A Scoping Review on the Progress, Applicability, and Future of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Source abstract
Abstract
Due to the success of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in the medical field over the past decade, concerns about the explainability of these systems have increased. The reliability requirements of black-box algorithms for making decisions affecting patients pose a challenge even beyond their accuracy. Recent advances in AI increasingly emphasize the necessity of integrating explainability into these systems. While most traditional AI methods and expert systems are inherently interpretable, the recent literature has focused primarily on explainability techniques for more complex models such as deep learning. This scoping review critically analyzes the existing literature regarding the explainability and interpretability of AI methods within the clinical domain. It offers a comprehensive overview of past and current research trends with the objective of identifying limitations that hinder the advancement of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in the field of medicine. Such constraints encompass the diverse requirements of key stakeholders, including clinicians, patients, and developers, as well as cognitive barriers to knowledge acquisition, the absence of standardised evaluation criteria, the potential for mistaking explanations for causal relationships, and the apparent trade-off between model accuracy and interpretability. Furthermore, this review discusses possible research directions aimed at surmounting these challenges. These include alternative approaches to leveraging medical expertise to enhance interpretability within clinical settings, such as data fusion techniques and interdisciplinary assessments throughout the development process, emphasizing the relevance of taking into account the needs of final users to design trustable explainability methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Machine Learning in Healthcare
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Artificial Intelligence, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08854, USA
Funding
IAX ‘Inteligencia Artificial eXplicable’ · Proyecto colaborativo de integración de datos genómicos (CICLOGEN) · Carlos III Health Institute from the Spanish National Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation 2017–2020 · European Regional Development Fund (FEDER)
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Artificial intelligence and human trust in healthcare: Focus on clinicians10.2196/15154 ↗
2. Explainable AI and Multi-Modal Causability in Medicine10.1515/icom-2020-0024 ↗
3. Adadi, A., and Berrada, M. (2020). Embedded Systems and Artificial Intelligence, Springer.
4. The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0 ↗
5. Joshi, G., Jain, A., Adhikari, S., Garg, H., and Bhandari, M. (2023). FDA approved Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AI/ML)-Enabled Medical Devices: An updated 2022 landscape. medRxiv.10.1101/2022.12.07.22283216 ↗
6. Han, C., Rundo, L., Murao, K., Nemoto, T., and Nakayama, H. (2020, January 14–17). Bridging the gap between AI and healthcare sides: Towards developing clinically relevant AI-powered diagnosis systems. Proceedings of the IFIP International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations, León, Spain.10.1007/978-3-030-49186-4_27 ↗
7. Physician understanding, explainability, and trust in a hypothetical machine learning risk calculator10.1093/jamia/ocz229 ↗
8. Ethics of artificial intelligence in global health: Explainability, algorithmic bias and trust10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.09.004 ↗
9. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198 ↗
10. Lee, P., Goldberg, C., and Kohane, I. (2023). The AI Revolution in Medicine: GPT-4 and Beyond, Pearson.
11. Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052 ↗
12. Sethi, T., Kalia, A., Sharma, A., and Nagori, A. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Precision Health: From Concept to Applications, Elsevier.
13. Machine learning in medicine: Should the pursuit of enhanced interpretability be abandoned?10.1136/medethics-2020-107102 ↗
14. Musen, M.A. (1993). An overview of knowledge acquisition. Second. Gener. Expert Syst., 405–427.10.1007/978-3-642-77927-5_18 ↗
15. Cruz, H.F.d., Pfahringer, B., Schneider, F., Meyer, A., and Schapranow, M.P. (2019, January 26–29). External validation of a “black-box” clinical predictive model in nephrology: Can interpretability methods help illuminate performance differences?. Proceedings of the Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine in Europe, Poznan, Poland.
16. Vilone, G., and Longo, L. (2020). Explainable artificial intelligence: A systematic review. arXiv.
17. Trust and medical AI: The challenges we face and the expertise needed to overcome them10.1093/jamia/ocaa268 ↗
18. From development to deployment: Dataset shift, causality, and shift-stable models in health AI
19. Brady, A., and Neri, E. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Radiology-Ethical Considerations. Diagnostics, 10.10.3390/diagnostics10040231 ↗
20. Maojo, V. (2004, January 18–19). Domain-specific particularities of data mining: Lessons learned. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Biological and Medical Data Analysis, Barcelona, Spain.10.1007/978-3-540-30547-7_24 ↗
21. Caruana, R., Lou, Y., Gehrke, J., Koch, P., Sturm, M., and Elhadad, N. (2015, January 10–13). Intelligible models for healthcare: Predicting pneumonia risk and hospital 30-day readmission. Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Sydney, NSW, Australia.10.1145/2783258.2788613 ↗
22. Data quality considerations for big data and machine learning: Going beyond data cleaning and transformations
23. Using machine learning in psychiatry: The need to establish a framework that nurtures trustworthiness
24. Artificial intelligence: Deep learning in oncological radiomics and challenges of interpretability and data harmonization10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.03.009 ↗
25. European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a “right to explanation”
26. Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: A multidisciplinary perspective10.1186/s12911-020-01332-6 ↗
27. The Mythos of Model Interpretability: In machine learning, the concept of interpretability is both important and slippery10.1145/3236386.3241340 ↗
28. The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00208-9 ↗
29. Antoniadi, A., Du, Y., Guendouz, Y., Wei, L., Mazo, C., Becker, B., and Mooney, C. (2021). Current Challenges and Future Opportunities for XAI in Machine Learning-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Systematic Review. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11115088 ↗
30. Abdullah, T., Zahid, M., and Ali, W. (2021). A Review of Interpretable ML in Healthcare: Taxonomy, Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions. Symmetry, 13.10.3390/sym13122439 ↗
31. Explainable artificial intelligence models using real-world electronic health record data: A systematic scoping review10.1093/jamia/ocaa053 ↗
32. Gulum, M., Trombley, C., and Kantardzic, M. (2021). A Review of Explainable Deep Learning Cancer Detection Models in Medical Imaging. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11104573 ↗
33. A Systematic Review of Human-Computer Interaction and Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare with Artificial Intelligence Techniques10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3127881 ↗
34. Salahuddin, Z., Woodruff, H., Chatterjee, A., and Lambin, P. (2022). Transparency of deep neural networks for medical image analysis: A review of interpretability methods. Comput. Biol. Med., 140.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105111 ↗
35. Unbox the black-box for the medical explainable AI via multi-modal and multi-centre data fusion: A mini-review, two showcases and beyond10.1016/j.inffus.2021.07.016 ↗
36. Zhang, Y., Weng, Y., and Lund, J. (2022). Applications of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosis and Surgery. Diagnostics, 12.10.3390/diagnostics12020237 ↗
37. A model-based method for computer-aided medical decision-making10.1016/0004-3702(78)90015-2 ↗
38. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews10.11124/JBIES-20-00167 ↗
39. A Brief Bibliometric Survey of Explainable AI in Medical Field
40. Interpretability of machine learning-based prediction models in healthcare10.1002/widm.1379 ↗
41. Singh, A., Sengupta, S., and Lakshminarayanan, V. (2020). Explainable Deep Learning Models in Medical Image Analysis. J. Imaging, 6.10.3390/jimaging6060052 ↗
42. Classification of explainable artificial intelligence methods through their output formats10.3390/make3030032 ↗
43. Arya, V., Bellamy, R.K., Chen, P.Y., Dhurandhar, A., Hind, M., Hoffman, S.C., Houde, S., Liao, Q.V., Luss, R., and Mojsilović, A. (2019). One explanation does not fit all: A toolkit and taxonomy of ai explainability techniques. arXiv.
44. Biran, O., and Cotton, C. (2017, January 19–25). Explanation and justification in machine learning: A survey. Proceedings of the IJCAI-17 Workshop on Explainable AI (XAI), Melbourne, Australia.
45. Asking ‘Why’ in AI: Explainability of intelligent systems–perspectives and challenges10.1002/isaf.1422 ↗
46. Vourgidis, I., Mafuma, S.J., Wilson, P., Carter, J., and Cosma, G. (2018, January 5–7). Medical expert systems—A study of trust and acceptance by healthcare stakeholders. Proceedings of the UK Workshop on Computational Intelligence, Nottingham, UK.10.1007/978-3-319-97982-3_9 ↗
47. Computer-based consultations in clinical therapeutics: Explanation and rule acquisition capabilities of the MYCIN system10.1016/0010-4809(75)90009-9 ↗
48. Miller, R.A., Pople, H.E., and Myers, J.D. (1985). Computer-Assisted Medical Decision Making, Springer.
49. Long, W., Naimi, S., Criscitiello, M., Pauker, S., and Szolovits, P. (1984, January 14–18). An aid to physiological reasoning in the management of cardiovascular disease. Proceedings of the 1984 Computers in Cardiology Conference, IEEE Computer Society, Long Beach, CA, USA.
50. Clancey, W.J., and Shortliffe, E.H. (1984). Readings in Medical Artificial Intelligence: The First Decade, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
51. Diagnosis and explanation by a nuclear cardiology expert system
52. Hogan, W.R., and Wagner, M.M. (1999, January 6–10). The use of an explanation algorithm in a clinical event monitor. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium. American Medical Informatics Association, Washington, DC, USA.
53. Darlington, K. (2008, January 28–31). Using explanation facilities in healthcare expert systems. Proceedings of the HEALTHINF 2008: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Health Informatics, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal.
54. Designing for explanation in health care applications of expert systems10.1177/2158244011408618 ↗
55. Choice and explanation in medical management: A multiattribute model of artificial intelligence approaches10.1177/0272989X8700700107 ↗
56. Molino, G., Console, L., and Torasso, P. (1989). Proceedings of the Images of the Twenty-First Century, Annual International Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, IEEE.
57. Reasoning foundations of medical diagnosis: Symbolic logic, probability, and value theory aid our understanding of how physicians reason10.1126/science.130.3366.9 ↗
58. Jacquez, J. (1963). The Diagnostic Process: Proceedings of a Conference Held at the University of Michigan, Malloy Lithographing, Inc.
59. Generalized linear models10.2307/2344614 ↗
60. Meacham, S., Isaac, G., Nauck, D., and Virginas, B. (2019, January 16–17). Towards explainable AI: Design and development for explanation of machine learning predictions for a patient readmittance medical application. Proceedings of the Intelligent Computing-Proceedings of the Computing Conference, London, UK.10.1007/978-3-030-22871-2_67 ↗
61. Banegas-Luna, A.J., Peña-García, J., Iftene, A., Guadagni, F., Ferroni, P., Scarpato, N., Zanzotto, F.M., Bueno-Crespo, A., and Pérez-Sánchez, H. (2021). Towards the interpretability of machine learning predictions for medical applications targeting personalised therapies: A cancer case survey. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22.10.3390/ijms22094394 ↗
62. Karatekin, T., Sancak, S., Celik, G., Topcuoglu, S., Karatekin, G., Kirci, P., and Okatan, A. (2019, January 26–28). Interpretable machine learning in healthcare through generalized additive model with pairwise interactions (GA2M): Predicting severe retinopathy of prematurity. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Deep Learning and Machine Learning in Emerging Applications (Deep-ML), Boca Raton, FL, USA.10.1109/Deep-ML.2019.00020 ↗
63. Integrating co-clustering and interpretable machine learning for the prediction of intravenous immunoglobulin resistance in kawasaki disease10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2996302 ↗
64. Itani, S., Rossignol, M., Lecron, F., and Fortemps, P. (2019). Towards interpretable machine learning models for diagnosis aid: A case study on attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0215720 ↗
65. Brito-Sarracino, T., dos Santos, M.R., Antunes, E.F., de Andrade Santos, I.B., Kasmanas, J.C., and de Leon Ferreira, A.C.P. (2019, January 15–18). Explainable machine learning for breast cancer diagnosis. Proceedings of the 2019 8th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS), Salvador, Brazil.10.1109/BRACIS.2019.00124 ↗
66. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
67. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 ↗
68. Interpretable Machine Learning–Based Prediction of Intraoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage in Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery: A Pilot Study10.1055/s-0041-1740621 ↗
69. An explainable machine learning framework for lung cancer hospital length of stay prediction10.1038/s41598-021-04608-7 ↗
70. A multilayer multimodal detection and prediction model based on explainable artificial intelligence for Alzheimer’s disease10.1038/s41598-021-82098-3 ↗
71. Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference, Morgan Kaufmann.10.1016/B978-0-08-051489-5.50008-4 ↗
72. A Bayesian decision analysis with fuzzy interpretability for aging chronic disease10.1504/IJTM.2007.013533 ↗
73. Recursive Bayesian nets for prediction, explanation and control in cancer science
74. Kyrimi, E., and Marsh, W. (2016, January 6). A progressive explanation of inference in ‘hybrid’ Bayesian networks for supporting clinical decision making. Proceedings of the Conference on Probabilistic Graphical Models. PMLR, Lugano, Switzerland.
75. Detecting symptom errors in neural machine translation of patient health information on depressive disorders: Developing interpretable bayesian machine learning classifiers10.3389/fpsyt.2021.771562 ↗
76. Yun, J., Basak, M., and Han, M.M. (2021). Bayesian rule modeling for interpretable mortality classification of COVID-19 patients. Cmc-Comput. Mater. Continua, 2827–2843.10.32604/cmc.2021.017266 ↗
77. An incremental explanation of inference in Bayesian networks for increasing model trustworthiness and supporting clinical decision making10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101812 ↗
78. Kanda, E., Epureanu, B.I., Adachi, T., Tsuruta, Y., Kikuchi, K., Kashihara, N., Abe, M., Masakane, I., and Nitta, K. (2020). Application of explainable ensemble artificial intelligence model to categorization of hemodialysis-patient and treatment using nationwide-real-world data in Japan. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0233491 ↗
79. Chen, J., Dai, X., Yuan, Q., Lu, C., and Huang, H. (2020, January 5–10). Towards interpretable clinical diagnosis with Bayesian network ensembles stacked on entity-aware CNNs. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Online.10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.286 ↗
80. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for exploring spatial variability of lung and bronchus cancer (LBC) mortality rates in the contiguous USA10.1038/s41598-021-03198-8 ↗
81. COVIDScreen: Explainable deep learning framework for differential diagnosis of COVID-19 using chest X-rays10.1007/s00521-020-05636-6 ↗
82. Yu, T.H., Su, B.H., Battalora, L.C., Liu, S., and Tseng, Y.J. (2022). Ensemble modeling with machine learning and deep learning to provide interpretable generalized rules for classifying CNS drugs with high prediction power. Briefings Bioinform., 23.10.1093/bib/bbab377 ↗
83. An explainable artificial intelligence framework for the deterioration risk prediction of hepatitis patients10.1007/s10916-021-01736-5 ↗
84. Interpretable machine learning for early neurological deterioration prediction in atrial fibrillation-related stroke10.1038/s41598-021-99920-7 ↗
85. Pearl, J., and Mackenzie, D. (2018). The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect, Hachette Basic Books.
86. Ren, Z., Nguyen, T.T., and Nejdl, W. (2022, January 22–27). Prototype learning for interpretable respiratory sound analysis. Proceedings of the ICASSP 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Singapore.10.1109/ICASSP43922.2022.9747014 ↗
87. Li, O., Liu, H., Chen, C., and Rudin, C. (2018, January 2–7). Deep learning for case-based reasoning through prototypes: A neural network that explains its predictions. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11771 ↗
88. Wan, Y., Zheng, Z., Liu, R., Zhu, Z., Zhou, H., Zhang, X., and Boumaraf, S. (2021). A Multi-Scale and Multi-Level Fusion Approach for Deep Learning-Based Liver Lesion Diagnosis in Magnetic Resonance Images with Visual Explanation. Life, 11.10.3390/life11060582 ↗
89. A hierarchical deep learning approach with transparency and interpretability based on small samples for glaucoma diagnosis10.1038/s41746-021-00417-4 ↗
90. Clinical interpretable deep learning model for glaucoma diagnosis10.1109/JBHI.2019.2949075 ↗
91. Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). “Why should i trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Cconference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939778 ↗
92. Magesh, P.R., Myloth, R.D., and Tom, R.J. (2020). An explainable machine learning model for early detection of Parkinson’s disease using LIME on DaTSCAN imagery. Comput. Biol. Med., 126.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104041 ↗
93. Tan, S., Caruana, R., Hooker, G., and Lou, Y. (2018, January 2–3). Distill-and-compare: Auditing black-box models using transparent model distillation. Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1145/3278721.3278725 ↗
94. Che, Z., Purushotham, S., Khemani, R., and Liu, Y. (2016, January 16). Interpretable deep models for ICU outcome prediction. Proceedings of the AMIA annual symposium proceedings. American Medical Informatics Association, Chicago, IL, USA.
95. A search technique for rule extraction from trained neural networks10.1016/S0167-8655(98)00145-7 ↗
96. Orthogonal search-based rule extraction (OSRE) for trained neural networks: A practical and efficient approach10.1109/TNN.2005.863472 ↗
97. Eclectic rule-extraction from support vector machines
98. The logic of inductive inference10.2307/2342435 ↗
99. Reduction of clustering problem to pattern recognition10.1016/0031-3203(69)90003-X ↗
100. Pattern recognition approach to medical diagnosis10.1109/TSSC.1970.300338 ↗