerations in design for additive manufacturing—A literature review10.1017/pds.2021.545 ↗
50. Comparison of different types of neuronal nets for failures location withinwater-supply networks
51. Rojek, I., Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, M., Piechowski, M., and Mikołajewski, D. (2023). An Artificial Intelligence Approach for Improving Maintenance to Supervise Machine Failures and Support Their Repair. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13084971 ↗
52. Predictive modeling of surface roughness in fused deposition modeling using data fusion10.1080/00207543.2018.1505058 ↗
53. High-throughput screening of surface roughness during additive manufacturing10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.06.049 ↗
54. Lin, W.J., Lo, S.H., Young, H.T., and Hung, C.L. (2019). Evaluation of deep learning neural networks for surface roughness prediction using vibration signal analysis. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9071462 ↗
55. Future prospects of computer-aided design (CAD)—A review from the perspective of artificial intelligence (AI), extended reality, and 3D printing10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100478 ↗
56. 3D printing and solar cell fabrication methods: A review of challenges, opportunities, and future prospects
57. Taunk, K., De, S., Verma, S., and Swetapadma, A. (2019, January 15–17). A brief review of nearest neighbor algorithm for learning and classification. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems, ICCS 2019, Madurai, India.10.1109/ICCS45141.2019.9065747 ↗
58. Huang, M., Jin, S., Tang, Z., Chen, Y., and Qin, Y. (2023). A Method for Predicting Surface Finish of Polylactic Acid Parts Printed Using Fused Deposition Modeling. Processes, 11.10.3390/pr11061820 ↗
59. Artificial Neural Network Systems
60. Soler, D., Telleria, M., García-Blanco, M.B., Espinosa, E., Cuesta, M., and Arrazola, P.J. (2022). Prediction of Surface Roughness of SLM Built Parts after Finishing Processes Using an Artificial Neural Network. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 6.10.3390/jmmp6040082 ↗
61. Evaluation of surface roughness in additive manufactured customized implant using artificial neural network based on 2D fourier transform—A machine vision approach
62. Improvement of FDM parts’ surface quality using optimized neural networks—Medical case studies10.1108/RPJ-06-2015-0075 ↗
63. Barrios, J.M., and Romero, P.E. (2019). Decision tree methods for predicting surface roughness in fused deposition modeling parts. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12162574 ↗