journal article·2022-10-19Open access

A Review of Flow Control for Gust Load Alleviation

Yonghong Li, Ning Qin

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 20

Abstract

Effective control of aerodynamic loads, such as maneuvering load and gust load, allows for reduced structural weight and therefore greater aerodynamic efficiency. After a basic introduction in the types of gusts and the current gust load control strategies for aircraft, we outline the conventional gust load alleviation techniques using trailing-edge flaps and spoilers. As these devices also function as high-lift devices or inflight speed brakes, they are often too heavy for high-frequency activations such as control surfaces. Non-conventional active control devices via fluidic actuators have attracted some attention recently from researchers to explore more effective gust load alleviation techniques against traditional flaps for future aircraft design. Research progress of flow control using fluidic actuators, including surface jet blowing and circulation control (CC) for gust load alleviation, is reviewed in detail here. Their load control capabilities in terms of lift force modulations are outlined and compared. Also reviewed are the flow control performances of these fluidic actuators under gust conditions. Experiments and numerical efforts indicated that both CC and surface jet blowing demonstrate fast response characteristics, capable for timely adaptive gust load controls.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK

High Speed Aerodynamic Institute, China Aerodynamic Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Psaraftis, H. (2015). Green Transportation Logistics: The Quest for Win-Win Solutions, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-17175-3 ↗
2. Multi-disciplinary analysis and optimisation methodology for conceptual design of a box-wing aircraft10.1017/aer.2016.59 ↗
3. Comparative Assessment of Strut-Braced and Truss-Braced Wing Configurations Using Multidisciplinary Design Optimization10.2514/1.C033120 ↗
4. Vortical structures on three-dimensional shock control bumps
5. Experimental Study into the Flow Physics of Three-Dimensional Shock Control Bumps10.2514/1.C031341 ↗
6. Numerical and Experimental Validation of Three-Dimensional Shock Control Bumps10.2514/1.41441 ↗
7. Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction Control Using Three-Dimensional Bumps for Transonic Wings10.2514/1.32049 ↗
8. Investigation of suction for laminar flow control of three-dimensional boundary layers10.1017/S0022112010001576 ↗
9. Experiments on secondary instability of streamwise vortices in a swept-wing boundary layer10.1017/S0022112005004386 ↗
10. Review of hybrid laminar flow control systems10.1016/j.paerosci.2017.05.005 ↗
11. Brion, V., Dandois, J., and Jacquin, L. (2017, January 3–6). Laminar buffet and flow control. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference for Aeronautics and Space Sciences, Milano, Italy.
12. A review of recent developments in flow control10.1017/S0001924000005200 ↗
13. Joslin, R.D. (1998). Overview of Laminar Flow Control, NASA/TP-1998-208705.
14. (1982). Hybrid Laminar Flow Control Study Final Technical Report, NASA-CR-165930.
15. Frictional drag reduction by bubble injection10.1007/s00348-014-1773-x ↗
16. Turbulent drag reduction using active control of buoyancy forces10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2016.07.003 ↗
17. Numerical investigation of turbulent-drag reduction induced by active control of streamwise travelling waves of wall-normal velocity10.1016/j.euromechflu.2014.09.004 ↗
18. Active control for drag reduction in turbulent channel flow: The opposition control schemes revisited10.1088/0169-5983/48/5/055501 ↗
19. Design of the Blended Wing Body Subsonic Transport10.2514/1.9084 ↗
20. The potential of future aircraft technology for noise and pollutant emissions reduction10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.017 ↗
21. Lebofsky, S., Ting, E., Nguyen, N., and Trinh, K. (2015, January 22–26). Optimization for Load Alleviation of Truss-Braced Wing Aircraft with Variable Camber Continuous Trailing Edge Flap. Proceedings of the 33rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Dallas, TX, USA.10.2514/6.2015-2723 ↗
22. Jemitola, P.O., and Fielding, J.P. (2012, January 23–28). Box wing aircraft conceptual design. Proceedings of the 28th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Brisbane, Australia.
23. Gust Alleviation of a Large Aircraft with a Passive Twist Wingtip10.3390/aerospace2020135 ↗
24. European Aviation Safety Agency (2008). Certification Specifications for Large Aeroplanes CS-25.
25. Johnston, J.F. (1979). Accelerated Development and Flight Evaluation of Active Controls Concepts for Subsonic Transport Aircraft. Volume 1: Load Alleviation/Extended Span Development and Flight Tests, NASA-CR-159097.
26. C-5A Active Load Alleviation System10.2514/3.57164 ↗
27. Al-Battal, N. (2019). Flow Control for Loads Control. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bath].
28. Payne, B.W. (1986, January 7–12). Designing a Load Alleviation System for a Modern Civil Aircraft. Proceedings of the 15th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, London, UK. ICAS-86-5.2.3.
29. Xu, J., and Kroo, I. (2011, January 27). Aircraft Design with Maneuver and Gust Load Alleviation. Proceedings of the 29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii. AIAA Paper 2011-3180.10.2514/6.2011-3180 ↗
30. Yonghong, L. (2020). Gust Load Alleviation by Fluidic Actuators on a Blended-Wing-Body Configuration. [Ph.D. Thesis, Sheffield University].
31. Paterson, E., Baker, W., Kunz, R., and Peltier, L. (2004, January 7–11). RANS and Detached-Eddy Simulation of the NCCR Airfoil. Proceedings of the 2004 Users Group Conference (DOD_UGC’04), Williamsburg, VA, USA.10.1109/DOD_UGC.2004.38 ↗
32. (2006). BAE Systems success in flapless flight. Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol., 78.
33. Cooper, J.E. (2015). Introduction to Aircraft Aeroelasticity and Dynamic Loads, Wiley. [2nd ed.].
34. Airborne Lidar for Automatic Feedforward Control of Turbulent In-Flight Phenomena10.2514/1.44950 ↗
35. Active gust load alleviation system for flexible aircraft: Mixed feedforward/feedback approach10.1016/j.ast.2014.12.020 ↗
36. Gust response stabilization for rigid aircraft with multi-control-effectors based on a novel integrated control scheme10.1016/j.ast.2018.06.022 ↗
37. Active control law design for flutter suppression and gust alleviation of a panel with piezoelectric actuators10.1088/0964-1726/17/3/035013 ↗
38. Output Feedback Control of the Nonlinear Aeroelastic Response of a Slender Wing10.2514/2.4882 ↗
39. LQG based model predictive control for gust load alleviation10.1016/j.ast.2017.10.006 ↗
40. Improved LQG Method for Active Gust Load Alleviation10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000712 ↗
41. Frost, S., Taylor, B., and Bodson, M. (2012, January 13–16). Investigation of Optimal Control Allocation for Gust Load Alleviation in Flight Control. Proceedings of the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Minneapolis, MN, USA. AIAA 2012-4858.10.2514/6.2012-4858 ↗
42. Lift reduction by counter flowing wall jets10.1016/j.ast.2018.05.025 ↗
43. Al-Battal, N., Cleaver, D., and Gursul, I. (2016, January 4–8). Aerodynamic Load Control through Blowing. Proceedings of the 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA. AIAA 2016-1820.10.2514/6.2016-1820 ↗
44. Abbott, I.H., and Doenhoff, A.E. (1959). Theory of Wing Sections: Including a Summary of Airfoil Data, Dover Publications, Inc.
45. Anderson, J.D. (2016). Introduction to Flight, McGraw-Hill Education. [8th ed.].
46. Gust alleviation using rapidly deployed trailing-edge flaps10.1016/j.jweia.2010.06.005 ↗
47. Investigation of Unsteady Subsonic Spoiler and Flap Aerodynamics10.2514/3.45488 ↗
48. Wind tunnel test on airfoil Risø-B1-18 with an Active Trailing Edge Flap10.1002/we.369 ↗
49. Sven Geisbauer, T.L. (2017, January 5–9). Towards the Investigation of Unsteady Spoiler Aerodynamics. Proceedings of the 35th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Denver, CO, USA. A.A. Forum.10.2514/6.2017-4229 ↗
50. Mack, M.D., Seetharam, H.D., Kuhn, W.G., and Bright, J.T. (1979, January 20–22). Aerodynamics of Spoiler Control Devices. Proceedings of the AIAA Aircraft Systems and Technology Meeting, New York, NY, USA. A.P. 1979-1873.
51. Wentz, J.W., Ostowari, C., and Seetharam, H.C. (1981, January 12–15). Effects of Design Variables on Spoiler Control Effectiveness, Hinge Moments and Wake Turbulence. Proceedings of the 19th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Louis, MO, USA. AIAA Paper 1981-0072.10.2514/6.1981-72 ↗
52. Maskell, E.C. (1955). Pressure Distributions Illustrating Flow Reattachment behind a Forward Mounted Flap, ARC-CP-211.
53. Croom, D.R., Shufflebarger, C.C., and Huffman, J.K. (1956). An Investigation of Forward-Located Fixed Spoilers and Deflectors as Gust Alleviators on an Unswept-Wing Model, NACA. NACA-TN-3705.
54. Siddalingappa, S.R., and Hancock, G.J. (1980). An Introduction to the Aerodynamics of Spoilers, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Queen Mary College. Paper QMC EP-1034.
55. Mabey, D.G. (1995). Experimental Methods to Determine Control Effectiveness in Wind Tunnels. AGARD Special Course on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Controls, AGARD. AGARD-R-711 Paper 5.
56. Hancock, G.J. (1995). Dynamic Effects of Controls. AGARD Special Course on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Controls, AGARD. AGARD-R-711 Paper 4.
57. Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Moving Two-Dimensional Spoiler in Subsonic and Transonic Flow10.2514/3.45015 ↗
58. Kalligas, K. (1986). The Dynamic Characteristics of Two-Dimensional Spoilers at Low Speeds. [Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, University of Bristol].
59. Unsteady, Separated Flow Behind an Oscillating, Two-Dimensional Spoiler10.2514/3.25128 ↗
60. Mineck, R.E. (2001, January 8–11). Reynolds Number Effects on the Performance of Ailerons and Spoilers. Proceedings of the 39th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. AIAA Paper 2001-0908.10.2514/6.2001-908 ↗
61. Numerical Simulation and Validation of Aerodynamics of Static and Dynamic Spoilers10.2514/1.C036145 ↗
62. Roth, D., Enenkl, B., and Dieterich, O. (2006, January 12–14). Active rotor control by flaps for vibration reduction—Full scale demonstrator and first flight test results. Proceedings of the 32nd European Rotorcraft Forum, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
63. Kota, S., Hetrick, J.A., Osborn, R., Paul, D., Pendleton, E., Flick, P., and Tilmann, C. (2003, January 4–5). Design and application of compliant mechanisms for morphing aircraft structures. Proceedings of the SPIE, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1117/12.483869 ↗
64. Potential Load Reduction Using Airfoils with Variable Trailing Edge Geometry10.1115/1.2037094 ↗
65. Unsteady Computational Investigations of Deploying Load Control Microtabs10.2514/1.22562 ↗
66. Blaylock, M., Chow, R., and van Dam, C.P. (July, January 28). Comparison of Microjets with Microtabs for Active Aerodynamic Load Control. Proceedings of the 5th Flow Control Conference, Chicago, IL, USA. AIAA 2010-4409.10.2514/6.2010-4409 ↗
67. An overview of active load control techniques for wind turbines with an emphasis on microtabs10.1002/we.356 ↗
68. Van Dam, C.P., Berg, D.E., and Johnson, S.J. (2008). Active Load Control Techniques for Wind Turbines, Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). SAND2008-4809.10.2172/943932 ↗
69. Gust response and body freedom flutter of a flying-wing aircraft with a passive gust alleviation device10.1016/j.ast.2017.08.008 ↗
70. Preliminary investigation of use of flexible folding wing tips for static and dynamic load alleviation10.1017/aer.2016.108 ↗
71. Nonlinear Negative Stiffness Wingtip Spring Device for Gust Loads Alleviation10.2514/1.C033887 ↗
72. Nonlinear Folding Wing Tips for Gust Loads Alleviation10.2514/1.C033474 ↗
73. Chan, D.T., Jones, G.S., Milholen, W.E., and Goodliff, S.L. (2017, January 5–9). Transonic Drag Reduction Through Trailing-Edge Blowing on the FAST-MAC Circulation Control Model. Proceedings of the 35th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Denver, CO, USA. AIAA AVIATION Forum, AIAA 2017-3246.10.2514/6.2017-3246 ↗
74. Comparison of Steady Blowing and Synthetic Jets for Aerodynamic Drag Reduction of a Simplified Vehicle10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.224 ↗
75. Active and Natural Suction at Forward-Facing Steps for Delaying Laminar–Turbulent Transition10.2514/1.J055122 ↗
76. Control of crossflow-vortex-induced transition by unsteady control vortices10.1017/jfm.2019.288 ↗
77. Flow separation control using unsteady pulsed suction through endwall bleeding holes in a highly loaded compressor cascade10.1016/j.ast.2017.11.031 ↗
78. The control of flow separation by periodic excitation10.1016/S0376-0421(00)00008-7 ↗
79. Experimental Studies of Active and Passive Flow Control Techniques Applied in a Twin Air-Intake10.1155/2013/523759 ↗
80. Flow Improvement in Rectangular Air Intake by Submerged Vortex Generators
81. Experimental study of stall control over an airfoil with dual excitation of separated shear layers10.1016/j.ast.2018.09.027 ↗
82. Role of Actuation Frequency in Controlled Flow Reattachment over a Stalled Airfoil10.2514/2.1662 ↗
83. Korbacher, G.K., and Sridhar, K. (1960). A Review of the Jet Flap, University of Toronto Press. UTIA Review, No. 14.
84. Comparisons of a Gurney and Jet-Flap for Hinge-Less Control10.2514/1.6023 ↗
85. Comparison of pneumatic jets and tabs for Active Aerodynamic Load Control10.1002/we.1638 ↗
86. Rao, P., Strganac, T., and Rediniotis, O. (2000, January 3). Control of aeroelastic response via synthetic jet actuators. Proceedings of the 41st Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit, Atlanta, GA, USA.10.2514/6.2000-1415 ↗
87. De Breuker, R., Abdalla, M., Marzocca, P., and Gürdal, Z. (2006, January 16–19). Flutter suppression using synthetic jet actuators: The typical section. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Adaptive Structures and Technologies, Taipei, Taiwan.
88. De Vries, H., Boeije, C., Cleine, I., van Emden, E., Zwart, G., Stobbe, H., Hirschberg, A., and Hoeijmakers, H. (2009, January 5). Fluidic Load Control for Wind Turbine Blades. Proceedings of the 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, FL, USA. AIAA 2009-684.10.2514/6.2009-684 ↗
89. Heathcote, D., Al-Battal, N., Gursul, I., and Cleaver, D. (2015, January 23–26). Control of Wing Loads by Means of Blowing and Mini-Tabs. Proceedings of the European Drag Reduction and Flow Control Meeting—EDRFCM 2015, Cambridge, UK.
90. Lockwood, V.E., and Vogler, R.D. (1958). Exploratory Wind-Tunnel Investigation at High Subsonic and Transonic Speeds of Jet Flaps on Unswept Rectangular Wings, NACA-TN-4353.
91. An Experimental Investigation of a Jet Issuing from a Wing in Crossflow10.2514/3.44390 ↗
92. Gust load alleviation by normal microjet10.1016/j.ast.2021.106919 ↗
93. Unsteady actuation of counter-flowing wall jets for gust load attenuation10.1016/j.ast.2019.03.053 ↗
94. Mueller-Vahl, H., Nayeri, C., Paschereit, C.O., and Greenblatt, D. (2014, January 16–20). Control of Unsteady Aerodynamic Loads Using Adaptive Blowing. Proceedings of the 32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA.10.2514/6.2014-2562 ↗
95. De Breuker, R., Abdalla, M., and Marzocca, P. (2007, January 23). Aeroelastic Control and Load Alleviation using Optimally Distributed Synthetic Jet Actuators. Proceedings of the 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii.10.2514/6.2007-2134 ↗
96. Alexander, M.G., Anders, S.G., Johnson, S.K., Florance, J.P., and Keller, D.F. (2005). Trailing Edge Blowing on a Two-Dimensional Six-Percent Thick Elliptical Circulation Control Airfoil up to Transonic Conditions, NASA/TM-2005-213545; Sponsoring Organization.
97. Ahuja, K., Sankar, L., Englar, R.J., Munro, S., and Liu, Y. (2000). Application of Circulation Control Technology to Airframe Noise Reduction, Georgia Institute of Technology. GIT. Annual Performance Report.
98. Advanced circulation control wing system for navy stol aircraft10.2514/3.57598 ↗
99. A circulation control actuator for flapless flight control10.1017/S0001924000002451 ↗
100. Application of circulation control to advanced subsonic transport aircraft. I—Airfoil development. II—Transport application10.2514/3.56907 ↗