Bayesian Hyperparameter Optimization of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Biomass Gasification Gases
Source abstract
Abstract
Predicting biomass gasification gases is crucial for energy production and environmental monitoring but poses challenges due to complex relationships and variability. Machine learning has emerged as a powerful tool for optimizing and managing these processes. This study uses Bayesian optimization to tune parameters for various machine learning methods, including Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient-Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Elastic Net, Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Gradient-Boosting Regressor (GBR), K-nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Decision Tree (DT), aiming to identify the best model for predicting the compositions of CO, CO2, H2, and CH4 under different conditions. Performance was evaluated using the correlation coefficient (R), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Relative Absolute Error (RAE), and execution time, with comparisons visualized using a Taylor diagram. Hyperparameter optimization’s significance was assessed via t-test effect size and Cohen’s d. XGBoost outperformed other models, achieving high R values under optimal conditions (0.951 for CO, 0.954 for CO2, 0.981 for H2, and 0.933 for CH4) and maintaining robust performance under suboptimal conditions (0.889 for CO, 0.858 for CO2, 0.941 for H2, and 0.856 for CH4). In contrast, K-nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Elastic Net showed the poorest performance and stability. This study underscores the importance of hyperparameter optimization in enhancing model performance and demonstrates XGBoost’s superior accuracy and robustness, providing a valuable framework for applying machine learning to energy management and environmental monitoring.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes · Heat transfer and supercritical fluids · Radiative Heat Transfer Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Engineering, Tekirdag Namik Kemal University, Tekirdag 59860, Turkey
References (81)
Show source-provided references
1. Process optimization of biomass gasification with a Monte Carlo approach and random forest algorithm10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115734 ↗
2. Assessment of coal gasification in a pressurized fixed bed gasifier using an ASPEN plus and Euler–Euler model10.1007/s40789-020-00361-w ↗
3. Hydrogen production via biomass gasification, and modeling by supervised machine learning algorithms10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.108 ↗
4. Environmental assessment of gasification technology for biomass conversion to energy in comparison with other alternatives: The case of wheat straw10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.004 ↗
5. ASEAN (2024, October 10). ASEAN Strategy on Sustainable Biomass Energy for Agriculture Communities and Rural Development in 2020–2030. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faolex/results/details/en/c/LEX-FAOC216870/.
6. Role of energy mix and eco-innovation in achieving environmental sustainability in the USA using the dynamic ARDL approach: Accounting the supply side of the ecosystem10.1016/j.renene.2023.118925 ↗
7. Artificial intelligence methods for modeling gasification of waste biomass: A review10.1007/s10661-024-12443-2 ↗
8. Modelling approaches for biomass gasifiers: A comprehensive overview10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155243 ↗
9. Li, J., Yao, X., and Xu, K. (2021). A comprehensive model integrating BP neural network and RSM for the prediction and optimization of syngas quality. Biomass Bioenergy, 155.10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106278 ↗
10. Predicting hydrogen production from co-gasification of biomass and plastics using tree based machine learning algorithms10.1016/j.renene.2023.119883 ↗
11. Process modelling integrated with interpretable machine learning for predicting hydrogen and char yield during chemical looping gasification10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137579 ↗
12. Predictive modeling of biomass gasification with machine learning-based regression methods10.1016/j.energy.2019.116541 ↗
13. An artificial intelligence based approach to predicting syngas composition for downdraft biomass gasification10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.131 ↗
14. Wen, H.-T., Lu, J.-H., and Phuc, M.-X. (2021). Applying artificial intelligence to predict the composition of syngas using rice husks: A comparison of artificial neural networks and gradient boosting regression. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14102932 ↗
15. Comparison of the different artificial neural networks in prediction of biomass gasification products10.1002/er.4682 ↗
16. Predicting the effect of bed materials in bubbling fluidized bed gasification using artificial neural networks (ANNs) modeling approach10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117021 ↗
17. Performance evaluation of gasification system efficiency using artificial neural network10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.136 ↗
18. Artificial neural network approach for the steam gasification of palm oil waste using bottom ash and CaO10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.142 ↗
19. Artificial neural network based modeling of biomass gasification in fixed bed downdraft gasifiers10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.01.029 ↗
20. Interpretable machine learning for predicting and evaluating hydrogen production via supercritical water gasification of biomass10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128244 ↗
21. A comprehensive artificial neural network model for gasification process prediction10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119289 ↗
22. Artificial neural network model of catalytic coal gasification in fixed bed10.1016/j.joei.2022.08.012 ↗
23. Development of explainable AI-based predictive models for bubbling fluidised bed gasification process10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128971 ↗
24. Robust modelling development for optimisation of hydrogen production from biomass gasification process using bootstrap aggregated neural network10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.110 ↗
25. Evaluating the effect of blending ratio on the co-gasification of high ash coal and biomass in a fluidized bed gasifier using machine learning10.22531/muglajsci.471538 ↗
26. Ayub, H.M.U., Rafiq, M., Qyyum, M.A., Rafiq, G., Choi, G.S., and Lee, M. (2022). Prediction of process parameters for the integrated biomass gasification power plant using artificial neural network. Front. Energy Res., 10.10.3389/fenrg.2022.894875 ↗
27. Hydrogen production by biomass gasification in supercritical or subcritical water with Raney-Ni and other catalysts10.1007/s11708-009-0069-y ↗
28. Experimental studies of biomass gasification with air10.1016/S1003-9953(11)60379-4 ↗
29. Experimental investigation on biomass gasification using chemical looping in a batch reactor and a continuous dual reactor10.1016/j.cej.2015.11.008 ↗
30. An experimental study on biomass air–steam gasification in a fluidized bed10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.003 ↗
31. Pilot-scale gasification of corn stover, switchgrass, wheat straw, and wood: 1. Parametric study and comparison with literature10.1021/ie900595m ↗
32. Hydrogen and syngas production from steam gasification of biomass using cement as catalyst10.1007/s13399-019-00404-6 ↗
33. Experimental study on non-woody biomass gasification in a downdraft gasifier10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.12.031 ↗
34. Experimental investigation of biomass gasification in a fluidized bed reactor10.1021/ef800180e ↗
35. Experimental study on industrial-scale CFB biomass gasification10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.145 ↗
36. Experimental study of biomass gasification with oxygen-enriched air in fluidized bed gasifier10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.016 ↗
37. Performance of fluidized bed steam gasification of biomass–modeling and experiment10.1016/j.enconman.2010.11.003 ↗
38. Research on the characteristics of biomass gasification in a fluidized bed10.1016/j.joei.2018.03.011 ↗
39. Three-stage steady-state model for biomass gasification in a dual circulating fluidized-bed10.1016/j.enconman.2011.09.019 ↗
40. High temperature steam gasification of corn straw pellets in downdraft gasifier: Preparation of hydrogen-rich gas10.1007/s12649-017-0143-3 ↗
41. Experimental study for dimethyl ether production from biomass gasification and simulation on dimethyl ether production10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.044 ↗
42. Khan, M.M., Xu, S., and Wang, C. (2022). Catalytic biomass gasification in decoupled dual loop gasification system over alkali-feldspar for hydrogen rich-gas production. Biomass Bioenergy, 161.10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106472 ↗
43. Experiments on biomass gasification using chemical looping with nickel-based oxygen carrier in a 25 kWth reactor10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.03.082 ↗
44. Design, instrumentation, and operation of a standard downdraft, laboratory-scale gasification testbed utilising novel seed-propagated hybrid Miscanthus pellets10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118864 ↗
45. An experimental investigation of hydrogen production from biomass gasification10.1016/S0360-3199(97)00118-3 ↗
46. Bubbling fluidized bed biomass gasification using a two-stage process at 600 °C: A way to avoid bed agglomeration10.1016/j.energy.2022.123882 ↗
47. Investigation on syngas production via biomass conversion through the integration of pyrolysis and air–steam gasification processes10.1016/j.enconman.2014.07.065 ↗
48. Generation of hydrogen rich gas through fluidized bed gasification of biomass10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.015 ↗
49. Air gasification of peat, wood and brown coal in a pressurized fluidized-bed reactor. I. Carbon conversion, gas yields and tar formation10.1016/0378-3820(92)90038-R ↗
50. Biomass air−steam gasification in a fluidized bed to produce hydrogen-rich gas10.1021/ef020181l ↗
51. A comparison between Miscanthus and bioethanol waste pellets and their performance in a downdraft gasifier10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.01.037 ↗
52. Hydrogen production in steam gasification of biomass with CaO as a CO2 absorbent10.1021/ef700744a ↗
53. A novel process of biomass gasification for hydrogen-rich gas with solid heat carrier: Preliminary experimental results10.1021/ef060137w ↗
54. Effects of different operating parameters on the syngas composition in a two-stage gasification process10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.019 ↗
55. Air-blown gasification of woody biomass in a bubbling fluidized bed gasifier10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.072 ↗
56. Pilot-plant gasification of olive stone: A technical assessment10.1021/ef0498418 ↗
57. Syngas production from olive tree cuttings and olive kernels in a downdraft fixed-bed gasifier10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.12.051 ↗
58. The study of reactions influencing the biomass steam gasification process10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00313-7 ↗
59. Comparison of the air-blown bubbling fluidized bed gasification of wood and wood–PET pellets10.1016/j.fuel.2016.03.038 ↗
60. Hydrogen-rich gas production by steam gasification of palm oil wastes over supported tri-metallic catalyst10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.09.030 ↗
61. Air gasification of empty fruit bunch for hydrogen-rich gas production in a fluidized-bed reactor10.1016/j.enconman.2010.10.023 ↗
62. Poultry litter gasification in a fluidized bed reactor: Effects of gasifying agent and limestone addition10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b00058 ↗
63. Potential of synthesis gas production from rubber wood chip gasification in a bubbling fluidised bed gasifier10.1016/j.enconman.2010.06.044 ↗
64. Biomass gasification with air in an atmospheric bubbling fluidized bed. Effect of six operational variables on the quality of the produced raw gas10.1021/ie9507540 ↗
65. Air gasification of rice husk in a dual distributor type fluidized bed gasifier10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00046-X ↗
66. Energy generation from fluidized bed gasification of rice husk10.1063/1.4816496 ↗
67. Gasification of high moisture rubber woodchip with rubber waste in a bubbling fluidized bed10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.11.026 ↗
68. Comparing calcined and un-treated olivine as bed materials for tar reduction in fluidized bed gasification10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.03.012 ↗
69. Effect of sepiolite bed material on gas composition and tar mitigation during C. cardunculus L. gasification10.1016/j.cej.2017.02.106 ↗
70. Gasification of palm empty fruit bunch in a bubbling fluidized bed: A performance and agglomeration study10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.101 ↗
71. Biomass gasification in a catalytic fluidized reactor with beds of different materials10.1016/j.cej.2009.04.002 ↗
72. Detecting outliers in a univariate time series dataset using unsupervised combined statistical methods: A case study on surface water temperature10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101672 ↗
73. Hayvan hastaliği teşhisinde normalizasyon tekniklerinin yapay sinir aği ve özellik seçim performansina etkisi10.7827/TurkishStudies.11902 ↗
74. Engelbrecht, A.P., Cloete, I., and Zurada, J.M. (1995). Determining the significance of input parameters using sensitivity analysis. From Natural to Artificial Neural Computation, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Artificial Neural Networks, Torremolinos, Spain, 7–9 June 1995, Springer.10.1007/3-540-59497-3_199 ↗
75. Ahmad, A., Chaiyasarn, K., Farooq, F., Ahmad, W., Suparp, S., and Aslam, F. (2021). Compressive strength prediction via gene expression programming (GEP) and artificial neural network (ANN) for concrete containing RCA. Buildings, 11.10.3390/buildings11080324 ↗
76. Huynh, A.T., Nguyen, Q.D., Xuan, Q.L., Magee, B., Chung, T., Tran, K.T., and Nguyen, K.T. (2020). A machine learning-assisted numerical predictor for compressive strength of geopolymer concrete based on experimental data and sensitivity analysis. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10217726 ↗
77. Sustainable use of fly-ash: Use of gene-expression programming (GEP) and multi-expression programming (MEP) for forecasting the compressive strength geopolymer concrete10.1016/j.asej.2021.03.018 ↗
78. Cutler, A., Cutler, D.R., and Stevens, J.R. (2012). Random forests. Ensemble Machine Learning: Methods and Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-9326-7_5 ↗
79. Prediction of tropospheric ozone concentration with Bagging-MLP method
80. Horse Surgery and Survival Prediction with Artificial Intelligence Models: Performance Comparison of Original, Imputed, Balanced, and Feature-Selected Datasets
81. Bayesian Optimization for Hyperparameter Tuning