Intelligent Prediction of Stuck Pipe Using Combined Data-Driven and Knowledge-Driven Model
Source abstract
Abstract
Stuck pipe phenomena can have disastrous effects on drilling performance, with outcomes that can range from time delays to loss of expensive machinery. In this work, we provide three methods for the prediction of stuck pipe. The first method targets the detection of friction coefficient which can represent the trend of stuck pipe. The second method targets the prediction of probability for stuck pipe using ANN (artificial neural network). The last model establishes a comprehensive indicator based on the first and the second method using fuzzy mathematics which can give more accurate probability for stuck pipe. The results show that the best model is the last one which can predict stuck pipe events with a F1 of 0.98 and a FAR (false alarm rate) of 1%. Preliminary experimental results on the available dataset indicate that the use of the proposed model and can help mitigate the stuck pipe issue.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Jianghan Machinery Research Institute Limited Company of CNPC, Wuhan 430000, China
School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, Beijing 102249, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · China National Petroleum Corporation · China University of petroleum, Beijing
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Statistical analysis of lost time events in drilling and completion of HTHP wells in South China Sea, Safety production science and technology in China
2. Evaluating Drilling Practice in Deviated Wells with Torque and Weight Data10.2118/16114-PA ↗
3. Uses and Limitations of Drillstring Tension and Torque Models for Monitoring Hole Conditions10.2118/16664-PA ↗
4. Differential Pressure Stuck pipe-Laboratory Studies of Friction Between Steel and Mud Filter Cake10.2118/151-PA ↗
5. Shahbazi, K., Meschi, M., and Shahri, E. (2010, January 14–17). A New Criteria to Predict Stuck Pipe Occurrence. Proceedings of the North Africa Technical Conference and Exhibition, Cairo, Egypt.10.2523/128376-MS ↗
6. Bit Stuck pipe Caused by Borehole Deformation10.2118/14179-PA ↗
7. Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Stuck Drillpipe Situations10.2118/14181-PA ↗
8. Murillo, A., Neuman, J., and Samuel, R. (2009, January 4–8). Pipe stuck pipe prediction and avoidance using adaptive fuzzy logic and neural network modeling. Proceedings of the SPE Production and Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.10.2118/120128-MS ↗
9. Shoraka, S., Shadizadeh, S.R., and Shahri, M.P. (August, January 30). Prediction of Stuck Pipe in Iranian South Oil Fields Using Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Proceedings of the Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Abuja, Nigeria.
10. Biegler, M.W., and Kuhn, G.R. (1994, January 15–18). Advances in Prediction of Stuck Pipe Using Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Proceedings of the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, Dallas, TX, USA.10.2523/27529-MS ↗
11. A New Approach for Estimating Free Point in Fishing of Stuck Pipe using Artificial Neural Network
12. Stuck Drill Pipe Prediction with Networks Neural in Maroon Field
13. Siruvuri, C., Nagarakanti, S., and Samuel, R. (2006, January 21–23). Stuck Pipe Prediction and Avoidance: A Convolutional Neural Network Approach, Stuck Pipe Prediction and Avoidance: A Convolutional Neural Network Approach. Proceedings of the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, Miami, FL, USA.10.2523/98378 ↗
14. Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System and Artificial Neural Networks: Reliable approaches for pipe stuck prediction
15. Heinze, L., and Al-Baiyat, I.A. (2012, January 10–12). Implementing Artificial Neural Networks and Support Vector Machines in Stuck Pipe Prediction. Proceedings of the SPE Kuwait International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, Kuwait City, Kuwait.10.2118/163370-MS ↗
16. Prediction of drilling pipe stuck pipe by active learning method (ALM)10.5897/JPGE2013.0166 ↗
17. Stuck Pipe Prediction Using Automated Real-Time Modeling and Data Analysis10.2118/178888-PA ↗
18. The Development of a Window for Stuck Pipe Prediction10.1080/10916461003792302 ↗
19. Application of artificial neural network in real time prediction of stuck pipe
20. Research on prediction technology of stuck pipe accident
21. Liu, J.M., Li, Y.M., Zhang, T., and Song, J.M. (2022, May 01). Research on PCA-RF-Based Stuck Pipe Prediction Method. Available online: https://scjg.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?filename=BJGY202101004&dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFD2021&v=MTY2NTJUZzJYMmhzeEZyQ1VSN3VlWnVacUZ5dmxWTC9BSnlmTWQ3RzRITkRNcm85RllJUitDMzg0emg0WG5EMEw=.10.12677/QRB.2014.11004 ↗
22. Data-driven indicators for the detection and prediction of stuck-pipe events in oil&gas drilling operations10.1016/j.upstre.2021.100043 ↗
23. Prediction of hook tension and torque based on bp-lstm dual input network
24. Learning Representations by Back Propagating Errors10.1038/323533a0 ↗
25. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
26. Torque and Drag in Directional Wells-Prediction and Measurement10.2118/11380-PA ↗
27. Ho, H.-S. (1988, January 2–5). An Improved Modeling Program for Computing the Torque and Drag in Directional and Deep Wells. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, USA.10.2523/18047-MS ↗
28. Optimization of Ammonium Sulfate Crystals Based on Orthogonal Design10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2021.126217 ↗
29. Baeza-Yates, R., and Ribeiro-Neto, B. (1999). Modern Information Retrieval, ACM Press.
30. Fuzzy sets10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X ↗