journal article·2023-04-13Open access

Assessing Vulnerability in Flood Prone Areas Using Analytic Hierarchy Process—Group Decision Making and Geographic Information System: A Case Study in Portugal

Sandra Mourato, Paulo Fernandez, Luísa Gomes Pereira, Madalena Moreira

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 8

Abstract

A flood vulnerability index was constructed by coupling Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping capabilities with an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Group Decision-Making (GDM) resulting from a paired comparison matrix of expert groups to assign weights to each of the standardised criteria. A survey was sent to 25 flood experts from government organisations, universities, research institutes, NGOs, and the private sector (56% academics and 44% non-academics). Respondents made pairwise comparisons for several criteria (population, socio-economic, buildings, and exposed elements) and sub-criteria. The group priorities were obtained by combining the Consistency Ratio (CR) and Euclidean Distance (ED) measures to assess the weight of each expert and obtain a final weight for each criterion and sub-criteria. In Portugal, 23 flood-prone areas were considered, and this work contributes with a tool to assess the flood vulnerability and consequently the flood risk. The flood vulnerability index was calculated, and the relevance of the proposed framework is demonstrated for flood-prone areas, in mainland Portugal. The results showed that in all five hydrographic regions, flood-prone areas with very high vulnerability were found, corresponding to areas with a high probability of flooding. The most vulnerable areas are Ponte de Lima in the North, Coimbra, and Pombal in the Centre; Loures in the Tagus and West Region; Setúbal and Alcácer do Sal in the Alentejo Region and Monchique in the Algarve Region. This methodology has the potential to be successfully applied to other flood-prone areas, combining the opinions of stakeholders validated by a mathematical model, which allows the vulnerability of the site to be assessed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Hydrology and Drought Analysis · Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Technology and Management, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal

MED&CHANGE—Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development & CHANGE—Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Universidade de Évora, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal

Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco, 6001-909 Castelo Branco, Portugal

Águeda School of Technology and Management, Aveiro University, Rua Comandante Pinho e Freitas, Nº 28, 3750-127 Águeda, Portugal

Research Centre of Geospatial Sciences, Porto University, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal

Architecture Department, Universidade de Évora, Ap. 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal

Funding

Operational Programme of the Centre Region · National Funds

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. A comprehensive approach to understanding flood risk drivers at the municipal level10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110127 ↗
2. Assessing flood risk using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and geographical information system (GIS): Application in Coochbehar district of West Bengal, India10.1007/s11069-019-03737-7 ↗
3. A GIS-Based Spatial Multi-Criteria Approach for Flood Risk Assessment in the Dongting Lake Region, Hunan, Central China10.1007/s11269-011-9866-2 ↗
4. Spatial vulnerability assessment of floods in the coastal regions of Bangladesh10.1080/19475705.2013.816785 ↗
5. Hoque, M.A., Tasfia, S., Ahmed, N., and Pradhan, B. (2019). Assessing Spatial Flood Vulnerability at Kalapara Upazila in Bangladesh Using an Analytic Hierarchy Process. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19061302 ↗
6. Social vulnerability indices: A comparative assessment using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis10.1007/s11069-012-0152-2 ↗
7. Assessing Illinois’s flood vulnerability using Hazus-MH10.1007/s11069-015-2077-z ↗
8. Flooding hazard in the Tagus estuarine area: The challenge of scale in vulnerability assessments10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.010 ↗
9. A new approach for computing a flood vulnerability index using cluster analysis10.1016/j.pce.2016.04.003 ↗
10. GIS-based flood risk assessment in suburban areas: A case study of the Fangshan District, Beijing10.1007/s11069-017-2828-0 ↗
11. Assessment of Social Vulnerability to Floods in the Floodplain of Northern Italy10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0090.1 ↗
12. Participatory flood vulnerability assessment: A multi-criteria approach10.5194/hess-22-373-2018 ↗
13. Social vulnerability change assessment: Monitoring longitudinal demographic indicators of disaster risk in Germany from 2005 to 201510.1007/s11069-018-3506-6 ↗
14. Xie, W., and Meng, Q. (2023). An Integrated PCA–AHP Method to Assess Urban Social Vulnerability to Sea Level Rise Risks in Tampa, Florida. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15032400 ↗
15. Saaty, T. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill.10.21236/ADA214804 ↗
16. Multi-criteria decision-making for flood risk management: A survey of the current state of the art10.5194/nhess-16-1019-2016 ↗
17. Flood management and a GIS modelling method to assess flood-hazard areas—A case study10.1080/02626667.2011.555836 ↗
18. Assessment of flood hazard based on natural and anthropogenic factors using analytic hierarchy process (AHP)10.1007/s11069-013-0639-5 ↗
19. Inundation risk assessment of metro system using AHP and TFN-AHP in Shenzhen10.1016/j.scs.2020.102103 ↗
20. Gacu, J.G., Monjardin, C.E.F., Senoro, D.B., and Tan, F.J. (2022). Flood Risk Assessment Using GIS-Based Analytical Hierarchy Process in the Municipality of Odiongan, Romblon, Philippines. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12199456 ↗
21. AHP and TOPSIS based flood risk assessment—A case study of the Navsari City, Gujarat, India10.1007/s10661-022-10111-x ↗
22. Integrated application of the analytic hierarchy process and the geographic information system for flood risk assessment and flood plain management in Taiwan10.1007/s11069-011-9831-7 ↗
23. Comprehensive flood risk assessment based on set pair analysis-variable fuzzy sets model and fuzzy AHP10.1007/s00477-012-0598-5 ↗
24. Riverine flood vulnerability assessment and zoning using geospatial data and MCDA method in Aq’Qala10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103345 ↗
25. Flood risk assessment in the Kosi megafan using multi-criteria decision analysis: A hydro-geomorphic approach10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.106861 ↗
26. Flood risk management centred on clusters of territorial vulnerability10.1080/19475705.2016.1250111 ↗
27. Multi-Criteria Analysis Framework for Potential Flood Prone Areas Mapping10.1007/s11269-014-0817-6 ↗
28. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2007). Directive 2007/60/EC on the Assessment and Management of Flood Risks, Official Journal of the European Union.
29. Social vulnerability assessment of flood risk using GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis. A case study of Vila Nova de Gaia (Portugal)10.1080/19475705.2015.1052021 ↗
30. Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method10.1016/j.dss.2010.03.003 ↗
31. Aguarón, J., Escobar, M.T., Moreno-Jiménez, J.M., and Turón, A. (2019). AHP-Group Decision Making Based on Consistency. Mathematics, 7.10.3390/math7030242 ↗
32. AHP based group decision making in ranking loan applicants for purchasing irrigation equipment: A case study
33. DGT (2022, September 05). Carta de Uso e Ocupação do Solo. Registo Nacional de Dados Geográficos. SNIG, Available online: https://geo2.dgterritorio.gov.pt/geoserver/COS2018/wms?service=wms&version=1.3.0&request=GetCapabilities.
34. Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards10.1111/1540-6237.8402002 ↗
35. Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany10.5194/nhess-9-393-2009 ↗
36. Contextualizing social vulnerability: Findings from case studies across Europe10.1007/s11069-011-9751-6 ↗
37. Social vulnerability assessment to seismic risk using multicriteria analysis: The case study of Vila Franca do Campo (São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal)10.1007/s11069-012-0084-x ↗
38. Hewitt, K. (1997). Regions of Risk: A Geographical Introduction to Disasters, Themes in Resource Management Addison Wesley Longman.
39. Simonovic, S.P., McBean, G., Prodanovic, P., Burn, D.H., Wey, K., Kay, P., Emerson, A., Mortsch, L., Hebb, A., and Goldt, R. (2007). Floods: Mapping Vulnerability in the Upper Thames Watershed under a Changing Climate, University of Waterloo, Environment Canada and Upper Thames River Conservation Authority.
40. Schneiderbauer, S. (2007). Risk and Vulnerability to Natural Disasters—From Broad View to Focused Perspective, University Berlin.
41. Vulnerability to flooding: Health and social dimensions10.1098/rsta.2002.1013 ↗
42. A flood vulnerability index for coastal cities and its use in assessing climate change impacts10.1007/s11069-012-0234-1 ↗
43. The impact of seasonal flooding on agriculture: The spring 2012 floods in Somerset, England10.1111/jfr3.12041 ↗
44. Whitlow, T.H., and Harris, R.W. (1979). Flood Tolerance in Plants: A State-of-the-Art Review.
45. Cardona, O.D. (2005). Indicators of Disaster Risk and Risk Management: Summary Report, Inter-American Development Bank.10.18235/0010537 ↗
46. Distribution of impacts of natural disasters across income groups: A case study of New Orleans10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.013 ↗
47. The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.011 ↗
48. Consistency prediction for incomplete AHP matrices10.1016/0895-7177(93)90183-Y ↗
49. The importance of property-specific attributes in assessing CBD office building quality10.1108/14635780510616025 ↗
50. A Method for Constructing a Social Vulnerability Index: An Application to Hurricane Storm Surges in a Developed Country10.1007/s11027-006-0265-6 ↗
51. Flanagan, B.E., Gregory, E.W., Hallisey, E.J., Heitgerd, J.L., and Lewis, B. (2011). A Social Vulnerability Index for Disaster Management. J. Homel. Secur. Emerg. Manag., 8.10.2202/1547-7355.1792 ↗