Evaluating the Facial Esthetic Outcomes of Digital Smile Designs Generated by Artificial Intelligence and Dental Professionals
Source abstract
Abstract
This study evaluates the preference rates for smile designs created by professionals or by Artificial Intelligence (AI) among dentists, dentistry students, and laypeople. Four cases with symmetrical and asymmetrical features were selected based on the Facial Flow (FF) concept from the database of the Smile Designer app regarding anatomical facial points. Two smile designs were created for each selected case: one using Artificial Intelligence (AI) and one created manually. An online survey assessed participants’ preferences for the different smile designs. The chi-square test “Pearson’s and Fisher’s exact test (P)” was used to analyze the survey data. A total of 628 people completed the study. Dentists preferred the manually-created smile design for the first three cases. For Case 4, dentists who used the Smile Designer program preferred the manually-created design (55.88%), while those who did not use the program preferred the AI-generated design (55.84%). There was a significant difference in esthetic perception between dentists and dental students (p = 0.001) and between dentists and laypeople (p = 0.001) for Case 1, only between dentists and dental students (p = 0.003) for Case 2, and only between dentists and laypeople (p = 0.001) for Case 3. Furthermore, we found that females (p = 0.007) and orthodontists (p = 0.025) had a higher preference for the AI-generated design in this case compared to males and other dental specialties for Case 3. While age, education level, and clinical experience did not significantly impact dentists’ preference for manually-created or AI-generated smile designs (p > 0.05), our results suggest that there were some differences in preference for Case 3. Overall, our findings suggest that the use of AI-generated smile designs for symmetric faces is acceptable to both dentists and laypeople and can offer time-saving benefits for clinicians.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research · Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul 34083, Türkiye
Department of Prosthodontics, Gülhane Faculty of Dentistry, Health Sciences University, Ankara 06010, Türkiye
Independent Researcher, Bursa 16200, Türkiye
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Perception of buccal corridor space on smile aesthetics among specialty dentist and layperson10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_2_19 ↗
2. Evolution of aesthetic dentistry10.1177/0022034519875450 ↗
3. Digitally Enhanced Esthetic Dentistry—From Treatment Planning to Quality Control10.1111/jerd.12205 ↗
4. Application of three-dimensional digital simulated design and implementation in esthetic rehabilitation
5. The application of parameters for comprehensive smile esthetics by digital smile design programs: A review of literature10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.09.001 ↗
6. Harmony of smile design in the facial context
7. DSDapp use for multidisciplinary esthetic planning10.1111/jerd.12637 ↗
8. Treatment of the Patient with Gummy Smile in Conjunction with Digital Smile Approach10.1016/j.cden.2015.03.007 ↗
9. The Photoshop Smile Design technique (part 1): Digital dental photography
10. Smile analysis and design in the digital era
11. Dynamic documentation of the smile and the 2D/3D digital smile design process10.11607/prd.2911 ↗
12. Differences in facial profile and dental esthetic perceptions between young adults and orthodontists10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.01.021 ↗
13. Esthetic dental perception comparisons between 2D- and 3D-simulated dental discrepancies10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.015 ↗
14. Virtual smile design systems: A current review Virtuelle Smile Design-Systeme: Eine aktuelle Übersicht
15. Artificial intelligence in dentistry: Current applications and future perspectives
16. Artificial intelligence in dentistry: Chances and challenges10.1177/0022034520915714 ↗
17. Artificial intelligence in orthodontics10.1007/s00056-019-00203-8 ↗
18. Scope and performance of artificial intelligence technology in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and clinical decision-making-A systematic review10.1016/j.jds.2020.05.022 ↗
19. The facial flow concept: An organic orofacial analysis—The vertical component10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.023 ↗
20. Laypersons’ perception of facial and dental asymmetries10.11607/prd.1618 ↗
21. Layperson’s preference regarding orientation of the transverse occlusal plane and commissure line from the frontal perspective10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.027 ↗
22. Layperson’s perception of axial midline angulation in asymmetric faces10.1111/jerd.12347 ↗
23. Facial attractiveness: Visual impact of symmetry increases significantly towards the midline10.1097/01.sap.0000252041.66540.ec ↗
24. Quantification of facial asymmetry by 2D analysis–A comparison of recent approaches10.1016/j.jcms.2013.07.033 ↗
25. Dental data mining: Potential pitfalls and practical issues10.1177/154407370301700125 ↗
26. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, neural networks, and deep learning: Futuristic concepts for new dental diagnosis