journal article·2023-04-02Open access

The Effectiveness of Serious Games for Enhancing Literacy Skills in Children with Learning Disabilities or Difficulties: A Systematic Review

Chiara Valeria Marinelli, Giuliana Nardacchione, Eugenio Trotta, Raffaele Di Fuccio, Paola Palladino, Luigi Traetta, Pierpaolo Limone

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 7

Abstract

Serious games (SGs) are often used for learning and cognitive improvement. This systematic review aims to verify the effectiveness of SG in enhancing the reading and writing of children with learning difficulties or disorders. The study was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 Guidelines. The screening processes led to six relevant articles, all of which were randomized trials with a low risk of bias. The number of SGs developed for children with learning disorders with evidence of efficacy is very small, and they focus on enhancing only some aspects of literacy, leaving out the training of some fundamental skills, such as spelling and text comprehension. Serious games are effective in improving reading and metaphonological skills and in ensuring good engagement and enjoyment. However, poor generalization of progress to untreated skills was reported. The importance of investment in this area of research is highlighted.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Children's Physical and Motor Development · Reading and Literacy Development · Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Learning Science Hub, Department of Humanities, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy

Department of Humanities, Pegaso University, 80143 Napoli, Italy

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Computerized training of working memory in a group of patients suffering from acquired brain injury10.3109/02699052.2010.498007 ↗
2. Rego, P.A., Moreira, P.M., and Reis, L.P. (2014). Architecture for Serious Games in Health Rehabilitation, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-05948-8_30 ↗
3. Abt, C.C. (1987). Serious Games, University Press of America.
4. Serious Games between simulation and game. A taxonomy proposal
5. Dipace, A. (2016). Simulazioni e Giochi Digitali Per L’apprendimento, Progedit. [1st ed.].
6. Designing and integrating purposeful learning in game play: A systematic review10.1007/s11423-015-9418-1 ↗
7. Michael, D.R., and Chen, S.L. (2005). Serious Games: Games That Educate, Train, and Inform, Thomson Course Technology. [2nd ed.].
8. A meta-analysis of use of serious games in education over a decade
9. “Il mio nome è Game, Serious Game”. Tra Serious Game e Scienza Psicologica. Teorie e risvolti applicativi
10. Games for science and engineering education10.1145/1272516.1272536 ↗
11. Recommendations for the use of serious games in neurodegenerative disorders10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01243 ↗
12. Cognitive deficits in multiple sclerosis: Recent advances in treatment and neurorehabilitation10.1007/s11940-018-0538-x ↗
13. Ern, A.M. (2014). The Use of Gamification and Serious Games within Interventions for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. [Bachelor’s Thesis, University of Twente].
14. Improving adaptive and cognitive skills of children with an intellectual disability and/or autism spectrum disorder: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials on the effects of serious games10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100488 ↗
15. Developmental pattern of the cortical topology in high-functioning individuals with autism spectrum disorder10.1002/hbm.25251 ↗
16. Serious Games: How do they impact special education needs children10.47577/teh.v2i3.7407 ↗
17. Bibliometric and Content Analysis of Research Trends on the Use of Serious Games to Assist People with Disabilities10.18009/jcer.858500 ↗
18. World Health Organization (2016). International Statistical Classification of Disease and Health Related Problems, World Health Organization. [10th ed.].
19. American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, American Psychiatric Association. [5th ed.].10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 ↗
20. Mobile Applications, An Emerging Powerful Tool for Dyslexia Screening and Intervention: A Systematic Literature Review
21. Boekaerts, M. (2010). The Nature of Learning: Using Research to Inspire Practice, OECD.
22. A review of national-level adaptation planning with regards to the risks posed by climate change on infectious diseases10.3390/ijerph10127083 ↗
23. Impact of the mandatory implementation of reporting guidelines on reporting quality in a surgical journal: A before and after study10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.032 ↗
24. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4 ↗
25. Rayyan—A web and mobile app for systematic reviews10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 ↗
26. Quality criteria for serious games: Serious part, game part, and balance10.2196/19037 ↗
27. RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials10.1136/bmj.l4898 ↗
28. Chandler, J., McKenzie, J., Boutron, I., and Welch, V. (2016). Cochrane Methods, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.10.1002/14651858.CD201601 ↗
29. Higgins, J.P., Savović, J., Page, M.J., and Sterne, J.A. (2019). Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (RoB 2), RoB2 Development Group; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/9781119536604.ch8 ↗
30. coefficient of agreement for nominal scales10.1177/001316446002000104 ↗
31. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data10.2307/2529310 ↗
32. Marsh, T., Ma, M., Oliveira, M., Baalsrud Hauge, J., and Göbel, S. (2016). Serious Games, Springer. JCSG: Lecture Notes in Computer Science.10.1007/978-3-319-45841-0 ↗
33. The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62789-2 ↗
34. Evaluation of a digital gamebased reading training for German children with reading disorder10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103834 ↗
35. Supporting struggling readers with digital game-based learning10.1007/s11423-019-09658-3 ↗
36. A mobile game as a support tool for children with severe difficulties in reading and spelling10.1111/jcal.12456 ↗
37. Kashani-Vahid, L., Taskooh, S.K., and Moradi, H. (2019, January 26). Effectiveness of “Maghzineh” cognitive video game on reading performance of students with learning disabilities in reading. Proceedings of the 2019 International Serious Games Symposium (ISGS), Tehran, Iran.10.1109/ISGS49501.2019.9047004 ↗
38. The Effects of Using Digital Game Based Learning in Primary Classes with Inclusive Education
39. Why learning to read is easier in Welsh than in English: Orthographic transparency effects evinced with frequency-matched tests10.1017/S0142716401004052 ↗
40. The effects of orthographic depth on learning to read alphabetic, syllabic, and logographic scripts10.1598/RRQ.39.4.5 ↗
41. Does the mean adequately represent reading performance? Evidence from a cross-linguistic study10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00903 ↗
42. Spelling acquisition in English and Italian: A cross-linguistic study10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01843 ↗
43. Marinelli, C.V., Romani, C., Burani, C., McGowan, V.A., and Zoccolotti, P. (2016). Costs and benefits of orthographic inconsistency in reading: Evidence from a cross-linguistic comparison. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0157457 ↗
44. Marinelli, C.V., Romani, C., McGowan, V.A., Giustizieri, S., and Zoccolotti, P. (2023). Characterization of reading errors in languages with different orthographic regularity: An Italian–English comparison. J. Cult. Cogn. Sci.10.21203/rs.3.rs-1828524/v1 ↗
45. Decision times in orthographic processing: A cross-linguistic study10.1007/s00221-022-06542-0 ↗
46. A cross-linguistic comparison of children learning to read in English and Dutch10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.785 ↗
47. Developmental dyslexia in different languages: Language-specific or universal?10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00139-5 ↗
48. Do Italian dyslexic children use the lexical reading route efficiently? An orthographic judgment task10.1007/s11145-008-9118-x ↗
49. How different reading habits influence lines, words and pseudowords bisection: Evidence from Italian and Hebrew10.4236/psych.2019.1015132 ↗
50. Characteristics of writing disorders in Italian dyslexic children10.1097/00146965-200403000-00003 ↗
51. Dysfluent reading in the absence of spelling difficulties: A specific disability in regular orthographies10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.272 ↗
52. Galuschka, K., Ise, E., Krick, K., and Schulte-Körne, G. (2014). Effectiveness of treatment approaches for children and adolescents with reading disabilities: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE, 9.10.1371/journal.pone.0089900 ↗
53. Predictors of word decoding and reading fluency across languages varying in orthographic consistency10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.566 ↗
54. Phoneme awareness and pathways into literacy: A comparison of German and American children10.1023/A:1020984704781 ↗
55. Metaanalyse zur Wirksamkeit einer Forderung der phonologischen Bewusstheit in der deutschen Sprache10.1024/1010-0652/a000165 ↗
56. The process of dropping out of high school: A 19-year perspective10.3102/00028312034002395 ↗
57. Educational attainments of school leavers with a preschool history of speech-language impairments10.1080/13682820010019892 ↗
58. OECD (2013). Education at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing.
59. Teaching spelling and composition alone and together: Implications for the simple view of writing10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.291 ↗
60. Should the natural learning approach replace spelling instruction?10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.235 ↗
61. A synthesis of spelling and reading interventions and their effects on the spelling outcomes of students with LD10.1177/00222194060390060501 ↗
62. Orthographic learning at a glance: On the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching10.1016/j.jecp.2004.01.001 ↗
63. Strategic control in developmental dyslexia10.1080/026432997381510 ↗
64. Analysis of error profile in a regular orthography: Role of reading deficit and strategic control10.1080/02643294.2013.814569 ↗
65. Marinelli, C.V., Martelli, M., Pizzicannella, E., and Zoccolotti, P. (Psychol. Educ., 2023). What do reading times tell us about the effect of orthographic regularity? Evidence from English and Italian readers, Psychol. Educ., in press.10.33910/2686-9527-2023-5-3-345-365 ↗
66. Automatic speech recognition: Reliability and pedagogical implications for teaching pronunciation
67. Li, J., Deng, L., Haeb-Umbach, R., and Gong, Y. (2016). A Bridge to Practical Applications, Elsevier. [1st ed.].
68. Forsberg, M. (2003). Why Is Speech Recognition Difficult, Chalmers University of Technology.
69. A review of challenges in automatic speech recognition
70. Double dissociation between reading and spelling deficits10.1080/10888430903162878 ↗
71. Kognitive Korrelate der Lese-, Leserechtschreib-und der Rechtschreibstörung10.1024/2235-0977/a000002 ↗
72. Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades?10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x ↗
73. Reading comprehension instruction for secondary students: Challenges for struggling students and teachers10.2307/1593593 ↗
74. Single or dual orthographic representations for reading and spelling? A study of Italian dyslexic-dysgraphic and normal children10.1080/02643294.2010.543539 ↗
75. Lexical processing and distributional knowledge in sound-spelling mapping in a consistent orthography: A longitudinal study of reading and spelling in dyslexic and typically developing children10.1080/02643294.2017.1386168 ↗
76. Surface dyslexia and dysgraphia: Dual routes, single lexicon10.1080/02643299208252059 ↗
77. Ability to Consolidate Instances as a Proxy for the Association Among Reading, Spelling, and Math Learning Skill10.3389/fpsyg.2021.761696 ↗
78. Testing the specificity of predictors of reading, spelling and maths: A new model of the association among learning skills based on competence, performance and acquisition10.3389/fnhum.2020.573998 ↗
79. Zoccolotti, P., Angelelli, P., Marinelli, C.V., and Romano, D.L. (2021). A network analysis of the relationship among reading, spelling and maths skills. Brain Sci., 11.10.3390/brainsci11050656 ↗
80. Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., and Marinelli, C.V. (2021). Interpreting developmental surface dyslexia within a comorbidity perspective. Brain Sci., 11.10.3390/brainsci11121568 ↗
81. Successful treatment of sublexical reading deficits in a child with dyslexia of the mixed type10.1080/09602010244000048 ↗
82. Hemispheric, attentional, and processing speed factors in the treatment of developmental dyslexia10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.040 ↗
83. Effects of visual hemispherespecific stimulation versus reading-focused training in dyslexic children10.1080/09602010500145620 ↗
84. An evaluation of the relationship between perceptions and performance of students in a serious game10.1177/07356331211036989 ↗
85. Experiences and attitudes of elementary school students and their parents toward online learning in china during the COVID-1 pandemic: Questionnaire study10.2196/24496 ↗
86. Remediation of fluency: Word specific or generalised training effects?10.1007/s11145-005-5259-3 ↗
87. Finn, J.D., and Zimmer, K.S. (2012). Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, Springer.
88. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence10.3102/00346543074001059 ↗
89. Mathiak, K.A., Klasen, M., Weber, R., Ackermann, H., Shergill, S.S., and Mathiak, K. (2011). Reward system and temporal pole contributions to affective evaluation during a first person shooter video game. BMC Neurosci., 12.10.1186/1471-2202-12-66 ↗
90. The opponent matters: Elevated fMRI reward responses to winning against a human versus a computer opponent during interactive video game playing10.1093/cercor/bhs259 ↗
91. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press.
92. Does early reading failure decrease children’s reading motivation?10.1177/0022219408321112 ↗
93. Academic self-concept, reading attitudes and approaches to learning of children with dyslexia: Do they differ from their peers?10.1080/08856250600956311 ↗
94. Using game-based learning to support struggling readers at home10.1080/17439884.2010.531023 ↗
95. Technology-based reading intervention programs for elementary grades: An analytical review10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.003 ↗
96. Games for engaged learning of middle school children with special learning needs10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01326.x ↗
97. Children’s engagement during digital game-based learning of reading: The effects of time, rewards, and challenge10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.008 ↗
98. Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis10.3102/00346543065003245 ↗
99. The power of feedback10.3102/003465430298487 ↗
100. Binaghi, G., and Guida, M. (2021). Education and Technology Support for Children and Young Adults with ASD and Learning Disabilities, IGI Global.