Machine-Learning-Based Predictive Models for Compressive Strength, Flexural Strength, and Slump of Concrete
Source abstract
Abstract
The process of concrete production involves mixing cement, water, and other materials. The quantity of each of these materials results in a performance that is particularly estimated in terms of compressive or flexural strength. It has been observed that the final performance of concrete has a high variance and that traditional formulation methods do not guarantee consistent results. Consequently, designs tend to be over-designed, generating higher costs than required, to ensure the performance committed to the client. This study proposes the construction of predictive machine learning models to estimate compressive or flexural strength and concrete slump. The study was carried out following the Team Data Science Process (TDSP) methodology, using a dataset generated by the Colombian Ready Mix (RMX) company Cementos Argos S.A. over five years, containing the quantity of materials used for different concrete mixes, as well as performance metrics measured in the laboratory. Predictive models such as XGBoost and neural networks were trained, and hyperparameter tuning was performed using advanced techniques such as genetic algorithms to obtain three models with high performance for estimating compressive strength, flexural strength, and slump. This study concludes that it is possible to use machine learning techniques to design reliable concrete mixes that, when combined with traditional analytical methods, could reduce costs and minimize over-designed concrete mixes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Facultad de Ingeniería en TIC, Escuela de Ingeniería, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín 050031, Colombia
Escuela de Ingeniería, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín 050031, Colombia
Cementos Argos, Medellin 050031, Colombia
Funding
Minciencias Colombia
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. (2022, November 04). Cement Production Global 2023|Statista. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1087115/global-cement-production-volume/.
2. (2022, November 10). Cement and Concrete around the World. Available online: https://gccassociation.org/concretefuture/cement-concrete-around-the-world/.
3. Towards sustainable concrete10.1038/nmat4930 ↗
4. Concrete material science: Past, present, and future innovations10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.002 ↗
5. Mehta, P.K., and Monteiro, P.J.M. (2014). Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, McGraw-Hill Education.
6. Telechea, S., Diego, S., and Tecnología del Concreto y del Mortero, 5ta Edición (2024, March 09). Tecnolog 2001. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/49045048/.
7. The Design of Fly-Ash Concretes
8. (2023). Standard Specification for Coal Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete (Standard No. ASTM C618-23).
9. Moreno, J.D. (2023, December 09). Materiales Cementantes Suplementarios y Sus Efectos en el Concreto. Available online: https://360enconcreto.com/blog/detalle/efectos-de-cementantes-suplementarios/.
10. Kosmatka, S., Kerkhoff, B., and Panarese, W. (2002). Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures, Canadian Portland Cement Association.
11. Properties of concrete modified with mineral additives10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.215 ↗
12. Osorio, J.D. (2022, November 10). Resistencias del Concreto|ARGOS 360. Available online: https://www.360enconcreto.com/blog/detalle/resistencia-mecanica-del-concreto-y-compresion.
13. Compressive Strength Evaluation of Fiber-Reinforced High-Strength Self-Compacting Concrete with Artificial Intelligence10.1155/2020/3012139 ↗
14. Compressive Strength Prediction of Self-Compacting Concrete Incorporating Silica Fume Using Artificial Intelligence Methods10.28991/cej-0309193 ↗
15. Fundamentals of Artificial Neural Networks
16. Adaptive Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) Controller for an Active Magnetic Bearing System with Unbalance Mass
17. Eiben, A.E., and Smith, J.E. (2003). Introduction to Evolutionary Computing, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-05094-1 ↗
18. Support-vector networks10.1007/BF00994018 ↗
19. Induction of decision trees10.1007/BF00116251 ↗
20. Classification of EEG spatial patterns with a tree-structured methodology: CART10.1109/TBME.1986.325684 ↗
21. Can the compressive strength of concrete be estimated from knowledge of the mixture proportions?: New insights from statistical analysis and machine learning methods10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.09.006 ↗
22. Ahmad, M., Hu, J.L., Ahmad, F., Tang, X.W., Amjad, M., Iqbal, M.J., Asim, M., and Farooq, A. (2021). Supervised Learning Methods for Modeling Concrete Compressive Strength Prediction at High Temperature. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14081983 ↗
23. Huang, J., Zhou, M., Yuan, H., Sabri, M.M.S., and Li, X. (2022). Prediction of the Compressive Strength for Cement-Based Materials with Metakaolin Based on the Hybrid Machine Learning Method. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15103500 ↗
24. Moradi, N., Tavana, M.H., Habibi, M.R., Amiri, M., Moradi, M.J., and Farhangi, V. (2022). Predicting the Compressive Strength of Concrete Containing Binary Supplementary Cementitious Material Using Machine Learning Approach. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15155336 ↗
25. Khan, K., Salami, B.A., Jamal, A., Amin, M.N., Usman, M., Al-Faiad, M.A., Abu-Arab, A.M., and Iqbal, M. (2022). Prediction Models for Estimating Compressive Strength of Concrete Made of Manufactured Sand Using Gene Expression Programming Model. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15175823 ↗
26. Silva, V.P., de Alencar Carvalho, R., da Silva Rêgo, J.H., and Evangelista, F. (2023). Machine Learning-Based Prediction of the Compressive Strength of Brazilian Concretes: A Dual-Dataset Study. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16144977 ↗
27. Li, D., Tang, Z., Kang, Q., Zhang, X., and Li, Y. (2023). Machine Learning-Based Method for Predicting Compressive Strength of Concrete. Processes, 11.10.3390/pr11020390 ↗
28. Kumar, A., Arora, H.C., Kapoor, N.R., Mohammed, M.A., Kumar, K., Majumdar, A., and Thinnukool, O. (2022). Compressive Strength Prediction of Lightweight Concrete: Machine Learning Models. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14042404 ↗
29. Ali, A., Riaz, R.D., Malik, U.J., Abbas, S.B., Usman, M., Shah, M.U., Kim, I.H., Hanif, A., and Faizan, M. (2023). Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Tensile and Flexural Strength of 3D-Printed Concrete. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16114149 ↗
30. Shah, H.A., Yuan, Q., Akmal, U., Shah, S.A., Salmi, A., Awad, Y.A., Shah, L.A., Iftikhar, Y., Javed, M.H., and Khan, M.I. (2022). Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Compressive, Splitting Tensile, and Flexural Strengths of Concrete with Metakaolin. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15155435 ↗
31. Zheng, D., Wu, R., Sufian, M., Kahla, N.B., Atig, M., Deifalla, A.F., Accouche, O., and Azab, M. (2022). Flexural Strength Prediction of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Using Artificial Intelligence. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15155194 ↗
32. Multiple linear regression, artificial neural network, and fuzzy logic prediction of 28 days compressive strength of concrete10.1007/s11709-016-0363-9 ↗
33. Prediction of Concrete Compressive Strength and Slump by Machine Learning Methods10.1155/2019/3069046 ↗
34. Predicting the slump of industrially produced concrete using machine learning: A multiclass classification approach10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104997 ↗
35. Chen, Y., Wu, J., Zhang, Y., Fu, L., Luo, Y., Liu, Y., and Li, L. (2022). Research on Hyperparameter Optimization of Concrete Slump Prediction Model Based on Response Surface Method. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15134721 ↗
36. Jaf, D.K.I. (2023). Soft Computing and Machine Learning-Based Models to Predict the Slump and Compressive Strength of Self-Compacted Concrete Modified with Fly Ash. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151511554 ↗
37. Jani, M. (2024, March 09). What Is the Team Data Science Process?. Available online: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/ai-ml/.
38. ARGOS (2022, May 29). Centro Argos Para la Innovación. Available online: https://argos.co/centro-argos-para-la-innovacion/.
39. Osorio, J.D. (2023, December 07). Resistencia mecáNica del Concreto y Resistencia a la Compresión. Available online: https://360enconcreto.com/blog/detalle/resistencia-mecanica-del-concreto-y-compresion/.
40. PyPI (2024, March 09). Pandas-Profiling. Available online: https://pypi.org/project/pandas-profiling/.
41. Singh, A. (2024, March 09). KNN Algorithm: Guide to Using K-Nearest Neighbor for Regression. Available online: https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2018/08/k-nearest-neighbor-introduction-regression-python/.
42. Lek, S., and Park, Y.S. (2008). Encyclopedia of Ecology, Five-Volume Set, PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
43. Gholami, R., and Fakhari, N. (2017). Handbook of Neural Computation, Academic Press.
44. Shrivastava, D., Sanyal, S., Maji, A.K., and Kandar, D. (2020). Smart Healthcare for Disease Diagnosis and Prevention, Academic Press.
45. Morde, V. (2023, November 10). XGBoost Algorithm: Long May She Reign! 2019. Available online: https://towardsdatascience.com/https-medium-com-vishalmorde-xgboost-algorithm-long-she-may-rein-edd9f99be63d.
46. Snoek, J., Larochelle, H., and Adams, R.P. (2012). Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 25.
47. An efficient optimization approach for designing machine learning models based on genetic algorithm10.1007/s00521-020-05035-x ↗
48. Qolomany, B., Maabreh, M., Al-Fuqaha, A., Gupta, A., and Benhaddou, D. (2017, January 26–30). Parameters optimization of deep learning models using Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the 2017 13th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference, IWCMC 2017, Valencia, Spain.10.1109/IWCMC.2017.7986470 ↗
49. Huang, L., Zhou, X., Shi, L., and Gong, L. (2024). Time Series Feature Selection Method Based on Mutual Information. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14051960 ↗
50. Estimating mutual information