journal article·2022-08-01Open access

Prediction of Temperature and Carbon Concentration in Oxygen Steelmaking by Machine Learning: A Comparative Study

Ján Kačur, Patrik Flegner, Milan Durdán, Marek Laciak

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 15

Abstract

The basic oxygen steelmaking process (BOS) faces the issue of the absence of information about the melt temperature and the carbon concentration in the melt. Although deterministic models for predicting steelmaking process variables are being developed in metallurgical research, machine-learning models can model the nonlinearities of process variables and provide a good estimate of the target process variables. In this paper, five machine learning methods were applied to predict the temperature and carbon concentration in the melt at the endpoint of BOS. Multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), support-vector regression (SVR), neural network (NN), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), and random forest (RF) methods were compared. Machine modeling was based on static and dynamic observations from many melts. In predicting from dynamic melting data, a method of pairing static and dynamic data to create a training set was proposed. In addition, this approach has been found to predict the dynamic behavior of temperature and carbon during melting. The results showed that the piecewise-cubic MARS model achieved the best prediction performance for temperature in testing on static and dynamic data. On the other hand, carbon predictions by machine models trained on joined static and dynamic data were more powerful. In the case of predictions from dynamic data, the best results were obtained by the k-NN-based model, i.e., carbon, and the piecewise-linear MARS model in the case of temperature. In contrast, the neural network recorded the lowest prediction performance in more tests.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics · Iron and Steelmaking Processes · Mineral Processing and Grinding

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Control and Informatization of Production Processes, Faculty BERG, Technical University of Košice, Němcovej 3, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia

Funding

U.S. Steel Košice · The Cultural and educational grant agency of the Ministry of Education, science, research and sport of the Slovak Republic

References (85)

Show source-provided references
1. Fortuna, L., Graziani, S., Rizzo, A., and Xibilia, G.M. (2007). Soft Sensors for Monitoring and Control of Industrial Processes, Springer.
2. Hubmer, R., Kühböck, H., and Pastucha, K. (2015, January 25). Latest Innovations in Converter Process Modelling. Proceedings of the Metec ε, 2nd Estat, Dusseldorf, Germany.
3. Weeks, R. (1973). Dynamic Model of the BOS Process, Mathematical Process Models in Iron and Steel Making, The Metals Society.
4. Laciak, M., Petráš, I., Terpák, J., Kačur, J., Flegner, P., Durdán, M., and Tréfa, G. (2018). Výskum Nepriameho Merania Teploty a Uhlíka v Procese Skujňovania. (Zmluva o Dielo č. P-101-0030/17) (en: Research on Indirect Measurement of Temperature and Carbon in the Process of Steelmaking (Contract for Work No. P-101-0030/17)), Technical University of Košice, Faculty BERG, Institute of Control and Informatization of Production Processes. Technical Report 2018.
5. Laciak, M., Kačur, J., Flegner, P., Terpák, J., Durdán, M., and Tréfa, G. (2020, January 27–29). The Mathematical Model for Indirect Measurement of Temperature in the Steel-Making Process. Proceedings of the 2020 21th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC), Kosice, Slovakia.10.1109/ICCC49264.2020.9257259 ↗
6. Laciak, M., Kačur, J., Terpák, J., Durdán, M., and Flegner, P. (2022). Comparison of Different Approaches to the Creation of a Mathematical Model of Melt Temperature in an LD Converter. Processes, 10.10.3390/pr10071378 ↗
7. A Temperature Prediction Model of Converters Based on Gas Analysis10.1016/j.proeps.2011.09.003 ↗
8. Dynamic Modeling of LD Converter Steelmaking: Reaction Modeling Using Gibbs’ Free Energy Minimization10.1007/s11663-014-0245-2 ↗
9. Terpák, J., Laciak, M., Kačur, J., Durdán, M., Flegner, P., and Trefa, G. (2020, January 27–29). Endpoint Prediction of Basic Oxygen Furnace Steelmaking Based on Gradient of Relative Decarburization Rate. Proceedings of the 2020 21th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC), Ostrava, Czech Republic.10.1109/ICCC49264.2020.9257229 ↗
10. Kumari, V. (2015). Mathematical Modeling of Basic Oxygen Steel Making Process, National Institute of Technology.
11. Wang, X., Xing, J., Dong, J., and Wang, Z. (2017, January 26–28). Data driven based endpoint carbon content real time prediction for BOF steelmaking. Proceedings of the 2017 36th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Dalian, China.10.23919/ChiCC.2017.8028905 ↗
12. Terpák, J., Flegner, P., Kačur, J., Laciak, M., Durdán, M., and Trefa, G. (2019, January 26–29). Utilization of the Mathematical Model of the Converter Process for the Sensitivity Analysis. Proceedings of the 2019 20th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC), Krakow, Poland.10.1109/CarpathianCC.2019.8766019 ↗
13. Theoretical Analysis by the Use of Mathematical Model in LD Converter Operation10.2355/isijinternational1966.10.250 ↗
14. Prediction of BOF Endpoint Temperature and Carbon Content10.1016/S1474-6670(17)57201-8 ↗
15. Kostúr, K., Laciak, M., and Truchlý, M. (2005). Systémy Nepriameho Merania (en: Systems of Indirect Measurement), Reprocentrum. [1st. ed.]. Monograph.
16. Huang, W., Liu, Y., Dong, Z., and Yang, B. (2015, January 24–25). The Regression Equation of Oxygen Content and Temperature to End Point of Bath Based on Exhaust Gas Analysis. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Automation, Mechanical Control and Computational Engineering, Changsha, China.10.2991/amcce-15.2015.84 ↗
17. Bouhouche, S., Mentouri, Z., Meradi, H., and Yazid, L. (2012, January 3–6). Combined Use of Support Vector Regression and Monte Carlo Simulation in Quality and Process Control Calibration. Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Istanbul, Turkey.
18. Schlüter, J., Odenthal, H.J., Uebber, N., Blom, H., and Morik, K. (2013, January 6–9). A novel data-driven prediction model for BOF endpoint. Proceedings of the Association for Iron & Steel Technology Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
19. Schlüter, J., Uebber, N., Odenthal, H.J., Blom, H., Beckers, T., and Morik, K. (2014, January 16–18). Reliable BOF endpoint prediction by novel data-driven modeling. Proceedings of the Association for Iron & Steel Technology Conference, AISTech 2014 Proceedings, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
20. Duan, J., Qu, Q., Gao, C., and Chen, X. (2017, January 26–28). BOF steelmaking endpoint prediction based on FWA-TSVR. Proceedings of the 2017 36th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Dalian, China.10.23919/ChiCC.2017.8028067 ↗
21. End-Point Static Control of Basic Oxygen Furnace (BOF) Steelmaking Based on Wavelet Transform Weighted Twin Support Vector Regression10.1155/2019/7408725 ↗
22. Endpoint Prediction of BOF Steelmaking based on BP Neural Network Combined with Improved PSO
23. Cai, B.Y., Zhao, H., and Yue, Y.J. (2011, January 19–22). Research on the BOF steelmaking endpoint temperature prediction. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Mechatronic Science, Electric Engineering and Computer (MEC), Jilin, China.
24. Endpoint prediction model for basic oxygen furnace steel-making based on membrane algorithm evolving extreme learning machine10.1016/j.asoc.2013.09.012 ↗
25. Comparative Study of Estimation Methods of the Endpoint Temperature in Basic Oxygen Furnace Steelmaking Process with Selection of Input Parameters10.3365/KJMM.2018.56.11.813 ↗
26. BOF Endpoint Prediction Based on Multi-Neural Network Model10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.441.666 ↗
27. Feed forward neural network for prediction of end blow oxygen in LD converter steel making10.1590/S1516-14392010000100005 ↗
28. Neural modeling helps the BOS process to achieve aimed end-point conditions in liquid steel10.1016/j.engappai.2005.06.002 ↗
29. Intelligent Control Method and Application for BOF Steelmaking Process10.3182/20020721-6-ES-1901.00726 ↗
30. Greedy Kernel Components Acting on ANFIS to Predict BOF Steelmaking Endpoint10.3182/20080706-5-KR-1001.01864 ↗
31. An improved case-based reasoning method and its application in endpoint prediction of basic oxygen furnace10.1016/j.neucom.2014.09.003 ↗
32. Temperature Model for LD-KG Converter10.1016/S1474-6670(17)37606-1 ↗
33. Application of Data Mining in BOF Steelmaking Endpoint Control10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.402.96 ↗
34. Sala, D.A., Jalalvand, A., Deyne, A.Y.D., and Mannens, E. (2018, January 17–20). Multivariate Time Series for Data-Driven Endpoint Prediction in the Basic Oxygen Furnace. Proceedings of the 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/ICMLA.2018.00231 ↗
35. Akundi, A., Euresti, D., Luna, S., Ankobiah, W., Lopes, A., and Edinbarough, I. (2022). State of Industry 5.0—Analysis and Identification of Current Research Trends. Appl. Syst. Innov., 5.10.3390/asi5010027 ↗
36. Made in China 2025: Industrial country from great to powerful
37. Ma, H., Huang, X., Cui, X., Wang, P., Chen, Y., Hu, Z., and Hua, L. (2022). Management Control and Integration Technology of Intelligent Production Line for Multi-Variety and Complex Aerospace Ring Forgings: A Review. Metals, 12.10.3390/met12071079 ↗
38. Beliatis, M., Jensen, K., Ellegaard, L., Aagaard, A., and Presser, M. (2021). Next Generation Industrial IoT Digitalization for Traceability in Metal Manufacturing Industry: A Case Study of Industry 4.0. Electronics, 10.10.3390/electronics10050628 ↗
39. Industry 5.0: Improving humanization and sustainability of Industry 4.010.1007/s11192-022-04370-1 ↗
40. An Overview of Contemporary Steelmaking Processes10.1007/BF03339152 ↗
41. Oeters, F. (1994). Metallurgy of Steelmaking, Verlag Stahleisen mbH.
42. Ban, T.E. (1967). Basic Oxygen Steel Making Process. (No. 3,301,662), U.S. Patent.
43. Ghosh, A., and Chatterjee, A. (2008). Ironmaking and Steelmaking, Theory and Practice, PHI Learning, Private Limited.
44. Takemura, Y., Saito, T., Fukuda, S., and Kato, K. (1978). BOF Dynamic Control Using Sublance System, Nippon Steel Corporation. Technical Report 11.
45. Energiemodell eines LD-Stahlwerks
46. Analysis of Converter Process Variables from Exhaust Gas10.2355/isijinternational1966.28.59 ↗
47. Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines
48. Sephton, P. (2001). Forecasting Recessions: Can We Do Better on MARS?.10.20955/r.83.39-50 ↗
49. A Comparative Study Between Least Square Support Vector Machine(Lssvm) and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline(Mars) Methods for the Measurement of Load Storing Capacity of Driven Piles in Cohesion Less Soil
50. Multivariate adaptive regression splines
51. A Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline Approach for Prediction of Maximum Shear Modulus and Minimum Damping Ratio10.4186/ej.2012.16.5.69 ↗
52. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning—Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Springer. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 ↗
53. Multivariate adaptive regression splines and neural network models for prediction of pile drivability10.1016/j.gsf.2014.10.003 ↗
54. Díaz, J., Fernández, F.J., and Prieto, M.M. (2019). Hot Metal Temperature Forecasting at Steel Plant Using Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines. Metals, 10.10.3390/met10010041 ↗
55. Jekabsons, G. (2022, February 24). ARESLab: Adaptive Regression Splines Toolbox for Matlab/Octave. Available online: http://www.cs.rtu.lv/jekabsons/regression.html.
56. A Comparative Study of Data-Driven Modeling Methods for Soft-Sensing in Underground Coal Gasification10.14311/AP.2019.59.0322 ↗
57. Boser, B.E., Guyon, I.M., and Vapnik, V.N. (1992). A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. Proceedings of the 5th Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory—COLT ’92, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 27–29 July 1992, ACM Press.10.1145/130385.130401 ↗
58. Vapnik, V.N. (1995). Constructing Learning Algorithms. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 ↗
59. Kačur, J., Laciak, M., Flegner, P., Terpák, J., Durdán, M., and Trefa, G. (2019, January 26–29). Application of Support Vector Regression for Data-Driven Modeling of Melt Temperature and Carbon Content in LD Converter. Proceedings of the 2019 20th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC), Krakow, Poland.10.1109/CarpathianCC.2019.8765956 ↗
60. Downs, T., Frean, M., and Gallagher, M. (1999). General cost functions for support vector regression. Proceedings of the 9th Australian Conference on Neural Networks, Brisbane, Australia, 11–13 February 1999, University of Queensland.
61. Mozer, M., Jordan, M., and Petsche, T. (1997). Improving the accuracy and speed of support vector learning machines. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 9, MIT Press.
62. Learning the Kernel Matrix with Semidefinite Programming
63. MathWorks (2016). Matlab Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox Release 2016b, MathWorks.
64. MathWorks (2022). Understanding Support Vector Machine Regression. Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox User’s Guide (R2022a), MathWorks. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/understanding-support-vector-machine-regression.html.
65. On a Kernel-Based Method for Pattern Recognition, Regression, Approximation, and Operator Inversion10.1007/PL00013831 ↗
66. Kvasnička, V., Beňušková, Ľ., Pospíchal, J., Farkaš, I., Tiňo, P., and Kráľ, A. (1997). Úvod do Teórie Neurónových Sietí, IRIS.
67. MathWorks (2022). Deep Learning Toolbox, MathWorks.
68. Rumelhart, D.E., McClelland, J.L., and PDP Research Group (1987). Learning internal representation by error propagation. Parallel Distributed Processing. Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Vol 1: Foundation, Stanford University.
69. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructures of Cognition10.2307/415721 ↗
70. Fix, E., and Hodges, J.L. (2022, February 24). Discriminatory Analysis: Nonparametric Discrimination: Consistency Properties (Report). Available online: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA800276.pdf.
71. An Introduction to Kernel and Nearest-Neighbor Nonparametric Regression10.1080/00031305.1992.10475879 ↗
72. Role of Data Analytics in Infrastructure Asset Management: Overcoming Data Size and Quality Problems10.1061/JPEODX.0000175 ↗
73. BOF Oxygen Control by Mixed Case Retrieve and Reuse CBR10.3182/20110828-6-IT-1002.01832 ↗
74. Kramer, O. (2013). K-Nearest Neighbors. Dimensionality Reduction with Unsupervised Nearest Neighbors, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-38652-7 ↗
75. Ferreira, D. (2022, February 24). k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN) Regressor. GitHub. Available online: https://github.com/ferreirad08/kNNeighborsRegressor/releases/tag/1.0.1.
76. Ho, T.K. (1995, January 14–16). Random decision forests. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, Montreal, QC, Canada.
77. The random subspace method for constructing decision forests10.1109/34.709601 ↗
78. Using Machine Learning to Examine Impact of Type of Performance Indicator on Flexible Pavement Deterioration Modeling10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000602 ↗
79. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
80. Minitab (2022, February 24). Random Forests Trademark of Health Care Productivity, Inc.—Registration Number 3185828—Serial Number 78642027. Available online: https://trademarks.justia.com/857/89/randomforests-85789388.html.
81. Modeling of steelmaking process with effective machine learning techniques10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.030 ↗
82. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R. (2013). An Introduction to Statistical Learning, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7 ↗
83. Banerjee, S. (2022, February 24). Generic Example Code and Generic Function for Random Forests. MATLAB Central File Exchange. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/63698-generic-example-code-and-generic-function-for-random-forests.
84. Gandomi, A.H., and Roke, D.A. (2013, January 12–14). Intelligent formulation of structural engineering systems. Proceedings of the Seventh MIT Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics-Focus: Multiphysics and Multiscale, Cambridge, MA, USA.
85. Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.05.007 ↗