Region-of-Interest Optimization for Deep-Learning-Based Breast Cancer Detection in Mammograms
Source abstract
Abstract
The early detection and diagnosis of breast cancer may increase survival rates and reduce overall treatment costs. The cancer of the breast is a severe and potentially fatal disease that impacts individuals worldwide. Mammography is a widely utilized imaging technique for breast cancer surveillance and diagnosis. However, images produced with mammography frequently contain noise, poor contrast, and other anomalies that hinder radiologists from interpreting the images. This study develops a novel deep-learning technique for breast cancer detection using mammography images. The proposed procedure consists of two primary steps: region-of-interest (ROI) (1) extraction and (2) classification. At the beginning of the procedure, a YOLOX model is utilized to distinguish breast tissue from the background and to identify ROIs that may contain lesions. In the second phase, the EfficientNet or ConvNeXt model is applied to the data to identify benign or malignant ROIs. The proposed technique is validated using a large dataset of mammography images from various institutions and compared to several baseline methods. The pF1 index is used to measure the effectiveness of the technique, which aims to establish a balance between the number of false positives and false negatives, and is a harmonic mean of accuracy and recall. The proposed method outperformed existing methods by an average of 8.0%, obtaining superior levels of precision and sensitivity, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC AUC) and the precision–recall curve (PR AUC). In addition, ablation research was conducted to investigate the effects of the procedure’s numerous components. According to the findings, the proposed technique is another choice that could enhance the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer using mammography images.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: AI in cancer detection · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory of Laser Technology, Faculty of Applied Science, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), Ho Chi Minh City 72506, Vietnam
General Physics Laboratory, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Linh Trung Ward, Thu Duc City, Ho Chi Minh City 71308, Vietnam
Laboratory of General Physics, Faculty of Applied Science, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), 268 Ly Thuong Kiet Street, District 10, Ho Chi Minh City 72506, Vietnam
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. World Health Organization (2023, April 07). Breast Cancer. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer.
2. Variability in radiologists’ interpretations of mammograms10.1056/NEJM199412013312206 ↗
3. Breast-cancer tumor size, overdiagnosis, and mammography screening effectiveness10.1056/NEJMoa1600249 ↗
4. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
5. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning, MIT Press.
6. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 ↗
7. Dhungel, N., Carneiro, G., and Bradley, A.P. (2015, January 5–9). Deep learning and structured prediction for the segmentation of mass in mammograms. Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-319-24553-9_74 ↗
8. Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions10.1016/j.media.2016.07.007 ↗
9. Zhu, W., and Xie, X. (2015, January 5–9). Adversarial deep structural networks for mammographic mass segmentation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Munich, Germany.10.1101/095786 ↗
10. Detecting and classifying lesions in mammograms with deep learning10.1038/s41598-018-22437-z ↗
11. Wang, D., Khosla, A., Gargeya, R., Irshad, H., and Beck, A.H. (2016). Deep learning for identifying metastatic breast cancer. arXiv.
12. VinDr-Mammo: A large-scale benchmark dataset for computer-aided diagnosis in full-field digital mammography10.1038/s41597-023-02100-7 ↗
13. A mini-digital database for screening mammography: Mini-DDSM
14. Cui, C., Li, L., Cai, H., Fan, Z., Zhang, L., Dan, T., Li, J., and Wang, J. (2021). The Chinese Mammography Database (CMMD): An Online Mammography Database with Biopsy Confirmed Types for Machine Diagnosis of Breast, The Cancer Imaging Archive.
15. Categorized contrast enhanced mammography dataset for diagnostic and artificial intelligence research10.1038/s41597-022-01238-0 ↗
16. Breast masses classification in mammograms using deep convolutional neural networks and transfer learning
17. Carr, C., Kitamura, F., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Mongan, J., Andriole, K., Vazirabad, M., Riopel, M., Ball, R., and Dane, S. (2023, February 27). RSNA Screening Mammography Breast Cancer Detection. Available online: https://kaggle.com/competitions/rsna-breast-cancer-detection.
18. Tan, M., and Le, Q.V. (2019). EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. arXiv.
19. Liu, Z., Mao, H., Wu, C.-Y., Feichtenhofer, C., Darrell, T., and Xie, S. (2022). A ConvNet for the 2020s. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01167 ↗
20. Zou, X., Wu, Z., Zhou, W., and Huang, J. (2022). YOLOX-PAI: An Improved YOLOX, Stronger and Faster than YOLOv6. arXiv.
21. Wang, C.-Y., Liao, H.-Y.M., Yeh, I.-H., Wu, Y.-H., Chen, P.-Y., and Hsieh, J.-W. (2020). CSPNet: A New Backbone that can Enhance Learning Capability of CNN. arXiv.10.1109/CVPRW50498.2020.00203 ↗
22. Li, J., Wang, Y., Liang, X., and Zhang, L. (2021). SFPN: Synthetic FPN for Object Detection. arXiv.
23. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 ↗
24. Chen, Y., Li, Y., Sakaridis, C., Dai, D., and Van Gool, L. (November, January 27). ContourNet: Taking a further step toward accurate arbitrary-shaped scene text detection. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Seoul, Republic of Korea.
25. Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization10.1007/s11263-019-01228-7 ↗
26. Liu, W., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Szegedy, C., Reed, S., Fu, C.-Y., and Berg, A.C. (2016). SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2 ↗
27. Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., and Sun, J. (2015). Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks. arXiv.
28. Dai, J., Li, Y., He, K., and Sun, J. (2016). R-FCN: Object Detection via Region-based Fully Convolutional Networks. arXiv.
29. Pre-operative assessment of ablation margins for variable blood perfusion metrics in a magnetic resonance imaging-based complex breast tumor anatomy: Simulation paradigms in thermal therapies10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105781 ↗