journal article·2022-05-08Open access

Resilience Evaluation of Shallow Circular Tunnels Subjected to Earthquakes Using Fragility Functions

Zhongkai Huang

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 9

Abstract

The present work aims to introduce an integrated framework for the resilience evaluation of shallow circular tunnels subjected to earthquakes using fragility and restoration functions. A typical shallow circular tunnel in Shanghai city of China is examined in this work and a corresponding numerical model is established using ABAQUS. Then, a set of ground motions are well chosen to implement large numbers of non-linear numerical analyses so as to determine the lining responses of the tunnel structure with various levels of seismic intensities. According to the above numerical results, fragility functions in terms of the peak ground acceleration (PGA) and peak ground velocity (PGV) at the free-field ground surface are generated, accounting for the main sources of uncertainty, and the direct seismic loss for the examined tunnel is obtained. Moreover, according to the developed fragility functions and the existing empirical tunnel restoration functions, the evolution of the resilience index (Re) with various levels of PGA and PGV for the examined tunnel is derived and quantified. The results indicate that the tunnel resilience will decrease significantly as the earthquake intensity measure (IM), i.e., PGA or PGV herein, increases. The proposed framework is expected to help city managers support adaptations to seismic hazards with the development of preventive or retrofitting measures as part of efforts to provide more resilient metro systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Shanghai Science and Technology Committee Program · National Key Research and Development Program of China · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Assessment of damage in mountain tunnels due to the Taiwan Chi-Chi earthquake10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00047-5 ↗
2. Damage to mountain tunnels related to the Wenchuan earthquake and some suggestions for aseismic tunnel construction10.1007/s10064-011-0367-6 ↗
3. Seismic design and analysis of underground structures10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00051-7 ↗
4. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities10.1193/1.1623497 ↗
5. Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008 ↗
6. Seismic resilience of concrete structures under corrosion10.1002/eqe.2591 ↗
7. Localized health monitoring for seismic resilience quantification and safety evaluation of smart structures10.1016/j.strusafe.2021.102127 ↗
8. Seismic resilience of transportation networks with deteriorating components10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001399 ↗
9. Resilience metrics and measurement methods for transportation infrastructure: The state of the art10.1080/23789689.2018.1448663 ↗
10. Argyroudis, S.A. (2021). Resilience metrics for transport networks: A review and practical examples for bridges. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Bridge Eng.
11. Exploring the concept of seismic resilience for acute care facilities10.1193/1.2431396 ↗
12. Shang, Q., Wang, T., and Li, J. (2020). A quantitative framework to evaluate the seismic resilience of hospital systems. J. Earthq. Eng., 1–25.
13. Seismic resilience evaluation based on vulnerability curves for existing and retrofitted typical RC school buildings10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105844 ↗
14. Event-based assessment of seismic resilience in Mexican school buildings10.1007/s10518-020-00938-5 ↗
15. Seismic resilience of retrofitted RC buildings10.1007/s11803-020-0580-z ↗
16. Improving the seismic resilience of existing braced-frame office buildings10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001302 ↗
17. A probabilistic approach for the prediction of seismic resilience of bridges10.1002/eqe.2282 ↗
18. Probabilistic life-cycle seismic resilience assessment of aging bridge networks considering infrastructure upgrading10.1080/15732479.2020.1716258 ↗
19. Fragility assessment of tunnels in soft soils using artificial neural networks10.1016/j.undsp.2021.07.007 ↗
20. Tran, T.T., Cao, A.T., Kim, D., and Chang, S. (2020). Seismic vulnerability of cabinet facility with tuned mass dampers subjected to high-and low-frequency earthquakes. Appl. Sci., 2020. 10.10.3390/app10144850 ↗
21. Fragility-based seismic performance assessment of modular underground arch bridges10.1016/j.istruc.2022.04.005 ↗
22. Resilience analysis of shield tunnel lining under extreme surcharge: Characterization and field application10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.044 ↗
23. Huang, Z.K., Zhang, D.M., and Zhou, Y.T. (2022;, January 15–17). Resilience Assessment Framework for Tunnels Exposed to Earthquake Loading. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Performance-Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (PBD-IV), Beijing, China.10.1007/978-3-031-11898-2_213 ↗
24. CEN (European Committee for Standardization) (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, CEN.
25. Finite dynamic model for infinite media10.1061/JMCEA3.0001144 ↗
26. Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.11.004 ↗
27. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) (2020). Hazus 4.2 SP3: Hazus Earthquake Model Technical Manual, FEMA.
28. Werner, S.D., Taylor, C.E., Cho, S., Lavoie, J.P., Huyck, C.K., Eitzel, C., Chung, H., and Eguchi, R.T. (2006). Redars 2 Methodology and Software for Seismic Risk Analysis of Highway Systems, Special Report MCEER-060SP08; MCEER (Multidisciplinary Center Earthquake Engineering Research).
29. Computation of bridge seismic fragility by large-scale simulation for probabilistic resilience analysis10.1002/eqe.2567 ↗
30. Cloud-IDA-MSA conversion of fragility curves for efficient and high-fidelity resilience assessment10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002998 ↗
31. Multiple-hazard fragility and restoration models of highway bridges for regional risk and resilience assessment in the United States: State-of-the-art review10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001672 ↗
32. Effects of SSI and lining corrosion on the seismic vulnerability of shallow circular tunnels10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.04.016 ↗
33. ALA (American Society of Civil Engineers-FEMA) (2001). Seismic Fragility Formulations for Water Systems: Part 1-Guideline, ALA.
34. Huang, Z.K., Argyroudis, S., Zhang, D.M., Pitilakis, K., Huang, H.W., and Zhang, D.M. (2022). Forthcoming. Time-dependent fragility functions for circular tunnels in soft soils. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. Part A Civ. Eng.10.1061/AJRUA6.0001251 ↗
35. Selection of optimal intensity measures for fragility assessment of circular tunnels in soft soil deposits10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106724 ↗