journal article·2024-12-21Open access

Galvanic Skin Response and Photoplethysmography for Stress Recognition Using Machine Learning and Wearable Sensors

Alina Nechyporenko, Marcus Frohme, Yaroslav Strelchuk, Vladyslav Omelchenko, Vitaliy Gargin, Liudmyla Ishchenko, Victoriia Alekseeva

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 24

Abstract

This study investigates stress recognition using galvanic skin response (GSR) and photoplethysmography (PPG) data and machine learning, with a new focus on air raid sirens as a stressor. It bridges laboratory and real-world conditions and highlights the reliability of wearable sensors in dynamic, high-stress environments such as war and conflict zones. The study involves 37 participants (20 men, 17 women), aged 20–30, who had not previously heard an air raid siren. A 70 dB “S-40 electric siren” (400–450 Hz) was delivered via headphones. The protocol included a 5 min resting period, followed by 3 min “no-stress” phase, followed by 3 min “stress” phase, and finally a 3 min recovery phase. GSR and PPG signals were recorded using Shimmer 3 GSR+ sensors on the fingers and earlobes. A single session was conducted to avoid sensitization. The workflow includes signal preprocessing to remove artifacts, feature extraction, feature selection, and application of different machine learning models to classify the “stress “and “no-stress” states. As a result, the best classification performance was shown by the k-Nearest Neighbors model, achieving 0.833 accuracy. This was achieved by using a particular combination of heart rate variability (HRV) and GSR features, which can be considered as new indicators of siren-induced stress.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring · Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control · Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Division Molecular Biotechnology and Functional Genomics, Technical University of Applied Sciences Wildau, 1 Hochschulring, 15745 Wildau, Germany

Systems Engineering Department, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics, 14 Nauky Avenue, 61166 Kharkiv, Ukraine

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Pathological Anatomy, Kharkiv National Medical University, 4 Nauky Avenue, 61000 Kharkiv, Ukraine

Department of Professionally Oriented Disciplines, Kharkiv International Medical University, 38 Molochna Str., 61001 Kharkiv, Ukraine

Funding

Brandenburg ministry for science, research and culture (MWFK)

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Sympathetic Nervous System Activity Measured by Skin Conductance Quantifies the Challenge of Walking Adaptability Tasks After Stroke10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.11.025 ↗
2. Stress Detection Through Wrist-Based Electrodermal Activity Monitoring and Machine Learning10.1109/JBHI.2023.3239305 ↗
3. Aqajari, S.A.H., Naeini, E.K., Mehrabadi, M.A., Labbaf, S., Rahmani, A.M., and Dutt, N. (2020). GSR Analysis for Stress: Development and Validation of an Open Source Tool for Noisy Naturalistic GSR Data. arXiv.
4. Photoplethysmography Based Psychological Stress Detection with Pulse Rate Variability Feature Differences and Elastic Net10.1177/1550147718803298 ↗
5. Kim, H.G., Song, S., Cho, B.H., and Jang, D.P. (2024). Deep Learning-Based Stress Detection for Daily Life Use Using Single-Channel EEG and GSR in a Virtual Reality Interview Paradigm. PLoS ONE, 19.10.1371/journal.pone.0305864 ↗
6. Under-Sampling in Epilepsy: Limitations of Conventional EEG10.1016/j.cnp.2020.12.002 ↗
7. Abd Al-Alim, M., Mubarak, R., Salem, N., and Sadek, I. (2024). A Machine-Learning Approach for Stress Detection Using Wearable Sensors in Free-Living Environments. Comput. Biol. Med., 179.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108918 ↗
8. Evaluation of an Integrated System of Wearable Physiological Sensors for Stress Monitoring in Working Environments by Using Biological Markers10.1109/TBME.2017.2764507 ↗
9. Detection and Characterization of Physical Activity and Psychological Stress from Wristband Data10.3390/signals1020011 ↗
10. Kong, Y., Posada-Quintero, H.F., Tran, H., Talati, A., Acquista, T.J., Chen, I.P., and Chon, K.H. (2023). Differentiating Between Stress- and EPT-Induced Electrodermal Activity During Dental Examination. Comput. Biol. Med., 155.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106695 ↗
11. Raju, A.R., Ramadevi, R., Babu, P.R., and Vetriselvi, D. (2023, January 23–25). Galvanic Skin Response-Based Stress Detection System Using Machine Learning and IoT. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Augmented Intelligence and Sustainable Systems (ICAISS), Trichy, India.10.1109/ICAISS58487.2023.10250663 ↗
12. A Physicochemical-Sensing Electronic Skin for Stress Response Monitoring10.1038/s41928-023-01116-6 ↗
13. Uninterrupted Real-Time Cerebral Stress Level Monitoring Using Wearable Biosensors: A Review10.1002/bab.2491 ↗
14. Hickey, B.A., Chalmers, T., Newton, P., Lin, C.T., Sibbritt, D., McLachlan, C.S., Clifton-Bligh, R., Morley, J., and Lal, S. (2021). Smart Devices and Wearable Technologies to Detect and Monitor Mental Health Conditions and Stress: A Systematic Review. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21103461 ↗
15. Wearable Biochemical Sensors for Human Health Monitoring: Sensing Materials and Manufacturing Technologies10.1039/C9TB02474C ↗
16. Empty-Nest-Related Psychosocial Stress: Conceptual Issues, Future Directions in Economic Crisis10.22365/jpsych.2019.304.329 ↗
17. Age at Onset of Mental Disorders Worldwide: Large-Scale Meta-Analysis of 192 Epidemiological Studies10.1038/s41380-021-01161-7 ↗
18. Iqbal, T., Simpkin, A.J., Roshan, D., Glynn, N., Killilea, J., Walsh, J., Molloy, G., Ganly, S., Ryman, H., and Coen, E. (2022). Stress Monitoring Using Wearable Sensors: A Pilot Study and Stress-Predict Dataset. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22218135 ↗
19. Continuous Detection of Physiological Stress with Commodity Hardware10.1145/3361562 ↗
20. Advances and Challenges in the Detection of Academic Stress and Anxiety in the Classroom: A Literature Review and Recommendations10.1007/s10639-022-11324-w ↗
21. Chidambaram, S., Maheswaran, Y., Patel, K., Sounderajah, V., Hashimoto, D.A., Seastedt, K.P., McGregor, A.H., Markar, S.R., and Darzi, A. (2022). Using Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Sensing and Wearable Technology in Sports Medicine and Performance Optimization. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22186920 ↗
22. Pereira, C.V.F., de Oliveira, E.M., and de Souza, A.D. (2024). Machine Learning Applied to Edge Computing and Wearable Devices for Healthcare: Systematic Mapping of the Literature. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24196322 ↗
23. Bora, V., Sood, G., Dunville, L.M., and Kramer, J. (2024). Oculocardiac Reflex. StatPearls [Internet], StatPearls Publishing.
24. Study and Analysis of Human Stress Detection Using Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) Sensor in Wired and Wireless Environments10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00109.3 ↗
25. Changes in Skin Conductance as a Tool to Monitor Nociceptive Stimulation and Pain10.1097/ACO.0b013e3283183fe4 ↗
26. Evaluating Visual Photoplethysmography Method
27. Hoog Antink, C., Mai, Y., Peltokangas, M., Leonhardt, S., Oksala, N., and Vehkaoja, A. (2021). Accuracy of Heart Rate Variability Estimated with Reflective Wrist-PPG in Elderly Vascular Patients. Sci. Rep., 11.10.1038/s41598-021-87489-0 ↗
28. Electrodermal Activity and Stress Assessment10.2478/prilozi-2020-0028 ↗
29. Markiewicz, R., Markiewicz-Gospodarek, A., and Dobrowolska, B. (2022). Galvanic Skin Response Features in Psychiatry and Mental Disorders: A Narrative Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph192013428 ↗
30. (2024, December 08). Specifications Shimmer3 GSR+. Available online: https://shimmersensing.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Shimmer3-GSR-Spec-Sheet.pdf.
31. Shimmer Sensing (2024, December 08). ConsensysPRO Software. Available online: https://shimmersensing.com/product/consensyspro-software/.
32. (2024, December 08). WMA Declaration of Helsinki—Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Participants. Available online: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki/.
33. Detection of c, d, and e Waves in the Acceleration Photoplethysmogram10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.08.001 ↗
34. NeuroKit2: A Python Toolbox for Neurophysiological Signal Processing10.3758/s13428-020-01516-y ↗
35. Stress Detection with Single PPG Sensor by Orchestrating Multiple Denoising and Peak-Detecting Methods10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3060441 ↗
36. Alberdi, A., Aztiria, A., and Basarab, A. (2016). Towards an Automatic Early Stress Recognition System for Office Environments Based on Multimodal Measurements: A Review. J. Biomed. Inform., 59.10.1016/j.jbi.2015.11.007 ↗
37. Psychological Stress Level Detection Based on Electrodermal Activity10.1016/j.bbr.2017.12.021 ↗
38. Vapnik, V.N. (1998). Statistical Learning Theory, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
39. Relief-Based Feature Selection: Introduction and Review10.1016/j.jbi.2018.07.014 ↗
40. Jaiswal, J.K., and Samikannu, R. (2017, January 2–4). Application of Random Forest Algorithm on Feature Subset Selection and Classification and Regression. Proceedings of the 2017 World Congress on Computing and Communication Technologies (WCCCT), Tiruchirappalli, India.10.1109/WCCCT.2016.25 ↗
41. (2024, December 08). Python Library Scikit-Learn. Available online: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/.
42. The distance function effect on k-nearest neighbor classification for medical datasets10.1186/s40064-016-2941-7 ↗
43. Shouman, M., Turner, T., and Stocker, R. (2012, January 2–4). Integrating Naïve Bayes and K-Means Clustering with Different Initial Centroid Selection Methods in the Diagnosis of Heart Disease Patients. Proceedings of the Computer Science and Information Technologies, Bangalore, India.
44. Heartbeat Classification by Random Forest with a Novel Context Feature: A Segment Label10.1109/JTEHM.2022.3202749 ↗
45. Classification of Electrocardiogram Signals with Support Vector Machines and Particle Swarm Optimization10.1109/TITB.2008.923147 ↗
46. Tribhuvanam, H.C., Nagaraj, V.P.S., and Naidu, V.P.S. (2023, January 21–22). Performance Evaluation of Classifiers for ECG Signal Analysis. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Applications (ICAIA) Alliance Technology Conference (ATCON-1), Bangalore, India.10.1109/ICAIA57370.2023.10169512 ↗
47. Bahameish, M., Stockman, T., and Requena Carrión, J. (2024). Strategies for Reliable Stress Recognition: A Machine Learning Approach Using Heart Rate Variability Features. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24103210 ↗
48. Shaffer, F., and Ginsberg, J.P. (2017). An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms. Front. Public Health, 5.10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258 ↗
49. Chumachenko, D., Butkevych, M., Lode, D., Frohme, M., Schmailzl, K.J.G., and Nechyporenko, A. (2022). Machine Learning Methods in Predicting Patients with Suspected Myocardial Infarction Based on Short-Time HRV Data. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22187033 ↗