journal article·2023-10-24Open access

Utilizing Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) for Precise Estimation of Soil Compaction Parameters

Musaab Sabah Abed, Firas Jawad Kadhim, Jwad K. Almusawi, Hamza Imran, Luís Filipe Almeida Bernardo, Sadiq N. Henedy

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 21

Abstract

Traditional laboratory methods for estimating soil compaction parameters, such as the Proctor test, have been recognized as time-consuming and labor-intensive. Given the increasing need for the rapid and accurate estimation of soil compaction parameters for a range of geotechnical applications, the application of machine learning models offers a promising alternative. This study focuses on employing the multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) model algorithm, a machine learning method that presents a significant advantage over other models through generating human-understandable piecewise linear equations. The MARS model was trained and tested on a comprehensive dataset to predict essential soil compaction parameters, including optimum water content (wopt) and maximum dry density (ρdmax). The performance of the model was evaluated using coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) values. Remarkably, the MARS models showed excellent predictive ability with high R2 and low RMSE, MAE, and relative error values, indicating its robustness and reliability in predicting soil compaction parameters. Through rigorous five-fold cross-validation, the model’s predictions for wopt returned an RMSE of 1.948%, an R2 of 0.893, and an MAE of 1.498%. For ρdmax, the results showcased an RMSE of 0.064 Mg/m3, an R2 of 0.899, and an MAE of 0.050 Mg/m3. When evaluated on unseen data, the model’s performance for wopt prediction was marked with an MAE of 1.276%, RMSE of 1.577%, and R2 of 0.948. Similarly, for ρdmax, the predictions were characterized by an MAE of 0.047 Mg/m3, RMSE of 0.062 Mg/m3, and R2 of 0.919. The results also indicated that the MARS model outperformed previously developed machine learning models, suggesting its potential to replace conventional testing methods. The successful application of the MARS model could revolutionize the geotechnical field through providing quick and reliable predictions of soil compaction parameters, improving efficiency for construction projects. Lastly, a variable importance analysis was performed on the model to assess how input variables affect its outcomes. It was found that fine content (Cf) and plastic limit (PL) have the greatest impact on compaction parameters.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Soil and Unsaturated Flow · Dam Engineering and Safety · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Misan, Amarah 62001, Iraq

Department of Environmental Science, College of Energy and Environmental Science, Alkarkh University of Science, Baghdad 10081, Iraq

Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, GeoBioTec-UBI, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal

Department of Civil Engineering, Mazaya University College, Nasiriyah City 64001, Iraq

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. Prediction of compaction parameters for fine-grained and coarse-grained soils: A review10.1080/19386362.2019.1595301 ↗
2. Fundamental principles of soil compaction
3. Estimation of compaction characteristics of soils using Atterberg limits10.1088/1757-899X/800/1/012024 ↗
4. Effect of gum Arabic content on maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of laterite soil10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11553 ↗
5. An overview on the compaction characteristics of soils by laboratory tests10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105830 ↗
6. Test method for determination of optimum moisture content of soil and maximum dry density10.1007/s12205-015-0163-0 ↗
7. Wetting-induced compression of compacted Oklahoma soils10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:10(1014) ↗
8. Ageing effects in a compacted bentonite: A microstructure approach10.1680/geot.2006.56.5.291 ↗
9. Soil stiffness evaluation for compaction control of cohesionless embankments10.1520/GTJ100971 ↗
10. Best-fit models to estimate modified proctor properties of compacted soil10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000022 ↗
11. Swelling of compacted sand–bentonite mixtures10.1016/j.clay.2008.12.006 ↗
12. A simplified axisymmetric model for column supported embankment systems10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.07.027 ↗
13. Effects of degree of compaction and fines content of the subgrade bottom layer on moisture migration in the substructure of high-speed railways10.1177/0954409717710838 ↗
14. Microstructure and hydraulic properties of coarse-grained subgrade soil used in high-speed railway at various compaction degrees10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002972 ↗
15. Soil compaction parameters prediction using GMDH-type neural network and genetic algorithm10.1080/19648189.2017.1304269 ↗
16. Estimating static and dynamic stresses in geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported track-bed under train moving loads10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002056 ↗
17. Progressive machine learning approaches for predicting the soil compaction parameters10.1007/s40515-021-00212-4 ↗
18. (2021). Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)) (Standard No. ASTM D698).
19. (2021). Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modiefied Effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)) (Standard No. ASTM D1557).
20. Estimating optimum water content and maximum dry unit weight for compacted clays10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:9(907) ↗
21. Compaction characteristics of granular soils in United Arab Emirates10.1023/A:1024927719730 ↗
22. Compaction behaviour and prediction of its characteristics of fine grained soils with particular reference to compaction energy10.3208/sandf.44.5_27 ↗
23. Plastic limit and compaction characteristics of finegrained soils10.1680/grim.2005.9.1.17 ↗
24. Correlation between gradational parameters and compaction characteristics of sandy soils10.1179/1938636213Z.00000000045 ↗
25. Prediction of compaction characteristics of fine-grained soils using consistency limits10.1007/s13369-015-1918-0 ↗
26. Artificial neural network prediction models for maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of stabilized soils10.1007/s40515-018-0053-2 ↗
27. Prediction of the soil compaction parameters using deep neural networks10.1007/s40515-021-00213-3 ↗
28. Multi-layer perceptron (MLP) neural network for predicting the modified compaction parameters of coarse-grained and fine-grained soils10.1007/s41062-021-00679-7 ↗
29. Bardhan, A., Singh, R.K., Ghani, S., Konstantakatos, G., and Asteris, P.G. (2023). Modelling Soil Compaction Parameters Using an Enhanced Hybrid Intelligence Paradigm of ANFIS and Improved Grey Wolf Optimiser. Mathematics, 11.10.3390/math11143064 ↗
30. Artificial neural network equations for predicting the modified proctor compaction parameters of fine-grained soil10.1007/s40515-022-00228-4 ↗
31. Prediction of compaction parameters of soil using support vector regression
32. Ferreira, C. (2001). Gene expression programming: A new adaptive algorithm for solving problems. arXiv.
33. Raja, M.N.A., Abdoun, T., and El-Sekelly, W. (2023). Smart prediction of liquefaction-induced lateral spreading. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng.10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.05.017 ↗
34. Predicting the compaction characteristics of expansive soils using two genetic programming-based algorithms10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100608 ↗
35. Indirect estimation of swelling pressure of expansive soil: Gep versus mep modelling10.1155/2023/1827117 ↗
36. Determination of ultimate capacity of driven piles in cohesionless soil: A multivariate adaptive regression spline approach10.1002/nag.1076 ↗
37. Multivariate adaptive regression spline (Mars) for prediction of elastic modulus of jointed rock mass10.1007/s10706-012-9584-4 ↗
38. Slope reliability analysis in spatially variable soils using sliced inverse regression-based multivariate adaptive regression spline10.1007/s10064-021-02353-9 ↗
39. Modeling of unconfined compressive strength of soil-RAP blend stabilized with Portland cement using multivariate adaptive regression spline10.1007/s11709-019-0516-8 ↗
40. Multivariate adaptive regression splines model for prediction of the liquefaction-induced settlement of shallow foundations10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106097 ↗
41. Settlement prediction of the piles socketed into rock using multivariate adaptive regression splines
42. Sirimontree, S., Jearsiripongkul, T., Lai, V.Q., Eskandarinejad, A., Lawongkerd, J., Seehavong, S., Thongchom, C., Nuaklong, P., and Keawsawasvong, S. (2022). Prediction of penetration resistance of a spherical penetrometer in clay using multivariate adaptive regression splines model. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14063222 ↗
43. Estimation of soil cation exchange capacity using genetic expression programming (GEP) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS)10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.025 ↗
44. Prediction of river pipeline scour depth using multivariate adaptive regression splines10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000248 ↗
45. Assessment of susceptibility to earth-flow landslide using logistic regression and multivariate adaptive regression splines: A case of the Belice River basin (western Sicily, Italy)10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.09.020 ↗
46. Performance of Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) in predicting runoff in mid-Himalayan micro-watersheds with limited data/Performances de régressions par splines multiples et adaptives (MARS) pour la prévision d’écoulement au sein de micro-bassins versants Himalayens d’altitudes intermédiaires avec peu de données10.1623/hysj.53.6.1165 ↗
47. R Core Team (2020). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Core Team.
48. Multivariate adaptive regression splines
49. Classification and regression trees10.1002/widm.8 ↗
50. Kuhn, M., and Johnson, K. (2013). Applied Predictive Modeling, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3 ↗
51. Alhakeem, Z.M., Jebur, Y.M., Henedy, S.N., Imran, H., Bernardo, L.F., and Hussein, H.M. (2022). Prediction of ecofriendly concrete compressive strength using gradient boosting regression tree combined with GridSearchCV hyperparameter-optimization techniques. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15217432 ↗
52. A novel electromechanical impedance-based method for non-destructive evaluation of concrete fiber content10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128972 ↗
53. Comparative analysis of different machine learning algorithms to predict mechanical properties of concrete10.1080/15376494.2021.1917021 ↗
54. Hybridizing grid search and support vector regression to predict the compressive strength of fly ash concrete10.1155/2022/3601914 ↗
55. Machine learning–based backbone curve model of reinforced concrete columns subjected to cyclic loading reversals10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000787 ↗
56. Sensitivity analysis of k-fold cross validation in prediction error estimation10.1109/TPAMI.2009.187 ↗
57. Kohavi, R. (1995, January 20). A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Montreal, QC, Canada.
58. Performance evaluation of classification algorithms by k-fold and leave-one-out cross validation10.1016/j.patcog.2015.03.009 ↗
59. Long-term performance prediction framework based on XGBoost decision tree for pultruded FRP composites exposed to water, humidity and alkaline solution10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115184 ↗
60. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J.H., and Friedman, J.H. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and prediction, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 ↗
61. High performance prediction of soil compaction parameters using multi expression programming10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105758 ↗
62. Shah, H.A., Nehdi, M.L., Khan, M.I., Akmal, U., Alabduljabbar, H., Mohamed, A., and Sheraz, M. (2022). Predicting Compressive and Splitting Tensile Strengths of Silica Fume Concrete Using M5P Model Tree Algorithm. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15155436 ↗
63. New model derivation for the bond behavior of NSM FRP systems in concrete10.1007/s40996-017-0058-z ↗
64. Building predictive models in R using the caret package10.18637/jss.v028.i05 ↗
65. Experimental study of the effect of fines content on dynamic compaction grouting in completely decomposed granite of Hong Kong10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.002 ↗
66. Maximum dry density of sand–kaolin mixtures predicted by using fine content and specific gravity10.1007/s42452-020-03481-9 ↗