Show source-provided references
1. Lofi, C., and El Maarry, K. (2014, January 14–17). Design patterns for hybrid algorithmic-crowdsourcing workflows. Proceedings of the IEEE 16th Conference on Business Informatics, Geneva, Switzerland.
10.1109/CBI.2014.16 ↗3. Vargas-Santiago, M., Monroy, R., Ramirez-Marquez, J.E., Zhang, C., Leon-Velasco, D.A., and Zhu, H. (2020). Complementing solutions to optimization problems via crowdsourcing on video game plays. Appl. Sci., 10.
10.3390/app10238410 ↗4. Flud: A hybrid crowd–algorithm approach for visualizing biological networks
10.1145/3479196 ↗5. Taxonomy and theory in computer supported cooperative work
7. Joining together online: The trajectory of CSCW scholarship on group formation
10.1145/3359250 ↗8. McGrath, J.E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and Performance, Prentice-Hall.
9. Scaling group tasks: A method for dimensional analysis
12. Johansen, R. (1988). Groupware: Computer Support for Business Teams, The Free Press.
13. Lee, C.P., and Paine, D. (2015, January 14–18). From the matrix to a model of coordinated action (MoCA): A conceptual framework of and for CSCW. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
10.1145/2675133.2675161 ↗15. Transforming taxonomic interfaces: “Arm’s length” cooperative work and the maintenance of a long-lived classification system
10.1145/3274442 ↗16. A research agenda for hybrid intelligence: Augmenting human intellect with collaborative, adaptive, responsible, and explainable artificial intelligence
10.1109/MC.2020.2996587 ↗18. Dellermann, D., Calma, A., Lipusch, N., Weber, T., Weigel, S., and Ebel, P. (2019, January 8–11). The future of human-AI collaboration: A taxonomy of design knowledge for hybrid intelligence systems. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA.
10.24251/HICSS.2019.034 ↗19. Dubey, A., Abhinav, K., Jain, S., Arora, V., and Puttaveerana, A. (2020, January 27–29). HACO: A framework for developing human-AI teaming. Proceedings of the 13th Innovations in Software Engineering Conference, Jabalpur, India.
10.1145/3385032.3385044 ↗22. Rouse, A.C. (2010, January 1–3). A preliminary taxonomy of crowdsourcing. Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Brisbane, Australia.
28. Gadiraju, U., Kawase, R., and Dietze, S. (2014, January 1–4). A taxonomy of microtasks on the web. Proceedings of the 25th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, Santiago, Chile.
10.1145/2631775.2631819 ↗30. Alabduljabbar, R., and Al-Dossari, H. (2017, January 22–23). Towards a classification model for tasks in crowdsourcing. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Internet of Things and Cloud Computing, Cambridge, UK.
10.1145/3018896.3018916 ↗32. Chilton, L.B., Little, G., Edge, D., Weld, D.S., and Landay, J.A. (May, January 27). Cascade: Crowdsourcing taxonomy creation. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France.
33. Sharif, A., Gopal, P., Saugstad, M., Bhatt, S., Fok, R., Weld, G., Dey, K.A.M., and Froehlich, J.E. (2021, January 18–22). Experimental crowd+AI approaches to track accessibility features in sidewalk intersections over time. Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, Virtual Event.
10.1145/3441852.3476549 ↗34. Zhang, D.Y., Huang, Y., Zhang, Y., and Wang, D. (2020, January 7–12). Crowd-assisted disaster scene assessment with human-AI interactive attention. Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New York, NY, USA.
10.1609/aaai.v34i03.5658 ↗35. Kaspar, A., Patterson, G., Kim, C., Aksoy, Y., Matusik, W., and Elgharib, M. (2018, January 21–26). Crowd-guided ensembles: How can we choreograph crowd workers for video segmentation?. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada.
10.1145/3173574.3173685 ↗37. Maier-Hein, L., Ross, T., Gröhl, J., Glocker, B., Bodenstedt, S., Stock, C., Heim, E., Götz, M., Wirkert, S.J., and Kenngott, H. (2016, January 17–21). Crowd-algorithm collaboration for large-scale endoscopic image annotation with confidence. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Athens, Greece.
10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_71 ↗38. Mohanty, V., Thames, D., Mehta, S., and Luther, K. (2019, January 17–20). Photo Sleuth: Combining human expertise and face recognition to identify historical portraits. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Marina del Ray, CA, USA.
10.1145/3301275.3302301 ↗39. Huang, T.H., Chang, J.C., and Bigham, J.P. (2018, January 21–26). Evorus: A crowd-powered conversational assistant built to automate itself over time. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada.
10.1145/3173574.3173869 ↗40. Crowd-AI camera sensing in the real world
41. Correia, A., Paredes, H., Schneider, D., Jameel, S., and Fonseca, B. (2019, January 6–9). Towards hybrid crowd-AI centered systems: Developing an integrated framework from an empirical perspective. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Bari, Italy.
10.1109/SMC.2019.8914075 ↗42. Transitioning to human interaction with AI systems: New challenges and opportunities for HCI professionals to enable human-centered AI
10.1080/10447318.2022.2041900 ↗46. Tricco, A.C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., Kastner, M., Levac, D., Ng, C., Sharpe, J.P., and Wilson, K. (2016). A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 16.
10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4 ↗48. Oberländer, A.M., Lösser, B., and Rau, D. (2019, January 8–14). Taxonomy research in information systems: A systematic assessment. Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems, Stockholm and Uppsala, Sweden.
49. Gerber, A. (2018, January 16–18). Computational ontologies as classification artifacts in IS research. Proceedings of the 24th Americas Conference on Information Systems, New Orleans, LA, USA.
50. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review
51. Schmidt-Kraepelin, M., Thiebes, S., Tran, M.C., and Sunyaev, A. (2018, January 3–6). What’s in the game? Developing a taxonomy of gamification concepts for health apps. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hilton Waikoloa Village, HI, USA.
10.24251/HICSS.2018.150 ↗53. Andraschko, L., Wunderlich, P., Veit, D., and Sarker, S. (2021, January 12–15). Towards a taxonomy of smart home technology: A preliminary understanding. Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Information Systems, Austin, TX, USA.
54. Understanding the elephant: The discourse approach to boundary identification and corpus construction for theory review articles
55. Elliott, J.H., Turner, T., Clavisi, O., Thomas, J., Higgins, J.P.T., Mavergames, C., and Gruen, R.L. (2014). Living systematic reviews: An emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap. PLoS Med., 11.
10.1371/journal.pmed.1001603 ↗57. Kittur, A., Nickerson, J.V., Bernstein, M., Gerber, E., Shaw, A., Zimmerman, J., Lease, M., and Horton, J.J. (2013, January 23–27). The future of crowd work. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, San Antonio, TX, USA.
10.1145/2441776.2441923 ↗58. Zhang, D., Zhang, Y., Li, Q., Plummer, T., and Wang, D. (2019, January 7–10). CrowdLearn: A crowd-AI hybrid system for deep learning-based damage assessment applications. Proceedings of the 39th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Dallas, TX, USA.
10.1109/ICDCS.2019.00123 ↗59. Landolt, S., Wambsganss, T., and Söllner, M. (2021, January 5). A taxonomy for deep learning in natural language processing. Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, USA.
10.24251/HICSS.2021.129 ↗61. Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business Press.
62. Understanding crowdsourcing projects: A review on the key design elements of a crowdsourcing initiative
10.1111/caim.12454 ↗63. Hemmer, P., Schemmer, M., Vössing, M., and Kühl, N. (2021, January 12–14). Human-AI complementarity in hybrid intelligence systems: A structured literature review. Proceedings of the 25th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Virtual Event, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
64. Holstein, K., Aleven, V., and Rummel, N. (2020, January 6–10). A conceptual framework for human-AI hybrid adaptivity in education. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Ifrane, Morocco.
10.1007/978-3-030-52237-7_20 ↗66. Weber, E., Marzo, N., Papadopoulos, D.P., Biswas, A., Lapedriza, A., Ofli, F., Imran, M., and Torralba, A. (2020, January 23–28). Detecting natural disasters, damage, and incidents in the wild. Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Computer Vision, Glasgow, UK.
10.1007/978-3-030-58529-7_20 ↗67. Making better use of the crowd: How crowdsourcing can advance machine learning research
68. Hamadi, R., Ghazzai, H., and Massoud, Y. (2022). A generative adversarial network for financial advisor recruitment in smart crowdsourcing platforms. Appl. Sci., 12.
10.3390/app12199830 ↗69. Work system theory: Overview of core concepts, extensions, and challenges for the future
70. Venumuddala, V.R., and Kamath, R. (2022). Work systems in the Indian information technology (IT) industry delivering artificial intelligence (AI) solutions and the challenges of work from home. Inf. Syst. Front., 1–25.
10.1007/s10796-022-10259-4 ↗72. Neale, D.C., Carroll, J.M., and Rosson, M.B. (2004, January 6–10). Evaluating computer-supported cooperative work: Models and frameworks. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Chicago, IL, USA.
10.1145/1031607.1031626 ↗73. Exploring real-time collaboration in crowd-powered systems through a UI design tool
10.1145/3274373 ↗75. Agapie, E., Teevan, J., and Monroy-Hernández, A. (2015, January 8–11). Crowdsourcing in the field: A case study using local crowds for event reporting. Proceedings of the Third AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, San Diego, CA, USA.
10.1609/hcomp.v3i1.13235 ↗76. Lafreniere, B.J., Grossman, T., Anderson, F., Matejka, J., Kerrick, H., Nagy, D., Vasey, L., Atherton, E., Beirne, N., and Coelho, M.H. (2016, January 16–19). Crowdsourced fabrication. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
10.1145/2984511.2984553 ↗78. Bouwer, A. (2022). Marketing and Smart Technologies, Springer.
79. Lubars, B., and Tan, C. (2019, January 8–14). Ask not what AI can do, but what AI should do: Towards a framework of task delegability. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
80. Investigating crowdworkers’ identify, perception and practices in micro-task crowdsourcing
10.1145/3492854 ↗81. Khan, V.J., Papangelis, K., Lykourentzou, I., and Markopoulos, P. (2019). Macrotask Crowdsourcing—Engaging the Crowds to Address Complex Problems, Springer.
10.1007/978-3-030-12334-5 ↗85. Online sequencing of non-decomposable macrotasks in expert crowdsourcing
10.1145/3140459 ↗88. Amershi, S., Weld, D., Vorvoreanu, M., Fourney, A., Nushi, B., Collisson, P., Suh, J., Iqbal, S.T., Bennett, P.N., and Inkpen, K. (2019, January 4–9). Guidelines for human-AI interaction. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
10.1145/3290605.3300233 ↗90. Bridging the gap between ethics and practice: Guidelines for reliable, safe, and trustworthy human-centered AI systems
10.1145/3419764 ↗91. On the state of reporting in crowdsourcing experiments and a checklist to aid current practices
92. Robert, L., and Romero, D.M. (2015, January 18–23). Crowd size, diversity and performance. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
10.1145/2702123.2702469 ↗93. Intelligent interaction design: The role of human-computer interaction research in the design of intelligent systems
10.1111/1468-0394.00151 ↗94. Being a solo endeavor or team worker in crowdsourcing contests? It is a long-term decision you need to make
95. GroundTruth: Augmenting expert image geolocation with crowdsourcing and shared representations
10.1145/3359209 ↗96. Zhou, S., Valentine, M., and Bernstein, M.S. (2018, January 21–26). In search of the dream team: Temporally constrained multi-armed bandits for identifying effective team structures. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada.
10.1145/3173574.3173682 ↗97. Gray, M.L., Suri, S., Ali, S.S., and Kulkarni, D. (March, January 27). The crowd is a collaborative network. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, San Francisco, CA, USA.
98. Imbalanced volunteer engagement in cultural heritage crowdsourcing: A task-related exploration based on causal inference
10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103027 ↗