journal article·2022-11-01Open access

Poka Yoke Meets Deep Learning: A Proof of Concept for an Assembly Line Application

Matteo Martinelli, Marco Lippi, Rita Gamberini

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 21

Abstract

In this paper, we present the re-engineering process of an assembly line that features speed reducers and multipliers for agricultural applications. The “as-is” line was highly inefficient due to several issues, including the age of the machines, a non-optimal arrangement of the shop floor, and the absence of process standards. The assembly line issues were analysed with Lean Manufacturing tools, identifying irregularities and operations that require effort (Mura), overload (Muri), and waste (Muda). The definition of the “to-be” line included actions to update the department layout, modify the assembly process, and design the line feeding system in compliance with the concepts of Golden Zone (i.e., the horizontal space more ergonomically and easily accessible by the operator) and Strike Zone (i.e., the vertical workspace setup in accordance to ergonomics specifications). The re-engineering process identified a critical problem in the incorrect assembly of the oil seals, mainly caused by the difficulty in visually identifying the correct side of the component, due to different reasons. Convolutional neural networks were used to address this issue. The proposed solution resulted to be a Poka Yoke. The whole re-engineering process induced a productivity increase that is estimated from 46% to 80%. The study demonstrates how Lean Manufacturing tools together with deep learning technologies can be effective in the development of smart manufacturing lines.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Assembly Line Balancing Optimization · Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization · Digital Transformation in Industry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Sciences and Methods for Engineering, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, 42122 Reggio nell’Emilia, Italy

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Shingo, S. (1986). Zero Quality Control: Source Inspection and the Poka-Yoke System, Productivity Press.
2. Shingo, S. (2019). A Study of the Toyota Production System: From an Industrial Engineering Viewpoint, Routledge.10.4324/9781315136509 ↗
3. Lean 4.0—A conceptual conjunction of lean management and Industry 4.010.1016/j.procir.2018.03.292 ↗
4. Lean manufacturing and internet of things—A synergetic or antagonist relationship?10.1016/j.compind.2021.103464 ↗
5. Akella, P. (2022, September 30). Intelligent Poka Yoke: When Lean Manufacturing Meets Deep Learning. Available online: https://www.industryweek.com/technology-and-iiot/article/22025815/.
6. Preliminary study of Augmented Reality based manufacturing for further integration of Quality Control 4.0 supported by metrology10.1088/1757-899X/1193/1/012105 ↗
7. Application of deep visualization in CNN-based tool condition monitoring for end milling10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.096 ↗
8. Condition monitoring in Industry 4.0 production systems—The idea of computational intelligence methods application10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.012 ↗
9. Design of poka-yoke system based on fuzzy neural network for rotary-machinery monitoring10.1088/1757-899X/602/1/012003 ↗
10. Rethinking jidoka systems under automation & learning perspectives in the digital lean manufacturing world10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.309 ↗
11. Longo, F., Nicoletti, L., Padovano, A., Bruzzone, A., and Mirabelli, G. (2019, January 18–20). Improving data consistency in Industry 4.0: An application of digital lean to the maintenance record process. Proceedings of the European Modeling & Simulation Symposium, Lisbon, Portugal.10.46354/i3m.2019.emss.054 ↗
12. Automated generation of CNC programs for manufacturing of individualized products10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.064 ↗
13. García-Garza, M.A., Ahuett-Garza, H., Lopez, M.G., Orta-Castañón, P., Kurfess, T.R., Coronado, P.D., Güemes-Castorena, D., Villa, S.G., and Salinas, S. (2019). A case about the upgrade of manufacturing equipment for insertion into an industry 4.0 environment. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19153304 ↗
14. A convolutional neural network based on a capsule network with strong generalization for bearing fault diagnosis10.1016/j.neucom.2018.09.050 ↗
15. A Jointed Signal Analysis and Convolutional Neural Network Method for Fault Diagnosis10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.117 ↗
16. Recognition of incorrect assembly of internal components by X-ray CT and deep learning10.1016/j.nima.2018.12.031 ↗
17. Use of SMART 3D printing technology in conventional engineering production to detect and prevent the occurence of defects10.17973/MMSJ.2021_12_2021115 ↗
18. Multi-head CNN–RNN for multi-time series anomaly detection: An industrial case study10.1016/j.neucom.2019.07.034 ↗
19. In-Process monitoring of porosity during laser additive manufacturing process10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.030 ↗
20. Process stability analysis and weld formation evaluation during disk laser–mag hybrid welding10.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.105835 ↗
21. Weld image deep learning-based on-line defects detection using convolutional neural networks for Al alloy in robotic arc welding10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.06.023 ↗
22. Artificial-neural-networks-based surface roughness Pokayoke system for end-milling operations10.1016/j.neucom.2007.07.029 ↗
23. Development of an in-process Pokayoke system utilizing accelerometer and logistic regression modeling for monitoring injection molding flash10.1007/s00170-013-5604-7 ↗
24. An Integrated Environment Based on Augmented Reality and Sensing Device for Manual Assembly Workstations10.1016/j.procir.2015.12.128 ↗
25. Application of the artificial neural network method to detect defective assembling processes by using a wearable technology10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.10.001 ↗
26. Nithyanandam, G.K., Kothandaraman, P.K., Munguia, J., and Marimuthu, M. (2020, January 11–12). Implementing Marked-Based Augmented Reality in Discrete industry—A Case Study. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE-HYDCON International Conference on Engineering in the 4th Industrial Revolution, Hyderabad, India.10.1109/HYDCON48903.2020.9242696 ↗
27. Poka Yoke system based on image analysis and object recognition10.1088/1757-899X/95/1/012138 ↗
28. Development of an Optical Object Detection Solution for Defect Prevention in a Learning Factory10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.037 ↗
29. An unsupervised artificial neural network versus a rule-based approach for fault detection and identification in an automated assembly machine10.1016/j.rcim.2015.11.006 ↗
30. Deep learning-based visual control assistant for assembly in Industry 4.010.1016/j.compind.2021.103485 ↗
31. Lean 4.0 Dynamic Tools for Polymeric Products Manufacturing in Industry 4.010.1002/masy.202000316 ↗
32. Hollnagel, E. (2016). Barriers and Accident Prevention, Routledge.10.4324/9781315261737 ↗
33. A framework for assessing poka-yoke devices10.1016/j.jmsy.2012.04.001 ↗
34. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2015). Deep Learning, MIT Press.
35. Six sigma: A literature review10.1108/20401461011075017 ↗
36. Antony, J., McDermott, O., Powell, D., and Sony, M. (TQM J., 2022). The evolution and future of lean Six Sigma 4.0, TQM J., ahead-of-print.10.1108/TQM-04-2022-0135 ↗
37. Industry’s 4.0 transformation process: How to start, where to aim, what to be aware of10.1080/09537287.2020.1830315 ↗
38. Mapping the Terrain for Lean Six Sigma 4.0