Pushover Analysis in Seismic Engineering: A Detailed Chronology and Review of Techniques for Structural Assessment
Source abstract
Abstract
This study analyzes the progression, utilization, and inherent challenges of traditional non-linear static procedures (NSPs) such as the capacity spectrum method, the displacement coefficient method, and the N2 method for evaluating seismic performance in structures. These methods, along with advanced versions such as multi-mode, modal, adaptive, and energy-based pushover analysis, help determine seismic demands, enriching our grasp on structural behaviors and guiding design choices. While these methods have improved accuracy by considering major vibration modes, they often fall short in addressing intricate aspects such as bidirectional responses, torsional effects, soil-structure interplay, and variations in displacement coefficients. Nevertheless, NSPs offer a more comprehensive and detailed analysis compared to rapid visual screening methods, providing a deeper understanding of potential vulnerabilities and more accurate predictions of structural performance. Their efficiency and reduced computational demands, compared to the comprehensive nonlinear response history analysis (NLRHA), make NSPs a favored tool for engineers aiming for swift seismic performance checks. Their accuracy and application become crucial when gauging seismic risks and potential damage across multiple structures. This paper underscores the ongoing refinements to these methods, reflecting the sustained attention they receive from both industry professionals and researchers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Structural Engineering and Geotechnics, Széchenyi István University, 9026 Győr, Hungary
References (82)
Show source-provided references
1. Singh, R., and Awadhiya, G.P. (2008). Pushover Analysis of Multistorey Building. [Master’s Thesis, Delhi College of Engineering].
2. Shehu, R. (2021). Implementation of Pushover Analysis for Seismic Assessment of Masonry Towers: Issues and Practical Recommendations. Buildings, 11.10.3390/buildings11020071 ↗
3. Bektaş, N., and Kegyes-Brassai, O. (2022). Conventional RVS Methods for Seismic Risk Assessment for Estimating the Current Situation of Existing Buildings: A State-of-the-Art Review. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14052583 ↗
4. Performance-based Seismic Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Moment Resisting Frame
5. Applied Technology Council (1996). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, California Seismic Safety Commission. Available online: www.4downloader.ir.
6. British Standards Institution (2005). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, British Standards Institution.
7. American Society of Civil Engineers, and American Society of Civil Engineers and Structural Engineering Institute (2017). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings: ASCE/SEI, 41-17, American Society of Civil Engineers.
8. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2000). FEMA356/November 2000 Pre-Standard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings.
9. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (2019). White Paper on Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Japan.
10. Irregularity Effects of Masonry Infills on Nonlinear Seismic Behaviour of RC Buildings10.1155/2020/4086320 ↗
11. Bisch, P., Carvalho, E., Degee, H., Fajfar, P., Fardis, M., Franchin, P., Kreslin, M., Pecker, A., Pinto, P., and Plumier, A. (2012). Eurocode 8: Seismic Design of Buildings Worked Examples Support to the Implementation, Harmonization and Further Development of the Eurocodes, Publications Office of the European Union.
12. Gupta, A.K. (1990). Response Spectrum Method in Seismic Analysis and Design of Structures, Routledge.
13. Evaluation of NSP to Estimate Seismic Deformation: SDF Systems10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:4(482) ↗
14. Abass, H.A., and Jarallah, H.K. (2022, November 17). Comparative Study of the Seismic Assessment according to ATC-40, FEMA-356 and FEMA-440 for Existing Hospital Building Located at Baghdad City. Available online: https://www.acapublishing.com/dosyalar/baski/PACE_2021_342.pdf.
15. Shaking table tests of structures with hysteretic dampers: Experimental results versus prediction using non-linear static methods10.1007/s10518-012-9375-6 ↗
16. Assessment of current nonlinear static procedures for seismic evaluation of buildings10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.04.012 ↗
17. Paret, T.F., Sasaki, K.K., Eilbeck, D.H., and Freeman, S.A. (1996). Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Elseviser. Paper No. 966.
18. Evaluation of a Modified MPA Procedure Assuming Higher Modes as Elastic to Estimate Seismic Demands10.1193/1.1775237 ↗
19. An upper-bound pushover analysis procedure for estimating the seismic demands of high-rise buildings10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.003 ↗
20. Two-degree-of-freedom modal response history analysis of buildings with specific vertical irregularities10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.106 ↗
21. Jun, D.-H., and Kang, H.-G. (2012, January 24–28). Nonlinear Response Analysis of Multistory Buildings Subjected to Synthetic Motions Compatible with Design Spectrum. Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
22. Lima, C., Martinelli, E., and Faella, C. (2023, July 03). Simplified Nonlinear Static Procedures for Seismic Assessment of Masonry Infilled RC Structures Confinement of Masonry Columns with FRP Materials View Project International Journal of Structural Glass and Advanced Materials Research View Project. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320034814.
23. Alternative non-linear demand estimation methods for probability-based seismic assessments10.1002/eqe.876 ↗
24. Adaptive Spectra-Based Pushover Procedure for Seismic Evaluation of Structures10.1193/1.1586117 ↗
25. Evaluation of Conventional and Adaptive Pushover Analysis Ii: Comparative Results10.1080/13632460609350590 ↗
26. Development and Verification of a Displacement-Based Adaptive Pushover Procedure10.1080/13632460409350504 ↗
27. Deierlein, G.G., Reinhorn, A.M., and Willford, M.R. (2022, October 22). Nonlinear Structural Analysis for Seismic Design a Guide for Practicing Engineers. Available online: www.curee.org.
28. Themelis, S. (2022, October 22). Pushover Analysis for Seismic Assessment and Design of Structures. Available online: http://www.ros.hw.ac.uk/handle/10399/2170.
29. Analysis in seismic provisions for buildings: Past, present and future. The fifth Prof. Nicholas Ambraseys lecture10.1007/s10518-017-0290-8 ↗
30. Seismic Performance and Retrofit Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Structures10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:1(3) ↗
31. Antoniou, S. (2002). Advanced Inelastic Static Analysis for Seismic Assessment of Structures. [Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College London].
32. Khan, M.A. (2013). Earthquake-Resistant Structures, Elsevier.
33. Bektaş, N., and Kegyes-Brassai, O. (2022, January 4–9). A comparative study of rapid visual screening methods to detailed seismic assessment of a reinforced concrete residential building. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Earthquake Engineering & Seismology, Bucharest, Romania.
34. Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: State of development10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00036-0 ↗
35. Freeman, S.A., Nicoletti, J.P., and Tyrell, J.V. (1975, January 18–20). Evaluations of existing buildings for seismic risk—a case study of Puget Sound Naval Shipyard. Proceedings of the U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Oakland, CA, USA.
36. Review of the Development of the Capacity Spectrum Method
37. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings: A Practical Overview of the ATC 40 Document10.1193/1.1586093 ↗
38. Aşıkoğlu, A., Vasconcelos, G., and Lourenço, P.B. (2021). Overview on the Nonlinear Static Procedures and Performance-Based Approach on Modern Unreinforced Masonry Buildings with Structural Irregularity. Buildings, 11.10.3390/buildings11040147 ↗
39. Kuria, K.K., and Kegyes-Brassai, O.K. (2023). Nonlinear Static Analysis for Seismic Evaluation of Existing RC Hospital Building. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132111626 ↗
40. FEMA (2005). Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures FEMA 440, Applied Technology Council.
41. Goel, R.K. (2007). SMIP07 Seminar on Utilization of Strong-Motion Data.
42. (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. Standard No. EN 1998-1.
43. Peter, F. (1988, January 2–9). N2-A Method for Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of Regular Buildings. Proceedings of the Ninth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, Japan.
44. A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance-Based Seismic Design10.1193/1.1586128 ↗
45. Seminar, C.H. (1997). Nehrp Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (FEMA 273).
46. An Energy-Based Formulation for First-and Multiple-Mode Nonlinear Static (Pushover) Analyses10.1080/13632460409350481 ↗
47. Mendes Pontes, A.R. (2013). The Forests of Maraca, Northern Brazilian Amazonia: Their Structure, Phenology, Fruit Assessment and an Illustrative Guide to Their Fruit, Editora da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.
48. Kotanidis, C., and Doudoumis, I.N. (2008, January 12–17). Energy-Based Approach of Static Pushover Analysis. Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
49. Leelataviwat, S., Saewon, W., and Goel, S.C. (2008, January 12–17). An Energy Based Method for Seismic Evaluation of Structures. Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
50. Localization Issues in Force-Based Frame Elements10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:11(1257) ↗
51. Building Seismic Safety Council (2000). NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for new Buildings and Other Structures Part 2: Commentary (FEMA 369), Building Seismic Safety Council.
52. An alternative pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic displacement demands10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.008 ↗
53. An improved first-mode-based pushover analytical procedure for assessing seismic performance of special moment resisting frame building structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113587 ↗
54. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings10.1002/eqe.144 ↗
55. Multi-mode pushover procedure for deformation demand estimates of steel moment-resisting frames10.1007/s13296-017-6022-8 ↗
56. A multi-mode adaptive pushover analysis procedure for estimating the seismic demands of RC moment-resisting frames10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110528 ↗
57. An improved modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands of structures10.1007/s11803-008-0786-y ↗
58. Generalized force vectors for multi-mode pushover analysis10.1002/eqe.1020 ↗
59. A consecutive modal pushover procedure for estimating the seismic demands of tall buildings10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.10.009 ↗
60. Pushover Analysis Procedure in Earthquake Engineering10.1193/1.1586051 ↗
61. Modified consecutive modal pushover procedure for seismic investigation of one-way asymmetric-plan tall buildings10.1007/s11803-012-0112-6 ↗
62. The modified and extended upper-bound (UB) pushover method for the multi-mode pushover analysis of unsymmetric-plan tall buildings10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.01.012 ↗
63. An improved upper-bound pushover procedure for seismic assessment of high-rise moment resisting steel frames10.1007/s10518-017-0204-9 ↗
64. Extension of the improved upper-bound pushover analysis for seismic assessment of steel moment resisting frames with setbacks10.1007/s10518-022-01478-w ↗
65. The extended N2 method considering higher mode effects in both plan and elevation10.1007/s10518-011-9319-6 ↗
66. Chopra, A.K. (2011). Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall. [4th ed.].
67. Spectrum-based pushover analysis for estimating seismic demand of tall buildings10.1007/s10518-017-0132-8 ↗
68. Adaptive pushover analysis
69. Evaluation of Conventional and Adaptive Pushover Analysis I: Methodology10.1080/13632460509350572 ↗
70. An adaptive modal pushover analysis procedure (VMPA-A) for buildings subjected to bi-directional ground motions10.1007/s10518-018-0324-x ↗
71. Adaptive Modal Combination Procedure for Nonlinear Static Analysis of Building Structures10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:11(1721) ↗
72. Adaptive upper-bound pushover analysis for high-rise moment steel frames10.1016/j.istruc.2019.07.006 ↗
73. Chopra, A.K., and Goel, R.K. (2001). A Modal Pushover Analysis Procedure to Estimate Seismic Demands for Buildings, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.10.1002/eqe.144 ↗
74. Modeling of higher-mode effects using an optimal multi-modal pushover analysis
75. Seismic damage evaluation in urban areas using the capacity spectrum method: Application to Barcelona10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.006 ↗
76. Simplicity versus accuracy trade-off in estimating seismic fragility of existing reinforced concrete buildings10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106678 ↗
77. Comparison of nonlinear static methods for the assessment of asymmetric buildings10.1007/s10518-013-9516-6 ↗
78. A pushover procedure for seismic assessment of buildings with bi-axial eccentricity under bi-directional seismic excitation10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.10.018 ↗
79. Cyclic Pushover Analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for buildings10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.02.001 ↗
80. An improved consecutive modal pushover procedure for estimating seismic demands of multi-storey framed buildings10.1002/tal.1336 ↗
81. Assessment of FEMA356 nonlinear static procedure and modal pushover analysis for seismic evaluation of buildings10.12989/sem.2012.41.2.243 ↗
82. Yang, P., and Wang, Y. (February, January 30). A Study on Improvement of Pushover Analysis. Proceedings of the12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.