journal article·2024-08-21Open access

Artificial Intelligence Advancements for Accurate Groundwater Level Modelling: An Updated Synthesis and Review

Saeid Pourmorad, Mostafa Kabolizade, Luca Antonio Dimuccio

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 16

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods, including Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFISs), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Deep Learning (DL), Genetic Programming (GP) and Hybrid Algorithms, have proven to be important tools for accurate groundwater level (GWL) modelling. Through an analysis of the results obtained in numerous articles published in high-impact journals during 2001–2023, this comprehensive review examines each method’s capabilities, their combinations, and critical considerations about selecting appropriate input parameters, using optimisation algorithms, and considering the natural physical conditions of the territories under investigation to improve the models’ accuracy. For example, ANN takes advantage of its ability to recognise complex patterns and non-linear relationships between input and output variables. In addition, ANFIS shows potential in processing diverse environmental data and offers higher accuracy than alternative methods such as ANN, SVM, and GP. SVM excels at efficiently modelling complex relationships and heterogeneous data. Meanwhile, DL methods, such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), are crucial in improving prediction accuracy at different temporal and spatial scales. GP methods have also shown promise in modelling complex and nonlinear relationships in groundwater data, providing more accurate and reliable predictions when combined with optimisation techniques and uncertainty analysis. Therefore, integrating these methods and optimisation techniques (Hybrid Algorithms), tailored to specific hydrological and hydrogeological conditions, can significantly increase the predictive capability of GWL models and improve the planning and management of water resources. These findings emphasise the importance of thoroughly understanding (a priori) the functionalities and capabilities of each potentially beneficial AI-based methodology, along with the knowledge of the physical characteristics of the territory under investigation, to optimise GWL predictive models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrological Forecasting Using AI · Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies · Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Coimbra, Centre of Studies in Geography and Spatial Planning (CEGOT), Department of Geography and Tourism, Largo da Porta Férrea, 3004-530 Coimbra, Portugal

Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz 61357-43136, Iran

Funding

Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT)

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Prediction of groundwater level variations using deep learning methods and GMS numerical model10.1007/s12145-023-01052-1 ↗
2. Groundwater level prediction using genetic programming: The importance of precipitation data and weather station location on model accuracy10.1007/s12665-019-8776-0 ↗
3. Groundwater level response identification by hybrid wavelet–machine learning conjunction models using meteorological data10.1007/s11356-022-23686-2 ↗
4. Evaluation of Several models of Genetic Expression Programming and Time Series to Provide Groundwater Balancing Scenarios in Shabestar Plain (East of Urmia Lake)
5. Forecasting groundwater levels using machine learning methods: The case of California’s Central Valley
6. Reconstruction of Missing Groundwater Level Data by Using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Deep Neural Network10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125776 ↗
7. A comparative study of artificial neural networks and support vector machines for predicting groundwater levels in the Ziveh Aquifer–West Azerbaijan10.1007/s12517-023-11180-z ↗
8. Intelligent approach to predict future groundwater level based on artificial neural networks (ANN)10.1007/s41207-020-00185-9 ↗
9. Artificial neural network modeling for groundwater level forecasting in a river Island of eastern India10.1007/s11269-009-9527-x ↗
10. Groundwater level simulation using artificial neural network in Southeast Punjab, India
11. Developing comparative mathematic models, BN and ANN for forecasting of groundwater levels10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100237 ↗
12. Relating groundwater levels with meteorological parameters using ANN technique10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108163 ↗
13. Multilayer feed forward models in groundwater level forecasting using meteorological data in public management10.1007/s11269-018-2126-y ↗
14. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning, MIT Press.
15. Modeling response of runoff and evapotranspiration for predicting water table depth in arid region using dynamic recurrent neural network10.1016/j.gsd.2018.01.007 ↗
16. Using artificial neural network approach for simultaneous forecasting of weekly groundwater levels at multiple sites10.1007/s11269-015-1132-6 ↗
17. Jha, R., Singh, V.P., Singh, V., Roy, L., and Thendiyath, R. (2022). ANN Modeling of Groundwater Development for Irrigation. Groundwater and Water Quality Water Science and Technology Library, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-09551-1 ↗
18. Assessment and Prediction of Groundwater using Geospatial and ANN Modeling10.1007/s11269-021-02874-8 ↗
19. Modeling Monthly Pan Evaporation Process Over the Indian Central Himalayas: Application of Multiple Learning Artificial Intelligence Model
20. Particle swarm optimisation based artificial neural network model for forecasting groundwater level in Udupi district10.1063/1.5031983 ↗
21. Using artificial neural network models for groundwater level forecasting and assessment of the relative impacts of influencing factors10.1007/s10040-018-1866-3 ↗
22. Modelling long-term groundwater fluctuations by extreme learning machine using hydro-climatic data10.1080/02626667.2017.1410891 ↗
23. Forecasting groundwater levels using nonlinear autoregressive networks with exogenous input (narx)10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.01.045 ↗
24. Assessing the Suitability of Extreme Learning Machines (ELM) for Groundwater Level Prediction10.1515/jwld-2017-0012 ↗
25. Feasibility of using artificial neural networks to forecast groundwater levels in real-time10.1007/s10346-017-0844-5 ↗
26. Forecasting of groundwater level using artificial neural network by incorporating river recharge and river bank infiltration10.1051/matecconf/201710304007 ↗
27. Monthly groundwater level prediction using ANN and neuro-fuzzy models: A case study on Kerman Plain, Iran10.2166/hydro.2010.034 ↗
28. Application of Several Data-Driven Techniques for Predicting Groundwater Level10.1007/s11269-012-0194-y ↗
29. Wavelet and Neuro-Fuzzy Conjunction Model for Predicting Water Table Depth Fluctuations10.2166/nh.2012.104b ↗
30. A wavelet-ANFIS hybrid model for groundwater level forecasting for different prediction periods10.1007/s11269-012-0239-2 ↗
31. Optimization of wavelet-ANFIS and wavelet-ANN hybrid models by Taguchi method for groundwater level forecasting10.1007/s13369-013-0762-3 ↗
32. Prediction of Water Quality Parameters of Karoon River (Iran) by Artificial Intelligence-Based Models10.1007/s13762-013-0378-x ↗
33. Simulation of Groundwater Level Through Artificial Intelligence System10.1007/s12665-014-3997-8 ↗
34. Groundwater level simulation and forecasting using interior search algorithm-least square support vector regression (ISA-LSSVR)10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100447 ↗
35. A stochastic modelling technique for groundwater level forecasting in an arid environment using time series methods10.1007/s11269-014-0875-9 ↗
36. Groundwater level forecasting using ensemble coactive neuro-fuzzy inference system10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168760 ↗
37. Gong, Y., Wang, Z., Xu, G., and Zhang, Z. (2018). A comparative study of groundwater level forecasting using data-driven models based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition. Water, 10.10.3390/w10060730 ↗
38. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) model for Forecasting Groundwater Level in the Pravara River Basin10.1007/s40808-022-01639-5 ↗
39. Groundwater Depth Predictions by GSM, RBF, and ANFIS Models: A Comparative Assessment10.1007/s12517-017-2954-8 ↗
40. Groundwater Level Fluctuations Simulation and Prediction by ANFIS-and Hybrid Wavelet-ANFIS/Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) Clustering Models: Application to the Miandarband Plain10.1016/j.jher.2017.11.004 ↗
41. Prediction of Groundwater Table Using NF-GMDH Based Evolutionary Algorithms10.1007/s12205-019-0804-9 ↗
42. Groundwater Level Prediction Using ANFIS Algorithm
43. Raghavendra, N.S., and Deka, P.C. (2016). Multistep Ahead Groundwater Level Time-Series Forecasting Using Gaussian Process Regression and ANFIS. Advanced Computing and Systems for Security, Springer.10.1007/978-81-322-2653-6_19 ↗
44. A Two-Stage Approach Integrating SOM-and MOGA-SVM-Based Algorithms to Forecast Spatial-Temporal Groundwater Level with Meteorological Factors10.1007/s11269-018-2143-x ↗
45. On the Evaluation of the Gradient Tree Boosting Model for Groundwater Level Forecasting10.51526/kbes.2020.1.01.48-57 ↗
46. On Predictability of Groundwater Level in Shallow Wells Using Satellite Observations10.1007/s11269-017-1865-5 ↗
47. A Comparative Study of Artificial Neural Networks, Support Vector Machines, and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System for Forecasting Groundwater Levels Near Lake Okeechobee, Florida10.1007/s11269-015-1167-8 ↗
48. Data-Driven Modeling of Groundwater Level with Least-Square Support Vector Machine and Spatial–Temporal Analysis10.1007/s10706-018-0713-6 ↗
49. Simulation and Uncertainty Analysis for Groundwater Levels Using Radial Basis Function Neural Network and Support Vector Machine Models10.2166/aqua.2016.069 ↗
50. Evaluation of Seasonally Classified Inputs for the Prediction of Daily Groundwater Levels: Narx Networks vs Support Vector Machines10.1007/s10666-018-9639-x ↗
51. A Method to Improve the Stability and Accuracy of ANN-and SVM-Based Time Series Models for Long-Term Groundwater Level Predictions10.1016/j.cageo.2016.03.002 ↗
52. A comparative study of artificial neural networks and support vector machines for predicting groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.002 ↗
53. Prediction of groundwater levels using evidence of chaos and support vector machine10.2166/hydro.2017.102 ↗
54. Prediction of GWL with the help of GRACE TWS for unevenly spaced time series data in India: Analysis of comparative performances of SVR, ANN and LRM10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.005 ↗
55. Samantaray, S., Sahoo, A., and Ghose, D.K. (2020). Infiltration Loss Affects Toward Groundwater Fluctuation Through CANFIS in Arid Watershed: A Case Study. Smart Intelligent Computing and Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-981-13-9282-5_76 ↗
56. Prediction of Groundwater Level in Ardebil Plain Using Support Vector Regression and M5 Tree Model10.1111/gwat.12620 ↗
57. Self-attention (SA) temporal convolutional network (SATCN)-long short-term memory neural network (SATCN-LSTM): An advanced python code for predicting groundwater level. An Advanced Deep Learning Model for Predicting Groundwater Level10.1007/s11356-023-28771-8 ↗
58. Lion Algorithm-Optimized Long Short-Term Memory Network for Groundwater Level Forecasting in Udupi District, India
59. Shin, M.-J., Moon, S.-H., Kang, K.G., Moon, D.-C., and Koh, H.-J. (2020). Analysis of Groundwater Level Variations Caused by the Changes in Groundwater Withdrawals Using Long Short-Term Memory Network. Hydrology, 7.10.3390/hydrology7030064 ↗
60. Estimation of Groundwater Level Based on the Robust Training of Recurrent Neural Networks Using Corrupted Data10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124512 ↗
61. Evaluating the Groundwater Prediction Using LSTM Model
62. Predicting Groundwater Depth Fluctuations Using Deep Learning, Extreme Learning Machine, and Gaussian Process: A Comparative Study10.1007/s12145-020-00508-y ↗
63. Bowes, B.D., Sadler, J.M., Morsy, M.M., Behl, M., and Goodall, J.L. (2019). Forecasting groundwater table in a flood-prone coastal city with long short-term memory and recurrent neural networks. Water, 11.10.1002/essoar.10500507.1 ↗
64. Combining Physically Based Modeling and Deep Learning for Fusing GRACE Satellite Data: Can We Learn from Mismatch?10.1029/2018WR023333 ↗
65. Technical note: Application of artificial neural networks in groundwater table forecasting—A case study in a Singapore swamp forest10.5194/hess-20-1405-2016 ↗
66. Comparative Applications of Data-Driven Models Representing Water Table Fluctuations10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.02.051 ↗
67. Developing a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Based Model for Predicting Water Table Depth in Agricultural Areas10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.04.065 ↗
68. An adaptive gaussian process-based method for efficient bayesian experimental design in groundwater contaminant source identification problems10.1002/2016WR018598 ↗
69. Predicting Groundwater Level Fluctuations with Meteorological Effect Implications–A Comparative Study Among Soft Computing Techniques10.1016/j.cageo.2013.01.007 ↗
70. Lal, A., and Datta, B. (2018, January 11–13). Genetic programming and gaussian process regression models for groundwater salinity prediction: Machine learning for sustainable water resources management. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech), Long Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/SusTech.2018.8671343 ↗
71. Genetic programming based monthly groundwater level forecast models with uncertainty quantification10.1007/s40808-016-0083-0 ↗
72. Prediction and Simulation of Monthly Groundwater Levels by Genetic Programming10.1016/j.jher.2013.03.005 ↗
73. Uncertainty-based simulation-optimization using gaussian process emulation: Application to coastal groundwater management10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.10.041 ↗
74. Predicting groundwater levels using linear regression and neural networks
75. Development and evaluation of hybrid artificial neural network architectures for modeling spatio-temporal groundwater fluctuations in a complex aquifer system10.1007/s11269-019-02253-4 ↗
76. Barzegari, F., and Torabi Haghighi, A. (2023). Groundwater level modeling using multi-objective optimization hybridising artificial intelligence. Groundwater Level Modeling Using Multiobjective Optimization with Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Methods. Environ. Model. Assess.
77. An enhanced extreme learning machine model for river flow forecasting: State-of-the-art, practical applications in water resource engineering area and future research direction10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.069 ↗
78. Comparative study of hybrid-wavelet artificial intelligence models for monthly groundwater depth forecasting in extreme arid regions, northwest China10.1007/s11269-017-1811-6 ↗
79. Prediction of groundwater level fluctuations using artificial intelligence-based models and GMS10.1007/s13201-022-01861-7 ↗
80. Groundwater level modeling using Augmented Artificial Ecosystem Optimization10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.129034 ↗
81. Seifi, A., Ehteram, M., Singh, V.P., and Mosavi, A. (2020). Modeling and uncertainty analysis of groundwater level using six evolutionary optimization algorithms hybridized with anfis, svm, and ann. Sustainability, 12.10.2139/ssrn.3636873 ↗
82. Groundwater Level Forecasting Using Soft Computing Techniques10.1007/s00521-019-04234-5 ↗
83. Enhancement of groundwater-level prediction using an integrated machine learning model optimized by whale algorithm10.1007/s11053-020-09634-2 ↗
84. Neural network modeling for groundwater-level forecasting in coastal aquifers10.1007/s00521-020-04722-z ↗
85. Hybrid artificial intelligence based abc-pso system for ground water level forecasting in Udupi region
86. Numerical simulation on slope stability analysis considering anisotropic properties of layered fractured rocks: A case study10.1007/s12517-014-1609-2 ↗
87. Guzman, S.M., Paz, J.O., Tagert, M.L.M., and Mercer, A. (2015, January 26–29). Artificial neural networks and support vector machines: Contrast study for groundwater level prediction. Proceedings of the 2015 ASABE Annual International Meeting, New Orleans, LA, USA.
88. Wavelet-entropy data pre-processing approach for ann-based groundwater level modeling10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.048 ↗
89. Spatiotemporal groundwater level modeling using hybrid artificial intelligence-meshless method10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.030 ↗
90. Application of rbfn network and gm (1, 1) for groundwater level simulation10.1007/s13201-016-0481-5 ↗
91. Groundwater level forecasting using artificial neural network
92. Modeling of groundwater level fluctuations using dendrochronology in alluvial aquifers10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.028 ↗
93. Simulation and prediction of suprapermafrost groundwater level variation in response to climate change using a neural network model10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.038 ↗
94. Comparison of three forecasting models for groundwater levels: A case study in the semiarid area of west Jilin Province, China10.2166/aqua.2014.023 ↗
95. Efficacy of neural network and genetic algorithm techniques in simulating spatio-temporal fluctuations of groundwater10.1002/hyp.10166 ↗
96. Artificial neural network simulation of hourly groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer system of the Venice lagoon10.1016/j.engappai.2012.02.009 ↗
97. Forecasting groundwater level in Shiraz plain using artificial neural networks10.1007/s13369-012-0291-5 ↗
98. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Based Modeling for Karstic Groundwater Level Simulation10.1007/s11269-010-9628-6 ↗
99. Application of integrated back-propagation network and self-organizing map for groundwater level forecasting10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000121 ↗
100. Groundwater level prediction using SOM-RBFN multisite model10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000218 ↗