Raster Angle Prediction of Additive Manufacturing Process Using Machine Learning Algorithm
Source abstract
Abstract
As additive manufacturing (AM) processes become integrated with artificial intelligence systems, the time and cost of the fabrication process decrease. In this study, the raster angle, an important parameter in the manufacturing process, was examined using fused deposition modeling (FDM), an AM method. The optimal value of this parameter varies depending on the designed product geometry. By changing the raster angle, the distribution of stresses and strains within the printed object can be modified, potentially influencing the mechanical behavior of the object. Thus, the correct estimation of the raster angle is essential for obtaining parts with high mechanical properties. The focus of this study is to reduce the fabrication time and cost of products by intertwining machine learning (ML) systems with mechanical systems. Its novelty is that ML has never been applied for FDM raster angle estimation. The estimation and modeling of the raster angle were performed using five different ML algorithms. These algorithms include a support vector machine (SVM), Gaussian process regression (GPR), an artificial neural network (ANN), decision tree regression (DTR), and random forest regression (RFR). Data for training were generated using various shapes and geometries, then trained in the MATLAB software, and a prediction model between the input parameters and the raster angle was created. The predicted model was evaluated using five performance criteria. The RFR model predicts the raster angle in the FDM test data with R-squared (R2) = 0.92, an explained variance score (EVS) = 0.92, a mean absolute error (MAE) = 0.012, a root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.056, and a mean squared error (MSE) = 0.0032. These values are R2 = 0.93, EVS = 0.93, MAE = 0.010, RMSE = 0.051, and MSE0.0025 for the training data. RFR is significantly superior to the other prediction algorithms. The proposed model predicts the optimum raster angle for any geometry.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electric and Energy, Mus Alparslan University, Mus 49210, Turkey
Department of Civil Engineering, Siirt University, Siirt 56100, Turkey
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Siirt University, Siirt 56100, Turkey
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Thermoelectric materials and devices fabricated by additive manufacturing10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109384 ↗
2. Technology selection in green supply chains-the effects of additive and traditional manufacturing10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124554 ↗
3. Deep learning for distortion prediction in laser-based additive manufacturing using big data10.1016/j.mfglet.2019.02.001 ↗
4. A novel approach based on the elastoplastic fatigue damage and machine learning models for life prediction of aerospace alloy parts fabricated by additive manufacturing10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106089 ↗
5. Parametric optimization of parameters affecting dimension precision of FDM printed part using hybrid Taguchi-MARCOS-nature inspired heuristic optimization technique10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.216 ↗
6. Automated real-time detection and prediction of interlayer imperfections in additive manufacturing processes using artificial intelligence10.1002/aisy.201900130 ↗
7. Additive manufacturing technologies: An overview about 3D printing methods and future prospects10.1155/2019/9656938 ↗
8. Hassan, M.S., Zaman, S., Dantzler, J.Z., Leyva, D.H., Mahmud, M.S., Ramirez, J.M., Gomez, S.G., and Lin, Y. (2023). 3D Printed Integrated Sensors: From Fabrication to Applications—A Review. Nanomaterials, 13.10.3390/nano13243148 ↗
9. Sepasgozar, S.M., Shi, A., Yang, L., Shirowzhan, S., and Edwards, D.J. (2020). Additive manufacturing applications for industry 4.0: A systematic critical review. Buildings, 10.10.3390/buildings10120231 ↗
10. Salmi, M. (2021). Additive manufacturing processes in medical applications. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14010191 ↗
11. Comparison of 3D printing MJP and FDM technology in dentistry
12. Manufacture of polyurethane foam parts for automotive industry using FDM 3D printed molds10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.01.019 ↗
13. Fused deposition modeling: Process, materials, parameters, properties, and applications10.1007/s00170-022-08860-7 ↗
14. Review on the fabrication of fused deposition modelling (FDM) composite filament for biomedical applications10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.535 ↗
15. A review article on FDM process parameters in 3D printing for composite materials10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.385 ↗
16. Experimental investigation of FDM process parameters using Taguchi analysis10.1016/j.matpr.2019.09.078 ↗
17. Conductive Additive Manufactured Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Filaments: Statistical Approach to Mechanical and Electrical Behaviors
18. Syrlybayev, D., Zharylkassyn, B., Seisekulova, A., Akhmetov, M., Perveen, A., and Talamona, D. (2021). Optimisation of strength properties of FDM printed parts—A critical review. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13101587 ↗
19. The effects of layer manufacturing parameters on Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) of ASA: A statistical approach
20. Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS10.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
21. Galeja, M., Hejna, A., Kosmela, P., and Kulawik, A. (2020). Static and dynamic mechanical properties of 3D printed ABS as a function of raster angle. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13020297 ↗
22. Modelling and prediction of surface roughness in wire arc additive manufacturing using machine learning10.1007/s10845-020-01725-4 ↗
23. Optimization of surface roughness and dimensional accuracy in LPBF additive manufacturing10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107246 ↗
24. Physics-informed machine learning and mechanistic modeling of additive manufacturing to reduce defects10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101123 ↗
25. Ulkir, O., Bayraklılar, M.S., and Kuncan, M. (3D Print. Addit. Manuf., 2023). Energy Consumption Prediction of Additive Manufactured Tensile Strength Parts Using Artificial Intelligence, 3D Print. Addit. Manuf., ahead of print.10.1089/3dp.2023.0189 ↗
26. Predicting the dimensional variation of geometries produced through FDM 3D printing employing supervised machine learning10.1016/j.sintl.2022.100194 ↗
27. Effect of process parameters on the strength of ABS based FDM prototypes: Novel machine learning based hybrid optimization technique10.1088/2053-1591/acb909 ↗
28. Predicting and optimising the surface roughness of additive manufactured parts using an artificial neural network model and genetic algorithm10.1080/13621718.2023.2200572 ↗
29. Prediction of surface roughness in extrusion-based additive manufacturing with machine learning10.1016/j.rcim.2019.01.004 ↗
30. Use of machine learning algorithms for surface roughness prediction of printed parts in polyvinyl butyral via fused deposition modeling10.1007/s00170-021-07300-2 ↗
31. Smart additive manufacturing: Current artificial intelligence-enabled methods and future perspectives10.1007/s11431-020-1581-2 ↗
32. Masinelli, G., Shevchik, S.A., Pandiyan, V., Quang-Le, T., and Wasmer, K. (2021, January 1). Artificial intelligence for monitoring and control of metal additive manufacturing. Proceedings of the AMPA2020: Industrializing Additive Manufacturing, Zurich, Switzerland.10.1007/978-3-030-54334-1_15 ↗
33. Tanveer, M., Rajani, T., Rastogi, R., Shao, Y.H., and Ganaie, M.A. (2022). Comprehensive review on twin support vector machines. Ann. Oper. Res., 1–46.10.1007/s10479-022-04575-w ↗
34. Support-vector network10.1007/BF00994018 ↗
35. Support vector machine in structural reliability analysis: A review10.1016/j.ress.2023.109126 ↗
36. An empirical assessment of different kernel functions on the performance of support vector machines10.11591/eei.v10i6.3046 ↗
37. Rasmussen, C.E., and Williams, C. (2006). Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 ↗
38. Gaussian process regression for materials and molecules10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00022 ↗
39. A survey of constrained Gaussian process regression: Approaches and implementation challenges10.1615/JMachLearnModelComput.2020035155 ↗
40. Multi-fidelity Gaussian process regression for prediction of random fields10.1016/j.jcp.2017.01.047 ↗
41. Gaussian process regression for numerical wind speed prediction enhancement10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.018 ↗
42. A new fixed-time stability theorem and its application to the fixed-time synchronization of neural networks10.1016/j.neunet.2019.12.028 ↗
43. Mehrotra, K., Mohan, C.K., and Ranka, S. (1997). Elements of Artificial Neural Networks, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2687.001.0001 ↗
44. A new fixed-time stability theorem and its application to the synchronization control of memristive neural networks10.1016/j.neucom.2019.03.040 ↗
45. On the expressiveness of approximate inference in bayesian neural networks
46. Predicting recovery in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury by using admission variables and physiological data: A comparison between decision tree analysis and logistic regression10.3171/jns.2002.97.2.0326 ↗
47. Estimation of soil moisture using decision tree regression10.1007/s00704-019-03048-8 ↗
48. Rathan, K., Sai, S.V., and Manikanta, T.S. (2019, January 23–25). Crypto-currency price prediction using decision tree and regression techniques. Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI), Tirunelveli, India.10.1109/ICOEI.2019.8862585 ↗
49. Spatial heterogeneity modeling of water quality based on random forest regression and model interpretation10.1016/j.envres.2021.111660 ↗
50. Classification and regression by randomForest
51. A novel hybrid method for flight departure delay prediction using Random Forest Regression and Maximal Information Coefficient10.1016/j.ast.2021.106822 ↗
52. Explainable machine learning model and reliability analysis for flexural capacity prediction of RC beams strengthened in flexure with FRCM10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.113903 ↗