journal article·2023-02-08Open access

Designing for Hybrid Intelligence: A Taxonomy and Survey of Crowd-Machine Interaction

António Correia, Andrea Grover, Daniel Schneider, Ana Paula Pimentel, Ramon Chaves, Marcos Antonio de Almeida, Benjamim Fonseca

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 4

Abstract

With the widespread availability and pervasiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in many application areas across the globe, the role of crowdsourcing has seen an upsurge in terms of importance for scaling up data-driven algorithms in rapid cycles through a relatively low-cost distributed workforce or even on a volunteer basis. However, there is a lack of systematic and empirical examination of the interplay among the processes and activities combining crowd-machine hybrid interaction. To uncover the enduring aspects characterizing the human-centered AI design space when involving ensembles of crowds and algorithms and their symbiotic relations and requirements, a Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) lens strongly rooted in the taxonomic tradition of conceptual scheme development is taken with the aim of aggregating and characterizing some of the main component entities in the burgeoning domain of hybrid crowd-AI centered systems. The goal of this article is thus to propose a theoretically grounded and empirically validated analytical framework for the study of crowd-machine interaction and its environment. Based on a scoping review and several cross-sectional analyses of research studies comprising hybrid forms of human interaction with AI systems and applications at a crowd scale, the available literature was distilled and incorporated into a unifying framework comprised of taxonomic units distributed across integration dimensions that range from the original time and space axes in which every collaborative activity take place to the main attributes that constitute a hybrid intelligence architecture. The upshot is that when turning to the challenges that are inherent in tasks requiring massive participation, novel properties can be obtained for a set of potential scenarios that go beyond the single experience of a human interacting with the technology to comprise a vast set of massive machine-crowd interactions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing · Open Source Software Innovations · Personal Information Management and User Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

INESC TEC, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal

College of Information Science & Technology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182, USA

Postgraduate Program in Informatics, PPGI/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro 21941-916, Brazil

Tércio Pacitti Institute of Computer Applications and Research (NCE), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-916, Brazil

Systems Engineering and Computer Science Program (PESC/COPPE/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941-972, Brazil

Funding

National Funds through FLAD—Luso-American Development Foundation · FCT—Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Lofi, C., and El Maarry, K. (2014, January 14–17). Design patterns for hybrid algorithmic-crowdsourcing workflows. Proceedings of the IEEE 16th Conference on Business Informatics, Geneva, Switzerland.10.1109/CBI.2014.16 ↗
2. Large-scale medical image annotation with crowd-powered algorithms10.1117/1.JMI.5.3.034002 ↗
3. Vargas-Santiago, M., Monroy, R., Ramirez-Marquez, J.E., Zhang, C., Leon-Velasco, D.A., and Zhu, H. (2020). Complementing solutions to optimization problems via crowdsourcing on video game plays. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10238410 ↗
4. Flud: A hybrid crowd–algorithm approach for visualizing biological networks10.1145/3479196 ↗
5. Taxonomy and theory in computer supported cooperative work
6. A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems10.1057/ejis.2012.26 ↗
7. Joining together online: The trajectory of CSCW scholarship on group formation10.1145/3359250 ↗
8. McGrath, J.E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and Performance, Prentice-Hall.
9. Scaling group tasks: A method for dimensional analysis
10. Information technology (IT) enabled crowdsourcing: A conceptual framework10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102135 ↗
11. General framework, opportunities and challenges for crowdsourcing techniques: A comprehensive survey10.1016/j.jss.2020.110611 ↗
12. Johansen, R. (1988). Groupware: Computer Support for Business Teams, The Free Press.
13. Lee, C.P., and Paine, D. (2015, January 14–18). From the matrix to a model of coordinated action (MoCA): A conceptual framework of and for CSCW. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1145/2675133.2675161 ↗
14. Uncovering the complexity of care networks—Towards a taxonomy of collaboration complexity in homecare10.1007/s10606-022-09433-8 ↗
15. Transforming taxonomic interfaces: “Arm’s length” cooperative work and the maintenance of a long-lived classification system10.1145/3274442 ↗
16. A research agenda for hybrid intelligence: Augmenting human intellect with collaborative, adaptive, responsible, and explainable artificial intelligence10.1109/MC.2020.2996587 ↗
17. A brief taxonomy of hybrid intelligence10.3390/forecast3030039 ↗
18. Dellermann, D., Calma, A., Lipusch, N., Weber, T., Weigel, S., and Ebel, P. (2019, January 8–11). The future of human-AI collaboration: A taxonomy of design knowledge for hybrid intelligence systems. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA.10.24251/HICSS.2019.034 ↗
19. Dubey, A., Abhinav, K., Jain, S., Arora, V., and Puttaveerana, A. (2020, January 27–29). HACO: A framework for developing human-AI teaming. Proceedings of the 13th Innovations in Software Engineering Conference, Jabalpur, India.10.1145/3385032.3385044 ↗
20. Crowdsourcing, the great meteor storm of 1833, and the founding of meteor science10.1016/j.endeavour.2014.03.002 ↗
21. Outsourcing labour to the cloud10.1504/IJISD.2009.033083 ↗
22. Rouse, A.C. (2010, January 1–3). A preliminary taxonomy of crowdsourcing. Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Brisbane, Australia.
23. The collective intelligence genome10.1109/EMR.2010.5559142 ↗
24. Co-creation: Toward a taxonomy and an integrated research perspective10.2753/JEC1086-4415150101 ↗
25. Crowdsourcing systems on the world-wide web10.1145/1924421.1924442 ↗
26. Rules of crowdsourcing: Models, issues, and systems of control10.1080/10580530.2013.739883 ↗
27. A taxonomy of crowdsourcing based on task complexity10.1177/0165551514550140 ↗
28. Gadiraju, U., Kawase, R., and Dietze, S. (2014, January 1–4). A taxonomy of microtasks on the web. Proceedings of the 25th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, Santiago, Chile.10.1145/2631775.2631819 ↗
29. Crowdsourcing: A taxonomy and systematic mapping study10.1016/j.cosrev.2015.05.001 ↗
30. Alabduljabbar, R., and Al-Dossari, H. (2017, January 22–23). Towards a classification model for tasks in crowdsourcing. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Internet of Things and Cloud Computing, Cambridge, UK.10.1145/3018896.3018916 ↗
31. Exploring the effects of problem- and solution-related knowledge sharing in internal crowdsourcing10.1108/JKM-10-2021-0769 ↗
32. Chilton, L.B., Little, G., Edge, D., Weld, D.S., and Landay, J.A. (May, January 27). Cascade: Crowdsourcing taxonomy creation. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France.
33. Sharif, A., Gopal, P., Saugstad, M., Bhatt, S., Fok, R., Weld, G., Dey, K.A.M., and Froehlich, J.E. (2021, January 18–22). Experimental crowd+AI approaches to track accessibility features in sidewalk intersections over time. Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, Virtual Event.10.1145/3441852.3476549 ↗
34. Zhang, D.Y., Huang, Y., Zhang, Y., and Wang, D. (2020, January 7–12). Crowd-assisted disaster scene assessment with human-AI interactive attention. Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New York, NY, USA.10.1609/aaai.v34i03.5658 ↗
35. Kaspar, A., Patterson, G., Kim, C., Aksoy, Y., Matusik, W., and Elgharib, M. (2018, January 21–26). Crowd-guided ensembles: How can we choreograph crowd workers for video segmentation?. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1145/3173574.3173685 ↗
36. CollabLearn: An uncertainty-aware crowd-AI collaboration system for cultural heritage damage assessment10.1109/TCSS.2021.3109143 ↗
37. Maier-Hein, L., Ross, T., Gröhl, J., Glocker, B., Bodenstedt, S., Stock, C., Heim, E., Götz, M., Wirkert, S.J., and Kenngott, H. (2016, January 17–21). Crowd-algorithm collaboration for large-scale endoscopic image annotation with confidence. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Athens, Greece.10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_71 ↗
38. Mohanty, V., Thames, D., Mehta, S., and Luther, K. (2019, January 17–20). Photo Sleuth: Combining human expertise and face recognition to identify historical portraits. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Marina del Ray, CA, USA.10.1145/3301275.3302301 ↗
39. Huang, T.H., Chang, J.C., and Bigham, J.P. (2018, January 21–26). Evorus: A crowd-powered conversational assistant built to automate itself over time. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1145/3173574.3173869 ↗
40. Crowd-AI camera sensing in the real world
41. Correia, A., Paredes, H., Schneider, D., Jameel, S., and Fonseca, B. (2019, January 6–9). Towards hybrid crowd-AI centered systems: Developing an integrated framework from an empirical perspective. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Bari, Italy.10.1109/SMC.2019.8914075 ↗
42. Transitioning to human interaction with AI systems: New challenges and opportunities for HCI professionals to enable human-centered AI10.1080/10447318.2022.2041900 ↗
43. Zero-phase angle asteroid taxonomy classification using unsupervised machine learning algorithms10.1051/0004-6361/202243428 ↗
44. Taxonomic classification of DNA sequences beyond sequence similarity using deep neural networks10.1073/pnas.2122636119 ↗
45. The nature of taxonomy10.1111/j.1547-5069.1987.tb00613.x ↗
46. Tricco, A.C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., Kastner, M., Levac, D., Ng, C., Sharpe, J.P., and Wilson, K. (2016). A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 16.10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4 ↗
47. Phenetic taxonomy: Theory and methods10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.002231 ↗
48. Oberländer, A.M., Lösser, B., and Rau, D. (2019, January 8–14). Taxonomy research in information systems: A systematic assessment. Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems, Stockholm and Uppsala, Sweden.
49. Gerber, A. (2018, January 16–18). Computational ontologies as classification artifacts in IS research. Proceedings of the 24th Americas Conference on Information Systems, New Orleans, LA, USA.
50. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review
51. Schmidt-Kraepelin, M., Thiebes, S., Tran, M.C., and Sunyaev, A. (2018, January 3–6). What’s in the game? Developing a taxonomy of gamification concepts for health apps. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hilton Waikoloa Village, HI, USA.10.24251/HICSS.2018.150 ↗
52. Taxonomy of centralization in public blockchain systems: A systematic literature review10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102584 ↗
53. Andraschko, L., Wunderlich, P., Veit, D., and Sarker, S. (2021, January 12–15). Towards a taxonomy of smart home technology: A preliminary understanding. Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Information Systems, Austin, TX, USA.
54. Understanding the elephant: The discourse approach to boundary identification and corpus construction for theory review articles
55. Elliott, J.H., Turner, T., Clavisi, O., Thomas, J., Higgins, J.P.T., Mavergames, C., and Gruen, R.L. (2014). Living systematic reviews: An emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap. PLoS Med., 11.10.1371/journal.pmed.1001603 ↗
56. The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5 ↗
57. Kittur, A., Nickerson, J.V., Bernstein, M., Gerber, E., Shaw, A., Zimmerman, J., Lease, M., and Horton, J.J. (2013, January 23–27). The future of crowd work. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, San Antonio, TX, USA.10.1145/2441776.2441923 ↗
58. Zhang, D., Zhang, Y., Li, Q., Plummer, T., and Wang, D. (2019, January 7–10). CrowdLearn: A crowd-AI hybrid system for deep learning-based damage assessment applications. Proceedings of the 39th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Dallas, TX, USA.10.1109/ICDCS.2019.00123 ↗
59. Landolt, S., Wambsganss, T., and Söllner, M. (2021, January 5). A taxonomy for deep learning in natural language processing. Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, USA.10.24251/HICSS.2021.129 ↗
60. Testing a typology of tasks: An empirical validation of McGrath’s (1984) group task circumplex10.1177/104649649903000202 ↗
61. Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business Press.
62. Understanding crowdsourcing projects: A review on the key design elements of a crowdsourcing initiative10.1111/caim.12454 ↗
63. Hemmer, P., Schemmer, M., Vössing, M., and Kühl, N. (2021, January 12–14). Human-AI complementarity in hybrid intelligence systems: A structured literature review. Proceedings of the 25th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Virtual Event, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
64. Holstein, K., Aleven, V., and Rummel, N. (2020, January 6–10). A conceptual framework for human-AI hybrid adaptivity in education. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Ifrane, Morocco.10.1007/978-3-030-52237-7_20 ↗
65. Elaborating team roles for artificial intelligence-based teammates in human-AI collaboration10.1007/s10726-022-09792-z ↗
66. Weber, E., Marzo, N., Papadopoulos, D.P., Biswas, A., Lapedriza, A., Ofli, F., Imran, M., and Torralba, A. (2020, January 23–28). Detecting natural disasters, damage, and incidents in the wild. Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Computer Vision, Glasgow, UK.10.1007/978-3-030-58529-7_20 ↗
67. Making better use of the crowd: How crowdsourcing can advance machine learning research
68. Hamadi, R., Ghazzai, H., and Massoud, Y. (2022). A generative adversarial network for financial advisor recruitment in smart crowdsourcing platforms. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12199830 ↗
69. Work system theory: Overview of core concepts, extensions, and challenges for the future
70. Venumuddala, V.R., and Kamath, R. (2022). Work systems in the Indian information technology (IT) industry delivering artificial intelligence (AI) solutions and the challenges of work from home. Inf. Syst. Front., 1–25.10.1007/s10796-022-10259-4 ↗
71. Nardi, B. (1996). Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2137.001.0001 ↗
72. Neale, D.C., Carroll, J.M., and Rosson, M.B. (2004, January 6–10). Evaluating computer-supported cooperative work: Models and frameworks. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1145/1031607.1031626 ↗
73. Exploring real-time collaboration in crowd-powered systems through a UI design tool10.1145/3274373 ↗
74. A picture is worth a thousand words: Share your real-time view on the road10.1109/TVT.2016.2592685 ↗
75. Agapie, E., Teevan, J., and Monroy-Hernández, A. (2015, January 8–11). Crowdsourcing in the field: A case study using local crowds for event reporting. Proceedings of the Third AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1609/hcomp.v3i1.13235 ↗
76. Lafreniere, B.J., Grossman, T., Anderson, F., Matejka, J., Kerrick, H., Nagy, D., Vasey, L., Atherton, E., Beirne, N., and Coelho, M.H. (2016, January 16–19). Crowdsourced fabrication. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.10.1145/2984511.2984553 ↗
77. Profiles of engagement in online communities of citizen science participation10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.044 ↗
78. Bouwer, A. (2022). Marketing and Smart Technologies, Springer.
79. Lubars, B., and Tan, C. (2019, January 8–14). Ask not what AI can do, but what AI should do: Towards a framework of task delegability. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
80. Investigating crowdworkers’ identify, perception and practices in micro-task crowdsourcing10.1145/3492854 ↗
81. Khan, V.J., Papangelis, K., Lykourentzou, I., and Markopoulos, P. (2019). Macrotask Crowdsourcing—Engaging the Crowds to Address Complex Problems, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-12334-5 ↗
82. The future of microwork10.1145/3019600 ↗
83. Microtasking activities in crowdsourced software development: A systematic literature review10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3148400 ↗
84. Optimized group formation for solving collaborative tasks10.1007/s00778-018-0516-7 ↗
85. Online sequencing of non-decomposable macrotasks in expert crowdsourcing10.1145/3140459 ↗
86. A technical survey on statistical modelling and design methods for crowdsourcing quality control10.1016/j.artint.2020.103351 ↗
87. Optimizing microtask assignment on crowdsourcing platforms using Markov chain Monte Carlo10.1016/j.dss.2020.113404 ↗
88. Amershi, S., Weld, D., Vorvoreanu, M., Fourney, A., Nushi, B., Collisson, P., Suh, J., Iqbal, S.T., Bennett, P.N., and Inkpen, K. (2019, January 4–9). Guidelines for human-AI interaction. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.10.1145/3290605.3300233 ↗
89. Mapping citizen science through the lens of human-centered AI10.15346/hc.v9i1.133 ↗
90. Bridging the gap between ethics and practice: Guidelines for reliable, safe, and trustworthy human-centered AI systems10.1145/3419764 ↗
91. On the state of reporting in crowdsourcing experiments and a checklist to aid current practices
92. Robert, L., and Romero, D.M. (2015, January 18–23). Crowd size, diversity and performance. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea.10.1145/2702123.2702469 ↗
93. Intelligent interaction design: The role of human-computer interaction research in the design of intelligent systems10.1111/1468-0394.00151 ↗
94. Being a solo endeavor or team worker in crowdsourcing contests? It is a long-term decision you need to make
95. GroundTruth: Augmenting expert image geolocation with crowdsourcing and shared representations10.1145/3359209 ↗
96. Zhou, S., Valentine, M., and Bernstein, M.S. (2018, January 21–26). In search of the dream team: Temporally constrained multi-armed bandits for identifying effective team structures. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1145/3173574.3173682 ↗
97. Gray, M.L., Suri, S., Ali, S.S., and Kulkarni, D. (March, January 27). The crowd is a collaborative network. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, San Francisco, CA, USA.
98. Imbalanced volunteer engagement in cultural heritage crowdsourcing: A task-related exploration based on causal inference10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103027 ↗
99. Team situation awareness and conflict: A study of human–machine teaming10.1177/15553434211017354 ↗
100. Cooperative AI: Machines must learn to find common ground10.1038/d41586-021-01170-0 ↗