journal article·2022-02-23Open access

A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Computational Modeling of the Selective Laser Melting Additive Manufacturing Process

Shubham Chaudhry, Azzeddine Soulaïmani

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 5

Abstract

Selective laser melting (SLM) is a metal-based additive manufacturing (AM) technique. Many factors contribute to the output quality of SLM, particularly the machine and material parameters. Analysis of the parameters’ effects is critical, but using traditional experimental and numerical simulation can be expensive and time-consuming. This paper provides a framework to analyze the sensitivity and uncertainty in SLM input and output parameters, which can then be used to find the optimum parameters. The proposed data-driven approach combines machine learning algorithms with high-fidelity numerical simulations to study the SLM process more efficiently. We have considered laser speed, hatch spacing, layer thickness, Young modulus, and Poisson ratio as input variables, while the output variables are numerical predicted normal strains in the building part. A surrogate model was constructed with a deep neural network (DNN) or polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) to generate a response surface between the SLM output and the input variables. The surrogate model and the sensitivity analysis found that all five parameters were important in the process. The surrogate model was combined with non-intrusive optimization algorithms such as genetic algorithms (GA), differential evolution (DE), and particle swarm optimization (PSO) to perform an inverse analysis and find the optimal parameters for the SLM process. Of the three algorithms, the PSO performed well, and the DNN model was found to be the most efficient surrogate model compared to the PCE.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, 1100 Notre-Dame W., Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
2. Additive manufacturing: Challenges, trends, and applications10.1177/1687814018822880 ↗
3. Bian, L., Shamsaei, N., and Usher, J. (2017). Laser-Based Additive Manufacturing of Metal Parts: Modeling, Optimization, and Control of Mechanical Properties, CRC Press.10.1201/9781315151441 ↗
4. Multiscale Modeling of Powder Bed—Based Additive Manufacturing10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-032158 ↗
5. A Review on Process Monitoring and Control in Metal-Based Additive Manufacturing10.1115/1.4028540 ↗
6. Uncertainty quantification and management in additive manufacturing: Current status, needs, and opportunities10.1007/s00170-017-0703-5 ↗
7. Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index10.1016/j.cpc.2009.09.018 ↗
8. Global sensitivity analysis in welding simulations—What are the material data you really need?10.1016/j.finel.2011.03.016 ↗
9. (2021, December 22). torey.liepa@nist.gov, “Benchmark Test Data,” NIST, Available online: https://www.nist.gov/ambench/benchmark-test-data.
10. Influence of process parameters on part quality and mechanical properties for DMLS and SLM with iron-based materials10.1007/s00170-011-3643-5 ↗
11. Sensitivity analysis of material and process parameters in finite element modeling of selective laser melting of Inconel 62510.1007/s00170-015-8329-y ↗
12. Global sensitivity analyses of a selective laser melting finite element model: Influential parameters identification10.1007/s00170-018-2531-7 ↗
13. Identifying Uncertainty in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Models10.1115/1.4034103 ↗
14. Ma, L., Fong, J., Lane, B., Moylan, S., Filliben, J., Heckert, A., and Levine, L. (2015, January 10–12). Using design of experiments in finite element modeling to identify critical variables for laser powder bed fusion. Proceedings of the International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, USA.
15. Data mining and statistical inference in selective laser melting10.1007/s00170-015-8289-2 ↗
16. Machine Learning in Additive Manufacturing: A Review10.1007/s11837-020-04155-y ↗
17. Machine learning in additive manufacturing: State-of-the-art and perspectives
18. Ravichander, B.B., Rahimzadeh, A., Farhang, B., Moghaddam, N.S., Amerinatanzi, A., and Mehrpouya, M. (2021). A Prediction Model for Additive Manufacturing of Inconel 718 Superalloy. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11178010 ↗
19. The prediction model for additively manufacturing of NiTiHf high-temperature shape memory alloy10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102022 ↗
20. Prediction model for determining the optimum operational parameters in laser forming of fiber-reinforced composites10.1007/s40436-020-00304-3 ↗
21. Uncertainty quantification of manufacturing process effects on macroscale material p roperties10.1615/IntJMultCompEng.2016015552 ↗
22. Uncertainty quantification and model validation of fatigue crack growth prediction10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.02.017 ↗
23. Gaussian process-based surrogate modeling framework for process planning in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel10.1007/s00170-017-1045-z ↗
24. Optimizing process parameters for selective laser sintering based on neural network and genetic algorithm
25. Prediction of porosity in metal-based additive manufacturing using spatial Gaussian process models
26. Optimization of Process Parameters for Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing by Combination of Machine Learning and Finite Element Method: A Conceptual Framework10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.204 ↗
27. Multi-objective optimisation and multi-criteria decision making in SLS using evolutionary approaches10.1108/13552541111184198 ↗
28. Optimum part deposition orientation for multiple objectives in SL and SLS prototyping10.1080/00207540802183661 ↗
29. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning, MIT Press.
30. Bishop, C.M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer.
31. Deep neural network-based predictive modeling of road accidents10.1007/s00521-019-04695-8 ↗
32. Beale, M.H., Hagan, M.T., and Demuth, H.B. (2010). Neural Network Toolbox, MathWorks. User’s Guide.
33. Shahzadi, G., and Soulaïmani, A. (2021). Deep Neural Network and Polynomial Chaos Expansion-Based Surrogate Models for Sensitivity and Uncertainty Propagation: An Application to a Rockfill Dam. Water, 13.10.3390/w13131830 ↗
34. An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis10.1016/j.probengmech.2009.10.003 ↗
35. Polynomial chaos: A tutorial and critique from a statistician’s perspective
36. Saliby, E., and Pacheco, F. (2003, January 8–11). An empirical evaluation of sampling methods in risk analysis simulation: Quasi-Monte Carlo, descriptive sampling, and latin hypercube sampling. Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, San Diego, CA, USA.
37. Arora, R.K. (2019). Optimization: Algorithms and Applications, Chapman and Hall/CRC.
38. Holland, J.H. (1992). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001 ↗
39. Wilson, P., and Mantooth, H.A. (2013). Model-Based Engineering for Complex Electronic Systems, Elsevier Newnes.10.1016/B978-0-12-385085-0.00001-4 ↗
40. Differential Evolution—A simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces
41. A Comparative Study of Differential Evolution Variants in Constrained Structural Optimization10.3389/fbuil.2020.00102 ↗
42. Differential evolution—A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces10.1023/A:1008202821328 ↗
43. (2021, December 22). Workbench Additive Manufacturing Analysis Guide. Available online: https://www.ansys.com/products/additive.
44. Heinrich, L., Feldhausen, T., Saleeby, K.S., Saldana, C., and Kurfess, T.R. (2021). Prediction of Thermal Conditions of DED with FEA Metal Additive Simulation. Volume 1: Additive Manufacturing; Advanced Materials Manufacturing; Biomanufacturing; Life Cycle Engineering; Manufacturing Equipment and Automation, American Society of Mechanical Engineers.10.1115/MSEC2021-63841 ↗
45. Weinhold, B., Heck, B., Albright, A., Wang, K., Grote, J.M., Adeniji, E., Masoomi, M., and Thompson, S. (2021, January 2–4). Simulation of the Laser-Powder Bed Fusion Process for Determining the Effects of Part-to-Substrate Location and Orientation on Distortion in a Connecting Rod. Proceedings of the 2021 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Online.
46. Additive Manufacturing of Functional Inconel 718 Parts from Recycled Materials10.1007/s11665-020-05402-8 ↗
47. Modeling and experimental validation of an immersed thermo-mechanical part-scale analysis for laser powder bed fusion processes
48. Elastic Residual Strain and Stress Measurements and Corresponding Part Deflections of 3D Additive Manufacturing Builds of IN625 AM-Bench Artifacts Using Neutron Diffraction, Synchrotron X-ray Diffraction, and Contour Method10.1007/s40192-019-00149-0 ↗
49. (2021, November 15). inconel-alloy-625.pdf. Available online: https://www.specialmetals.com/documents/technical-bulletins/inconel/inconel-alloy-625.pdf.