Digitalization Trend and Its Influence on the Development of the Operational Process in Production Companies
Source abstract
Abstract
The subject of digitization is currently very widely described. Implementing digitization is a complex task and there are many variants of its implementation. The authors of this article asked themselves what current trends affect the digitization of processes and what factors resulting from the characteristics of production enterprises affect the development of operational processes. The CAWI method was used in the study. In the analysis of the results, the following methods were used: Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS), Mood’s Median Test, or visualization using a box plot. The analysis of the results allowed us to conclude that the development of operational processes of production enterprises is related to digitization trends, but this relationship is not direct. It is necessary to link digitalization trends with software development trends. The conducted research also indicated that there are company characteristics that determine the degree of use (absorption) and the perception of significance for digitalization trends. These characteristics are the type of a company and the age of a company.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Economic and Technological Systems Analysis · Digital Transformation in Industry · Business and Economic Development
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Management and Logistics, Poznan School of Logistics, Estkowskiego 6, 61-755 Poznan, Poland
Lukasiewicz Research Network—Poznan Institute of Technology, Estkowskiego 6, 61-755 Poznan, Poland
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 3, 61-138 Poznan, Poland
Faculty of Manufacturing Technologies with a Seat in Prešov, Technical University of Košice, Bayerova 1, 080 01 Prešov, Slovakia
Funding
Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Assessment of the Level of Information Integration in CRM Systems for SMEs for the needs of omnichannel retailing
2. Supply chain digitisation trends: An integration of knowledge management10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.012 ↗
3. Digital supply chain: Challenges and future directions10.1080/16258312.2020.1816361 ↗
4. Industry 4.0 and digital supply chain capabilities: A framework for understanding digitalisation challenges and opportunities10.1108/BIJ-12-2018-0435 ↗
5. Strategies to overcome barriers to innovative digitalisation technologies for supply chain logistics resilience during pandemic10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101970 ↗
6. Digitalization model of information and documents flows in goods movement processes in supply chains-determinants of implementation and measurement efficiency
7. Review Of Intelligent Solutions To Optimise Logistics Processes And Improve Efficiency
8. Physical internet (PI): A systematic literature review10.17270/J.LOG.2018.269 ↗
9. Flexible automated warehouse: A literature review and an innovative framework10.1007/s00170-019-04588-z ↗
10. Batarlienė, N., and Meleniakas, M. (2021). Claims Solutions Using a Blockchain System in International Logistics. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13073710 ↗
11. Critical factors for the realization of sustainable supply chain innovations-model development based on a systematic literature review10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126471 ↗
12. Building a model for assessing the maturity of polish enterprises in terms of logistics 4.0 assumptions
13. Araújo, A.F., Varela, M.L., Gomes, M.S., Barreto, R.C., and Trojanowska, J. (2018). Advances in Manufacturing, Springer.
14. Simulation Models for Management Solutions when Implementing Innovative Technologies10.1051/shsconf/20208001020 ↗
15. Ulrich, K. (2011). Strategies and Communications for Innovations, Springer.
16. Assessment of innovativeness level for chosen solutions related to Logistics 4.010.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.080 ↗
17. Stachowiak, A., Adamczak, M., Hadas, L., Domański, R., and Cyplik, P. (2019). Knowledge Absorption Capacity as a Factor for Increasing Logistics 4.0 Maturity. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9245365 ↗
18. Controlling and regulation of integrated aquaponic production systems–An approach for a management execution system (MES)
19. Digital interoperability in logistics and supply chain management: State-of-the-art and research avenues towards Physical Internet10.1016/j.compind.2021.103435 ↗
20. A template-based approach to support an automated digital production plant engineering10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.069 ↗
21. Golinska-Dawson, P. (2020). Logistics Operations and Management for Recycling and Reuse, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-33857-1 ↗
22. Werner-Lewandowska, K., and Golinska-Dawson, P. (2021). Sustainable Logistics Management Maturity—The Theoretical Assessment Framework and Empirical Results from Poland. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13095102 ↗
23. Barczak, A., Dembińska, I., and Marzantowicz, Ł. (2019). Analysis of the risk impact of implementing digital innovations for logistics management. Processes, 7.10.3390/pr7110815 ↗
24. Choi, D., and Song, B. (2018). Exploring technological trends in logistics: Topic modeling-based patent analysis. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10082810 ↗
25. Pagano, A.M., and Liotine, M. (2019). Technology in Supply Chain Management and Logistics: Current Practice and Future Applications, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-815956-9.00002-8 ↗
26. Rimmer, J., and Kam, B.H. (2018). Consumer Logistics, Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781786430373 ↗
27. The significance of blockchain technology in digital transformation of logistics and transportation10.4018/IJESMA.2020010101 ↗
28. Wei, F., Alias, C., and Noche, B. (2019). Innovative Logistics Services and Sustainable Lifestyles, Springer.
29. Egorov, D., Levina, A., Kalyazina, S., Schuur, P., and Gerrits, B. (2020, January 27–29). The challenges of the logistics industry in the era of digital transformation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Technological Transformation: A New role for Human, Machines and Management, St. Petersburg, Russia.10.1007/978-3-030-64430-7_17 ↗
30. Digital transformation at logistics service providers: Barriers, success factors and leading practices10.1108/IJLM-08-2019-0229 ↗
31. Balakrishnan, N., and Basu, A. (1996). The Exponential Distribution: Theory, Methods, and Applications, Routledge.
32. Blanchard, B.S., Fabrycky, W.J., and Fabrycky, W.J. (1990). Systems Engineering and Analysis, Prentice Hall.
33. Latent variables in business logistics research: Scale development and validation
34. Logistics research methods: Employing structural equation modeling to test for construct validity
35. Logistics needs qualitative research–especially action research10.1108/09600030210434143 ↗
36. A discrete simulation analysis of a logistics supply system10.1016/j.tre.2004.10.002 ↗
37. Multiple-method analysis of logistics costs10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.007 ↗
38. Survey Research in Operations Management: A Process-Based Perspective10.1108/01443570210414310 ↗
39. Mobility data across the EU 28 member states: Results from an extensive CAWI survey10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.181 ↗
40. Fowler, F.J., and Magnione, T.W. (1999). Standardized Survey Interviewing: Minimizing Interviewer-Related Error, SAGE Publications, Inc.
41. Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., and Sarstedt, M. (2017). Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), SAGE Publications. [2nd ed.].
42. Falk, R.F., and Miller, N.B. (1992). University of Akron Press.
43. The effects of information technologies on automotive supply chain and firm performance10.17270/J.LOG.2022.641 ↗
44. Kaščak, J., Husár, J., Knapčíková, L., Trojanowska, J., and Ivanov, V. (2022). Advances in Manufacturing III, Springer.
45. Lucato, W.C., Pacchini, A.P.T., Facchini, F., and Mummolo, G. (2019, January 28–30). Model to evaluate the industry 4.0 readiness degree in industrial companies. Berlin, Germany.10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.464 ↗
46. Collaborative paradigm for single-machine scheduling under just-in-time principles: Total holding-tardiness cost problem